Yes.

Lol "AI invasion"? If that's what this is you "lost" over a decade ago. LLMs are a massive leap in NLP technology, but AI backs everything already.

John Connor was a shitposter all along.

what are the systoms of being pregarnt?

maybe I should start asking it impossible questions

"how do I stop contacts from enabling the email flange during the squeej phase of marketing?"

edit: gottem lmao

Okay but good goddamn your name IS fun.

I looked through your profile.

You seem like fun. Liar!

I wanna see what happens as the inevitable market crash comes!

A lot more companies are making and saving quite a lot of money because of it

People downplaying the value of AI are like people in 1993 talking about how the Internet is just a playground for nerds.

Ah yes, the trend of every new technological development ever. Apparently investment is "hemorrhaged money" until it's profitable.

The history of chatbots for support purposes show us that jobs will be replaced not when they can be done as good, but good enough, and what "enough" means is going to be a race to the bottom kind of situation over time.

Dude for real. Even the "technology" community is just people shitting on everything from eVTOLs to AI, should be called c/luddites instead.

Most of lemmy doesn't even understand how this shit works let alone has the knowledge to be an authority on it. There's constant "oh this is going to make the company go under, stupid AI can't possibly take our jobs!" Nonsense. Yet the cash keeps rolling in and AI becomes more and more integrated into every company.

Hell our cloud engineering team is currently building an in house model to assist data entry level workers with accessing the necessary data they need to do their jobs, and my team has used it to set up automated SFTP backups of our network gear.

It's not going anywhere, and whenever someone says it's useless because you can mislead it intentionally, or that it's just a gimmick cause they "can't see what it's good for," it's a safe bet they're just some gig economy worker who can't conceive of a world outside their bubble.

no Quenya. They even speak elvish

I'm not sure if you're praising or damning can openers

You have to define improvement with AI.

And given that AI doesn’t have observational awareness or ability to see it’s surroundings to compare fact from fiction so it takes direct input from users:it will adapt to what it is scraping.

And if you think it’ll just improve without human interaction for such an objective to be ‘improved’, perhaps you’re one of those people who think becoming a racist bigot spewing hate online where this will get scraped up by AI as an adaptation is ‘an improvement’

The nothing forever hiccup was a deep lesson on that.

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gullible

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

Oh, so it doe-- ahh, you stole my lungs

I do want to point out that while our tech doesnt look as amazing in the same way as the 50's thought it'd be, its pretty amazing in its own ways. I'm writing this message to you on a glass obelisk physically connected to nothing, that enables me to talk to my adopted family on the literal opposite end of the planet with maybe a few seconds of delay (if that), who dont speak the same language as me, and its more than 100,000 times more powerful than the computers thay first got us to the moon, while being small enough to comfortably fit in my pocket

The Jetson's was supposed to take place 100 years from when it was being made in the 1960s.

Which means the following technologies beat their predictions by decades:

• Video calls
• Robot vacuums
• Tablet computing
• Smart watches
• Drones
• Pill cams
• Flat screen TVs

Flying cars exist, they just aren't economically viable or practical given the cost, necessity to have a flight license, and aviation regulations regarding takeoff and landing.

And we're still 40 years away from that show's imagined future.

Your thesis focuses too much on the things here and there that were wrong, which typically related to expensive hardware cycles being assumed to be faster because the focus was only on the underlying technology being possible and not thinking through if it was practical (doors that slide into the ceiling is a classic example - the cost of retrofitting for that vs keeping doorknobs means the latter will be around for a very very long time).

What we are discussing is the rate of change for centrally run software which has already hit milestones ahead of expert expectations several times over in the past few years and set the world record for fastest growing new product usage beating the previous record holder by over a 4x speedup.

You're comparing apples to oranges.

Captain obvious

You are saying destroyed, as if the job itself is a service. Work is cost not value.

That doesn’t apply to art, though. Artists enjoy their job and are grateful that they can earn a living by doing it, so the job is the service.

This would not be a problem if we actually had an UBI-like system or the cost of basic living was near zero, but apparently we like getting rid of solutions before finding better ones.

Maybe I'm just high.. but I'm confused about your point. I'm just referring to what capitalism has done over and over. Technology does destroy jobs... Yes it also creates them but can that continue forever?

It also got rid of a metric shit ton of them as well. Like all other economic automation it starts with manual labor being replaced by technical repair and deployment personnel. Then eventually that all becomes automated too.

In the next 50 years you'll see a whole IT field develop around AI, then slowly it'll phase out low level IT workers and developers until the only people that are left are QA checking on the AI services to ensure functionality.

Explain why buzzfeed shuttered their news division and said they will be focusing on AI.