I wonder if there exists people who aggressively believe mushrooms are plants, similar to people who defend Pluto as a planet.

2 years ago by ByteOnBikes to c/showerthoughts

It was only in 1969 (nice) that fungi officially became its own separate kingdom.

lord_ryvan 81 points 2 years ago

I overheard someone talking about veganism and said they only eat plants. I asked them about mushrooms, “of course it's fine, those are plants”.
No amount of convincing worked.

So I've seen it once.

path: 0 12735975, hotness: undefined, score: 81, children: 18
ShaggyBlarney 69 points 2 years ago

Mushrooms are plants in the culinary sense. Like strawberries, blackberries and raspberries are berries in the culinary sense.

path: 0 12735975 12736628, hotness: undefined, score: 69, children: 5
kn33 51 points 2 years ago

Yup. Inside culinary classifications, fungi don't exist. Outside of culinary classifications, vegetables don't exist.

path: 0 12735975 12736628 12736806, hotness: undefined, score: 51, children: 0
lord_ryvan 13 points 2 years ago

Culinary definition doesn't differentiate plants, but mushrooms are vegetables.

path: 0 12735975 12736628 12741135, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
Klear 7 points 2 years ago

Separate culinary definitions? That's nuts!

path: 0 12735975 12736628 12742768, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2
sik0fewl 4 points 2 years ago

But not peanuts, which are legumes.

path: 0 12735975 12736628 12742768 12754410, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
EtherWhack 1 point 2 years ago

Or the stone fruit, coconuts.

path: 0 12735975 12736628 12742768 12754410 12756119, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
dustyData 10 points 2 years ago

If anything is close to having a consciousness and experiencing an array of emotion, including suffering. That's a mushroom, much more than a plant.

path: 0 12735975 12736011, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 11
SatyrSack 13 points 2 years ago

The mycelium, maybe. That is definitely not the part of the mushroom that you eat.

path: 0 12735975 12736011 12736967, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 2
shneancy 1 point 2 years ago

so hang on, mushrooms are like uh, well not milk, but as if say a cow regrew its meat every season? or maybe like a lizard that regrows its tail?

mushrooms are weird, man

wild idea, would it be possible to hijack mycelium with animal DNA and make it grow mushroom shaped meat??

path: 0 12735975 12736011 12736967 12745927, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
frezik 2 points 2 years ago

Notch funds a real life Mooshroim when?

path: 0 12735975 12736011 12736967 12745927 12746799, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
JackGreenEarth 9 points 2 years ago

Actual animals are far more likely to feel pain that fungi. Do fungi even have a nervous system?

path: 0 12735975 12736011 12736184, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 3
muntedcrocodile 17 points 2 years ago

Fungi are a nervous system.

path: 0 12735975 12736011 12736184 12736865, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
dustyData 8 points 2 years ago

We actually suspect they do. They can also display intelligent behavior, from a certain definition of the concept.

path: 0 12735975 12736011 12736184 12736844, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
AlexanderESmith 4 points 2 years ago path: 0 12735975 12736011 12736184 12736769, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
sunzu2 -8 points 2 years ago
path: 0 12735975 12736011 12736196, hotness: undefined, score: -8, children: 3
teft 19 points 2 years ago

So are chickpeas or edamame meat to you? Because they have like 5 times as much protein by weight than mushrooms.

path: 0 12735975 12736011 12736196 12736369, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 1
sunzu2 -10 points 2 years ago
path: 0 12735975 12736011 12736196 12736369 12736422, hotness: undefined, score: -10, children: 0
protist 10 points 2 years ago

Mushrooms have some protein, but not very much. They aren't a very good source of protein

path: 0 12735975 12736011 12736196 12736603, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
Greg 80 points 2 years ago

Pluto is a mushroom

path: 0 12737555, hotness: undefined, score: 80, children: 6
Soup 24 points 2 years ago

No, Pluto is a plant.

path: 0 12737555 12738888, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 5
TranquilTurbulence 21 points 2 years ago path: 0 12737555 12738888 12739919, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 3
Soup 8 points 2 years ago

Is he though? He’s anthropomorphic, speaks clear English, and owns a dog.

Pluto is an animal-shaped person.

Wait no that’s Goofy. Pluto is an animal owned by an animal-shaped person!

path: 0 12737555 12738888 12739919 12739953, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 2
Klear 8 points 2 years ago

Ya done goofed!

path: 0 12737555 12738888 12739919 12739953 12742777, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
Draconic_NEO 1 point 2 years ago

Question is, if they are a plant, who are they in league with?

path: 0 12737555 12738888 12791832, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
qjkxbmwvz 50 points 2 years ago

I think an issue here is that taxonomic and colloquial definitions don't always agree.

Spiders are colloquially bugs, but they're not taxonomically "true bugs" (which is itself a colloquialism for Hemiptera). Tomatos are colloquially vegetables but taxonomically fruits...but afaik vegetable is a purely colloquial term anyway.

And as someone else in the thread mentioned, colloquial berries are not always taxonomic berries.

So...colloquially, "plants" sorta means, "macroscopic multicellular living non-animal thing," but taxonomically it's something else.

path: 0 12739557, hotness: undefined, score: 50, children: 14
Aeri 10 points 2 years ago

And literally anything is a fish if you try hard enough

path: 0 12739557 12747758, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 2
Silentiea 2 points 2 years ago

I mean, probably not bacteria or viruses.

path: 0 12739557 12747758 12756442, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Donebrach 1 point 2 years ago

Any vertebrate at least. A boney fish what likes a-bonin’

path: 0 12739557 12747758 12786372, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
TranquilTurbulence 7 points 2 years ago

Similarly, “a planet” can be understood in technical or colloquial context which changes the meaning. It can have a specific meaning or a vague flexible meaning, just like with berries.

BTW raspberries are my favorite berries… sort of. Watermelons are pretty good too.

path: 0 12739557 12740030, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 5
idiomaddict 5 points 2 years ago

I like bananas

path: 0 12739557 12740030 12742709, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
CheeseNoodle 3 points 2 years ago

Actually planet doesn't have any hard set definition, we kind of just do it case by case because its damn near impossible to come up with a rigid definition that doesn't suddenly classify some planets as moons or some moons as planets or create weird situations in which an object can switch between the two.

path: 0 12739557 12740030 12752189, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
wanderer 4 points 2 years ago

The International Astronomical Union (IAU) defined in August 2006 that, in the Solar System, a planet is a celestial body that:

  1. is in orbit around the Sun,
  2. has sufficient mass to assume hydrostatic equilibrium (a nearly round shape), and
  3. has "cleared the neighbourhood" around its orbit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/...

path: 0 12739557 12740030 12752189 12753765, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
CheeseNoodle 5 points 2 years ago

And in that same article:

It has been argued that the definition is problematic because it depends on the location of the body: if a Mars-sized body were discovered in the inner Oort cloud, it would not have enough mass to clear out a neighbourhood that size and meet criterion 3. The requirement for hydrostatic equilibrium (criterion 2) is also universally treated loosely as simply a requirement for roundedness; Mercury is not actually in hydrostatic equilibrium, but is explicitly included by the IAU definition as a planet

path: 0 12739557 12740030 12752189 12753765 12756949, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
hedgehog 6 points 2 years ago

If you’re talking about tomatoes, the difference is the context, and it isn’t a choice between colloquial vs scientific taxonomy, but between culinary/nutritional vs botany/taxonomy (and). You can talk about either in a colloquial context or a formal context, though generally there isn’t much reason to talk about botany in a colloquial setting.

From a nutritional perspective, mushrooms are generally considered vegetables, too.

afaik vegetable is a purely colloquial term anyway.

I thought you were wrong but I looked it up and I appear to have been mistaken. It makes “tomatoes are fruits, not vegetables” sound nonsensical, as it implies that “vegetable” is a different taxonomical option, when really it’s just a word for objects with a particular collection of traits that are relevant in a different context. What we should he saying is “While tomatoes are not fruit in the food pyramid, taxonomically, they are.” Doesn’t really roll off the tongue, though. Maybe “Tomatoes are vegetables AND fruits!” would solve that?

path: 0 12739557 12740391, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
TeoTwawki 15 points 2 years ago

but what about berry club? which things count as berries now?

path: 0 12739557 12740391 12746330, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
TimewornTraveler 5 points 2 years ago

very well said

path: 0 12739557 12757159, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
intensely_human -2 points 2 years ago

I hate the word colloquial

path: 0 12739557 12753974, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 1
Nomecks 8 points 2 years ago

Colloquialism is the best word.

path: 0 12739557 12753974 12754092, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
TheLowestStone 37 points 2 years ago

Fuck you op. Mushrooms are plants, Pluto is a planet, and that's the truth from one edge of this flat Earth to the other.

disclaimer: this is a joke

path: 0 12736786, hotness: undefined, score: 37, children: 10
dharmacurious 12 points 2 years ago

Honestly? Flat earth? It's not even funny as a joke. That entire movement has been so incredibly detrimental, and dangerous. It has shattered families, and been an instruction manual for other conspiracy theorists. And the worst thing of all is that it makes actual, real facts about how the earth is in, in reality, a hollow shell with a breathable atmosphere in its inferior, come across as just as crazy as flat earth. How are we supposed to spread the truth of hollow earth when flat earthers are out there making us look crazy? Just because hollow earth also points out that the government is lying about the earth doesn't mean we're the same! People need to know about hollow earth! Otherwise, we'll never be able to heal the housing market by building condos inside the earth!

path: 0 12736786 12739379, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 5
idiomaddict 4 points 2 years ago

That’s how we get morlocks, though

path: 0 12736786 12739379 12742627, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 3
dharmacurious 2 points 2 years ago

Ugh. Morlock racism crops up yet again! The morlocks did nothing wrong

path: 0 12736786 12739379 12742627 12747614, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
TheLowestStone 2 points 2 years ago

I'll be running for President next cycle on a platform based around Morlock equality. Make America Morlock Again!

path: 0 12736786 12739379 12742627 12747614 12750461, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
TeoTwawki 1 point 2 years ago

flat earthers are weird. the earth is obviously bowl shaped or the oceans would fall off. and cats would knock everything else off, thats just common sense!

path: 0 12736786 12739379 12746411, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Illuminostro 6 points 2 years ago
path: 0 12736786 12737260, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
dharmacurious 2 points 2 years ago

Honestly? Flat earth? It's not even funny as a joke. That entire movement has been so incredibly detrimental, and dangerous. It has shattered families, and been an instruction manual for other conspiracy theorists. And the worst thing of all is that it makes actual, real facts about how the earth is in, in reality, a hollow shell with a breathable atmosphere in its inferior, come across as just as crazy as flat earth. How are we supposed to spread the truth of hollow earth when flat earthers are out there making us look crazy? Just because hollow earth also points out that the government is lying about the earth doesn't mean we're the same! People need to know about hollow earth! Otherwise, we'll never be able to heal the housing market by building condos inside the earth!

path: 0 12736786 12739359, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
intensely_human 1 point 2 years ago

What’s the worst that could happen if you didn’t put in that disclaimer?

path: 0 12736786 12754044, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
TheLowestStone 1 point 2 years ago

Annoying messages.

path: 0 12736786 12754044 12755985, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Kolanaki 32 points 2 years ago

It's not a plant or an animal, but a secret third thing.

path: 0 12740093, hotness: undefined, score: 32, children: 6
Draconic_NEO 11 points 2 years ago

They're fungi fun guys.

path: 0 12740093 12740506, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
EtherWhack 2 points 2 years ago

Plants are closer to humans than the mushrooms.

path: 0 12740093 12756011, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
BalooWasWahoo 1 point 2 years ago path: 0 12740093 12756011 12756227, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
EtherWhack 2 points 2 years ago

That's just the explanation of eukarya which lists animalia within the same super-group as fungi and plants being in a different one altogether. Any relationship with plants to humans (which are within animalia) or mushrooms could be a bit subjective.

Yes, fungi are closer to humans than plants. If you look at the reproductive cycle of all three though, plants have a closer amount of "sexes" to humans. Plants generally having "1" or 2 sexes; humans having 2. Fungi though...

path: 0 12740093 12756011 12756227 12756883, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
LordGimp 0 points 2 years ago

Scratch that. Reverse it. And on we go

path: 0 12740093 12756011 12756652, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
rothaine 1 point 2 years ago

Mushrooms are actually aliens

path: 0 12740093 12767039, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
rockerface 22 points 2 years ago

If Pluto is a planet, then Ceres is a planet too. CERES RIGHTS!

path: 0 12738877, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 11
Draconic_NEO 10 points 2 years ago

Let's just acknowledge that anything big enough to be round is a planet. That's the bare minimum criteria.

Orbit shapes and clear paths don't matter, the Solar system isn't a typical stellar system, many aren't so stable and ordered, especially in binary and triplet star systems. So the pedantry around the shapes of the orbits of the outer kuiper planets is a very silly thing to argue about. After all most orbits in binary and triplet systems aren't even predictable long term, let alone not circular.

path: 0 12738877 12740591, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 9
rockerface 8 points 2 years ago

So that makes Earth and Moon a binary planet system. I'm cool with that

path: 0 12738877 12740591 12740677, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 6
deadbeef79000 5 points 2 years ago

I believe the rule of thumb is binary planets' barycentre is external to either body. This is the case with Pluto/Charon, I think it's also the case with Earth/Moon.

path: 0 12738877 12740591 12740677 12741379, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 5
SkyeStarfall 9 points 2 years ago

It is not the case with the earth and the moon. It would be if the moon was 40% more massive

path: 0 12738877 12740591 12740677 12741379 12742909, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 3
leftzero 1 point 2 years ago

That's a good rule of thumb... but it's probably not enough; no reasonable definition would call Jupiter a star, or even a brown dwarf, or the Solar System a binary system, yet the Sol - Jupiter barycentre is outside the sun... (the whole system's barycentre is sometimes inside the sun, but that's due to Saturn's, Uranus', and Neptune's pulls cancelling Jupiter's).

I'd call the barycentre thing a necessary but not sufficient requirement; a proper definition of double planet should probably also take into account other factors like the relative mass and density of the bodies, and their minimum and maximum distance.

path: 0 12738877 12740591 12740677 12741379 12755254, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Klear 2 points 2 years ago

OK, can you name all planets in the solar system?

path: 0 12738877 12740591 12742786, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 5 points 2 years ago

Sure. Jeff, Darryl, Norma, Luanne, I got lotsa names.

path: 0 12738877 12740591 12742786 12747625, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
ours 4 points 2 years ago

Remember the Cant!

path: 0 12738877 12746033, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
0ops 21 points 2 years ago

I've met people who were certain that bugs weren't animals

path: 0 12746621, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 7
AbsoluteChicagoDog 21 points 2 years ago
path: 0 12746621 12747819, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 4
Mubelotix 8 points 2 years ago

Interestingly people who don't understand they are animals are the least human

path: 0 12746621 12747819 12747897, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
Silentiea 2 points 2 years ago

I've met a lot more people who think people aren't animals than people who think bugs aren't.

path: 0 12746621 12747819 12756429, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
DragonTypeWyvern -1 points 2 years ago

I'd like to see your statistical records.

path: 0 12746621 12747819 12756429 12764995, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 1
Silentiea 5 points 2 years ago

Left them in my other pants, unfortunately.

path: 0 12746621 12747819 12756429 12764995 12765108, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
TimewornTraveler 0 points 2 years ago

like everything else in this thread, doesn't it depend on the context? like I'm willing to bet that if you polled a ton of people to "draw an animal" the overwhelming majority would draw vertebrates

path: 0 12746621 12757193, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
Maalus 5 points 2 years ago

That doesn't mean that the animals they don't draw aren't animals

path: 0 12746621 12757193 12757285, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
hddsx 21 points 2 years ago

Thanks plants vs zombies 😡😡

path: 0 12740573, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 0
hedgehog 20 points 2 years ago path: 0 12740057, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 4
GrammarPolice -16 points 2 years ago

I mean Pluto IS a planet i guess what people mean when they say pluto is not a planet is that it is no longer part of our solar system

path: 0 12740057 12743331, hotness: undefined, score: -16, children: 3
andxz 12 points 2 years ago

No, that's just you. I'm genuinely curious why you'd think anyone would ever make the argument Pluto isn't part of our solar system.

path: 0 12740057 12743331 12745500, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
ripcord 6 points 2 years ago

No, they don't.

path: 0 12740057 12743331 12743542, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
EtherWhack 1 point 2 years ago path: 0 12740057 12743331 12756176, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
WoahWoah 15 points 2 years ago

Watermelons are berries. Strawberries are not.

path: 0 12754446, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 2
AeonFelis 4 points 2 years ago

They are not made of straw, either.

path: 0 12754446 12758045, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
CileTheSane 2 points 2 years ago

Tomatoes are a fruit.

path: 0 12754446 12765863, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Illuminostro 14 points 2 years ago
path: 0 12737239, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
sik0fewl 14 points 2 years ago

The definition of planet is completely subjective, whereas the definition of mushroom is based on science and evolution.

path: 0 12754449, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 3
Lennny 12 points 2 years ago

path: 0 12754449 12754710, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
klisurovi4 3 points 2 years ago

Some people believe the earth is flat, I don't think whether the definition is scientific or not matters much lmao

path: 0 12754449 12757882, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Draconic_NEO 1 point 2 years ago

Planet used to mean wandering star, referring to 'stars' that didn't stay in one place but moved around with the days, months, years, or centuries. Obviously not a useful definition these days, I consider a planet a rocky body big enough that it's gravity makes it almost perfectly round.

path: 0 12754449 12791822, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
SauceBossSmokin 13 points 2 years ago

From what I've seen, dudes that care that much about mushrooms are really fun guys.

path: 0 12736536, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
MelodiousFunk 9 points 2 years ago

...this would trigger a friend of mine so badly (fungi enthusiast and Pluto stan). I want to send it, but at the same time... I'm not sure I'd hear the end of it.

path: 0 12736962, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
atrielienz 8 points 2 years ago

Send it and report back. I am interested in subscribing to their newsletter. You'll let them know, right?

path: 0 12736962 12738143, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
Warjac 9 points 2 years ago

I think OP is on mushrooms.

path: 0 12753384, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Treczoks 8 points 2 years ago

Fun fact: mushrooms are closer to the animal kingdom than to the plant kingdom.

path: 0 12736832, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 4
linearchaos 10 points 2 years ago

Yeah but we're not eating the whole thing we're just eating its sex organ

path: 0 12736832 12738112, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 3
lurch 4 points 2 years ago

Except, in cheese and some sausages. Also, I'm not sure yeast counts, because it's usually dead by the time we eat it in our food.

path: 0 12736832 12738112 12738317, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
Contramuffin 5 points 2 years ago

not sure yeast counts because it's usually dead

As long as the organism is dead, we're not eating it? Time to have some steak then, surely that's not a cow!

path: 0 12736832 12738112 12738317 12739812, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
lurch 2 points 2 years ago

lol, yeah, but when baking, the yeast gets destroyed pretty bad. i didn't dare call it yeast at that point, but maybe you're right.

path: 0 12736832 12738112 12738317 12739812 12740165, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
muntedcrocodile 7 points 2 years ago

Well they use chitin not celulose for structure so definatly closer to animals than plants.

path: 0 12736884, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
Today 6 points 2 years ago

I have family in Streator, IL, home of Clyde Tombaugh, so we're die hard planet pluto.

path: 0 12736106, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
youngalfred 6 points 2 years ago

Similarly plate tectonics - not fully recognised until the 60s apparently.

path: 0 12736648, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
AlexanderESmith 5 points 2 years ago

I mean both classifications are arbitrary and made up, so defense of either side is equally valid (even if only because they're also equally invalid).

We don't even have a solid definition of what constitutes "life", or "consciousness", because we can't agree on what should be included, or how various aspects are defined.

In the end, words are just symbols or sounds that we try to - as consistently as possible - associate with ideas, but it's all made up.

path: 0 12736720, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 5
Contramuffin 4 points 2 years ago

That sounds scientifically incorrect. Mushrooms are closer to animals than they are to plants. They fundamentally do not resemble plants in any sense of the word, except maybe that they both grow in the ground.

path: 0 12736720 12739750, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 4
elephantium 1 point 2 years ago

Mushrooms are closer to animals than they are to plants

How? At first blush, this seems absurd.

Disclaimer, it's been a while since middle school biology class where we might have talked about this subject.

path: 0 12736720 12739750 12740703, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
Contramuffin 1 point 2 years ago

The things that we call mushrooms aren't the actual organism. That's just fruiting body of the organism, analogous to a flower in a plant. Picking the mushroom doesn't kill the organism, since the mushroom itself is really only a very small fraction of the entire organism. The actual organism is actually underground. The organism is large network Berg-like microorganisms that fused together into a complex system of "roots" called hyphae.

Hyphae do not photosynthesize like plants do, they eat things in the soil for their energy. They do not have a cellulose cell wall like plants do, their cell wall is made of chitin (the stuff that bugs use for their exoskeleton). Genetically, they are (very slightly) closer to animals than they are to plants. Morphologically, they resemble protists than anything else. Chronologically, they evolved significantly after plants evolved, and they evolved from a proto-animal lineage. In some species, the microorganisms that make up the hyphae can decide to unfuse and start living on their own (at that point, we call them yeasts). How and when they decide to fuse/unfuse is unknown and it's a fairly large area of research, especially since that transition is often associated with their ability to cause diseases (yeast infections).

Mushrooms are the closest things we have to aliens, and the fact that we just eat them and think nothing more of it is genuinely amusing to me

path: 0 12736720 12739750 12740703 12752647, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
elephantium 1 point 2 years ago

Interesting! So the part we pick is and eat is like a strawberry more than, say, lettuce.

Naively, it's easy to think: it grows in the ground, therefore, it's a plant. There's a lot more than meets the eye, though.

Mushrooms are the closest things we have to aliens

Star Trek: Let's figure out how to hook up the translator to Data so we can talk to them. Real life: Let's see whether they're tasty.

path: 0 12736720 12739750 12740703 12752647 12775715, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
AlexanderESmith 0 points 2 years ago

I'm not sure you meant to respond to my post. This response doesn't seem to address what I said.

path: 0 12736720 12739750 12754355, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
brown567 3 points 2 years ago

Pokemon

path: 0 12737095, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 2 points 2 years ago

All hail the Mushroom King!

path: 0 12747584, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
TheRealKuni 2 points 2 years ago

You can use mushrooms in Plants vs Zombies.

It isn’t called “Plants and Fungi vs Zombies.”

Ergo, mushrooms are plants.

Checkmate, atheists!

path: 0 12772080, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Melatonin 1 point 2 years ago
path: 0 12765610, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
ultranaut 1 point 2 years ago

Yes, I've encountered a few people like this. Also, no one has ever heard of Archaea.

path: 0 12736237, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
thenextguy 1 point 2 years ago

I've never even considered whether they're plants or not. I guess I always assumed they were, but now it makes sense that they're not. But I can't imagine anyone having a tizzy over it either way.

path: 0 12736690, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Melatonin 1 point 2 years ago
path: 0 12765333, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
showerthoughts
showerthoughts

@lemmy.world

login for more options
44046
4160
5739

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

go to feed...