Lemmy and Mastodon feel like the real web3.

3 years ago by Amoiridis Kyriakos to c/lemmyworld

I think this decentralization and federation is what web3 is all about, without all the corporations calling everything to do with monkey pixel art that costs a million dollars "web3"

lucien 229 points 3 years ago

Hah, web 2.0 was all about the explosion of user-generated content. Corps and cryptonerds wanted to make web 3.0 about making money, but the web has always been about the content, not its monetization. In trying to monetize the content, they're alienating people and forcing them off the platforms they defaulted to.

Humans like to create and share content, no matter how easy or difficult it is to monetize. If the people who want to monetize humanity's collective output make it harder to create, then hopefully the result is that people move off the ad-supported platforms and replace them with something that doesn't rely on centralization with lots of capital to stay afloat.

If nothing else, the way that youtube has made it impossible for segments of the creative community to monetize their content and forced them rely on platforms such as patreon has made it more and more clear that ad-generated revenue is a dead end. You can't force people to view advertising unless you hold their content hostage, and for the first time in history, they can't buy out the means of production.

path: 0 101398, hotness: undefined, score: 229, children: 17
BobKillsNinjas 98 points 3 years ago

I was resistant to the federverses, but these corpos just think they can get away with anything...

Fuck them I won't do what they tell me!

It will be fun to watch this place grow, it feels like the start of a new story!

path: 0 101398 104165, hotness: undefined, score: 98, children: 9
kiriakos 23 points 3 years ago

based

path: 0 101398 104165 104233, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 5
kommanditbolag 24 points 3 years ago
path: 0 101398 104165 104233 105743, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 4
Redex68 21 points 3 years ago path: 0 101398 104165 104233 105743 106191, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 3
huskersax 20 points 3 years ago

federverses

I'm more a fan of the nadalverses, but to each their own.

path: 0 101398 104165 110674, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 2
DRx 3 points 3 years ago

path: 0 101398 104165 110674 126961, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
DRx 5 points 3 years ago path: 0 101398 104165 110674 126961 127000, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
ultimate_question 22 points 3 years ago

replace them with something that doesn’t rely on centralization with lots of capital to stay afloat

There's no conceivable reason that reddit shouldn't be profitable right now with the market saturation they have unless the majority of people who've been making money off of the site up until now have been minimal effort contributors trying to get their piece of the money pie. 99% of the work is done by "unpaid" (by reddit) mods yet somehow they still have 2k people on the payroll and still need to centralize more and more capital to cover the overhead, it's easy to imagine most of their current expenses are going to dumb corporate tech money sinks that are going out of style fast and have little to show for the last decade of spending lol

path: 0 101398 114643, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 2
berkeleyblue 20 points 3 years ago

I mean that’s maybe the only good thing: If they are a public traded company, they have to file public revenue reports. Would love to see where those morons burn their money…

path: 0 101398 114643 115383, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 0
lucien 17 points 3 years ago

2k people in expensive San Francisco office space. Willing to bet that the % of them dedicated to improving user experience was quite low in comparison to those trying to figure out how to squeeze money out of it.

path: 0 101398 114643 116679, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
bandario 16 points 3 years ago

Every single platform that has claimed "Web 3.0" has been revealed to be a crypto scam, and generally not even a sneaky one. Pop over to minds.com if you'd like a free taste of exactly what that ends up looking like. It's disgusting.

path: 0 101398 121039, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 2
PottedPlant 4 points 3 years ago

Good God, minds.com is a cesspool.

path: 0 101398 121039 203840, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
lucien 3 points 3 years ago

Very much aware of that.

path: 0 101398 121039 125355, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
ultimate_question 6 points 3 years ago
path: 0 101398 114567, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Barbarian 144 points 3 years ago

It's pretty dope. Been following the fediverse for a while, but I've never used twitter so mastodon felt kinda useless to me. I've never used facebook, so friendica felt kinda useless to me.

Anonymous strangers posting links and having discussions? Now that's more my jam.

path: 0 100716, hotness: undefined, score: 144, children: 7
kommanditbolag 26 points 3 years ago
path: 0 100716 105870, hotness: undefined, score: 26, children: 4
marksson 18 points 3 years ago

My favourite part was AMAs by scientists and authors or even ppl like Gov Schwarzenegger. I hope fediverse develops to that point one day.

path: 0 100716 105870 108319, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 2
darkwing_duck 12 points 3 years ago

I remember when AMAs were organic and people actually answered questions. Before prepared questions and answers became a thing.

path: 0 100716 105870 108319 116778, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
SubmarineDoor 4 points 3 years ago

I loved seeing those IAMAs too. Schwarzenegger, Obama, NASA scientists and Woody Harrelson (can we talk about Rampart?)! Unfortunately I think the web is worse now, far too much focus on monetization, bots, propaganda> and astroturfing.

I'm hoping that Lemmy flies under the radar in the sweet spot of enough subscribers but not too many.

path: 0 100716 105870 108319 118427, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
haxasaur 3 points 3 years ago

The only bot issue I heard of is following people, which one would only get notified if they use new reddit or official app. What were the other bot problems? What's to stop the bots on this site?

path: 0 100716 105870 107846, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
mikehunt 20 points 3 years ago

My thoughts exactly

path: 0 100716 102842, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 0
slaacaa 11 points 3 years ago

Same here, neither of those are my thing, but lemmy scratches my needs. Of course without reddit fucking up, I would never have checked it out, but now I’m really hoping this gets big, without losing it’s core

path: 0 100716 118230, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
TheVHSWizard 125 points 3 years ago

So you're saying that the real web3 was... the friends we made along the way?

path: 0 101660, hotness: undefined, score: 125, children: 2
odin 50 points 3 years ago

web3 was within us the whole time

path: 0 101660 103755, hotness: undefined, score: 50, children: 1
kommanditbolag 23 points 3 years ago
path: 0 101660 103755 105781, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 0
TheRealLinga 124 points 3 years ago

Honestly I'm not even sure what the term web3 means but Lemmy does feel... less commercial, which is really refreshing! And I'm noticing alot less criticizism which is excellent. I'm certainly going to be staying here and trying to help it grow in a positive and mindful way.

I get what others are saying about it feeling like how the internet used to be... I'm really excited to see where Lemmy goes. Hopefully it doesn't just end up the way its predecessors have gone! Feels like I'm part of a movement to fight the oppression!! Power to the people woo!

path: 0 126594, hotness: undefined, score: 124, children: 21
mcpheeandme 43 points 3 years ago

You nailed it: It feels like a movement. And movements, especially nascent ones, require buy-in and work from their members. I guess that explains why I feel obligated to participate more than I did at Reddit.

I've only been on Lemmy for a day, but it's already clear no one is gonna build this out for us.

path: 0 126594 127060, hotness: undefined, score: 43, children: 2
Kapitel42 15 points 3 years ago

Same here, I think I lebt more comments here today than on reddit the last month

path: 0 126594 127060 130279, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 1
TheRealLinga 8 points 3 years ago

Right? I'm thinking about trying to start my beginner guitar sub (do I still call it sub?). I tried on reddit, posted a few times and it fizzled out. Maybe it would be more successful here. Just a sub dedicated to helping people begin their guitar playing journey. Playing guitar has made such a positive impact on my life, I'd like to share that with others you know?

path: 0 126594 127060 130279 148909, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
Astrovenator 42 points 3 years ago

That's what I'm enjoying about it so far too. Content is sparse but that's okay. I'm so tired of being marketed to, of being a product. These open source federated apps are janky and quieter, but they feel more real. These aren't algorithms pushing engagement and outrage or ads every 10 seconds.

path: 0 126594 132533, hotness: undefined, score: 42, children: 6
ljubashin 24 points 3 years ago

Plus on Reddit, corporation makes money from content users create while here everything is open, free and fun.

path: 0 126594 132533 134891, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 1
slashzero 9 points 3 years ago

Let's just hope we can keep it that way! 🙂

path: 0 126594 132533 134891 144843, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
ThoreauIsCool 19 points 3 years ago

Right? It's way calmer here. I felt hesitant about that at first, but it's only because we've gotten so used to an endless stream of (often inconsequential and low-effort) content. More isn't always necessary or better.

Kid-me used to have days off and he'd hop onto Warcraft 3 or various message boards only to realize no one was online because everyone had jobs or was at school. It had a rhythm to it which was really cool. It wouldn't surprise me if the "always-on" content spam of the modern internet has given people unhealthy ideas about what life is supposed to feel like.

path: 0 126594 132533 147266, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 1
taladar 3 points 3 years ago

I don't mind the lack of an endless stream of content so much, however it would be nice if it was easier to not see the same content again and again after already reading it. Maybe some sort of read flag would be good for posts, possibly with a configurable number of new comments after which it is shown again.

path: 0 126594 132533 147266 181453, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
edgerunneralexis 12 points 3 years ago

I agree wholeheartedly. I think what all of us who care about these alternative underground social networks need to do is try to provide the best content we can, because that will attract other people here, which will benefit us in turn through the content they make!

path: 0 126594 132533 141373, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
Faceman2K23 9 points 3 years ago

There might be a case for a more sparse content feed. Sure you can subscribe to hundreds of communities across a hundred different servers but you are more in control of the feed. every post is going to be more relevant and you will have more incentive to take part in conversations instead of just refreshing and having a whole new page of crap.

There are some ease of use improvements to be made of course, this is the most users and fastest growth lemmy has ever seen, so there is some learning to be done as it scales.

path: 0 126594 132533 146746, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
CoolioDood 32 points 3 years ago

Web3 became a marketing term, doesn't even really have a clear meaning, but it's used as a catch-all word for blockchain-related things like NFTs, cryptocurrency projects, etc. But most of those are not truly decentralized, whereas Lemmy and other fediverse projects are.

path: 0 126594 128450, hotness: undefined, score: 32, children: 1
manitcor 16 points 3 years ago

I kind of like the idea of rebranding it around a more honest and inclusive definition of decentralization. Though getting past bad marketing is so hard it might not be worth it.

path: 0 126594 128450 131315, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
slashzero 15 points 3 years ago

What is sort of bothering me is how as it becomes more popular, I've already seen a few people asking about adding advertising to lemmy instances. I hope advertisers are not looking at diminished revenue with the reddit blackouts and trying to move to Lemmy already. I just can't stand ads, and hope to never see ads interwoven with posts and comments.

path: 0 126594 144760, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 8
omni_memer 18 points 3 years ago

I suppose the benefit to lemmy is that you could always migrate to another instance if yours starts pulling that shit

path: 0 126594 144760 146229, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 5
Faceman2K23 7 points 3 years ago

As far as I know, while account migration is technically possible it isnt implemented yet, so if a server decicdes to shut up shop due to lack of funds your account there is lost and only federated content on other instances will be saved.

So once migration of user accounts and communities is implemented we should be able to easily survive waves of server closures.

I do worry that it will eventually coalesce into a couple of ultra-large servers and lose a lot of it's decentralisation though. gotta spread out!

path: 0 126594 144760 146229 146649, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 3
omni_memer 6 points 3 years ago

I mean, I suppose creating alts on multiple instances might work as an alternative in the meantime. I don’t know if that’s frowned upon though.

Completely agree on the last point, though. It is crucial that we spread out!

path: 0 126594 144760 146229 146649 146881, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
slashzero 4 points 3 years ago

True enough. And I know I’m just a drop in the bucket, but I will do exactly that if it ever happens.

path: 0 126594 144760 146229 146629, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
CarbonIceDragon 8 points 3 years ago

Technically it should already be possible for a company to advertise here, no? Not in the "there are little video boxes you can't get rid of (barring adblocker extensions)" but in the sense that one could have their employees create accounts and make comments and posts to promote their products. They'd probably have to do it subtly and sneakily, because they'd likely get banned or if they had their own instance, defederated, but they could. Wouldn't even need to pay anything beyond employee salaries to make it.

I feel like "proper" ads would be more difficult to implement, because even if the software were updated to include the ability to add them, people could and likely would make forks of it that just didn't display those from federated servers, or clients that don't on any server, and because the software is open source there would be no stopping it. An instance could defederate instances using such an ad-blocking fork, but that would risk ending up themselves isolated and therefore lose much of their traffic and viability as a platform.

path: 0 126594 144760 150420, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
doylio 6 points 3 years ago

I think it might be ok if some instances decide to run ads. Someone has to pay for the server costs, and ads are an option.

The great thing about the Fediverse is you can move to a different instance if you don't like it :)

path: 0 126594 144760 184271, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
psychothumbs 119 points 3 years ago

It's nice to have this space to retreat to. Even if it doesn't outcompete the corporate web anytime soon, the existence of another option will constrain how bad they can get a bit, and will create a place for refugees to go after each new outrage. And it's not like the core functionality of any of the corporate sites was that complicated underneath all the bloat, after people have been on here working out the kinks for a while there's no reason it should be any less convenient of an experience.

path: 0 101280, hotness: undefined, score: 119, children: 13
acosmichippo 28 points 3 years ago

agreed, i can’t remember the last time reddit added an actual useful feature.

path: 0 101280 107417, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 9
nepatriots32 22 points 3 years ago

The only thing they did do relatively recently that I liked was adding the option for subs to not archive posts that are older than 6 months. But I guess when you think about it, that's more of just taking a restriction away, and less of adding something new. Other than that, though, it's either just useless stuff or stuff that actively made things worse.

path: 0 101280 107417 108383, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 4
totallynotsocsa 10 points 3 years ago

Holy shit, is that why I got a random influx of trolls commenting on 5 year old comments?

path: 0 101280 107417 108383 110657, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
thecdc1995 9 points 3 years ago

To be fair about the archiving thing you have to consider that being able to make old data read only allows you to optimize a lot of things. With good engineering the allowance for archival should make the whole site faster and more stable. So sort of a soft feature.

path: 0 101280 107417 108383 110120, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 2
nepatriots32 7 points 3 years ago

I get that, and it could make sense to archive things at some point, but I do think it was nice for certain communities, aside from things like sports, news, etc., to be able to still comment on old posts. Especially help posts or things like that, because they could still be relevant months or even years later.

path: 0 101280 107417 108383 110120 112319, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
StrandIntro 3 points 3 years ago

There should be a way to unarchive something if that's the case, which works better than a new post which references the previous one with small addendums or questions. This is especially useful when people are searching for information on certain topics and everything is contained within one post rather than 5 posts because the earlier ones were archived. Many people will never continue searching and see all of the newer information once they have found the old now incomplete posts.

path: 0 101280 107417 108383 110120 133731, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
haxasaur 10 points 3 years ago

The multi-image post, but only worked on new reddit.

path: 0 101280 107417 107718, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 2
SubmarineDoor 10 points 3 years ago

Seeing your post my first thought was that multi-image albums always worked on old.Reddit. But actually I was thinking of a Reddit Enhancement Suite feature. Which is another open-source toolkit that was provided by the community to Reddit.

Happy to see that the Open Source came up with something top-to-bottom like Lemmy and the Fediverse!

path: 0 101280 107417 107718 118275, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
haxasaur 3 points 3 years ago

I meant actually making a post with multiple images. Old reddit only allowed one, whereas new reddit, you can upload multiple to one and it creates a gallery.

Yes, RES would let you see all the images afaik. I can't remember the last time I browsed on my desktop without RES.

path: 0 101280 107417 107718 118275 137253, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
ultimate_question 10 points 3 years ago

word is they've got 300 full time devs in the april fools experiment department

path: 0 101280 107417 114824, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
Weerdo 19 points 3 years ago

Feels like old school forums again. A little barebones compared to some of the corporate stuff, but that's not a bad thing. Just the simple what's needed no extra fluff.

path: 0 101280 111792, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 2
rskn 13 points 3 years ago

I like it like this, but I've always been a minimalist. With a few QoL changes/fixes (especially for the mobile app) this will be perfect.

path: 0 101280 111792 112909, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 1
akvomelono 10 points 3 years ago

I agree, it's got a really solid foundation and Lemmy's got nowhere to go but up

path: 0 101280 111792 112909 114336, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
nattekrant 87 points 3 years ago

Web 1.0, users form communities on bulletin boards, internet forums and newsgroups. It's the birth of Web 2.0, investors and advertisers see potential in large user bases. This leads to social media and mobile apps as fronts for tracking users and big data collection. Smart home and wearables become a plot to bring tracking hardware into your life even when you aren't actively engaging on the internet. The tech billionaire is born at the cost of the privacy and wallet of the user. Web 3.0, a federated Web 1.0 where users take back control of the internet. Tech billionaires live in homeless shelters and eat ramen noodles.

path: 0 128557, hotness: undefined, score: 87, children: 3
BobKerman3999 25 points 3 years ago
path: 0 128557 128909, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 0
animist 20 points 3 years ago

I'd buy that for a dollar

path: 0 128557 131019, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 1
this_here_is_the_guy 6 points 3 years ago

I understand that reference

path: 0 128557 131019 141679, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Blaed 62 points 3 years ago

I say let’s keep up this momentum and continue making this a space people want to be in and engage with.

We’re already off to a strong start, let’s commit and see what new corner of the internet we can define for ourselves.

path: 0 101184, hotness: undefined, score: 62, children: 0
daniel 59 points 3 years ago

The future of the internet isn't artificially scarce digital collectibles? 😲

path: 0 102365, hotness: undefined, score: 59, children: 11
bhj 18 points 3 years ago

It better be! I spent millions on jpgs of monkeys! /s

path: 0 102365 103303, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 3
kiriakos 10 points 3 years ago

Please tell me they weren't highly compressed jpegs

path: 0 102365 103303 103706, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
cyber_kalashnikov 4 points 3 years ago

Well, how are they supposed to accommodate millions of monkeys in a single file then? Huh? /s

path: 0 102365 103303 103706 117686, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
akvomelono 8 points 3 years ago

dude you got ripped off, my monkey is a png

path: 0 102365 103303 114359, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
Master 15 points 3 years ago

No one tell my StarCitizen ship collection this...

path: 0 102365 103815, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 6
fiah 3 points 3 years ago

are those even scarce tho

path: 0 102365 103815 108825, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 5
Master 6 points 3 years ago

Yea, SC does this really dumb thing where they only sell some ships a few times a year and when they do sell them they sell limited batches of them... the very definition of artificial scarcity and FOMO.

But really... probably not that scarce..

path: 0 102365 103815 108825 108868, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 4
fiah 3 points 3 years ago

watch them turn those ships into NFTs and charge you for each one of those a second time

oh no, you can't use your old ships on the new metaverse, they're tied to your legacy account! Here, use our convenient minter service to transfer them to your web 4.0 address, for a small small fee of $50* per ship!

^*fees^ ^subject^ ^to^ ^current^ ^network^ ^conditions^

path: 0 102365 103815 108825 108868 109019, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
fubo 54 points 3 years ago

What we're seeing here seems more like a restoration of the architecture of pre-web Internet services, like SMTP, NNTP, or IRC.

The protocols are built on top of HTTPS and JSON as a session layer, rather than on lines of ASCII as in those classic protocols ... but the architecture looks a lot more like "a bunch of servers under independent administration, that agree to share messages with each other in a network" than like anything with the stink of blockchains on it.

path: 0 103330, hotness: undefined, score: 54, children: 21
kiriakos 18 points 3 years ago

Sorry but I had to do it

path: 0 103330 103741, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0
anders 6 points 3 years ago

@kiriakos @fubo Blockchain is also a cool technology I think but I don't think it's so well suited for social networks because any node needs to store all the data so it becomes quite heavy with time. Blockchain is better suited for financial transactions which it does really well in my opinion.

path: 0 103330 105899, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 13
TinfoilBeanieTech 8 points 3 years ago

Blockchain is well suited for storing authentication and provenance information. The Fediverse could benefit from blockchain stored instance, user, and community metadata.

path: 0 103330 105899 106329, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
anders 3 points 3 years ago

@TinfoilBeanieTech
Interesting idea. So blockchain could make communication between instances more efficient

path: 0 103330 105899 106329 106639, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
anders 2 points 3 years ago

@kiriakos @fubo One thing I think a platform like #Peertube needs to solve, which #LBRY does (because it uses a blockchain) is the financial incentive for content creators without ads because right now you can't really make money on Peertube. On LBRY you can because it features its own currency and on #Youtube of course but this is using ads. This is one of the advantages to using a blockchain. However LBRY's torrent like protocol for sharing video data is very slow and buggy which incentives the centralisation around odysee. The idea behind the project is great but not that well in practice if they don't make the protocol faster.

path: 0 103330 105899 106253, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 10
lucien 12 points 3 years ago

Plenty of creators have solved that already through platforms like patreon. It turns out that ad-supported content only works if advertisers want to advertise on your content, and large segments of media aren't "advertiser friendly".

No crypto required.

path: 0 103330 105899 106253 106415, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 3
fubo 3 points 3 years ago

"Crypto" has meant "encryption" since the early days of PGP.

If you mean "cryptocurrency" or "blockchain", please consider using those specific words.

path: 0 103330 105899 106253 106415 108744, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
anders 2 points 3 years ago

@lucien
Really? Just heard someone who complained about it but maybe you're right.

path: 0 103330 105899 106253 106415 107979, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
fubo 4 points 3 years ago

It's not clear to me that media distribution and payment need to follow the same channels.

For instance, classic TV uses completely separate pathways for distributing media to users (via broadcast radio signals) and collecting revenues. Commercial TV stations run advertisements; US-style public TV stations attract contributors and sponsors; UK BBC-style public TV stations have government funding.

(And the BBC produces good material — not only BBC World Service, but also Doctor Who.)

Platforms such as YouTube collapse all of this into a single service for convenience. And then "YouTubers" get the mistaken impression that they're entitled to it, and fuss when they are "demonetized".

("Demonetization" just means "the platform doesn't think its advertisers want to be associated with you; and the advertisers are paying to have the platform make that decision.")

path: 0 103330 105899 106253 108709, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 5
anders 2 points 3 years ago

@fubo yeah that's true but why not improve things. making it more convenient is better IMO and we have the technologies to do it.

path: 0 103330 105899 106253 108709 108833, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 4
QuazarOmega 1 point 3 years ago

Pretty much yeah.

But what's wrong with bolckchains? That technology is good too, a bunch of lowly monetization schemes based around it shouldn't deface the core idea and its possibilities.

path: 0 103330 104645, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 5
fubo 15 points 3 years ago

The notion that any "Web" technology (i.e. user-facing publication, sharing, & discussion) needs to be coupled with a fraught¹ payment system seems like a fundamentally contentious issue, mostly introduced by people who stand to profit from the success of those payment systems regardless of benefit to Web users.

¹ Regulatory issues, cut-and-run scams, and so on. Some blockchain services have turned out to be securities regulation violations. Some have turned out to be outright frauds where the issuers have just run away with "invested" money. In any event, nobody should today be relying on any blockchain service when creating forums or other services intended for the general public.

path: 0 103330 104645 105563, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 1
Thedogspaw 5 points 3 years ago

See ftx

path: 0 103330 104645 105563 109053, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
blackbelt352 12 points 3 years ago

In theory/research papers, it's not a terrible idea, a few years ago, 3blue1brown on YouTube did a video about how blockchains and cryptocurrencies work at their core, setting the controversy aside. It is a currency that is actually tied to something of immutable valuable, time and logarithmic growth, and would require much more computational power than any singular entity could control over 50% of. Those goals are good goals.

The the irl problems come in on multiple aspects however, there are only so many graphics cards made every year, so people purchasing for mining impacted the entire market of graphics cards spiking prices higher and higher, they run on electricity which is still generated with a lot of fossils fuels, and cards that break because they're running all the time and are staying hot end often up in landfills, where lots of useful metals are just sitting and rusting away.

path: 0 103330 104645 105858, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
Kalkaline 11 points 3 years ago

The problem with Blockchains is most of the projects associated with them are scams until proven otherwise. It's kind of like Western Union transfers, money orders, or iTunes gift cards, nothing wrong with the technology behind them, but when the topic comes up, I immediately think of scams.

path: 0 103330 104645 105284, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
Amby 5 points 3 years ago

I don't think anything is inherently wrong with blockchain technology, but what it's been molded into (a purely speculative profit driven ecosystem ) is a waste of it's potential.

path: 0 103330 104645 120415, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Faceman2K23 52 points 3 years ago

Long way to go for ease of use, but the foundation is SOLID.

Decentralised without crypto-ifying everything. this is the way.

path: 0 118679, hotness: undefined, score: 52, children: 6
a1studmuffin 8 points 3 years ago

I gotta admit though, this has to be one of the first reasonable use cases for blockchain technology that I can think of - a P2P database for social forums... decentralised, but a single "instance" no matter how you access it. I imagine the blockchain sizes would get ridiculously large though, and all sorts of moderation issues. Probably not feasible, though I'm sure there's a project on GitHub I'm not aware of...

path: 0 118679 119979, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 5
cryball 29 points 3 years ago

If you were to host the entire forum on a blockchain, every node would have to hold the blockchain. So not scaling horizontally, but instead copying the "database" a bunch of times. Think of hosting all of the data in reddit on a thousand nodes. Sure you could access it from any node, but the database would be just as big as before, just copied around a bunch of times.

In a way this thing is already much more decentralized than a blockchain could ever be, in that every server doesn't hold all of the data at once. Much better use of resources IMO.

path: 0 118679 119979 120220, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 4
a1studmuffin 12 points 3 years ago

Yeah that's a good point. But this way we can't mine LemmyCoin. Won't someone think of the shitcoins!?

path: 0 118679 119979 120220 122493, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
cryball 7 points 3 years ago

For sure if reddit can have moons, then a blockchain forum should have their own shitcoin. How else would the founder of the decentralized platform make some bank? Get donations from from the general public for the volunteer work they do on the project? No way :)

path: 0 118679 119979 120220 122493 124471, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
veaviticus 4 points 3 years ago

A much better use of resources, but you shard the data amongst potentially untrusted hosts (ie, anybody can stand up a lemmy instance and start hosting posts/comments, and then get sick of hosting it and delete their instance and all the uploaded data).

Federation only allows access to the network of servers, it doesn't protect the data at all, which means at any moment an entire community of useful historical information could just be wiped away (especially since there's currently no monetary incentive to continue hosting, its only being done out of desire to be part of the network).

I guess I'd rather see the blockchain (or simpler caching/mirroring) approach, something like the torrent network, so that no single person has access to delete content. We can all choose to not view or not mirror content we don't agree with, but nobody can single-handedly own or modify the data

path: 0 118679 119979 120220 134940, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
cryball 3 points 3 years ago

Unless each node holds all the data, it is not guaranteed to stay available. Mirroring content across 2, 3, or even 10 servers wouldn't guarantee that it will remain eg. after 10 years. Even torrents die after they are no longer popular and people stop seeding them.

I still hold my opinion that using an actual blockchain to hold the conversations is not scalable solution at all. Only unique thing it would enable is for unwanted content to remain permanently in the system.

path: 0 118679 119979 120220 134940 137308, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
ininewcrow 51 points 3 years ago

This is what reddit felt like ten years ago ... now it's just a matter of growing the community and making it bigger and better.

I felt bad leaving my old communities at reddit ... but in a funny way, I feel like I've stepped into a time warp and jumped back ten years ... now I'm looking forward to the next ten on Lemmy and Mastadon

path: 0 138535, hotness: undefined, score: 51, children: 1
can 8 points 3 years ago

My thoughts exactly. Ten years ago reddit was "too confusing" for people too.

path: 0 138535 157148, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
Hypersapien 48 points 3 years ago

The internet was always intended to be decentralized

path: 0 108696, hotness: undefined, score: 48, children: 1
Kwakigra 19 points 3 years ago

I'm nostalgic for when it was. Hopefully in some form it can be again.

path: 0 108696 110614, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 0
true_blue 45 points 3 years ago

Federation definitely feels like the next major stepping stone of the internet's evolution. Protocols like ActivityPub and Matrix feel like a bit of a "new beginning" for communities on the internet.

path: 0 105149, hotness: undefined, score: 45, children: 15
brihuang95 9 points 3 years ago

do you use Matrix yourself? how hard was it set up? every time i look into it i can't help but feel lost

path: 0 105149 105880, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 5
true_blue 13 points 3 years ago

I have an account, but I don't really use it much. Not because I don't like it, but because I don't have much to say really. I'm more of the lurker type.

The important thing about Matrix is to think of it like email. Homeservers are like your email provider, like Hotmail or Gmail or Protonmail. You look for a homeserver, then you just make an account on that homeserver. The "main" homeserver is matrix.org, but it's recommended not to make an account on there if you can avoid it. Remember that making accounts on these homeservers is free, so there's no reason not to make accounts on a few of them to try out.

The other thing to think about is your matrix client. This is similar to an IRC client or an email app. Luckily, this matter even less than the homeservers since you can freely switch between these anytime with basically no issues. If none catch your eye, Element is the sort of "reference implementation" so you can just try that one if you want. It has a web version too: https://app.element.io

There's some cool more advanced features like spaces and threads, but you don't have to worry about those much at first.

path: 0 105149 105880 106226, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 2
brihuang95 6 points 3 years ago

sweet thanks! i'll have to look into it more. i know that you can bridge other apps too, like discord and telegram which would be really awesome

path: 0 105149 105880 106226 106280, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
lotanis 6 points 3 years ago

That's what I use Matrix for. I actually just pay for Element One and that gets me Signal, WhatsApp and Telegram all in one app (and a more convenient one than any of them). It's great and zero effort, but you can't then add your own bridges for other services. If you need them you might better hosting it yourself.

path: 0 105149 105880 106226 106280 107831, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
amki 2 points 3 years ago

Creating an account? (basically the same as anywhere really) or your own instance? (Pretty easy, there are ansible playbooks, docker containers)

path: 0 105149 105880 109703, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Umbrias 1 point 3 years ago

Not too hard just a couple things to get used to but it genuinely was barely harder than discord for an easy sign up

path: 0 105149 105880 126502, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
wildbus8979 -2 points 3 years ago

Federation definitely feels like the next major stepping stone of the internet's evolution.

Ever heard of Email?...

Or XMPP for that matter.

Federation has been a core principle since the beginning.

path: 0 105149 106582, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 8
NabiscoShredderWheat 26 points 3 years ago

You don't have to be condescending.

path: 0 105149 106582 109011, hotness: undefined, score: 26, children: 6
lynny 20 points 3 years ago

Exactly. Most people have only used the Internet in its current centralized form. Not everyone had the benefit of being around in the IRC/XMPP/Icecast/BBS/Usenet/etc. days. Federated services are a new concept to many people.

path: 0 105149 106582 109011 109075, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 5
Stellario 12 points 3 years ago

Not everyone had the benefit of being around in the IRC/XMPP/Icecast/BBS/Usenet/etc. days.

Dies and turns into a pile of greymuzzle dust.

path: 0 105149 106582 109011 109075 109773, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
wildbus8979 -1 points 3 years ago

You have never used email?

path: 0 105149 106582 109011 109075 111758, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 2
micseydel 13 points 3 years ago path: 0 105149 106582 112050, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
coltzero 42 points 3 years ago

Yes, I would call it web1. Decentralization are basic concepts of the internet and it was more decentralized in the 90s. Getting back to the roots.

path: 0 168493, hotness: undefined, score: 42, children: 1
lyam23 12 points 3 years ago

Great point. Lemmy and Mastadon look more like an effort to claw back the web of open access and decentralization from VCs, grifters, and the like.

path: 0 168493 169861, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
colorfulmoth 41 points 3 years ago

I hate how crypto bros and scammers kidnapped the term web3. In reality is a nice concept, but they just turned it into a libertarian dystopia.

path: 0 125677, hotness: undefined, score: 41, children: 13
Gradually_Adjusting 11 points 3 years ago

I like the overall trend towards ownership and non-centralized tools implicit in web3. If everything happening on the internet is owned by wall street, then it's not going to act like the real internet.

If there's a crypto aspect that has uses beyond grift, I'm open to it. There are certain ways it could be used to disintermediate owners and creators. I'm not sure if that's happening yet. Ownership rights with digital content do leave a lot to be desired.

I hope we soon see the end of the "gold rush" era in crypto and start seeing actual cool stuff being done with it. Especially since legacy banking will simply co-opt it sooner or later.

path: 0 125677 128401, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 9
BobKerman3999 4 points 3 years ago
path: 0 125677 128401 129098, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 8
dx1 3 points 3 years ago

The question is really, are the inefficiencies in blockchains or related solutions worth the trade off of Wall Street/Fed not running the economy. And they aren't all proof-of-work Bitcoin either, Ethereum for instance is pretty finely tuned and on proof-of-stake now.

path: 0 125677 128401 129098 129322, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 7
argv_minus_one 8 points 3 years ago

About that: if you think a bunch of crypto bros can do a better job of managing an economy than the Federal Reserve can, then I seriously question your sanity. The Fed hasn't exactly done a great job of keeping the economy stable, but the value of cryptocurrency is not even remotely stable.

path: 0 125677 128401 129098 129322 136388, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 3
sotolf 5 points 3 years ago

The problem is that crypto is unregulated, the regulations are there for a reason, to stop things like ponzischemes and all the other things that already has happened that fucked people over. Maybe if they got regulated in some way, so that those things couldn't happen easily, as it is now, I would say no.

path: 0 125677 128401 129098 129322 134001, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
Gradually_Adjusting 2 points 3 years ago

That's where my head is at. They're building and improving it. Legacy banking isn't exactly green itself, as card transactions have a pretty hefty carbon footprint. Further, banks are eyeballing their own "CBDCs", which is basically cryptocurrency but without the intended benefits of decentralization.

Zero knowledge roll-ups have a lot of green promise with gas fees... but DeFi isn't better than legacy banking yet. Still, I think it will be sooner or later if only because some of those folks are actually trying to improve it (where banks are only really doing their best work at trying to get more exploitative).

path: 0 125677 128401 129098 129322 129773, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
dx1 3 points 3 years ago

My 2c, the development around Ethereum isn't really that dystopian or scammy, and there's still promise for decentralizing financial institutions. A lot of people tried to cash in on it is all. Was just reading an article about the gold rush around marketing cereal ~1860-today, companies loading it with sugary and cartoon marketing to brainwash kids, etc., but that doesn't mean cereal is bad for you.

path: 0 125677 129216, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
hydra 4 points 3 years ago

someone tried making a Reddit clone called Plebbit and it was built on the Ethereum network, avatars had NFTs, the UI was similar to new Reddit, was clunky, extremely unresponsive and its mascot was the NPC wojak meme so it's just a 4channer trying to swindle money. To actually make an account you had to pay for an address LMAO

path: 0 125677 129216 130494, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
dx1 3 points 3 years ago

Yes, a lot of people saw easy money and tried to cash in on fads. Remember the "Million Dollar Website"? Just because that was stupid doesn't mean the internet was a scam.

path: 0 125677 129216 130494 158347, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
purplepony 40 points 3 years ago

It's so exciting to have another paradigm shift afoot. I feel a little regretful (not sure that's the right word here) that I wasn't born early enough to grow up with the rise of internet forums. It's not all bad because I also would not grown up during this great time of queer development, but it would've been neat. So now I get to live through and experience a similar time with web3 type stuff. The whole concept makes my little CS heart smile.

path: 0 109567, hotness: undefined, score: 40, children: 11
totallynotsocsa 21 points 3 years ago

It's definitely an “everything old is new” situation. It’s kind of fascinating how the technology has both become ubiquitous, and been monetized like perhaps nothing before it, but is still able to find a way to serve interests beyond capitalism. It’s a pitiful bar, but I still think it’s neat.

path: 0 109567 109988, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 4
purplepony 10 points 3 years ago

It's also very nice to know that I get a choice. Like, if I enjoy an instance, I can give them a $5-$10 donation and that will be worth tons more than any ads I wasn't going to watch anyway. Once I get a bit more used to these instances, since I'm fortunate enough to be able to, I fully intend to pay some part to help them run. I get there are people who would rather watch ads, but this feels so much better to me.

path: 0 109567 109988 110191, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
BeyonDespair 7 points 3 years ago

All this gets me a bit hopeful that we will go full circle and end up using the internet like the old days, even though it is kind of impossible now.

path: 0 109567 109988 112924, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
Dave_r 4 points 3 years ago

I remember fidonet...

path: 0 109567 109988 115629, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
darkwing_duck 5 points 3 years ago

It technically still exists. And even had some sort of resurgence post-2014, apparently.

path: 0 109567 109988 115629 116731, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Stellario 13 points 3 years ago

I wasn’t born early enough to grow up with the rise of internet forums.

It was...interesting, LOL. A wild west frontier.

path: 0 109567 109645, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 4
sparky 3 points 3 years ago

I miss that era. And the age of instant messengers. So many fond memories of MSN Messenger!

path: 0 109567 109645 120085, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
rmuk 4 points 3 years ago

I remember two kids in my school literally getting into a fight over MSN vs Yahoo Messengers. Good times. I used Trillian.

path: 0 109567 109645 120085 123040, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
sparky 3 points 3 years ago

Ah I had forgotten about Trillian!

path: 0 109567 109645 120085 123040 126305, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Aldo 7 points 3 years ago

I also wasn't born early enough to experience the rise of Internet forums. I was a late Reddit adopter, only jumping on in 2020. It is fascinating and exciting to be experiencing this in real time. Even if this isn't an instant and drastic shift, it's still a part of Internet history in the making.

path: 0 109567 109994, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
BadgerBadgerBadger 39 points 3 years ago

It's starting to feel like the 90's again, but without frames ;-) I haven't felt this engaged with the internet in years

path: 0 139996, hotness: undefined, score: 39, children: 9
lwgrs 12 points 3 years ago

I will have no disparaging of frames, thank you very much.

path: 0 139996 140218, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 6
BadgerBadgerBadger 7 points 3 years ago

I loved frames and will not hear a word said against them

path: 0 139996 140218 140511, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 3
PM_NUDES_4_DEGRADING 9 points 3 years ago

New project idea: lemmyframes by 2024, or we do a blackout!

path: 0 139996 140218 140511 143688, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
TheRealLinga 4 points 3 years ago

I'm gonna take it up a notch and listen to the album Blackout while doing the 2024 blackout and then blacking out my screen with sharpie

path: 0 139996 140218 140511 143688 147400, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
JudahBenHur 5 points 3 years ago

fuck I havent thoguht about frames in a minute

those tiny verticle and horizontal scroll bars, that was a luxurious www

path: 0 139996 140218 140511 143495, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
xyon 5 points 3 years ago
my beloved
path: 0 139996 140218 144431, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
nlm 6 points 3 years ago

The joy of creating an entire website layout in tables with background images per cell to paint the UI with without a line of CSS

path: 0 139996 140218 144431 167730, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
sensibilidades 4 points 3 years ago

I miss the blink tag and how annoying it was

path: 0 139996 158102, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
makingStuffForFun 3 points 3 years ago

Absolutely. The spark of the internet is back!

path: 0 139996 151652, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
edgerunneralexis 38 points 3 years ago

I'm honestly very excited about Lemmy and Mastodon.

With federated and decentralized technology, I think there's a real hope of taking the internet back from the tiny selection of corporatized, monetized, sterile silos we have now, where everyone is forced to abide by the same compromise rules and everything can be co-opted or changed at a moment's notice without the userbase's consent, and giving it to smaller, more fun, radical, unique, and interesting internet communities, run by volunteers who really care, for like minded people.

I think it will lead to a much more diverse and richly textured internet, maybe even a more human internet, since each place you go will be a smaller, more intentional community which policies itself and can develop its own interesting culture and set of norms, while still being connected to everything else so the rot of pure isolation doesn't set in.

Technology — especially how it is structured — is never neutral, and I think for the first time in a long while, we've stumbled on technologies in federation and decentralization that actually tend towards good things. The inherent benefits of federation and decentralization to autonomy and resilience and diversity and resistance tocorporatizationn are stunning, and as long as we don't fuck that up by assuming that those benefits are sufficient, don't rest on our laurels thinking we don't need to maintain a culture that is consciously and intentionally oriented around preserving the things we want to see, I think we'll be okay!

path: 0 141254, hotness: undefined, score: 38, children: 1
JudahBenHur 2 points 3 years ago

hear hear

path: 0 141254 143529, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
NeonPayload 36 points 3 years ago

web3 was always a cryptocurrency scam and was doomed to fail. Federation is more a return to the early web with a way to link everything together to compete and get similar services to megacorps while distributing costs.

path: 0 115528, hotness: undefined, score: 36, children: 6
atzanteol 20 points 3 years ago

This is what I keep thinking as well. The "kids today" don't remember usenet, IRC, etc. All were decentralized systems capitalizing on distributed compute resources and moderation. They did have problems when it comes to direction, moderation, systems playing "nice", fragmentation, etc. But I still feel the plusses outweigh the minuses in a federated system. Unfortunately the public does like their "benevolent (until they aren't) dictators"...

path: 0 115528 117893, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 4
NeonPayload 11 points 3 years ago

It's because a system where everything is controlled by one person is so commonplace that any other idea seems foreign and impossible, or more often these days not profitable.

path: 0 115528 117893 118137, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 3
atzanteol 8 points 3 years ago

Yeah - and it does simplify things a lot as well. A single entity can move a platform in a specific direction without needing to consult other servers, writing an RFC, etc. And the onboarding is much simpler by comparison.

I think at this point the fediverse should turn its eye towards simplifying sign-ups. If only to make the language more clear about what you are, and are not, locked into when picking an instance. But also provide people with "I don't really care which one I use" options to round-robin them to servers to distribute the load (thinking out loud).

path: 0 115528 117893 118137 118236, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 2
NeonPayload 5 points 3 years ago

It's a never ending debate on how to "onboard" new users with all the growth. Honestly I'd think it would be easier to compare it to email. like a simple look it all works together just get a account and it will federate. It doesn't matter too much where you sign up your account it's able to send and receive email from everyone. But, everyone gets overwhelmed by choices and not knowing the difference between servers. Something like a email app where it gives you a list to pick and a other option would be good imo.

path: 0 115528 117893 118137 118236 118651, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
joestaen 13 points 3 years ago

yeah, the lack of brand presence is a convenient side effect, its refreshing, just like the iconic McCafé® blend. Crafted to perfection by expert baristas, just the way you like it. Get one today at McDonald's®. I'm Lovin' It!

path: 0 115528 116530, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
nodsocket 36 points 3 years ago
path: 0 119839, hotness: undefined, score: 36, children: 5
Anahkiasen 39 points 3 years ago

Web 2 was when the buttons got gradients, Web 3 was when we removed them for flat again

path: 0 119839 124843, hotness: undefined, score: 39, children: 4
feitingen 9 points 3 years ago

Web4 brings back marquee and blink, but with gradients and glitter.

path: 0 119839 124843 131847, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
niisyth 3 points 3 years ago

If a website doesn't give you a seizure or a migraine within 10 seconds, it cannot be web 4.0 compliant.

path: 0 119839 124843 131847 146904, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
asparagus_p 5 points 3 years ago

Man, 3D buttons with gradients were the hottest shit for a while. Also, the animated buttons that would just do a crappy flip or rotate for no reason whatsoever other than the tech made it possible.

path: 0 119839 124843 138154, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
feitingen 3 points 3 years ago

So much this. I remember lots of 3D text exploding, rendered to poorly dithered gif

path: 0 119839 124843 138154 167069, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Uniquitous 33 points 3 years ago

Good call. To me, Fediverse feels akin to the earlier days of the web. Fresh, new, relatively unspoiled. Nobody knows exactly wtf is going on, but the possibilities seem vast.

path: 0 125110, hotness: undefined, score: 33, children: 1
Kultronx 2 points 3 years ago

came here to say this... seems just like a forum to me a la web 1.0 or w/e

path: 0 125110 143125, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
hydra 32 points 3 years ago

this feels like what Web 2.0 should have been: the advanced version of user-run platforms with decentralization added in, rather than the adternet and enshittification trap venture capital backed platforms that lure people in and then downgrade quality of life.

This is pretty much the alternate timeline of Reddit. Community driven link aggregators do replace forums, but they stay decentralized and not corporate run

path: 0 114023, hotness: undefined, score: 32, children: 0
HakFoo 30 points 3 years ago

The web3 that can be named is not the true web3, or something like that.

The "branded" Web3 was about "how do we create the third Web BUBBLE" more than "how do we create the third Web experience." The people who missed buying AOL shares in 1996 or Amazon in 2002 wanted their chance to get in on speculation, except without the utility of an actual service or product underneath the hype.

path: 0 159500, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 0
AndreTelevise 30 points 3 years ago

With the quick death of Twitter and the even quicker death of Reddit, we as a community are speedrunning the transition to federated social media. We only need good mobile UX and keeping the growth, and we're set. It feels like a post-apocalypse right now, and I am not sure how to feel about it.

path: 0 117597, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 3
sparky 15 points 3 years ago

Feel optimistic about it, we’re the trailblazers, pioneering the post-Rexxit era!

path: 0 117597 119956, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 2
UESPA_Sputnik 19 points 3 years ago

To boldly shitpost where no one has shitposted before! 🖖🥹

path: 0 117597 119956 119982, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 1
sparky 8 points 3 years ago

Lmfao! These are the bowel movements of the starship Fediverse.

path: 0 117597 119956 119982 120008, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
Sergio 30 points 3 years ago

Interested to see this develop. It's my first experience with a federated social infrastructure and feels like something I need to work towards. Rewarding in a way.

path: 0 110672, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 3
Transwithvans 9 points 3 years ago

I feel that. I've interacted more in the few days I've been here than I have during all my years on Reddit.

path: 0 110672 115119, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 2
sparky 6 points 3 years ago

Yeah somehow this feels way less lurk-y.

path: 0 110672 115119 120049, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
mcpheeandme 1 point 3 years ago

It does. For me, I think part of that is a sense of responsibility to help create what I want to be a part of. But people also just seem nicer here!

path: 0 110672 115119 120049 127264, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
worfamerryman 29 points 3 years ago

This is it 100%. I don’t think there is a major platform that does not already exist in the fediverse. I’m sure there is something, but even Instagram and YouTube can be replaced… well the YouTube one is hard due to the bandwidth and storage needed. But the tech is out there.

I think at some point this web3 will take over. Things like YouTube, will eventually come, but we need a lot of cost reduction in current tech to be able to do that.

We are finally taking the web back.

path: 0 118457, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 2
RedComet91 11 points 3 years ago

Yep. Definitely feels how it did before the corporate world learned how to take advantage of the online space. Feels good that we now have a solution to that ever growing issue.

path: 0 118457 120677, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
worfamerryman 5 points 3 years ago

I completely agree. It is almost like when you got to play at school but for some reason all the teachers were not there so it was more fun.

path: 0 118457 120677 121388, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
zef 28 points 3 years ago

But how can this be web3 without blockchain!?

;-)

path: 0 167853, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 1
MaryAnna 13 points 3 years ago

What about my funny ape pictures? Won't someone think of my funny pictures that costs a cities worth of energy???

path: 0 167853 175901, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
mintiefresh 27 points 3 years ago

I finally dipped my toes in and having a blast.

Just need to get Sync/Apollo/etc .. aka the BOYS to come and make some mobile apps and we're SET :)

path: 0 117758, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 7
c0mbatbag3l 7 points 3 years ago

Is Jerboa on Android the only application currently?

path: 0 117758 118993, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 6
sparky 18 points 3 years ago

AFAIK yes, but until Spez conveniently ruined his site, Lemmy had like 2% of the user base it just gained. Jerboa is even made by the Lemmy developers IIRC. So now that the usage has spiked, I’m sure there are other developers thinking about it. Hell, I’m considering building an iOS app myself!

path: 0 117758 118993 119984, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0
mintiefresh 5 points 3 years ago

Yeah I think so. It's not too bad tbh, but would love to see this ecosystem flourish.

path: 0 117758 118993 119646, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 4
CheshireSnake 12 points 3 years ago

This is why I'm hoping people stay even after the blackout. Lemmy has potential but a big part of it is the community. I already like it here and I've seen it grow despite being here for only a week. It's honestly amazing to watch.

path: 0 117758 118993 119646 119725, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 3
Hanabie 9 points 3 years ago

I'm definitely here to stay. Reddit is now reportedly working on blocking the site on mobile browsers. It's not a stretch to assume they'll kill old.reddit, too, to maximise profits.

path: 0 117758 118993 119646 119725 126957, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 2
BlankSix 25 points 3 years ago

It really does feel a bit like the early days, for me. Bunch of strangers talking to each other in, generally, good faith. 'Course there were also tons of pop-ups, the banner would've taken an hour to download at that resolution... I like this more. lol

path: 0 113409, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 1
sparky 11 points 3 years ago

Haha, core memory unlocked. SHOOT THE MONKEY!!! 🎯🎯🎯

path: 0 113409 119947, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
ThoreauIsCool 24 points 3 years ago

It certainly feels nostalgic to me being on here. I miss the days of webrings and message boards and just crawling ever forward into unknown new places. I was a kid then though, so I thought it was just me becoming wiser/more tech-savvy. Now I realize how freaky all the consolidation is. Even some video game modding communities now have more of a presence on reddit than anywhere else. It's convenient but so weird.

I agree with u/Pelicanen that it feels like the uncertain times of the early internet where things were hosted by individuals and their really small websites. I don't know to what extent it will catch on (although Discord is huge with milleninals/Gen Z, no?) but it's interesting to imagine a world where the internet is primarily large consumer/business-facing websites and then highly decentralized communities.

path: 0 147118, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 0
Faceman2K23 24 points 3 years ago

feels like a modern take on usenet/newsgroups/bbs.

You pick your local server and your chosen feeds and enjoy.

I hope as more small servers start up and die that we don't just end up with a small number of mega size servers though, that goes against the point.

path: 0 146884, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 2
Mogofwin 12 points 3 years ago

I think one thing that may help with this is letting users stay on their instance when browsing others. Right now, if I want to hop over to another instance, I can definitely link there or comment if using the appropriate channel, but actually going there makes it seem like I am signed out. Implementing features like this https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/issues/1048 would help make the experience feel more cohesive, and encourage exploration of other instances without confusing users and accidentally encouraging sticking to one's own instance.

path: 0 146884 159940, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
Faceman2K23 4 points 3 years ago

Yes, if a new user weren't paying attention they would be caught up by that a lot.

formatting links with /c/community@instance rather than full URLS works on some platforms, but only if the content linked has been federated, otherwise it is out of sync. You then have to know the link was good, the community exists, then do the copy paste into your search to force it to sync, then the link will work for you...

That could be smoothed out with better fed request optimisation. it's particularly poor on smaller instances that haven't federated with much more than the few big servers, or self hosted instances that have to built that from scratch.

path: 0 146884 159940 160077, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
whoiscraig 23 points 3 years ago

Now we just need a federated Youtube replacement.

path: 0 123287, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 7
Pelicanen 42 points 3 years ago

There actually already is! PeerTube is the fediverse alternative to YouTube, hopefully it'll be able to grow more sometime in the near future.

path: 0 123287 123352, hotness: undefined, score: 42, children: 6
rejoyce 33 points 3 years ago

I have a hard time imaging a free, open video hosting service will ever succeed. YouTube's infrastructure is insane, and that's reflected in their costs.

Any sustainable video hosting platform is going to need a solid monetization plan because the costs of hosting and streaming exabytes of video is just not sustainable on donations. Platforms like Floatplane or Nebula seem like good alternatives, but they've chosen for a subscription-only model - which I personally think is the fairest solution.

path: 0 123287 123352 125022, hotness: undefined, score: 33, children: 5
Pelicanen 11 points 3 years ago

I agree that it's difficult, although the whole point of having a federated platform is that no single node would have to host exabytes themselves but each instance could host a certain amount of videos that are relevant to its topic. This of course comes with other downsides but I don't think there's ever going to be a perfect solution.

path: 0 123287 123352 125022 125628, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 4
Beefalo 3 points 3 years ago

Storage is cheap but at scale the bandwidth requirements are too much for hobbyists to handle

path: 0 123287 123352 125022 125628 145285, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
veaviticus 2 points 3 years ago

That has the same problem as any federated service like Lemmy... all that content only exists at the whims of whomever is willing to run the server and foot that bill. If they decide to delete their server, or just screw up and it dies... all that is gone.

We're basically relying on thousands of individuals to be good quality sysadmins and infosec engineers, all for free.

I guess we could move to a mirroring/caching concept so that no single node contains the only copy of loads of data, but then we're duplicating huge quantities of data.

Like even today with Lemmy, there's now thousands of instances stood up and I bet 2/3 of those will be dead within 6 months. So all those posts and comments that get made on those nodes will just go poof... which might be fine for a chat system, but for forums and microblogging (mastodon) that seems terrible

path: 0 123287 123352 125022 125628 134621, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
Hyperslob 21 points 3 years ago

I'm enjoying the lemmy.world experience, and I believe decentralised social networking could be the future. I am a refugee from Reddit and hopeful there is hope for a open, community focused platform.

As for this platform, I am apprehensive about somebody running the server I have my account with having the power to remove my account and my posts, but I guess this is true of any network in existence.

My concern in the long run is who pays for the hardware and energy costs even if it is federated. Without some kind of reliable funding model who will pay the bills?

Hopeful for many enjoyable encounters in the Fediverse.

path: 0 143627, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 3
tias 10 points 3 years ago

It's no different from using an email provider. Just get one that you trust will stay a while. But there are no guarantees. Google could kill off GMail tomorrow.

path: 0 143627 146036, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
Phileosopher 9 points 3 years ago

You'll always have to rely on someone else, unless you build the thing yourself.

The beauty of the fediverse concept is that it's about as easy as possible to build it yourself.

The cost of running a host is a matter of economical management:

  • It costs almost nil to run text-based content.
  • Images take a bit of memory and bandwidth, but are even manageable with an old cellphone under a set number of users.
  • Videos are a major drag, and very expensive unless you're embedding them.

Most open-source is funded as passion projects by devoted geeks who typically already make a living doing other computer things anyway, and fediverse is a bit of the same.

path: 0 143627 158303, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Veni_Vidic_Vici 3 points 3 years ago

I agree. I think there are moderstion logs though which is a good step towards transparency, I think there should be admin logs too for the same.

As for the running costs, I hope there is a more transparent system rather than running it for profit and selling it to corporations.

path: 0 143627 143956, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
WhoRoger 20 points 3 years ago

Wasn't web3 about everything being under control of a handful of mega corps that own everything? So more like web4 then.

path: 0 122316, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 7
Quentinp 16 points 3 years ago

Web 3 2.0

path: 0 122316 124598, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 4
kat 13 points 3 years ago

The USB naming strategy

path: 0 122316 124598 134352, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 1
niisyth 5 points 3 years ago

No no, web 1 is now web 3.0 Web 2 is web 3.0 gen 2 And web 3 will be web 3.0 gen 3

Now we await, web 3.0 2x2

path: 0 122316 124598 134352 146861, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
briongloid 11 points 3 years ago

Electric Boogaloo.

path: 0 122316 124598 125149, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
BrokenToshy 6 points 3 years ago

Web 3: Ah Shit here we go again

path: 0 122316 124598 125149 125263, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
BlinkerFluid 10 points 3 years ago

and a looooot of shady crypto shit.

"The dark side" of crypto.

Meme coins.

path: 0 122316 122760, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
taj 5 points 3 years ago

Ugh. I hate the crypto bs.

path: 0 122316 122760 128026, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Amby 19 points 3 years ago

The crypto side of web3 definitely felt way more "consumerist minded" with the way wallets were able to connect to multiple websites(exchanges) in order to "buy" things(alt/shitcoins). But federated social media feels like a much better use of decentralization so far.

path: 0 102614, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 0
D3F4U1T_ARS 18 points 3 years ago

Yeah I feel the same too. And I think decentralization is the only way to web3.

Distributed networks are very very complex to make. But decentralized networks have the simplicity and features of centralized networks with the addition of freedom that distributed networks give.

The best of both worlds really.

path: 0 135591, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0
ndr 17 points 3 years ago

I do not like using Web3 to refer to federated platforms. Indeed, Web3 is strongly associated with blockchains, cryptocurrencies and NFTs.

path: 0 107316, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 7
wheels 12 points 3 years ago

To me Web3 meant federated or p2p stuff, like Secure Scuttlebutt, way before cryptocurrency and NFTs stole the term. I think we should steal it back rather than stop using it!

path: 0 107316 110816, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
totallynotsocsa 8 points 3 years ago

Web3 has been a pretty big disappointment in that case.

Lemmy is like web 1.5 with threads. Threads which still actually need a lot of work, I might add.

path: 0 107316 110260, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
marksson 4 points 3 years ago

As much as I'm interested in crypto I hate the bizarre idea of nfts. I'm glad they all but died out already.

path: 0 107316 108141, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 4
ndr 6 points 3 years ago

I still have to come across one situation in which NFTs would be better than what we currently use.

path: 0 107316 108141 108178, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 3
purplepony 8 points 3 years ago

If the data was actually stored in the blockchain, then it would have some chance of being valuable, but every NFT, except I believe Bitcoin's newest, just stores a link in the chain which links to the image or whatever. As long as that's the standard it's not going to see use by anyone but scammers.

path: 0 107316 108141 108178 110258, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 2
Mimo 2 points 3 years ago

While I wouldn't say it would make things like drawings of monkeys with different backgrounds valuable at the very least it would have made them truly decentralized instead of these [random-blockchain-company]-dependent and ICANN-dependent scams

path: 0 107316 108141 108178 110258 123762, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
_number8_ 16 points 3 years ago

yeah, i love this new paradigm. i don't understand it but i hope it'll lead to a better experience with cool usability features later on. hopefully a good buffer against evil & suits & etc

i love how post URLs have numbers now. you can get dubs and trips!

path: 0 106123, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
CannaVet 16 points 3 years ago
path: 0 128839, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
Jummit 16 points 3 years ago path: 0 130794, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
BCas 13 points 3 years ago

I think we as users defining the future of the web would be a great outcome. Here's to the start of a long project.

path: 0 101872, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
eskimofry 11 points 3 years ago

Yeah, Corporate went off the deep end sniffing coke.

path: 0 139329, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
21trillionsats 11 points 3 years ago

I mean I definitely agree that this feels great, but decentralization and federation is what pure Bitcoin and crypto are all about. In many ways this community reminds me of the good vibes and great minds the early days of cryptocurrency discovery encouraged. This predated some of the corruption, VCs, and crypto bros that came around in 2013 during the first boom.

I still think that early soul of empowerment and community is there in Bitcoin itself but you gotta dig a little deeper to find it. I expect Lemmy will also “commercialize” to some extent in coming years, but it’ll always be better than Reddit and other centralized platforms that want to feature gate and censor unfairly.

path: 0 155633, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 3
darkmugglet 9 points 3 years ago

I think the crux of what you are saying is that decentralized is a means to create a community. Most of us here want the idea to succeed and are putting in the effort, much like early crypto. Where both Reddit and Crypto failed is when commercial interest took hold. And to your point as long as Lemmy remains commerically disinterting, it will be a true community.

But, because of the decentralized nature, even if a commercial interest takes hold, it will be on individual servers. I can see the NBA or the Olympics or niche topics having their own servers -- and I would argue that is a good thing for those interested to host. The value is that you can have both the astro turfed along side the organic with competing interests in the "why."

path: 0 155633 156811, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 2
MaryAnna 3 points 3 years ago

I like that idea. The corps and sellouts get their own place, the underground has theirs, normies, weebs, etc. Everyone actually gets a place and unlike Reddit, they can't really encroach on one another.

path: 0 155633 156811 176059, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
21trillionsats 1 point 3 years ago

Yeah I definitely agree -- you summarized my feelings nicely.

I would also add that as exciting concepts/technologies grow and commercialize they tend to become more subject to noise and self-interest interfering with some of their higher order "platonic" (ideal) forms. I fundamentally think that the more federated/decentralized a service can be, the better its original purpose and perfect form can be maintained. Practically I do think it's challenging for both currency and link aggregation to be properly decentralized, but I think both Bitcoin and Lemmy are inherently beautiful implementations if you strip them down to their core.

path: 0 155633 156811 179354, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
lanolinoil 11 points 3 years ago

How do you use mastodon or even Twitter for that matter? I've been active on Reddit for a decade plus, but any time I try to tweet or toot it just goes nowhere to no one and I quickly lose interest. How do you get started with this stuff?

path: 0 127758, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 3
tmyakal 14 points 3 years ago

Find a few dozen people you like and start responding to their posts. Other people will see them and reply to them, and you can build up a network of people you interact with socially.

It's not quick, but the patience helps to filter down to just the people you actually trust and want to interact with.

path: 0 127758 128101, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 1
LevelUp 11 points 3 years ago

In addition to this on mastodon (and *key instances) you can use hashtags can be used to follow and join in on topics you wish to post about. I find that people on the fediverse tend to be a lot more responsive when you talk to them in regards to something they have posted.

path: 0 127758 128101 130415, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
taj 2 points 3 years ago

So, they're not more short form vs long form if that makes sense. And, you need people to directly follow you to be 'heard'. Unless you're directly replying to someone else.

path: 0 127758 128007, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
sparky 10 points 3 years ago

Ditto for this, I can see the fediverse being the true Web 3.0! Love the freedom, flexibility and that kind of pioneering spirit I get by being an early adopter of what could be a new paradigm. Which is I guess an old paradigm, because we've kind of gone full circle to like, BBS and e-mail.

On the other hand I guess the ability to scam sell worthless monkey jpegs to greasy bros was kind of an amusing capability of the old web 3.0

path: 0 118264, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
MrsMouse 9 points 3 years ago

@kiriakos or skipped 3 and went right to web 4.0

path: 0 150072, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
UnusedEngine 8 points 3 years ago

Wishfully thinking, but, I hope companies follow this

path: 0 101144, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 10
matt 15 points 3 years ago
path: 0 101144 101988, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 9
kiriakos 14 points 3 years ago

That's fine, as long as no instance gets like 99% of the userbase and we are back to square one

path: 0 101144 101988 102230, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 8
sanguinepar 10 points 3 years ago

That's my concern - that some company buys up some of the most popular instances, then "encourages" their members to concentrate on just one instance, builds up the number of communities on it until it becomes totally dominant and then cuts out all the other instances.

Not that the others couldn't just continue, obviously, but if they're starved of users they'll be starved of content too and the gravitational pull of the big one(s) might drive the small ones into obscurity or closure.

BRB, got a business idea...

path: 0 101144 101988 102230 102560, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 7
wildbus8979 9 points 3 years ago

That's exactly what Apple, Google, and Facebook did to XMPP. They all started with a federated open protocol messaging system. At first iChat users could talk to GChat, and Messenger users, as well as users of thousands of other servers. After they built their network they closed off federation under the guise of "feature development".

To this day, iMessage still uses an XMPP based backend. But green text is for Apple users only!

path: 0 101144 101988 102230 102560 106787, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
blackstampede 5 points 3 years ago

Might seem naive, but I actually have a hard time imagining this. There's just not a lot to make one instance more desirable than another, which seems like a bad thing, but I don't think it is. I decided against signing up on lemmy.ml because it was laggy, so I went with a smaller instance- all the same content, but without the lag. If a lot of content gets created on one instance, there's no pressure to pile in, because you can view, comment and interact from a different, smaller instance.

path: 0 101144 101988 102230 102560 105119, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 3
Obi 2 points 3 years ago

I hear you but I'd like to think the federated nature is too complex and spread out for one entity to take it all. That might be wishful thinking though.

path: 0 101144 101988 102230 102560 104578, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
gawdahm 7 points 3 years ago

I don't know, it just feels like a fancier web 1.0 where things were less centralised (personal websites, forums etc).

path: 0 192455, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
BeldarWadsworth 6 points 3 years ago

Does that mean email is web3 😳

path: 0 115224, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
coderofhonor 14 points 3 years ago

Web 1: Decentralized everything

Web 2: Centralized everything

Web 3: Decentralized everything?

path: 0 115224 117837, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
XTL 9 points 3 years ago

Email is internet, but not Web.

(Actually email is older than internet as well)

path: 0 115224 120793, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
phillycodehound 5 points 3 years ago

I concur. I was thinking the same thing!

path: 0 130074, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
thisfro 5 points 3 years ago

I was literally thinking this like an hour ago! Feels like a small revolution that hopefully keeps its momentum and transforms more of the web.

path: 0 104423, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Squibbles 5 points 3 years ago

Fingers crossed.

path: 0 100848, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
CannaVet 4 points 3 years ago

I've been arguing for more decentralization for a long time now and have been shifting as much of my usage to self hosted services as possible over the past few years. I'm glad to see others picking up the cause. <3

path: 0 128935, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Hypersapien 4 points 3 years ago

Where's the Fediverse alternative to Facebook?

path: 0 110159, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
Clbull 9 points 3 years ago

I think it's existed for over a decade and is called Diaspora.

path: 0 110159 110265, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
c0mbatbag3l 2 points 3 years ago

That's actually a really cool name, fitting too.

path: 0 110159 110265 118788, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
sam 3 points 3 years ago

I prefer web 2.5

path: 0 125421, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
nattekrant 4 points 3 years ago

Web -"scrap that and start over again."

path: 0 125421 127898, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Amby 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 103571, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
hugz -1 points 3 years ago

Good as dead then.

path: 0 186828, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 1
jcb2016_ 5 points 3 years ago

@hugz @kiriakos
What do you mean as good as dead. I lf you haven't noticed committed are popping up left and right. Give it sometime and the fedeverse will supass Reddit. It just doesn't look like it right now

path: 0 186828 186993, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
problematicconsumer -2 points 3 years ago

I think you don't understand value proposition of web 3. Aside from financial applications, web 3(if realized properly) gives you certainty and even a better ux. Imagine you have a single account, secured and truly decentralized (no one will be able to delete or manipulate your account) you can easily signup in any web 3 site/app and start using it, ideally you content, data or whatever You're generating in this platform is stored on a Blockchain, immutable for ever. No one can censor you! You don't have to trust goodwill of anyone, everything will just work!

path: 0 124057, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 12
sotolf 4 points 3 years ago

I don't think no censoring is a good thing, opens for a LOT of harassment.

path: 0 124057 130978, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 8
problematicconsumer 1 point 3 years ago

I totally get your point. but I feel like thinking that censoring is OK comes from the fact that most of people here have not ever experienced authoritarian regimes or been on the other side(getting censored) In a web 3 platform your content is always there but it doesn't mean that we all can see it! You can opt-in to use some kind of moderated ui that only shows appropriate content. Isn't this the same? No cause I'm free to express myself and people willing can follow my thoughts and if you find it inappropriate you're also free to ignore me. If you're interested I can share examples of these censorships that leads to people getting killed

Edit: grammar

path: 0 124057 130978 133467, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 7
sotolf 3 points 3 years ago

There is a huge difference between moderation of posts on a platform and an authoritarian regime.... That's a long stretch, having a platform deleting something you posted that doesn't fit in, or is hatefull is something completely different from having an authoritarian regime going against you, if you have an authoritan regime then having something on a blockchain that can't be deleted is an extremely bad idea as well, that's another problem with that that I didn't see before, so thanks for that at least.

path: 0 124057 130978 133467 133978, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 5
problematicconsumer 0 points 3 years ago

That's not a stretch. Let me give you a recent example. In past few months people in Iran started protesting against regime(it's mostly known as Woman Life Freedom, you can search for it online) To begin with there's no such thing as free internet in Iran but people are used to ways to circumvent it(Proxy/VPN) but guess what? Instagram the most popular social media in iran decides that videos from the protests where actual people are getting shot on the street is "violent" and "harmful" and decides to remove them(not just shootings, even those where people were simply chanting)! How the hell are people supposed to tell the world what's going on there? It's not just Instagram it's almost all of these social media(which Iranian people don't really know of or use) How would web 3 solve this? Of course it's not magical and it's not going to solve this completely but at least these people would have chance to share what's going on There are hundreds of such events year Also blockchain is pseudonymous and isn't necessarily tied to a person may I ask what's your problem with web 3? What makes you hate it so much?

path: 0 124057 130978 133467 133978 134413, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 4
argv_minus_one 3 points 3 years ago

My brother in bucatini, we're going to get an authoritarian regime if right-wing misinformation is allowed to spread unchecked!

path: 0 124057 130978 133467 134264, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
CuriousOtter 4 points 3 years ago

I've dreamed for years about a decentralized single sign-in method. Some of the worst security issues derive from using passwords, usernames, emails, etc. Two factor authentication is ultimately just a band-aid fix for now. I truly think the killer usecase of web3 will be the ux. I'm glad that there's someone else that shares this conviction.

While signing up for Lemmy, I found myself wishing for a web3 sign-in method. Federation is great, but there are so many servers and to have an account on each would be silly. Instead of crossing the server boundary on an account from your home server, why not just have a native account on each, connected by your decentralized web3 sign-in.

path: 0 124057 143007, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
problematicconsumer 1 point 3 years ago

Exactly! Fortunately there are some great devs working on generalized web 3 sign in(like SpruceID) and we have some experiments with blockchain based social media(like Lens protocol) These are by no means perfect but can paint a picture of what's actually possible if we were to differenciate some bad actors using this new technology to scam people from actual underlying tech

path: 0 124057 143007 145404, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
problematicconsumer 1 point 3 years ago

Down votes as expected, would appreciate some actual reasoning from anyone against what I've said

path: 0 124057 127079, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
sunspider -3 points 3 years ago

Hey! This post is not specifically related to the lemmy.world instance. From now on, posts such as these will be removed, in order for the community to stay on topic. However, as this is a highly upvoted post, I'll just lock it for now.

path: 0 223405, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 0
ChaosAD -3 points 3 years ago path: 0 135767, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 3
almeida_alvaro 1 point 3 years ago

Os pings são tão diferentes aqui. meio estranho.

path: 0 135767 175468, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
ChaosAD 3 points 3 years ago

Pq? como apareceu?

path: 0 135767 175468 175830, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
almeida_alvaro 2 points 3 years ago

Aparecia como notificação, mas quando eu clicava na notificação não aparecia.

Só apareceu depois de eu mandar mostrar todas as notificações e não só as não lidas.

Mas ele ainda contava como não lida no simbolo.

path: 0 135767 175468 175830 180298, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
TinfoilBeanieTech -9 points 3 years ago

Proof of Stake will keep actual resource costs maintainable, and Blockchain does do some cool stuff for decentralization, and therefore federation. Right now Lemmy instances are tied to DNS. Hopefully in the future they will be tied to cryptographic assets. Distributed Autonomous Organizations are a great example of the potential.

path: 0 106255, hotness: undefined, score: -9, children: 7
Faendol 12 points 3 years ago

What advantage would switching to crypto have? I'm not well versed in how Lemmy works yet but I don't see why Lemmy would need blockchain.

path: 0 106255 106321, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 4
NorfolkingChance 17 points 3 years ago

Because Crypto desperately needs new fodder for the bottom of the pyramid

path: 0 106255 106321 110936, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
democracy1984 11 points 3 years ago

Blockchain is basically a write only database. It's great for stuff like financial transactions, but it's not really necessary for something like Lemmy.

path: 0 106255 106321 108665, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
phr0g -1 points 3 years ago

Blockchain/proof of work is indeed not necessary, but identities should not be bound to instances. That's the thing #nostr gets right and the #fediverse doesn't.

path: 0 106255 106321 125105, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 1
EscapeBigTech 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 106255 106321 125105 174541, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
c0mbatbag3l 6 points 3 years ago

What possible reason would Lemmy need the Blockchain for that makes you hopeful they'll adopt it?

path: 0 106255 119027, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
nodsocket 2 points 3 years ago
path: 0 106255 120054, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
lemmyworld
lemmyworld

@lemmy.world

login for more options
31478
771
649

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations 💗

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

go to feed...