YouTube cracking on ad blockers.

3 years ago by InternetCitizen2 to c/technology

celerate 425 points 3 years ago

Dear YouTube, if anyone there ever reads this.

I tried not to block ads, I would let the preroll go and usually not skip it.

I started skipping ads when they started getting long. I recall some were several minutes long at times.

I started leaving videos part way through when there were mid-roll ads, and those got long enough that I'd often forget what I was even watching.

I started blocking the ads outright when I would be watching a relaxing video, and a very loud mid-roll ad would blow out my goddamn eardrums.

Fuck you YouTube. You abused your users, you chased off good content creators, and now you're offering people no carrot and all stick. How about you offer to match the volume of the ads to the videos, limit the length of ads to something reasonable, and nicely tell viewers that you are making ads less annoying and that unblocking the ads helps pay the content creators.

path: 0 4539672, hotness: undefined, score: 425, children: 21
CrabAndBroom 177 points 3 years ago

I used to make animations for YouTube, which weren't monetized because I hate ads, and one day they copyright struck me for some very provably public domain music, but the way they did it was to insert ads into my video without my consent so they could monetize them to send the money to the scammer who flagged me. So I just deleted my entire account, fuck them.

path: 0 4539672 4543086, hotness: undefined, score: 177, children: 2
pinkdrunkenelephants 39 points 3 years ago

That didn't stop you from making cartoons, did it?

path: 0 4539672 4543086 4543282, hotness: undefined, score: 39, children: 1
CrabAndBroom 86 points 3 years ago

No I just went to Vimeo lol

path: 0 4539672 4543086 4543282 4545699, hotness: undefined, score: 86, children: 0
BlemboTheThird 47 points 3 years ago

if they're anything like cable ads, they actually make the ads louder than the regular programming on purpose to try to make sure you hear it if you tune out or just walk away. no relaxed, unfocused watching for you!

path: 0 4539672 4543758, hotness: undefined, score: 47, children: 0
InternetCitizen2 37 points 3 years ago

x2

path: 0 4539672 4540509, hotness: undefined, score: 37, children: 1
name_NULL111653 2 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4539672 4540509 4542432, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Scubus 9 points 3 years ago

Lmao "you purposely made your stuff shit. Now, if you offered a basic service without all the shit, I might pay for that."

Bruh, you don't pay for something because it's not shit, you pay for something because it's good. By paying for a basic service simply because it's not shit, you are incentivising them to enshittify their service and offer a premium "not shit" version, instead of actually improving their service.

It's just like the people who buy the new iPhone because it actually has a headphone jack this time.

path: 0 4539672 4552356, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
JasSmith 0 points 3 years ago

They get away with this because people don’t use the alternatives. Odysee and Rumble are actually good alternatives. No, they’re not as good as YouTube, but they’re good enough. We just need creators to also upload to those platforms. Since YouTube keeps banning and demobilising them, this problem might solve itself.

path: 0 4539672 4548201, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 12
Archer 22 points 3 years ago

Rumble is 100% fascist Nazi bullshit, not an alternative

path: 0 4539672 4548201 4549710, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 9
JasSmith -7 points 3 years ago

If your feed is “100% fascist Nazi bullshit” may I suggest you watch less Nazi bullshit, and stop subscribing to them?

path: 0 4539672 4548201 4549710 4552290, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 8
Oshka 13 points 3 years ago

Lmfao. I had literally never heard of Rumble. I opened up a private browser window and pulled it up for the first time ever.....the "Featured" was fucking Newsmax TV. Now obviously this isn't indicative of the whole site but damn that does not help your point when that's the featured for a brand new potential user

path: 0 4539672 4548201 4549710 4552290 4553310, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 7
papertowels 1 point 3 years ago

Curious, how does monetization work on those platforms? The bigger "Content creators" typically will be making videos as a job, so to draw them you'd need a halfway decent way to monetize.

path: 0 4539672 4548201 4593077, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
JasSmith 1 point 3 years ago

They have ads, but I think YouTube pays better. Which I suppose is why creators stick with YouTube for now.

path: 0 4539672 4548201 4593077 4622933, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Chev 0 points 3 years ago

NewPipr

path: 0 4539672 4559409, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
hal_5700X 144 points 3 years ago

If you’re using uBlock Origin. Go to “Filter Lists” and Purge All Caches. That may help.

path: 0 4538137, hotness: undefined, score: 144, children: 34
MoogleMaestro 44 points 3 years ago

I imagine they'll eventually find a way to prevent us from blocking ads. Twitch TV for example has found some ways to make adblock useless.

It's a shame, and it's really just a side effect of google racing to the bottom of the adspace game. If ads weren't as cheap as they are today, they wouldn't be trying to maximize the amount of users who are forced to see advertisements.

path: 0 4538137 4539152, hotness: undefined, score: 44, children: 26
logicbomb 85 points 3 years ago

I suspect ad blocking will always be an arms race. The server can only ask the client to play the ad, and then rely on the client to truthfully report whether it did so.

path: 0 4538137 4539152 4539435, hotness: undefined, score: 85, children: 13
r3df0x 41 points 3 years ago

I'm sure they'll try to implement some type of DRM BS into the web that allows them. It's one of the good things about projects like Gemini. I used to think it was only good for the novelty of having a web alternative protocol.

No doubt Big Tech would lobby for Microsoft to use Windows to flag Gemini browsers as malicious and then run FUD campaigns against the Gemini protocol

path: 0 4538137 4539152 4539435 4539834, hotness: undefined, score: 41, children: 4
ElectroNeutrino 43 points 3 years ago path: 0 4538137 4539152 4539435 4539834 4543305, hotness: undefined, score: 43, children: 0
CrabAndBroom 24 points 3 years ago path: 0 4538137 4539152 4539435 4539834 4543300, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 1
KittyCat 2 points 3 years ago

It still doesn't stop queueing a few videos ahead of time and watching them though, let it play the ad to noone and just cut it out after

path: 0 4538137 4539152 4539435 4539834 4561633, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
MR_GABARISE 23 points 3 years ago

But then you'll get prompts for "What product did you just watch an ad for?"

path: 0 4538137 4539152 4539435 4540251, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 3
rwhitisissle 21 points 3 years ago

"Drink verification can."

path: 0 4538137 4539152 4539435 4540251 4543800, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 0
killeronthecorner 10 points 3 years ago

They already do this on the YouTube TV app

It's amazing how many times someone in this thread has joked about Google doing something absurd sounding only for it to already be true.

path: 0 4538137 4539152 4539435 4540251 4547154, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
zurohki 7 points 3 years ago

You have to be careful with that sort of thing - some percentage of people who do watch the ads will close the tab rather than read the prompt and answer it.

path: 0 4538137 4539152 4539435 4540251 4544125, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
shamrock 8 points 3 years ago

It’s only a matter of time before they start embedding them into the video like podcasts do and you won’t be able tell the difference between ad and video with software.

path: 0 4538137 4539152 4539435 4543346, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 2
Gabu 17 points 3 years ago

Timestamps can still be voluntarily marked for an auto-skip feature to jump throughthe ads.

path: 0 4538137 4539152 4539435 4543346 4545385, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 1
netchami 5 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4538137 4539152 4539435 4567186, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
I_Miss_Daniel 39 points 3 years ago

Someone will create an extension to mute the ad and overlay it with suitably timed bite sized cat videos.

path: 0 4538137 4539152 4539679, hotness: undefined, score: 39, children: 1
Hamartiogonic 3 points 3 years ago

Oh, that's just brilliant! Instead of being interrupted by intrusive ads, I'm seeing videos of fluffy cats doing adorable and funny stuff all the time.

path: 0 4538137 4539152 4539679 4554425, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
MindCap 29 points 3 years ago path: 0 4538137 4539152 4544320, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 1
guycls 12 points 3 years ago

Also, checkout S0undTV if you use android TV.

path: 0 4538137 4539152 4544320 4546067, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
hal_5700X 21 points 3 years ago

Will to be fair, Google is an ad company. We should have seen this coming.

path: 0 4538137 4539152 4539353, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 0
stardust 9 points 3 years ago

Worst case scenario I think I'd just resort to downloading the videos to watch. Live videos is the challenge, but luckily I don't watch live streams.

path: 0 4538137 4539152 4539275, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 3
TropicalDingdong -6 points 3 years ago

Bruh, your not gonna believe this, but the ducks at the park are free. if you use one of these, you can download all the ducks you want. I downloaded 9000 ducks so far.

path: 0 4538137 4539152 4539275 4539434, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 2
AnonTwo 5 points 3 years ago

To be fair, he was talking about live streams, as in watching people in real-time.

That can be a fairly different experience, especially since downloaders don't grab the chat at the moment. Also for unarchived streams, they can only be downloaded if you are aware and able to download at the time that the stream is still active.

path: 0 4538137 4539152 4539275 4539434 4540683, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
somedaysoon 7 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4538137 4539152 4547004, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
dylanTheDeveloper 7 points 3 years ago

They'll start banning Google accounts, that'll stop quite alot of people just because of how many users use gmail or drive.

path: 0 4538137 4539152 4546924, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
Chailles 4 points 3 years ago

I don't think they'll resort to that because that would mean getting rid of their own source of income. YouTube may not be getting ad revenue, but they still collect data and that's where the real value is.

path: 0 4538137 4539152 4546924 4558449, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
BoxOfFeet 26 points 3 years ago

I just did the zap element thing on that warning. So far so good, except you can't scroll down.

path: 0 4538137 4542041, hotness: undefined, score: 26, children: 3
bamboo 40 points 3 years ago

I see this as an absolute win, since that means you don't have to read YouTube comments.

path: 0 4538137 4542041 4542833, hotness: undefined, score: 40, children: 0
NiaTheCat 8 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4538137 4542041 4548035, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
casmael 2 points 3 years ago

Lmao

path: 0 4538137 4542041 4555917, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
InternetCitizen2 4 points 3 years ago

Can we pin this?

path: 0 4538137 4540547, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
r3df0x 4 points 3 years ago

I occasionally see ads on Youtube. I'm not sure if this is related.

path: 0 4538137 4539675, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
KneeTitts 2 points 3 years ago

...temporarily it might help

path: 0 4538137 4575180, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
lemmesay 134 points 3 years ago

to people saying YouTube is a moneysink for google:

yes it is, if you just look at direct expenses of running it. but you're overlooking the fact that it has enabled google to amass so much data(we're taking about 500 hours worth of videos being uploaded per minute) that they can train anything with it.

it's a service that's too big to fail. even whole governments, courts, and other institutions depend on it. so, I refuse to believe that YouTube will be non-existant because a sliver of users refuse to be profiled by invasive advertisements.

path: 0 4553850, hotness: undefined, score: 134, children: 21
Kumabear 121 points 3 years ago

I am much, much more likely to be willing to pay for Ublock than I am YouTube.

path: 0 4559513, hotness: undefined, score: 121, children: 5
anewbeginning 112 points 3 years ago

I haven’t watched live tv in almost 20 years because I refuse to sit through ads, and I definitely won’t sit through them on YouTube. If it was a banner or some thing on the page or the side of video that would be more acceptable, but sitting through ads to watch a YouTube video….there’s just no way.

path: 0 4539303, hotness: undefined, score: 112, children: 84
uberkalden 2 points 3 years ago

You could subscribe

path: 0 4539303 4543660, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 83
Ashyr 6 points 3 years ago

I basically don't subscribe to any streaming services, but we got the family plan years ago and share it with a few friends and family that chip in a couple bucks each.

It's so affordable and the content on YouTube is second to none.

I'm so happy to help content creators earn a living content I genuinely care about rather than studios led by c-suite committees.

path: 0 4539303 4543660 4543901, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
LoreleiSankTheShip 5 points 3 years ago

Oh you sweet summer child

path: 0 4539303 4543660 4543901 4549917, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Polar -44 points 3 years ago

Lemmy users only want to use foss and not pay a single penny. How dare you suggest they pay a tiny amount to help pay for servers and the creators they're watching!

path: 0 4539303 4543660 4544741, hotness: undefined, score: -44, children: 80
uriel238 30 points 3 years ago

Some of us are legitimately broke (or on a very limited income). I get that some folk believe it's the capitalist way to force us to starve or succumb to the elements to demonstrate to others that humans have no value other than their productive worth to some plutocrat.

Heave ho, thieves and beggars, never shall we die!

path: 0 4539303 4543660 4544741 4545300, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 65
Polar -24 points 3 years ago

Ya I know. I'm living pay cheque to pay cheque. If I can't afford something, I watch ads. It's simple.

Why do you expect everything free?

path: 0 4539303 4543660 4544741 4545300 4545676, hotness: undefined, score: -24, children: 64
FabledAepitaph 16 points 3 years ago

It feels like a culture war between corporations and the OG user base. They reeled us in and monopolized the market with the idea of "free". Now that competitors are few and far between, they want to change the game and reel in literal billions. I have absolutely no sympathy for their "lost profits". They are making enough as-is, and I have no problems saying that out loud.

path: 0 4539303 4543660 4544741 4548340, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 2
Polar -22 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4539303 4543660 4544741 4548340 4548635, hotness: undefined, score: -22, children: 1
manapropos 5 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4539303 4543660 4544741 4545738, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 10
Polar -11 points 3 years ago

My privilege? You're expecting servers to pay for themselves without ads or subscriptions. Idiot.

path: 0 4539303 4543660 4544741 4545738 4546558, hotness: undefined, score: -11, children: 9
rwhitisissle 108 points 3 years ago

It's an end of an era. I've been on reddit for over a decade, and on youtube for even longer. Crazy to think I might be giving up both of those services within a few months of each other. Feels like the internet is dying. Oh well. Maybe I'll go back to reading a shitload.

path: 0 4564763, hotness: undefined, score: 108, children: 19
jcdenton 107 points 3 years ago

If YouTube premium was $4.99 a month it'd be worth a consideration. But then again adblocking is free and privacy respecting

path: 0 4548482, hotness: undefined, score: 107, children: 32
mojo 97 points 3 years ago

Yeah I could care less about people saying they'd watch ads of they were less intrusive. I'm not, I don't give a fuck about YouTube's sustainability who happened to still have major growth while I ran an AdBlock this entire time.

Maybe I'd consider paying if YouTube was the actual product I was paying for. Instead I get privacy invasive spying and my data being harvested, while am paying to do so. The product I'd want to pay for would have zero privacy invasive stuff involved. Which that isn't going to exist, so I'm never going to pay.

path: 0 4547276, hotness: undefined, score: 97, children: 13
MargotRobbie 96 points 3 years ago

I don't really know how people can even use YouTube without ad blockers. Sitting through minutes of advertisement is not going to make me want to buy your product if I start mentally associating your product with frustration and annoyance. If these video ads are going to be repetitive and annoying, at least make them funny.

It seems like there is nowhere on the Internet to get away from ads currently, even here, where you thought you are safe, you are now reading an ad for my newest movie (you know the one), now also available on streaming!

path: 0 4560549, hotness: undefined, score: 96, children: 19
net00 90 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4552802, hotness: undefined, score: 90, children: 9
Karyoplasma 83 points 3 years ago

Does anyone else remember back in the days of VCR, the networks wanted to push a technology that disallows you from fast-forwarding through ad breaks on the stuff you recorded?

Pepperidge Farm remembers.

path: 0 4547930, hotness: undefined, score: 83, children: 7
brown567 78 points 3 years ago

Holy crap

Piped is about to get another user

path: 0 4537673, hotness: undefined, score: 78, children: 4
electromage 19 points 3 years ago

Why wouldn't they block Piped?

path: 0 4537673 4539137, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 2
Knusper 24 points 3 years ago

For the past few months, they have been rather aggressive with IP bans for Piped instances, yeah.

path: 0 4537673 4539137 4539712, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 1
brown567 7 points 3 years ago

Oof

path: 0 4537673 4539137 4539712 4541234, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
TropicalDingdong -22 points 3 years ago

Bruh, your not gonna believe this, but the ducks at the park are free. if you use one of these, you can download all the ducks you want. I downloaded 9000 ducks so far.

path: 0 4537673 4539387, hotness: undefined, score: -22, children: 0
Voroxpete 77 points 3 years ago

If you're using UBlock Origin do the following:

Go to settings. Go to Filter Lists. Click purge all caches. Click update now.

That's it, this message should disappear entirely.

path: 0 4550223, hotness: undefined, score: 77, children: 19
NutWrench 72 points 3 years ago

I haven't turned off ad-blocking in 20 years. That's because I "don't allow" companies to use my home and my computer as their place of business.

path: 0 4557195, hotness: undefined, score: 72, children: 1
gapbetweenus 70 points 3 years ago

How did manipulation to make you buy specific shit become so accepted?

path: 0 4548305, hotness: undefined, score: 70, children: 37
jjjalljs 64 points 3 years ago

Google kind of sucks.

What was their last big success? Google maps? Pretty much everything they do lately is some combination of shitty or prematurely killed.

path: 0 4544126, hotness: undefined, score: 64, children: 34
Fades 44 points 3 years ago

Google more than just kind of sucks. Like you said they haven’t done shit in a long time outside of making the internet more hostile with shit like this and their planned chrome-based anti adblock (a LOT of browsers run on chromium which would bring the same shit, Mozilla4lyfe)

Also, the google graveyard is just pathetic at this point. They truly can’t do shit outside of anti-user bullshit

path: 0 4544126 4544739, hotness: undefined, score: 44, children: 1
Zealousideal_Fox900 6 points 3 years ago

UP FIREYFOX!

path: 0 4544126 4544739 4546662, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
bitflag 19 points 3 years ago

Android? Google Photo? Google Pixel? Google Pay? Google Apps? Chrome? Chromebook? Google Drive? Chromecast? Android Auto?

They launched a ton of successful stuff since Maps came out in 2005

path: 0 4544126 4545446, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 12
chilicheeselies 3 points 3 years ago

Google photo sucks

path: 0 4544126 4545446 4546282, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 7
papertowels 5 points 3 years ago

What do you prefer using?

path: 0 4544126 4545446 4546282 4547100, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 3
fiddlestix 3 points 3 years ago

Immich is on a par with Google Photos, imo. It's self hosted though, so not for everyone.

path: 0 4544126 4545446 4546282 4547100 4547452, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
bitflag 3 points 3 years ago

I personally love it. Being able to search "Tom at the beach drinking a cocktail" and get all the relevant pictures is magic.

path: 0 4544126 4545446 4546282 4566009, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
lustrum 3 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4544126 4545446 4546282 4553435, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
ZiemekZ 1 point 3 years ago

whether it’s worth the price

You don't have to pay Google a penny. I bought a quite cheap (50-60$) used but working Pixel 1 XL specifically for unlimited lifetime full-quality Google Photos upload.

path: 0 4544126 4545446 4546282 4553435 5408885, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
jjjalljs 0 points 3 years ago

You got me! Android came after maps in 2008. So that's not a great argument for recent development. Is pixel meaningfully different than Nexus? That would put it in 2010, or 2016 if you insist pixel is a big innovation.

Chromebooks are also a 2010 project.

Google pay I don't think is a success? Didn't they like relaunch it recently and shit it up by tying it to phone numbers instead of your Google account? https://arstechnica.com/... https://arstechnica.com/... . Also the original release is 2011. Quite some time ago. But technically newer than maps!

Drive is 2012. Dang, got me. But that's still more than 10 years old, so my actual point seems to stand.

Chromecast is 2013, so maybe within this decade.

Auto is 2015 but I know nothing about it.

I guess I should've said "in the past 7 years" instead of exaggerating and saying since maps!

path: 0 4544126 4545446 4553008, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
bitflag 2 points 3 years ago

But all "successes" are gonna be years old. You don't turn something like Chromebook into an overnight success. It takes years for an ecosystem to grow, users to find use cases, software revisions to polish the product, word of mouth, etc.

For comparison the Apple watch came out in 2015 and Airpods in 2016. What other successes has Apple had in the past 7 years? Maybe their AR thing will take off, but if it does it's probably 5-10 years from becoming a mass market product.

path: 0 4544126 4545446 4553008 4565929, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
NeuronautML -1 points 3 years ago

Android is developed by a consortium of developers called The Open Handset Alliance under an open source license. It is most certainly not a Google product, any more than Linux is a Canonical product. As in, they help develop it but it's not their product.

path: 0 4544126 4545446 4554181, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 1
bitflag 2 points 3 years ago

That is really playing with words... Android (the OS people run on their phone) was originally developed by a company bought by Google, which then funded it, made the overwhelming number of contributions to it for 19 years, does the marketing, certification plus all the non-open source elements that make the experience what 99.99% of users get everyday when they use their phone.

path: 0 4544126 4545446 4554181 4566003, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
floppade 2 points 3 years ago

Most of their innovation has been for developers it seems.

Edit for clarification: since Google maps

path: 0 4544126 4545851, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Polar -18 points 3 years ago

Ignoring everything after Google maps is ignorant as hell. I mean Google Photos is literally used by a massive percentage of iPhone users as well, because it's so good.

path: 0 4544126 4544676, hotness: undefined, score: -18, children: 17
jjjalljs 24 points 3 years ago path: 0 4544126 4544676 4545122, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 16
Polar -28 points 3 years ago

They didn't walk it back. Pixel 1 still has unlimited storage.

You're insufferable. Whatever fits your agenda.

path: 0 4544126 4544676 4545122 4545602, hotness: undefined, score: -28, children: 15
federatingIsTooHard 15 points 3 years ago

You're insufferable. Whatever fits your agenda.

irony

path: 0 4544126 4544676 4545122 4545602 4545828, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 9
jjjalljs 2 points 3 years ago

They didn’t walk it back. Pixel 1 still has unlimited storage.

And for some time, other devices did as well. And then they changed it. Would some other term than "walking back" describe "they offered a good deal to customers, and then changed it to a less good deal" better for you?

Do you like work for Google or something? Probably not. The handful of people I've met who work there aren't nearly this zealous about defending it.

path: 0 4544126 4544676 4545122 4545602 4552676, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
LemmysMum 1 point 3 years ago

You're insufferable. Whatever fits your agenda.

path: 0 4544126 4544676 4545122 4545602 4545830, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
fullstopslash 62 points 3 years ago

Adblockers are eventually just going to become undetectable because of this. Adblockers are about to get so much better!

path: 0 4564089, hotness: undefined, score: 62, children: 15
drathvedro 62 points 3 years ago

Unpopular opinion: They should've just started charging big creators, kind of like Vimeo. Mofos be having youtube ads, sponsorships, built-in ads, courses, merch stores and patreon, and then they whine when youtube wants them to comply with advertiser's demands.

path: 0 4554601, hotness: undefined, score: 62, children: 18
YoBuckStopsHere 62 points 3 years ago

ublock origin still blocking everything.

path: 0 4555968, hotness: undefined, score: 62, children: 11
Companion1666 62 points 3 years ago

if only ads arent annoying and loud, i have no problems unblocking them. but damn, they're unbearable atleast in my region.

path: 0 4546017, hotness: undefined, score: 62, children: 16
Zealousideal_Fox900 27 points 3 years ago

Getting so many NSFW dating/straight up p##n ads. I shit you not they have even had CP ads I have seen. Disgusting and completely illegal.

path: 0 4546017 4546656, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 10
Nythos 22 points 3 years ago

The amount of ads that I get on mobile YouTube about meeting Ukrainian women is alarming to say the least

path: 0 4546017 4546656 4546829, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 1
Zealousideal_Fox900 9 points 3 years ago

I got russian ones. Jesus christ they are running a fucking massive trafficking ring at the least.

path: 0 4546017 4546656 4546829 4547846, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
elbarto777 0 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4546017 4546656 4548038, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
Zealousideal_Fox900 -3 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4546017 4546656 4548038 4549901, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 0
Tom_bishop -7 points 3 years ago

Ads are served based on your browsing history. If you have never watched those, then you probably should check on you 8yo child or wife's who's using the same acc

path: 0 4546017 4546656 4548602, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 5
newIdentity 7 points 3 years ago

Not necessarily true. They are mostly advertised as "music videos" or something like this. If YouTube would know it's porn or even CP, they wouldn't serve the ads and block the account.

There are other factors that also play a role like location or age.

path: 0 4546017 4546656 4548602 4548765, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
meowMix2525 4 points 3 years ago

Yeah they probably serve it to certain demographics like "men between 25 and 45" or something.

I've never gotten ads even close to what they describe but probably because I'm a woman and fall on the elder end of gen z. So I get God awful temu and tiktok ads and then what I assume is just served to the general populace like whatever latest child mower they're calling a consumer truck these days.

path: 0 4546017 4546656 4548602 4548765 4553728, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Companion1666 4 points 3 years ago

Ads are served based on your browsing history.

Not really. Ads served on Google ecosystem is geo-based, if you don't logged in your Google account or where your YouTube connected. You cannot get rid of it, unless you wipe all Chrome and Android users.

path: 0 4546017 4546656 4548602 4551925, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Katrina 2 points 3 years ago

I’m pretty sure there’s nothing in my browsing history that would suggest I’m looking for a boyfriend 🤮

path: 0 4546017 4546656 4548602 4559722, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Zealousideal_Fox900 1 point 3 years ago

Nobody else used my google acc at the time i still had it. I use FF now anyway.

path: 0 4546017 4546656 4548602 4549929, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
lloram239 17 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4546017 4548043, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
brsrklf 15 points 3 years ago

Usually most of my YouTube ads are for bullshit training programs (and I do mean bullshit, like pseudosciencey shit) or gambling.

Both are just at the edge of legality (I am pretty sure some cross it).

Except since last month, because now almost all are for that Scorsese movie. I mean, I don't mind being advertised that, but I've seen these ads so much that all they managed to do is make me hate it despite barely knowing anything about it.

Also, unskippable ads keep being longer. Now it's reached two 20-second ads interrupting even short-ish videos every 5 minutes or so.

So yeah, people, that's what YouTube looks like without an ad blocker now. Gee, I wonder why so many block them.

path: 0 4546017 4549545, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 2
floofloof 5 points 3 years ago

I get the piano fraud guy shouting about how only he can teach you mastery of the piano in three days, or something like that. It's a scam but I can't get rid of his obnoxious ads.

path: 0 4546017 4549545 4550383, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Companion1666 2 points 3 years ago

In my region (Philippines), this Shopee ads (eq. of Amazon in US) are too cutesy, annoying, and louder than my video I suppose to watch. With or without Google account, this particular ad is everywhere on YouTube. Don't get me on gambling ads.

path: 0 4546017 4549545 4551873, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
meowMix2525 7 points 3 years ago

The temu and tiktok ads that seem to be intentionally engineered to provoke extreme negative emotions such as discomfort and irritation, that force your attention on the screen by overloading your ears with so much noise that you feel compelled to take in some amount of visual information to ease the shock, and then tacking on hashtag slogans at the end; like "oddly satisfying" after a video of a fucking butcher knife cutting through colorful play sand or "shop like a billionaire" after yelling at me about cheap Chinese goods, both of which only serving as reminders of the current state of society at large and pushing me ever so closer to a state of blind rage; are what finally pushed me to install vanced on my android.

It's psychological torture and it should be against international human rights law.

path: 0 4546017 4553451, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
wantd2B1ofthestrokes 54 points 3 years ago

YouTube is the cable tv of 2023

path: 0 4537704, hotness: undefined, score: 54, children: 0
BattleGrown 51 points 3 years ago

Advertisement is brainwashing and should be against human rights.

path: 0 4548510, hotness: undefined, score: 51, children: 5
DeathWearsANecktie 47 points 3 years ago

Suck my balls Google

path: 0 4574346, hotness: undefined, score: 47, children: 3
dunestorm 47 points 3 years ago

Unpopular Opinion: I don’t like ads as much as anyone, I’d rather YouTube monetises 1440p and 4k content instead of forcing people to watch ads. YouTube is an extremely expensive business to run, so it being free forever is completely unsustainable.

path: 0 4551249, hotness: undefined, score: 47, children: 13
openrain502r 43 points 3 years ago

Next tactic to stop adblocking: we will come to your house and break your fucking legs if you even THINK about installing ublock

Then a few days later ublock removes it

path: 0 4560685, hotness: undefined, score: 43, children: 2
disconnectikacio 41 points 3 years ago path: 0 4547739, hotness: undefined, score: 41, children: 2
Manmikey 40 points 3 years ago

Google recently announced that it's podcast service is shutting down and moving to YouTube music, I don't want or need YouTube music so I've already moved to Podcast Republic, it has a few ads but they can be removed with a small one off payment. Google just wants to shove all it's users into YouTube and YouTube music for maximum ads and data harvesting.

path: 0 4549577, hotness: undefined, score: 40, children: 8
fosstulate 30 points 3 years ago
  • 2025: Search removed. Spend a decade crippling the function, then claim the usage data support getting rid of it!
  • 2027: Expiring updates. Juice those watch numbers with a new artificial scarcity measure. Marvel Bullshit 49 Theatrical Trailer, available for seven days only! Featuring AI Robin Williams and a Mr B_ast guest ad!
  • 2028: Web Environment Integrity inserted. Hand warmer sales crater as mobile viewers relish their new handset functionality.
path: 0 4571308, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 0
Poem_for_your_sprog 29 points 3 years ago

Even if I have to sit through 30 seconds of silence, is there a way to redirect the ad to a ghost browser so I don't have to listen to something like grubhubs stupid video?

path: 0 4544437, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 15
crimsdings 17 points 3 years ago path: 0 4544437 4545152, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 4
Acters 2 points 3 years ago

I hear the ungoogled chromium is immune to the youtube antiadblock bs while getting rid of google's influence, leaving you to be able to keep your Firefox identity safe without compromising your privacy by going to a browser you know is maintained by a community instead of another corporation

path: 0 4544437 4545152 4547855, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
JustARegularNerd 1 point 3 years ago

For me personally, even when it's to my detriment, I intentionally go out of my way to use Firefox because other than Safari, it's the last major independent browser engine and I want to be at least one user of it, if it helps keep it relevant. That being said, I feel that Firefox might become more relevant and arguably already has because of crap like this.

path: 0 4544437 4545152 4547855 4578658, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
Acters 1 point 3 years ago

Fair enough, I mentioned ungoogled chrome because websites are lenient to it, and I use it for those sites that are being a pain in my ass. Also, I use the ungoogle chromium to separate my Firefox fingerprint from those privacy invading sites. It's a strange quirk of mine, but I'm hoping it pays off to prevent them from identifying my browsing habits.

path: 0 4544437 4545152 4547855 4578658 4591416, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Fades 11 points 3 years ago path: 0 4544437 4544805, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 9
shotgun_crab 5 points 3 years ago

Freetube is another valid option

path: 0 4544437 4544805 4546009, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
swab148 4 points 3 years ago

Or ReVanced

path: 0 4544437 4544805 4545075, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 6
geophysicist 5 points 3 years ago

Cannot get this to work for the life of me. Worked for a bit, then it stopped working again and no amount of repatching fixes it

path: 0 4544437 4544805 4545075 4545262, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 5
MayvisDelacour 4 points 3 years ago

I ran into the same problem. Uninstalling and trying again without touching any of the options for setup worked instead of going in and messing with the toggles. I hope it helps. I would suggest you look for a Lemmy uhh... What do we call them? Subreddit? I mean they are on the other site too and perhaps you can get assistance there if you're still having issues

path: 0 4544437 4544805 4545075 4545262 4545350, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 3
ChunkMcHorkle 3 points 3 years ago

deleted by creator

path: 0 4544437 4544805 4545075 4545262 4547707, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
418teapot 1 point 3 years ago

Definitely agree, but your link is protected by cloudflare (yet another centralized service destroying the internet) and therefore I'm unable to get through because I have privacy.resistFingerprinting enabled on my browser so cloudflare is unable to determine I'm human I suppose.

I despire youtube and it's monopoly, and I think it get's an appropriate amount of hate on here and HN, but what confuses me to no end are the people who complain about youtube turn right around and constantly recommend cloudflare. Can someone explain what I am missing?

path: 0 4544437 4544805 4563524, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
aswinbenny 28 points 3 years ago

Reset Ublock orgin and update the filter and Ublock extension. Disable other adblock extension if you have one. Still you would be getting the popup once a while.

path: 0 4567959, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 1
Metatronz 27 points 3 years ago

Eh, don't need YouTube that badly. I think we'll collectively figure out video distribution without em just fine.

path: 0 4559860, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 7
Suavevillain 27 points 3 years ago

Hold the line uBlock Origin. If YT becomes unusable, I'll find somewhere to binge-watch true crime videos at 3am.

path: 0 4559205, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 1
zcd 27 points 3 years ago

Fuck youtube

path: 0 4538952, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 0
deez_ballzzz 24 points 3 years ago

Yeah. This is becoming a problem with Google. Whatever they have created they just want to make it shit. Like everybody can't just pay and the amount of ads just makes it unwatchable.

On my firefox this rarely shows up though. I use the privacy extensions uBlock Origin, Privacy Badger, Decentraleyes.

path: 0 4545730, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 0
fosforus 23 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4547392, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 9
b0gl 22 points 3 years ago

"allowlisted" topkek

path: 0 4561573, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 0
SocialMediaRefugee 20 points 3 years ago

A good ad blocker would be one that will still load the page as intended but not display the ads. There would be no way for the site to know you can't see them. Blocking their activation just signals the site that you are using an adblocker.

Edit: I was thinking more of a VM sandbox like another comment said

path: 0 4575006, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 17
Grant_M 20 points 3 years ago

#BoycottGoogle

path: 0 4573070, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 1
CCF_100 20 points 3 years ago path: 0 4559977, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 1
aeharding 19 points 3 years ago

More PeerTube please!

path: 0 4564091, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 0
lwuy9v5 17 points 3 years ago path: 0 4543264, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
floppade 16 points 3 years ago

Been getting that lately after successfully avoiding it for a bit. Just not gonna use it directly anymore.

path: 0 4545831, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
shashi154263 14 points 3 years ago

Someone please make an extension so it automatically redirects to piped.video or something else.

path: 0 4567016, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 8
worsedoughnut 14 points 3 years ago

Do we really need a new post about this, with the same screenshot, every time it happens to someone for the first time?

path: 0 4586534, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 1
doctorcrimson 12 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4556421, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 3
dinckelman 12 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4550023, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 2
Smacks 10 points 3 years ago

I LOVE SUBSCRIPTION BASED SERVICES

path: 0 4558682, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
Solrac 9 points 3 years ago

This is why we use Frontends... NewPipe, FreeTube, Invidious, Piped, etc c: Otherwise the nuclear option; "mpv https://youtu.be/url"

path: 0 4587270, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
dynamojoe 9 points 3 years ago

Originally there was an X. Now I have to wait a few seconds before I can click the X. This pause gives me time to think if I really need to watch this video, which more and more often is turning into a "not really".

path: 0 4583421, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
hddsx 9 points 3 years ago

Is this fake? I thought the term is whitelisted not allowlisted

path: 0 4539132, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 18
alianne 45 points 3 years ago

In recent years there's been a shift from "white/black list" to "allow/block list" in an effort to avoid the stereotypes associated with those terms. I wouldn't say it's the new norm yet, but it's slowly becoming more popular.

path: 0 4539132 4539418, hotness: undefined, score: 45, children: 17
hddsx 3 points 3 years ago

Ah like the master/slave becoming server/client?

I still don’t like allow list though. Block list seems fine. Maybe access list?

path: 0 4539132 4539418 4543682, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
muntedcrocodile 6 points 3 years ago

I feel the use of master/slave to talk about technological concepts took power away from the original conotations of the words and by not using them its actualy making their effect more negative but what would i know.

path: 0 4539132 4539418 4543682 4545213, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
alianne 2 points 3 years ago

Similar to that, yeah, although I think the master/slave thing started earlier. (It's a bit more blatant, tbf.)

I agree that allowlist doesn't roll off the tongue quite as nicely, but as long as it makes it obvious what the word means, I'll go with it.

path: 0 4539132 4539418 4543682 4544635, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
SendMePhotos -9 points 3 years ago

I hate that.

With flying they changed NOTAM from notices to airmen to notices to air missions or something.

Calm tf down. Will they change Human to hupersons next? Man-made to huperson-made? GTFO here.

path: 0 4539132 4539418 4544135, hotness: undefined, score: -9, children: 4
hddsx 5 points 3 years ago

Okay, I have to ask: outside of training, did you ever say NOtice To AirMen? I haven’t. It’s always NOTAM for me. They were nice enough to keep the acronym the same.

path: 0 4539132 4539418 4544135 4549829, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
SendMePhotos 1 point 3 years ago

I suppose that's a fair point.

path: 0 4539132 4539418 4544135 4549829 4559473, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Polar 2 points 3 years ago

If something so trivial upsets you so deeply in an attempt to make others feel more included, maybe you should look into yourself.

You should probably take your advice and calm down.

path: 0 4539132 4539418 4544135 4544784, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
SendMePhotos -1 points 3 years ago

Talking with the people involved, at least in my experience, it is an unnecessary adjustment. Nobody "affected" gave a hoot.

path: 0 4539132 4539418 4544135 4544784 4559465, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
Blamemeta -30 points 3 years ago

Yeah, basically the demand for hate outstrips the supply, so they decided that whitelist/blacklist is racist. Its just a power trip, being able to change peoples vocab with nonsense.

path: 0 4539132 4539418 4540017, hotness: undefined, score: -30, children: 8
lwuy9v5 14 points 3 years ago

the newer words make way more sense. They actually convey the concept

path: 0 4539132 4539418 4540017 4543294, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 2
intensely_human 1 point 3 years ago

What makes no sense is the words “white” and “black” as referring to people. People are brown, all of them.

path: 0 4539132 4539418 4540017 4543294 4550410, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Polar 0 points 3 years ago

I remember when I tried setting up a server a couple decades ago and I didn't understand what the difference between a white and black list were. Made no sense to me.

Allow/block can't be mistaken. It's literally a better choice of words for many reasons.

path: 0 4539132 4539418 4540017 4543294 4544820, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
McNasty 5 points 3 years ago

Firefighter is the best of these.

path: 0 4539132 4539418 4540017 4540748, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
swab148 4 points 3 years ago

I have joined the war on fire, on the side of fire.

path: 0 4539132 4539418 4540017 4540748 4545221, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
hddsx 1 point 3 years ago

What?

Fire fighters fight fire. Crime fighters fight fire.

The weird one is freedom fighters…

path: 0 4539132 4539418 4540017 4540748 4561180, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
KneeTitts 1 point 3 years ago

They are a trillion dollar company, they can afford to give some slack on this issue that maybe affects 5% of their users

path: 0 4539132 4539418 4540017 4588206, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Blamemeta -2 points 3 years ago

Its honestly not a big deal, its just something to go rename for no good reason. At least for my job, it took about only a couple man-days to get every mention of blacklist/whitelist renamed and the code reviewed.

The bigger deal for me was master branch to main. Broke every pipeline script we had, broke our backups, and it caused not one but two outages in production. I guess its our fault for not making the branch name maintainable, but its never come up before and will never come up again. I honestly think between all the work we put in to that change, we spent a man-year on that. Thats before the production outages. Devops sucks.

At least I got paid to deal with it.

path: 0 4539132 4539418 4540017 4588206 4589934, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
Infinity187 9 points 3 years ago

I have yet to see anything like this with my adblocker.

path: 0 4561753, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 3
Hairy_MacBoon 8 points 3 years ago

Okay, I don't ever see this problem. Using Brave and uBlock origin in Firefox. Maybe just update your filters once in a while?

path: 0 4567260, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
UntouchedWagons 8 points 3 years ago

Fortunately I haven't gotten any warnings but my dad did last night. I cleared ublock's cache and updated the lists. Hopefully it works.

[Edit] Nope my dad is still getting warnings about ublock origin.

path: 0 4552593, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 3
deez_ballzzz 7 points 3 years ago

Yeah. This is becoming a problem with Google. Whatever they have created they just want to make it shit. Like everybody can't just pay and the amount of ads just makes it unwatchable.

On my firefox this rarely shows up though. I use the privacy extensions uBlock Origin, Privacy Badger, Decentraleyes.

path: 0 4545729, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
xantoxis 7 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4580451, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
pixelscience 6 points 3 years ago

This is only the 3764th post this week..

path: 0 4547601, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 5
Veneroso 6 points 3 years ago

Remember when the hopper was going to be the end of free TV?

path: 0 4578496, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
Tom_bishop 5 points 3 years ago

Streisand effect

path: 0 4548612, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
JewGoblin 2 points 3 years ago

Which browser is this?

path: 0 4581556, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
foggy 2 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4538852, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
foggy 13 points 3 years ago

I love how a massive Internet company is trying to act like their service isnt on the internet and like they don't know what that means

🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️

Currently downloading all of my favorite YouTubers content ad free 🖕

path: 0 4538852 4538871, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
MadBob 2 points 3 years ago

"Used by billions woldwide"?

path: 0 4559579, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
Ignacio 2 points 3 years ago

I just wanted to say that uBlock works in removing the annoying warning. But it doesn't prevent youtube from blocking your access to videos. I'm right now in the situation that I can't watch any video until tomorrow, despite uBlock and stuff.

EDIT: Screw you, Google, now I'm watching youtube videos on VLC.

path: 0 4632264, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
karlach 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 4556358, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
rand__althor 1 point 3 years ago

Do Pi-Holes work for this?

path: 0 4585166, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
buzz -1 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4556569, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 5
Ghostlight -3 points 3 years ago

I've been using Brave browser with no issues

path: 0 4551173, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 1
sugartits -6 points 3 years ago

I'll look forward to reading this yet again next week, alongside all the entitlement in the comments section that seem to think running YouTube is free and recommending trash alternatives which have less than 1% of YouTube's content and don't even work.

See you next week!

path: 0 4552678, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 4
nostradiel -8 points 3 years ago

Every day same post complaining about this..

path: 0 4547685, hotness: undefined, score: -8, children: 7
laylawashere44 -10 points 3 years ago

Look this is different than pirating a game or bypassing a newspaper paywall. Watching content on YouTube simply costs money to YouTube. It's not like torrenting a game or movie, where while you haven't paid for the content, it didn't cost anything to the owner other than theoretical revenue. And it's not like bypassing a newspaper paywall, either, where the cost to the newspaper to serve you the story is practically negligible and the real costs are fixed and not related to how many people actually read the story.

Hosting video costs money and nobody can replace YouTube's massive library or realistically replicate their business model. I mean just look at image/gif hosting sites, they constantly go bust like Photobucket because storing everyone's pictures forever and for free isn't not a real business model.

YouTube needs to be paid for its gonna go the way of Photobucket.

path: 0 4544168, hotness: undefined, score: -10, children: 33
uriel238 21 points 3 years ago

Google has billions. YouTube pirates (can we call ourselves that yet?) are not going to bankrupt Google. In fact, Alphabet is spending more on their crackdown for sake of principle.

But Google is beholden to its shareholders, whose interests are diametrically opposed to that of the general public, so any gain by Google is a loss to the rest of us.

So any profit we can deny the Google machine remains instead in the economy, rather than vaulted in offshore accounts or used to further lock down the empires of the shareholders.

The day I can't watch YouTube sans commercials is the day I quit watching YouTube. And then it will get absolute-zero engagement from me.

So bring it. I do not need YouTube, and it needs viewers like me.

path: 0 4544168 4545155, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 0
Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug 17 points 3 years ago

Good luck trying to talk about this with any amount of reason.

I'm a pirate, I understand what I'm doing is defrauding the tos of a mega corporation. I UNDERSTAND that and IM DOING IT ON PURPOSE.

But it seems like most of the people here are just going to hurl insults at you and call you a shill because you laid it out as "this cost money and the business needs money to even do it". This is how "free" services have always worked. They aren't a fucking charity.

I don't like ads so I do everything in my power to not see ads. Once they kill ReVanced and they start banned Google accounts, I'll just stop using YouTube unless I have a specific tutorial need.

path: 0 4544168 4545269, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
Fades 17 points 3 years ago

Corpo shill alert

YouTube doesn’t need to get paid (by the users watching their ads) they get paid through you, the actual product. What you watch what you click on what you search for, these are ALL monitizable. You think Google is protecting your data instead of selling it lmao

Furthermore how much is enough? They gonna keep adding more and more unskipable ads more pre/mid/post rolls, b-b-but the multi fucking billion dollar corpo needs to get pAiD!!!!

Grow up

path: 0 4544168 4544823, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 5
Taringano 4 points 3 years ago

Só your solution is instead of charging the viewer charge who? The person that puts videos up?

Do you really think your anonymized user data is worth the 20 bucks/user the YouTube premium costs?

In your mind YouTube can just sell the data for the 2 billion users they have and instantly make 40 billion dollars a month from that?

path: 0 4544168 4544823 4545139, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 4
Gabu 9 points 3 years ago

If the data isn't worth it, why are these cunts stealing it?

path: 0 4544168 4544823 4545139 4545299, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 3
ayyndrew 1 point 3 years ago

The data is only useful because they can use it to run ads

path: 0 4544168 4544823 4545139 4545299 4547131, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Taringano 1 point 3 years ago

Worth something, not 20 bucks per user per month.

path: 0 4544168 4544823 4545139 4545299 4546296, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
papertowels 1 point 3 years ago

They're "stealing" the data if they hacked another platform and got a hold of the data there.

You are literally using their website. You are giving them your data.

You want to stop them from "stealing" your data, stop using their services.

path: 0 4544168 4544823 4545139 4545299 4547142, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
MayvisDelacour 8 points 3 years ago

Does that boot taste good or something?

path: 0 4544168 4545391, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
manapropos 3 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4544168 4544405, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 20
laylawashere44 4 points 3 years ago

Go where? The only companies that can afford to do unlimited video forever for everyone are the likes of Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, etc. Meta tried to steal VOD watchers from YouTube years ago, they failed. Amazon tried to get into VOD via Twitch, they gave up. Microsoft tried to come after Twitch with Mixer, they failed. Moreover, a lot of the things we hate about youtube like poor content moderation, the copyright system, demonetization, etc arent youtubes fault. The broken copyright system is just a result of what copyright law is, it'd probably be worse on a different site since they wouldn't have the special agreement YouTube has with major copyright holders to serve as an intermediary. Instead of content strikes, or an ad revenue claim, that youtube has the special power to do, you'd just default to DMCA takedowns for everything immediately. And yeah content moderation and demonetization is bad but Youtube never wanted to do this right? They were happily showing ads on ISIS videos, its advertisers that forced them, which is how we ended up with a system that randomly pulls ads from videos if there is a hint of something an ad agency would object too. I mean it's either this or advertisers don't advertise at all, which fucks everyone, instead of a few people.

path: 0 4544168 4544405 4544540, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 7
manapropos 13 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4544168 4544405 4544540 4544885, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 5
papertowels 0 points 3 years ago

So uhhh where will content creators go, you still haven't answered the question.

path: 0 4544168 4544405 4544540 4544885 4547165, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 4
mesamunefire 0 points 3 years ago

We got videos before YouTube, it's fine. There are plenty competitors out there.

Peertube, twitch, hell archive.org has a video platform. And there are systems like Odyssey that already pay their creators.

path: 0 4544168 4544405 4544540 4546407, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
Polar -11 points 3 years ago

And are you going to pay to host the petabytes of 4K content? Or are you going to expect other people to pay that when these creators jump ship?

path: 0 4544168 4544405 4544713, hotness: undefined, score: -11, children: 11
Gabu 4 points 3 years ago

What kind of moron is distributing 4k content when 1080p with high bitrate is already overkill?

path: 0 4544168 4544405 4544713 4545324, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 4
Polar -9 points 3 years ago

What 💀 1080p looks like garbage on a 4K TV.

path: 0 4544168 4544405 4544713 4545324 4545581, hotness: undefined, score: -9, children: 3
shortwavesurfer 0 points 3 years ago

Maybe it's because I am blind and so my point is a little bit different. But personally, I have never understood having much video over about 1080p, especially on a phone and possibly even 720p. Peertube and 720p would work great. Each creator could set up their own instance or pay someone to set it up for them, and if they ever blew up and got seriously big, the amount of people watching their videos would send to their peers and load balance across them so the server wasn't totally overwhelmed.

path: 0 4544168 4544405 4544713 4548742, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
manapropos 0 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4544168 4544405 4544713 4544869, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 4
Polar -5 points 3 years ago

Ok. Just sit on Lemmy and complain, then. Very helpful.

path: 0 4544168 4544405 4544713 4544869 4545617, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 3
notintonsfw 1 point 3 years ago

Everything has to be free; I won't pay a dime. If anyone tries to make money (aka any business), they are evil.

  • Lemmy
path: 0 4544168 4579461, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
manapropos 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 4544168 4544363, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
tyrant -2 points 3 years ago

Google would never give up on a project!

path: 0 4544168 4545023, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
ilikenoodlez -24 points 3 years ago

Youtube is squeezing one party really hard while pretending the other party doesn't owe shit to keep their monopoly. Start charging uploaders. If YouTube needs to up what they're earning because of things like bandwidth cost and what not make uploaders cover some of that cost. They're a business making money off of the platform so charge them.

path: 0 4539625, hotness: undefined, score: -24, children: 5
ComicalMayhem 36 points 3 years ago

This is the worst possible take I've heard this week, probably this year.

You would fuck over thousands of people, in addition to creating a bar of entry for anyone wanting to post a video or start a channel. Like I genuinely don't even know where to begin explaining how bad this take is.

path: 0 4539625 4540750, hotness: undefined, score: 36, children: 3
poopkins 13 points 3 years ago

But I don't want to pay and I want everything for free! Make somebody else pay for my enjoyment!

path: 0 4539625 4540750 4541022, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
ilikenoodlez -10 points 3 years ago

My statement was far too broad for it to be "setting a bar of entry". YouTube is trying to squeeze its viewers for every drop they can without having uploaders and im obviously not talking about the little guy here shoulder any of that cost. Who in your mind is responsible for the cost associated with lets say a Mr Beast video? Is it Mr Beast or is it the viewer? I think it's both.

path: 0 4539625 4540750 4541479, hotness: undefined, score: -10, children: 1
Ilovethebomb 3 points 3 years ago

Why the hell would someone go to all the trouble of filming and editing a video, which is also not a cheap process, then pay to have people see it?

path: 0 4539625 4540750 4541479 4547446, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
cerevant 9 points 3 years ago

They already are, by monetizing the content they didn’t create, and paying creators just a fraction of the revenue generated.

path: 0 4539625 4540961, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Chozo -30 points 3 years ago

ITT: People upset that free things don't last forever.

path: 0 4546582, hotness: undefined, score: -30, children: 13
Synthead 12 points 3 years ago

Imagine if a (physical paper) newspaper could block you from reading an article because you didn't spend enough time looking at the ads.

After the content gets delivered to my browser, it's up to me how I want to consume that content. Anything that happens beyond that point is client-side. If I choose to pay attention to ads on purpose, that's my choice. If I accept the webserver's response and choose to view only parts of what I got, then that's my choice, too.

path: 0 4546582 4546899, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 7
serratur 10 points 3 years ago

Its free because they sell user data, I'm not gonna have them sell my data and pay them for doing that.

path: 0 4546582 4548534, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
SaltyLemon66 2 points 3 years ago

All these platforms like youtube, facebook, twitter don't make any sense from a financial standpoint. Their model was fucked from the start and only now are we seeing the consequences.

path: 0 4546582 4566303, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
LemmyIsFantastic -32 points 3 years ago

Pay?

path: 0 4538432, hotness: undefined, score: -32, children: 12
smileyhead 2 points 3 years ago

I am winning to pay for content I like. But using their propietary app? No thanks.

path: 0 4538432 4546427, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
LemmyIsFantastic 0 points 3 years ago

Then don't use it 🤷‍♂️

path: 0 4538432 4546427 4547261, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
smileyhead 1 point 3 years ago

So I use NewPipe, FreeTube, MPV, etc. Until Google block them too, then I'll refuse to use YouTube at all.

path: 0 4538432 4546427 4547261 4547925, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
poopkins -24 points 3 years ago

Hello, you must be new here. We don't like to be held accountable for anything and simply vocalize all our problems in an echo chamber where we collectively agree that other people should be held accountable instead. I hope this offers some context for the downvotes.

path: 0 4538432 4541120, hotness: undefined, score: -24, children: 8
PoliticalAgitator 15 points 3 years ago

Meanwhile, at expensive private schools across the world, budding young neoliberals are being taught there is nothing more reprehensible than not milking every possible person of every possible penny.

Not even child slavery.

path: 0 4538432 4541120 4543059, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 7
Meowoem -17 points 3 years ago

The whole amazing service is totally free to use, you just need an occasional advert break it's hardly nestle or Nike level greed now is it.

path: 0 4538432 4541120 4543059 4543224, hotness: undefined, score: -17, children: 6
TheBat 21 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4538432 4541120 4543059 4543224 4543387, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 4
PoliticalAgitator 13 points 3 years ago

Sure it is, it just hasn't had as long to mature.

But it's working on it. One pre-roll ad became two. Skippable ads became unskippable. Mid-roll ads were introduced. The algorithm was created to keep people watching, even if it set them on a path to domestic terrorism.

Now they're fighting ad blockers. Then they'll creep up the price of their paid tiers. Then they'll introduce ads into the paid tiers.

But don't worry, they promise it will only ever be a single, skippable, pre-roll ad, until it isn't.

You could hand over every cent you earn each week and they'll still show you ads and sell your data, because that's how greed works. If there is a penny to take, they'll take it.

The only thing we can do to defend ourselves from this practise is to make it clear that it will lose them more than it will gain.

The exact thing you're trying to shame people out of doing.

path: 0 4538432 4541120 4543059 4543224 4544857, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
Crunchypotat77 -93 points 3 years ago

Man y'all really expect high quality, extremely diverse, and robust video streaming platform for free?!

YouTube gotta pay it's bills somehow. Why y'all ok with paying Netflix/prime/hulu or whatever but not YouTube?!

YouTube don't owe nobody free services. Get over it.

path: 0 4537775, hotness: undefined, score: -93, children: 77
Hikiru 107 points 3 years ago

It’s google. They’re paying their bills just fine

path: 0 4537775 4537827, hotness: undefined, score: 107, children: 0
wreckedcarzz 101 points 3 years ago

Awww, poor little YouTube/Google/Alphabet, helpless and basically living on the streets, barely able to make ends meet.

literally laughs my fucking ass off

If it is so dire for the poor conglomerate, it could shutdown YouTube to cut costs.

crickets

That's what I thought.

path: 0 4537775 4537933, hotness: undefined, score: 101, children: 9
Tammo-Korsai 49 points 3 years ago

Won't somebody please think of the CEO!? Spare a thought for the investment portfolio!

path: 0 4537775 4537933 4538745, hotness: undefined, score: 49, children: 1
danque 1 point 3 years ago

Exactly! Give the CEO their 9th Lamborghini and 7th country holiday mansion. They deserve it!

path: 0 4537775 4537933 4538745 4552368, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Meowoem -7 points 3 years ago

So they should just provide you a totally free service the costs them money because...? Are they still going to pay creators or do you want everyone to work for free to entertain you?

Petition the government to make a nationally owned and run video sharing site if that's what you want, don't be surprised when a capitalist company doesn't give you everything you want for free

path: 0 4537775 4537933 4543277, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 6
rwhitisissle 10 points 3 years ago

People are generally okay with some ads. It's the quantity and aggressiveness and propensity for making the content worse by how they inject them into the videos that people don't like. Yes, their infrastructure costs money to run. But their service is only possible because of the people who make videos for them and the people who watch them. It's always been a give and take relationship. They've just been gradually deciding over the years to take more and more as their monopoly over a certain category of digital media has solidified and people have responded in the way people always do.

path: 0 4537775 4537933 4543277 4544005, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
wreckedcarzz 1 point 3 years ago

They knew what they were getting into when they acquired yt - or at least they should have known. I was a teen when yt started and even I could see how much of a money pit it would be. If G wants to throw wads of cash at it, fine. But I'm not propping up their fiscally-failed project with my own money.

You try to bait others into your poorly-crafted arguments when the core statement is stupid: there is no way yt would or will be profitable, full stop. That's it. And G waited way, way too long to try and monitize or start a subscription model, and now they have a sea of users who will not pay because 'it's always been free'. Through and through G fucked themselves with yt. They only have themselves to blame for the situation they now find themselves in.

path: 0 4537775 4537933 4543277 4547298, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
Meowoem 1 point 3 years ago

It's an amazing video sharing site that's made the world better in so many ways, especially for small businesses and individuals. Just the access to video guides on how to repair things was a game changer on its own, breaking content creators out of the traditional media monopoly has been absolutely huge.

All this and the only cost is they occasionally show adverts, it's such a tiny tiny price

path: 0 4537775 4537933 4543277 4547298 4575588, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
uberkalden -6 points 3 years ago

The entitlement around here and on Reddit is insane. Just stop using the service if the ads are too much. Or pay for the subscription

path: 0 4537775 4537933 4543277 4543771, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 0
sar1n 42 points 3 years ago

Corporate apologia 🙄

path: 0 4537775 4537880, hotness: undefined, score: 42, children: 14
Thorny_Insight 3 points 3 years ago

Do you work for free yourself? Is it completely unreasonable to expect money in return for your services?

path: 0 4537775 4537880 4546907, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 13
sar1n 6 points 3 years ago

Except Google is double dipping, making money off of your data while charging for the "privilege". Fuck all that

path: 0 4537775 4537880 4546907 4546946, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 3
Thorny_Insight 2 points 3 years ago

Agreed. However I still can't make a good faith argument as to why YouTube should be free. I too prefer not to pay but I never expected that to last forever and we've had a good run. I basically got a 15 year free trial and now they want me to pay for it - fair enough (I don't yet thought)

path: 0 4537775 4537880 4546907 4546946 4547147, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
papertowels 2 points 3 years ago

JW do you know how much money google actually makes off of your data?

I tried searching it and didn't find anything.

"Selling my data should be enough money to cover video bandwidth" is a common argument in this thread and was wondering if anyone actually had numbers to back that up.

path: 0 4537775 4537880 4546907 4546946 4547215, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
PoliticalAgitator 1 point 3 years ago

Do the Google engineers work for free?

path: 0 4537775 4537880 4546907 4552413, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 8
Thorny_Insight 1 point 3 years ago

No. What's your point?

path: 0 4537775 4537880 4546907 4552413 4553204, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 7
Jackthelad 34 points 3 years ago

I have YouTube Premium because I also use YouTube Music, so the subscription fee is worth it for me.

But if you don't use YouTube Music, it's far too expensive and tough to justify the cost for YouTube alone.

path: 0 4537775 4537929, hotness: undefined, score: 34, children: 5
Polar -12 points 3 years ago

It's $25 CAD. You can add 5 family members. It's literally $5 per month.

path: 0 4537775 4537929 4544851, hotness: undefined, score: -12, children: 3
wreckedcarzz 3 points 3 years ago

It's actually still $25. You, the user footing the bill, isn't getting 6 people's worth of entertainment from it.

It's also $300 a year, plus taxes and fees and whatever else. If you're actually collecting on those 5 other users, every month, reliably and automatically (unless your time is literally worth nothing), then sure. But financially it's usually ill-advised to assume that 'if I can just get X others to do Y for Z time, then the price goes down'. Most fall into this, fail to capitalize on the opportunity, and end up spending equal or more compared to a single-user subscription.

Just be sure that the 'winner' in the situation is truly you, and you aren't being had by the thought of $5.

path: 0 4537775 4537929 4544851 4547414, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
Polar -6 points 3 years ago

It's actually $5 when everyone pays me their portion.

In Canada we have this technology called e-transfer and automatic payments. No need to ask.

Not sure why Lemmy users are so angry about paying a few dollars for ad free entertainment.

path: 0 4537775 4537929 4544851 4547414 4548068, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 1
subspaceinterferents -15 points 3 years ago

Yep. That's why I also pay for it. It's a reasonable price for a valued service. Moaners gotta moan.

path: 0 4537775 4537929 4538142, hotness: undefined, score: -15, children: 0
BolexForSoup 31 points 3 years ago

I am so tired of seeing this argument. I do not care about ads. That is not the problem. The problem is that YouTube thinks it is entitled to suck up every little bit of information about me and everyone within speaking distance of me just because I use their service. Do you want to run ads? Go for it. Do you want to get a little bit of basic information about your audience? Such as State or city? Honestly, that is fine. We need to establish a line, but I am not wholesale against any sort of information coming in. But that is not what they are doing. They give us these opaque TOS’s that allow them to take so much information and even sell it to third parties. It is out of control and we have no sense of what our data is worth or who is getting it. That is not OK.

If you want to do an on air read, I’m not going to skip it. If YouTube to run the occasional ad, I’ll watch it. But I will never, ever take down my VPN and ublock origin. I will never apologize for obfuscating my data a little bit. That is my right, and I will exercise it every time.

There is also one other very simple problem with this argument: you don’t have to run ads and steal all my data in order to make money. There are tons of other revenue models out there.

path: 0 4537775 4538660, hotness: undefined, score: 31, children: 3
InternetCitizen2 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 4537775 4538660 4541026, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
InternetCitizen2 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 4537775 4538660 4541016, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
InternetCitizen2 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 4537775 4538660 4541000, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Mesophar 27 points 3 years ago

The ads are just out of control. Back when it was one, maybe two, ads that were 10-20s long combined, I was willing to sit through it. Now there are almost always multiple ads concurrent, ads in the middle of the video, ads at the end of the video if it plays all thr way through, then ads again before the next video plays.

Bring it back to a single ad at the beginning of the video and give me a variety of ads so it isn't the same 3 over and over, and I'll sit and watch it.

path: 0 4537775 4540202, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 3
PoliticalAgitator 11 points 3 years ago

That's the way greed creeps.

You could build a successful service that brought in $1 million a month from happy users treated ethically, but there will always be an insatiable psycopath whispering "if we sold our user data, we could make a extra $100k each month".

So one ad becomes two. Users are tracked and the information sold. Algorithms are created to make services as addictive as possible, because "one more video" turns into "4 more ads".

However many apologists may post about poor, destitute Google being unable to feed their children because people aren't watching enough ads, we're absolutely correct to oppose that endless creeping.

There is always another sleazy way to manipulate people out of money. Companies need to learn to accept that their tens of millions of dollars profit are enough.

path: 0 4537775 4540202 4544617, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 2
TimewornTraveler 4 points 3 years ago

you watched a short video, now bend over and take it so daddy google can get another bonus, you entitled slut 🥵🥵

path: 0 4537775 4540202 4544617 4549817, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
papertowels 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 4537775 4540202 4544617 4593184, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
bunnyfc 27 points 3 years ago

they get all content for free though, unlike netflix etc.

path: 0 4537775 4538244, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 9
poopkins 2 points 3 years ago

They also pay content creators, so perhaps you will need to drill into a bit more detail instead of offering a factually inaccurate single-line reply.

path: 0 4537775 4538244 4541235, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 5
wreckedcarzz 4 points 3 years ago

They pay some creators a pittance, and can revoke that amount and/or ability at any time, for any reason, even for reasons which are not listed in their terms, are factually inaccurate, or otherwise allows them to fuck the creator. Yt is like the waitstaff in the US, "yeah we pay them" ($3 an hour and the rest has to come from elsewhere to make ends meet).

Call me when you see a 90 second sponsor segment for SquareSpace in your next Netflix show.

path: 0 4537775 4538244 4541235 4547511, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 4
poopkins -2 points 3 years ago path: 0 4537775 4538244 4541235 4547511 4548162, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 3
Neve8028 1 point 3 years ago

The vast majority of content uploaded is never going to make them any money. They get free content but hosting it is incredibly expensive.

path: 0 4537775 4538244 4541879, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
Gabu 5 points 3 years ago

Vast majority of content won't fucking lose them money either, you hairless ape. They show ads even on unmonetizable content, i.e. they're using voluntary labor to make money.

path: 0 4537775 4538244 4541879 4545547, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
AmosBurton_ThatGuy 3 points 3 years ago

Boo fuckin hoo. The poor multi billion dollar corporation, what will they ever do?

path: 0 4537775 4538244 4541879 4545136, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Madrigal 22 points 3 years ago

I wouldn't object to paying if:

  1. Their pricing was more reasonable
  2. A fairer cut went to content creators
  3. They had something that actually qualified as a search function on their site
  4. They weren't trying to bully everyone into paying
path: 0 4537775 4539065, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 4
wreckedcarzz 4 points 3 years ago

This. I used to pay for ytp family plan, way back when now. I had to skip a month as money was that tight. When I went to resub, they wanted an extra ~$5 a month, or like 25%, for the same content and features. No advertised changes in revenue sharing amounts.

I just pay creators directly now, via patreon and ko-fi. I don't care about yt, I care about a few creators. A few have stated that $1 is more than they make from yt per user per month. The revenue split is wild.

I don't care about ytm. Cut the cost in half and give more to the people that are actually providing content. Right now yt in my eyes is greedy and their additional price hikes solidify that.

path: 0 4537775 4539065 4547659, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
NENathaniel -2 points 3 years ago

I think the price is very fair if you split the family plan with others

Also I think creators get a 55% cut for ad revenue which seems reasonable to me

path: 0 4537775 4539065 4542605, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 2
Gabu 1 point 3 years ago

You're joking, right? Creators make the whole video, Youtube only has to serve it. Also, not all creators get money from ads, so Youtube gets to STEAL from the little guys.

path: 0 4537775 4539065 4542605 4545596, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
NENathaniel 1 point 3 years ago

You realize that serving the video is incredibly expensive right? There’s a reason Lemmy doesn’t support video hosting

They also pay for hosting the thousands of videos from "little guys" that no one will watch

path: 0 4537775 4539065 4542605 4545596 4551484, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
PriceIsWrong 21 points 3 years ago

Cry us a river. I will find ways to block ads and tell people how to do it

path: 0 4537775 4538159, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 0
burliman 19 points 3 years ago

Difference is those other networks actually make content thats arguably seen as worth paying for. YouTube recycles user content and barely pays those users for it. Yes you can say that they deserve your money for servers and whatnot, but you can’t compare YouTube with those other services you mentioned and expect people to cry big crocodile tears…

path: 0 4537775 4538292, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 6
AnonTwo 2 points 3 years ago

They're not recycling anything though. They're hosting it. For 90% of therm they're not even charging the person to host it.

That's only possible because of ads, because it's not out of the kindness of their hearts. If there was not just value but negative value in Youtube, they would just shut Youtube down. Yeah, they make a lot more money than they need to maintain youtube. But they'd probably prefer to put that money towards the things actually making them money.

And yeah, it would be nice if some site existed that wasn't corporate driven, but most of them either have no content, or are just siphoning off of Youtube's content anyway.

And yes, you can say Youtube's (users) content, and it virtually makes no difference in the grand scheme of things. Hosting the content is still required to do.

path: 0 4537775 4538292 4540965, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 5
ElectroNeutrino 4 points 3 years ago

Ads aren't the only form of revenue for them, and historically, YouTube had been run at a loss for years.

path: 0 4537775 4538292 4540965 4543406, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
AnonTwo 2 points 3 years ago

...That...doesn't bode well when they already have an alternative revenue option. It sounds like the adblock is hurting their revenue, and the alternative options aren't making it up.

Like that doesn't sound like they have a good reason to stop trying.

path: 0 4537775 4538292 4540965 4543406 4547665, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Marin_Rider 2 points 3 years ago

not 90%, 100%. there are no hosting fees on YouTube for anyone. I could see being able to upload content requiring a subscription in future though

path: 0 4537775 4538292 4540965 4545198, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
burliman 2 points 3 years ago

You will never get the sympathy for YouTube that you’re looking for. Not as long as the ads keep being so blatantly offensive and irrelevant, and while they continue to dangle their power over the users and content creators, who ultimately make them what they are.

No one cares about their hosting fees. You’re right that it’s expensive to keep the necessary servers and bandwidth, but you’re wrong that people will care because of the lack of care YouTube has shown. On the other hand, paying for something like HBO Max, for example, is a thousand times more justifiable. Look at the novel content they actually create. They also host that content, but that’s not why people pay.

I think people go to the ends of the earth to block ads that are offensive or irrelevant. Some people block any ad because of the history of offensiveness and irrelevance that ads from the majority of services have been. Ads can be those things for lots of reasons. Too many, too long, too often repeated, actually offensive, annoying, distracting, insulting to your intelligence, conflict of interest, against the grain of the content they infest, just to name a few… But instead of advancing that front, services like YouTube would rather just cram them down your throat, and then block you if you object. Ultimately YouTube needs users. Nothing works without the users. The ads only even make money because of the users…

They should be giving us massages and making our stay as pleasant as possible… instead they are power-tripping because they think we need their bullshit, but we don’t.

path: 0 4537775 4538292 4540965 4549520, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
AnonTwo 2 points 3 years ago

You're right, people won't care.

But i'm not being sympathetic, i'm being realistic. I just know the end-point is going to be bad and leave everyone disappointed. Google isn't going to try less, and none of the alternative sites popping up are remotely able to keep up. Many existed in youtube's time and either died out or they're still around and nobody cares.

I'm sure one day youtube will go away and take all the videos of 20 years with it, as well as leave people with nowhere to go just rubbing their heads trying to figure out where their content can go.

I will say though: Youtube needs users. Google doesn't need users. They can go to any of their other products if they ever determine youtube isn't worth it.

path: 0 4537775 4538292 4540965 4549520 4559442, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
CarbonIceDragon 13 points 3 years ago

I dont use those particular other services to be fair. I do admittedly pay for Nebula, but to my understanding that is supposed to be more creator driven and is quite cheap anyway.

The thing about YouTube adblocking, at least for me, is that I dont think they owe me free and ad free content, or that they should be obligated to offer that for some reason. I fully understand that delivering video the way they do costs some amount of money even if not very much for an individual user, so blocking their monetization scheme means that using their website costs them money. However, I do not like or respect that company, I feel that their engagement algorithms have proven generally harmful to society as a whole by pushing people to more extreme content to improve retention, and I feel that their position as the primary place anyone thinks of to upload or view video not created by large scale studios is non-ideal. As such, when I do end up watching something there (content which, I might add, isnt even something that they create, just stuff independent creators are pretty much forced to upload there to be relevant as they are by far the largest game in town for their niche), I'm not bothered by blocking their ads, because I dont really care about Youtube's profit margin. If anything, if doing so actually harms them, in some tiny way, that is a bonus in my book.

path: 0 4537775 4538997, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
Pregnenolone 13 points 3 years ago

They’re one of the largest companies in world: they are the bills

path: 0 4537775 4538998, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
FlashZordon 13 points 3 years ago

People out here are really dick riding YouTube lmao.

path: 0 4537775 4539307, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 1
stardust 4 points 3 years ago

Most importantly they are simping for Google and acting as though YouTube is an independent company with its own separate stocks and unaffiliated under the Google monolith.

path: 0 4537775 4539307 4539350, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
stardust 8 points 3 years ago

Poor Google. Such a small company struggling to get by.

path: 0 4537775 4539306, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
mesamunefire 7 points 3 years ago

Meh if YouTube died tomorrow there would be a competitor the next day. Google bought YouTube back in the day and there are already like platforms.

path: 0 4537775 4539078, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
anewbeginning 6 points 3 years ago

YouTube is highly profitable already.

path: 0 4537775 4539389, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
narwhalperson 6 points 3 years ago

If Google wasn’t so blatantly malicious in their advertising practices then I would gladly pay for YouTube premium. However, their current business model of “take any and every bit of data on them to sell more product” is morally repugnant. Subsequently, I feel no shame in blocking ads and using invidious to avoid giving them even a cent of revenue.

path: 0 4537775 4545393, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
potpotato 5 points 3 years ago

How much of their revenue is spent toward content generation?

path: 0 4537775 4538963, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Cyo 3 points 3 years ago

I know but ... YouTube belongs to YouTube, and I'm sure google is already making tons of money selling/using the data of all their users so... I would not have a problem with one or two ads, but they often put three or more annoying ads per video.

path: 0 4537775 4538867, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Pregnenolone 0 points 3 years ago

Yes

path: 0 4537775 4538979, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
Outtatime -22 points 3 years ago

😂 reading the replies to your comment is the fun part. Watching people lose their minds over a comment.

path: 0 4537775 4538706, hotness: undefined, score: -22, children: 0
lolcatnip -31 points 3 years ago

Yeah, you can tell by the replies how much this forum is filled with entitled children and hipster anarchists.

That and by how anytime Google is mentioned here in literally any context, the top comments are all about how much people hate Google. Could be an article about Google rescuing lost kittens, and people here will make up stories about how Google is doing it for some evil reason and it's a threat to the internet as we know it.

Anyone who tries to argue with me will be summarily blocked because I don't have the patience today. Thanks in advance for helping me populate my block list.

path: 0 4537775 4538776, hotness: undefined, score: -31, children: 1
ElectroNeutrino 16 points 3 years ago

You and the other person's misrepresentation of the reason others are complaining about this are little more than complaining about other people complaining.

path: 0 4537775 4538776 4539151, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
technology
technology

@lemmy.world

login for more options
87358
21246
15760

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


go to feed...