What are some notable scams in history that went unnoticed for so long?

3 years ago by Bady to c/asklemmy

itsgroundhogdayagain 209 points 3 years ago

Religion

path: 0 2267861, hotness: undefined, score: 209, children: 22
bady 59 points 3 years ago

I am an atheist and I believe the world would be much better without religions. Having said that, I don't conisder it as a scam in itslef. Instead they must have been something evolved over the time due to our ignorance, fear and helplessness. The very same factors that still keep them going.

But hell yeah, people are exploited in the name of religion. I'm from India, one of the largest so called democracies, currently under the governance of a fascist hindutva party that thrives on polarizing people in the name of religion.

BTW I was actually looking for specific instances of scams carefully plotted by known people, companies or even countries instead of broad answers like religion.

path: 0 2267861 2268816, hotness: undefined, score: 59, children: 19
givesomefucks 28 points 3 years ago

Religion was needed, but at some point logic and critical thinking should have been enough.

The issue is the wealthiest benefit when the masses don't have the tools to use that. They want people who won't question rules and blindly follow them.

Humans are just animals, we're not born with those abilities, we need to be taught.

So we see education outright cut or forced to focus on rote memorization rather than the process to understand and figure shit out on our own.

We should be past religion as a species, but it's not automatic, we have to continually teach the next generation to think for themselves

path: 0 2267861 2268816 2269353, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 0
bitsplease 24 points 3 years ago

Having said that, I don’t conisder it as a scam in itslef

I think the more correct thing to say is that Organized Religion is a scam. There's absolutely nothing wrong with being religious (provided you don't force those views on others), but organized religion always winds up rotten at the top - and it's not surprising. Organized religion is one of the most powerful tools for controlling people, even if it wasn't (though it might have been) intended to be that way at the beginning. A king/president/dictator can threaten the lives of their subjects, but only a holy man can threaten their immortal soul (from the perspective of the devotee anyways).

path: 0 2267861 2268816 2279671, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 4
theshatterstone54 3 points 3 years ago

Now that's a take I completely stand behind and agree with. I couldn't have put it better myself. That said, some religions were not made with the intent of controlling others. I don't think Buddhism, Hinduism and Sikhism were made with the intent to control people. We can argue about Judaism, Christianity and Islam, as they were made for control by their founders, and what they intended for these movements after their deaths we do not know (or at least I don't, maybe someone out there does).

path: 0 2267861 2268816 2279671 2282693, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
bitsplease 7 points 3 years ago

Again - I'm not arguing necessarily that any of them started out that way, in fact - I'm willing to bet that very few (looking at you, Mormons) actually were. Most religion (in my humble opinion) just stems from folks trying to make sense of an unfathomable universe using what tools are available to them at the time. But once you have the religion, and you have holy men/women who have the ability to excersize some form of power over their flock, you'll inevitably find corrupt people flocking to those positions, as they do in every position of power. Then over time they'll carve out more power for themselves and more authority, find ways of extracting influence and power from their positions until soon you've got "holy men" living in palaces with the authority of kings.

It's just human nature for positions of power to eventually become corrupted to some degree, and positions of religious authority offer an unparalleled lever in which to move the masses, which only serves to make it more attractive to would-be tyrants

path: 0 2267861 2268816 2279671 2282693 2283186, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
richieadler 1 point 3 years ago

There’s absolutely nothing wrong with being religious (provided you don’t force those views on others)

Hum. That's like saying "there's nothing wrong with being convinced that 2+2=5". There's something intrinsically mistaken about it, and I don't think it's defensible.

path: 0 2267861 2268816 2279671 2595927, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
ewe 12 points 3 years ago

Just imagine what could have been done in the last 300 years if every dollar that was donated to churches went to some other cause, or back into the pockets of the masses. There is an immense amount of wealth that is trapped in the collective real estate, bank accounts, etc owned by churches. I'm not even talking about megachurches or the mormon's giant stack of cash, just mom'n'pop little parishes that are everywhere across the US.

If ALL that money was still kicking around in the economy and in the pockets of people to spend on real things, building real businesses, etc...we'd be way better off.

Always makes me sad when I visit my in-laws who live in a particularly bible thumpy area and you go and there are spots there where churches outnumber normal businesses. It seems like it's just a huge drain on the local economy devoting that much money into propping up churches of various kinds...

path: 0 2267861 2268816 2270360, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 7
colforge 11 points 3 years ago

There’s a church across the street from my home in a small rural town in Oklahoma. It sits completely empty except for about 90 minutes from 11:00 AM to 12:30 PM when about 6 cars pull up into the parking lot and maybe 15 people saunter in for Sunday service after ringing a loud bell announcing to the whole neighborhood. None of these attendees live in the neighborhood I might add.

There are literally dozens of other churches just like it throughout the town. It blows my mind that a religion that claims to be about spreading the love of their savior and saving as many people as possible from literal damnation would let a resource like that go unused. They could have volunteers there every day of the week helping to improve the community and help people in need but they couldn’t care less.

path: 0 2267861 2268816 2270360 2270672, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
applejacks -1 points 3 years ago

Churches do an immense amount of charity work and helping their communities.

path: 0 2267861 2268816 2270360 2276558, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 5
ewe 3 points 3 years ago

So do secular charities.

path: 0 2267861 2268816 2270360 2276558 2278624, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 4
kylua 4 points 3 years ago

Sometimes I mull over what state we'd be in as a society if instead of celebrating a man's deeds we had been celebrating nature and the environment that hosts us since the beginning.

I can't help but think there would be a lot less damage to the environment and less greed.

path: 0 2267861 2268816 2276365, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
ZodiacSF1969 1 point 3 years ago

BTW I was actually looking for specific instances of scams carefully plotted by known people, companies or even countries instead of broad answers like religion.

Lesson for next time, use the text part of your post to define what you are asking or are interested in hearing. Otherwise you get everyone giving glib answers that suck like the above.

BTW, I'm reading Smartest Guys In The Room, the book about Enron, you might be interested in looking up that company. They used very complex financial instruments to deceive shareholders and Wall Street and boost their stock price. Bunch of assholes, some of the shit they pulled was obscene.

path: 0 2267861 2268816 2288829, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
bady 1 point 3 years ago

Lesson for next time, use the text part of your post to define what you are asking or are interested in hearing.

Right, I should've seen it coming. But as long as the discussions are healthy, instead of mudslinging, I'm kind of okay with it.

path: 0 2267861 2268816 2288829 2295214, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
spiderman 1 point 3 years ago

thrives on polarizing people in the name of religion

things have been like this for a long time, irrespective of the parties. but this has been going too far for the past two decades, especially after the current prime minister started his period.

path: 0 2267861 2268816 2294136, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
bady 0 points 3 years ago

True that.

path: 0 2267861 2268816 2294136 2295163, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
lemonadebunny 1 point 3 years ago

Oh my god, isn't Christianity kinda a pyramid scheme?

path: 0 2267861 2351470, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
electrogamerman -2 points 3 years ago

I wanted to post this

path: 0 2267861 2280036, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
r0uphis 165 points 3 years ago

The American healthcare system.

path: 0 2271864, hotness: undefined, score: 165, children: 9
WtfEvenIsExistence 41 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2271864 2278736, hotness: undefined, score: 41, children: 5
Nezuh 3 points 3 years ago

What is the alternative to capitalism?

path: 0 2271864 2278736 2285582, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 4
OwenEverbinde 5 points 3 years ago

Depends on how you define capitalism.

According to the modern (very intentionally altered) definition of capitalism,

"a system allowing the exchange of goods and services for currency, where different skill sets can result in different compensation"

... everything, including the USSR [1][2] has been capitalism. And even most Marxists are pro-capitalists.

The definition above encompasses everything that ever was, and everything that ever will be. (And that's only a slight exaggeration)

Which -- just fyi -- makes the word one of the most useless words in the history of language.

If, however -- just hypothetically -- you wanted to have a productive dialogue with a self-described anti-capitalist, you would need to carry out the entire conversation pretending the word "capitalism" referred to something a hell of a lot more specific. A single mechanism within market society. A single kind of contractual relationship between worker and company.

Which is an exercise in imagination and in the algebraic concept of substitution that most people have a rather stubborn aversion to.

path: 0 2271864 2278736 2285582 2306264, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
AngryCommieKender 6 points 3 years ago

The barter system before currency was invented wouldn't fit that definition, and strictly speaking Marx wanted Communism to do away with currency so if that ever happened anywhere, that would also be outside of that definition.

That being said, yeah the modern definition of "capitalism" is over-broad and mostly useless as a concept.

path: 0 2271864 2278736 2285582 2306264 2306840, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
Colour_me_triggered 0 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2271864 2278736 2285582 2317900, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
unwinagainstable 19 points 3 years ago

Scam for sure. Hard to say it’s been unnoticed for a long time though

path: 0 2271864 2275883, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 2
bitsplease 12 points 3 years ago

idk - only 63% of Americans support single-payer healthcare, nearly half of Americans still haven't caught on at least

path: 0 2271864 2275883 2279377, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
angstylittlecatboy 7 points 3 years ago

"only"

That's a clear majority. If we had a referendum about it we'd get it (but the US doesn't have federal referendums.)

path: 0 2271864 2275883 2279377 2287166, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
sneezycat 126 points 3 years ago

Homeopathy, acupuncture, ozone therapy... all "alternative medicines" basically.

path: 0 2267897, hotness: undefined, score: 126, children: 60
Tanoh 76 points 3 years ago

Like the old joke, "What do you call alternative medicine that works?" "Medicine!"

If some herb, plant or extract has a proven effect it will be adopted by real medicine, and all that is left in alternative medicine is the scams that do not work.

path: 0 2267897 2268362, hotness: undefined, score: 76, children: 13
an0nym0us 14 points 3 years ago

You’re almost right. Modern medicine needs to synthesize natural compounds to profit fully from them. They can’t just use natural remedies and present them to patients because they can’t patent them.

path: 0 2267897 2268362 2268749, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 3
TheActualDevil 25 points 3 years ago

I'm sure that's a major part of it, but I also wouldn't want to live in a world where we could only get aspirin from willow bark. We either wouldn't have enough aspirin or we wouldn't have any more willow trees. Medicines derived from the actual source aren't possible on a global scale in most cases.

Capitalism is a blight on society and has lead to countless deaths. But in a utopia where money doesn't exist and people create medicine for the world only to help people with no profit they still need to synthesize it.

path: 0 2267897 2268362 2268749 2269447, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 1
an0nym0us 3 points 3 years ago

major part of it, but I also wouldn’t want to live in a world where we could only get aspirin from willow bark. We either wouldn’t have enough aspirin or we wouldn’t have any more willow trees. Medicines derived from the actual source aren’t possible on a global scale in most cases.

Capitalism is a blight on society and has lead to countless deaths. But in a utopia where money doesn’t exist and people create medicine for the world only to help people wit

I agree with you but in that case, the need to synthesize it could be made entirely based on practicality rather than profit.

path: 0 2267897 2268362 2268749 2269447 2270182, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
otter 8 points 3 years ago

Not all countries have for profit medicine though. I'm sure it's a factor, but it's not a universal thing.

There are other reasons why "natural" remedies get more scrutiny in the medical community, and the other comments have touched on a few of them

path: 0 2267897 2268362 2268749 2271281, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
DrQuint 5 points 3 years ago

There's a slight gotcha here:

I'm in Asia and a lot of traditional chinese medicine you can buy is just regular medicine with a marketing disguise hiding the fact. Why yes, this is a box of whatever the fuck extract, very interesting, old northern recipe to cure the shit, let me just check what's written on this paper, and, yep, there it is, it's just Loperamide but with an additive to make it taste like Ginseng. Got it.

path: 0 2267897 2268362 2283508, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
lambda 3 points 3 years ago

Tim Minchin

path: 0 2267897 2268362 2278671, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
GBR24_B_S 1 point 3 years ago

I worked for a medical clinic years ago.

One doctor was pushing natural hormone therapy.

I asked one of the other doctors. He wouldn’t touch it.

He told me he sees thousands of patients each year. Some number will get cancer, and some number of them will sue him.

If he prescribes a medication, he can defend himself by pointing to the medical studies showing the safety of the medication.

If he prescribes anything natural, there are no studies showing safety, because nobody can patent natural substances. Therefore there isn’t much money to be made, so nobody spends the money to do good studies.

Even if it was a miracle drug, he wouldn’t prescribe it.

path: 0 2267897 2268362 2286475, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 6
blujan 6 points 3 years ago

He is wrong tho, natural substances can and are regularly patented when a use is found for them or a production method that's better is discovered.

path: 0 2267897 2268362 2286475 2289402, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
AngryCommieKender 1 point 3 years ago

Monsanto has entered the chat.

DNA shouldn't be patentable. I guarantee you that the scenario that Micheal Crichton laid out in Next will end up happening at some point unless we reign this shit in.

path: 0 2267897 2268362 2286475 2289402 2307674, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
jon 1 point 3 years ago

That was my initial reaction at first as well. However as far as I can tell, natural products are not patentable, unless the product in question has been modified, manipulated etc, to produce something that is deemed to have been significantly changed.

So, in the US, for example, the Supreme Court ruled that human DNA, being a naturally occurring product, cannot be patented. However, it also ruled that complementary DNA, essentially DNA that has been extracted and then modified in a lab, can be patented.

path: 0 2267897 2268362 2286475 2289402 2336921, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
jon 3 points 3 years ago

Medicine is any substance that has a demonstrable healthcare effect (demonstrated through double blind tests and not some rando's anecdote). That includes natural substances.

To put it another way, medicine and natural substances are not two mutually exclusive (i.e. disjoint) sets, as you and/or your doctor friend appear to be implying.

path: 0 2267897 2268362 2286475 2310007, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
GBR24_B_S 0 points 3 years ago

That’s not what I’m saying.

I agree a natural substance can be medicine.

His statement - not mine - is that it couldn’t be patented.

Therefore the profit is limited.

Therefore there are fewer studies than a comparable pharmaceutical.

Therefore when (not if) he is sued, he will be less able to defend himself.

Therefore he won’t prescribe it.

path: 0 2267897 2268362 2286475 2310007 2324307, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
CrabAndBroom 42 points 3 years ago

Once I made a joke online about paying for homeopathy by dipping a dollar in a jar of water and giving them the jar, and like five people I know unfollowed me lol

path: 0 2267897 2271877, hotness: undefined, score: 42, children: 2
Tathas 15 points 3 years ago

Did you hear the one about the homeopathic who tried to commit suicide?

He took a 10X dilution of cyanide.

path: 0 2267897 2271877 2277609, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
ZodiacSF1969 4 points 3 years ago

Lol yeh a surprising amount of people believe in it.

I once trained to work in pharmacies, we had companies present on their products and one of them was selling homeopathic products. One of the other students asked if it actually worked and the rep's response was 'if it didn't do you think people would buy it?' I didn't say anything but I thought to myself yes, there absolutely are people who hand over money for dumb shit that doesn't work lol.

path: 0 2267897 2271877 2289100, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
LazaroFilm 29 points 3 years ago

I have a pinched nerve. I went to many doctors, done many tests, went to months of PT and was still in pain. I went to my acupuncturist and she is able to release the muscles around the pinch enough that my right arm doesn’t feel constantly numb. I a man of science. I don’t believe in he Chi traveling my body etc but the physical result of the acuponcture cannot be denied.

path: 0 2267897 2268956, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 36
CylonBunny 30 points 3 years ago

And there are physical therapists who do acupuncture strictly for muscle release without all of the chi stuff.

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2269804, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 1
MowFord 8 points 3 years ago

Yes absolutely. They call it needling though

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2269804 2271828, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
ryathal 12 points 3 years ago

Acupuncture has actually been shown to help in some cases beyond a placebo effect.

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2270622, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 2
ijeff 11 points 3 years ago

There isn't much evidence there. There's dry needling, which is the evidence-based alternative with different techniques - but much of that is built on the same evidence behind massage therapy.

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2270622 2275171, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
TheHalc 4 points 3 years ago path: 0 2267897 2268956 2270622 2273384, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Pandantic 4 points 3 years ago

I feel the same about chiropractic - many people call bullshit, but I’ll be damned if they don’t help me. Like you, I don’t believe “your spine is where all your problems originate” like some chiropractics try to peddle, but the dude pushes on my back and it pops and it feels better.

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2269656, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 23
naught 22 points 3 years ago

My brother was in total kidney failure and his chiro said the pain was likely "toxins" released from his session. Utter quack. They arent all hacks, but they can do real damage. They can paralyze you for life or even worse. I hope you will not have firsthand experience

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2269656 2269784, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 6
jballs 5 points 3 years ago

I used to believe the "they aren't all hacks thing" until I met more chiropractors. While I would like to believe that there's a subset of them out there who treat it more like a science of doing adjustments and what not, I don't think that's actually the case. My mom works for a chiropractor and has gone to several of their conventions over the years, and from what it sounds like they are all nutjobs who believe aligning your spine will cure you of all disease.

I would really love to see the numbers of how many chiropractors are antivaxxers. I bet it's in the high 90%.

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2269656 2269784 2281321, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
Pandantic 3 points 3 years ago

Oh I know, and I don’t trust any that ask me what other non-skeletal ailments I have (I had one tell me my acid reflux could be cured by chiro). But I have a few skeletal problems I go to them for about 3 times a year, and it helps.

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2269656 2269784 2269988, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
intensely_human 3 points 3 years ago

Yeah but so can regular doctors.

A friend went in for a colonoscopy and died from a series of complications. First they nicked the inside of her colon, and it started bleeding. Then there was a whole series of stupid responses, based on the meds she was taking and had disclosed. They just made one mistake after another, until she died.

None of us knew she was walking into that hospital for the last time, because we were all relying on the doctors to be masters of their craft.

To find religious behavior in the medical field doesn’t take long. Another friend has described being unable to process patients because the blood pressure equipment is broken. They’re down to one machine, and the manual squeeze bulbs have all failed, so there’s a massive backlog in their clinic.

Now, they know clinical outcomes are suffering as a result of the lack of throughput, but they have to take blood pressure on every patient before they do anything else. So they’re beholden to this policy, and can’t practice medicine in a rational manner. But they’re embedded in a system that won’t let them use their eyes and brains to operate on what’s in front of them.

So even without belief in the supernatural, doctors are serving a “false god” which is the bureaucracy, and because they can’t serve two gods that means actual medical practice itself takes a second seat.

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2269656 2269784 2270915, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Pandantic 2 points 3 years ago

MDs give you incorrect information too. I had a GP for 5 years who, when I talked about my cataplexy - a well-documented condition that is directly related to my (at that time, undiagnosed) narcolepsy - he told me to go on birth control, then he changed my antidepressant meds, and then when those things didn't help me, he said "try exercising more and lose some weight". If he would had looked up the symptoms I was describing (like I eventually did), he would have probably recommend I see a sleep doctor, but instead, I lived with narcolepsy under his care for 5 years, almost getting fired for falling asleep at my job.

I know it's not the same, as your brother had a life-threatening condition, but all this to say that MDs aren't all outstanding professionals either.

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2269656 2269784 2279358, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
LazaroFilm 10 points 3 years ago

The issue with chiropractors is that they treat the symptom and not the cause. If your back is misaligned, it’s because your muscles are pulling on it the wrong way, the chiro will pull it back in place but now your muscles are still pulling the wrong way and they may have pulled on the muscle to make it move and may have injured it, now your muscle says hell no you don’t and starts pulling even more. It’s instant relief with little lasting result. which is a great business model, instant result and returning customers because the problem isn’t treated. It’s like going to the mechanic because your motor is out of oil but not trying to fix the leak so you come back every week to refill the oil.

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2269656 2269964, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 7
Pandantic 3 points 3 years ago

The problem is I’ve been to numerous doctors, working with a pain management specialist now, done physical therapy with a few different places for months, do physical therapy every morning, do yoga, exercise every day, and still no relief. So, like, sometimes it gets so bad I go to the chiropractor because at least they can give me some relief.

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2269656 2269964 2270106, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
intensely_human 2 points 3 years ago

This is why you skip the chiropractor and go to the rolfer instead. They’ll free up the fascial tension and release the forces pulling your system out of whack.

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2269656 2269964 2270949, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
ijeff 7 points 3 years ago

The few things they do that are effective are better delivered by an evidence-based provider (e.g., physiotherapist, massage therapist) without the pseudoscience.

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2269656 2275240, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2
Pandantic 1 point 3 years ago

Where's the proof that massage therapy is more evidence-based than chiropractic? Honest question, a cursory search seems to show that it's not. Also, interesting that my chiropractic and physical therapy visits are covered by my insurance, but massage therapy is not. Wish I could afford it.

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2269656 2275240 2279183, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Berttheduck 6 points 3 years ago

See an osteopath instead, in the UK at least, they are trained and regulated unlike chiropractors who regularly kill or permanently disable people with unsafe and inappropriate "manipulations".

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2269656 2279218, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 3
Pandantic 4 points 3 years ago

osteopath

Thanks, I'll check it out (though I'm in the US). Also, I researched my chiropractor very thoroughly to ensure that he's not likely to kill or disable me.

edit: turns out my insurance covers osteopathic manipulative medicine, and there's 1 practitioner in my area (25 miles, probably more in the 50 mile range since I'm close to a big city). I will be making an appointment with her. Thanks kind stranger!

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2269656 2279218 2279440, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
LaunchesKayaks 1 point 3 years ago

My former boss, who is one of the biggest pieces of shit I know, has a severe back injury and goes to a chiropractor for it. Dude's gonna end up paralyzed or worse. He works with doctors daily.

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2269656 2288047, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
JokeDeity 1 point 3 years ago

Trust me bro.

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2269395, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
LazaroFilm 2 points 3 years ago

I Trust you what we doin’?

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2269395 2269981, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
RoadRunner451 1 point 3 years ago

my statutory health insurance (germany) pays for acupuncture. so it seems to be proven that it works so well that they cover the costs for the treatment

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2270519, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
ijeff 4 points 3 years ago

I'd just caution that coverage doesn't necessarily mean effectiveness.

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2270519 2275192, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
intensely_human -1 points 3 years ago

It just depends how you define the chi.

One simple way might be “responsiveness”. Chi is present wherever your body is capable of receiving and transmitting information.

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2270676, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 2
LazaroFilm 2 points 3 years ago

So nervous system…

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2270676 2278451, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
intensely_human 2 points 3 years ago

The information being passed isn't just nerve signals.

Basically, imagine a human body as being like a whip. If you take parts of the whip and make them stiff, then you can't crack the whip. The whip in its pliable form is capable of conducting a wave down its length. The whip with a stiff section can't conduct that wave.

In the whip, this wave is its "chi". A stiff section of the whip blocks its chi from flowing. It has a chi blockage. If the whip's chi channels are open, then it can be cracked.

The more of your body you can recruit into each movement, the more efficient that movement is. I believe that different parts of the body "communicate" (more precisely they respond to one another's actions) via tension and pressure. When a section of your body is stiff, that tension and pressure is less readable across that barrier. Your neck muscles will have a harder time predicting and responding to -- and ultimately optimizing -- the actions of your quadriceps, for example, if your trunk doesn't convey the mechanical "signals" well enough for your neck muscles to tell what's going on at the other end of the body.

To understand what I mean about responding, think of the way your body wobbles when you stand on one leg. That's tons of muscles in your body responding to information about your balance point. Your gut muscles might clench for a fraction of a second in response to your knee detecting that your leg has become less stable. Just an example. This action is coordinated, classically, by peripheral ganglia of the nervous system. But I believe it also relies on mechanical signals -- waves of pressure and tension, because mechanical signals conduct faster than nerve signals. (nerve conduction is about 50 m/s, speed of sound in the human body is about 1500 m/s)

Think of a flock of birds. Those birds each carry about a swarming algorithm: they make real-time decisions based on the positions and velocities of the other birds. The result is a flock that moves like an intelligent amoeba in the sky. Now imagine if you created some visual barrier in the middle of the flock. Now the birds on one side of that barrier can't effectively swarm with the birds on the other side. The flock has been split into two flocks. That visual information is the flock's "chi", and the blockage makes the flock less integrated.

Various body parts -- muscles, organs, nerve ganglia, senses -- are a swarm, and a chi blockage is something that splits that swarm into two or more smaller swarms.

path: 0 2267897 2268956 2270676 2278451 2282977, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
toothpaste_sandwich 22 points 3 years ago

I love how ruthless the wikipedia pages on these topics are, by the way. Do check them out if you get the chance.

path: 0 2267897 2268361, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 0
noughtnaut 7 points 3 years ago

Hey umm so ... homeopathy. There is a case to be made --hear me out here please-- that it might have been effective once, but now we've got millions of "practitioners" doing things that clearly do not work.

The reasoning is obvious.

The concentration of practitioners within the population is clearly too damn high (insert meme here). To show how effective it can truly be, all we need to do is to dilute the ratio ... by a lot.

Don't you agree that this is worth looking into?

(/s in case anyone is in doubt)

path: 0 2267897 2305069, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
alokir 4 points 3 years ago

A few weeks ago I got the flu and went to see my doctor. She wasn't in so I got sent to a substitute who examined my ear with a weird beeping device. I asked her what it was and she just said that she practices "Chinese medicine".

She told me her device indicated that I have huge problems with my thyroid and she said I should get some sort of crystal necklace that's good for that and that I should apply some essential oils daily. Of course, she happened to sell those at a good price.

I went to have a blood test and my thyroid was fine, my values were right in the middle of the acceptable range.

path: 0 2267897 2298144, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
echoplex21 2 points 3 years ago

I think chiropractors also fall under this

path: 0 2267897 2312965, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
some_guy 2 points 3 years ago

Scams, all of 'em. But the medbed that I can sell you is totally real. /s

path: 0 2267897 2278828, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
LaunchesKayaks 1 point 3 years ago

I used to get acupuncture with a tend unit attached to the needles as a kid for my chronic pain. Holy fuck did I feel better afterwards. It was probably the tens unit. I have a small one at home and it is great for relaxing my tight muscles.

path: 0 2267897 2287943, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
MonkderZweite 89 points 3 years ago

That you can get rich if you work hard.

path: 0 2299720, hotness: undefined, score: 89, children: 2
Toribor 24 points 3 years ago

Additionally, that it's okay to work yourself until death, because when you die you'll actually live a new eternal life of permanent luxury.

path: 0 2299720 2305697, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 1
Piecemakers3Dprints 5 points 3 years ago

Someone already mentioned religion, yes.

path: 0 2299720 2305697 2318910, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Efwis 78 points 3 years ago

Ponzi schemes, especially the insurance companies. They really are a Ponzi scheme.

Think about it, they promise you things asking for money, then when you need their services they decide where you go, how much they will pay (leaving the rest for you to pay as a deductible), then they turn around and increase your costs for their services, that they fight tooth and nail not to pay anything.

path: 0 2272278, hotness: undefined, score: 78, children: 23
scorpionix 36 points 3 years ago

I argue insurance in and of itself is no ponzi scheme. Working together is the basis of all civilisation. Trying to make a business out of a social service however ... that's rife for abuse, yes.

path: 0 2272278 2274451, hotness: undefined, score: 36, children: 2
Efwis 1 point 3 years ago

Depends on how you define a Ponzi scheme. Personally I define it as pay us money in return for a service, then run with the money or come up with ways to deny that service, once again keeping the money or as much as possible by telling businesses how much they can charge for their services.

If I ran my own company, I would be damned if someone is going to dictate my prices to help their bottom line.

IMHO, that is what has caused health care cost to be untenable for someone who cannot afford health insurance or makes like $3 too much to qualify for the likes of Medicaid.

path: 0 2272278 2274451 2275654, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Steeve 7 points 3 years ago

Ponzi schemes actually already have a clear definition, and what you're describing isn't actually a Ponzi scheme

path: 0 2272278 2274451 2275654 2286272, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
bitsplease 20 points 3 years ago

I work in the insurance industry and I 100% agree with this.

The only time it's wise to take out an insurance policy is when

A) It's legally required (though this is sometimes due to lobbying by the insurance companies themselves)

B) When you absolutely will not be able to actually pay for a potential, but necessary expense by yourself (cancer treatments and stuff like that)

So Health Insurance, Auto Insurance (even if your car is cheap and self-insurable, the car you hit may not be), Home-owners insurance and stuff like that are necessary and generally a good financial bet, even if they are crooked af.

Any "micro-insurances" though? All total scams. Travel insurance, phone insurance (or "Extended Warranties"), Apple Care, all that kind of shit is 100% going to cost you more money to have than it'll save you - unless you get really really lucky (or unlucky, depending on how you look at it). You'd be better off spending what you'd pay on those insurance premiums on a hand of blackjack, I'll bet the odds would be slightly more in your favor that way

path: 0 2272278 2279493, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 13
scrubbles 6 points 3 years ago

Ugh my parents both insist on travel insurance. What if you get sick?? Idk, I'll cancel the stuff I can and take the loss on what I can't, for all the travel I've done the amount of times that has happened does not even remotely come close to how much I would have paid each time for travel insurance.

No mom, I'm not going to insure our 2 night stay at the Hilton in (mid sized city). I'm sure it's going to be fine.

Last time I did was for a very very expensive flight across an ocean, just because it was like, 15 dollars on a 2000 flight for a few people. Fine, but everything else we took the risk. (And we did not use it)

path: 0 2272278 2279493 2280118, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
bitsplease 8 points 3 years ago

Travel insurance is especially terrible, because a lot of the time it's a pretty substantial premium, and actually filing a claim on it is a HUGE PITA.

I worked for a traveler insurance company before, and we denied most claims that came in. People would buy insurance on a $100 concert ticket, paying a $10 premium for the insurance, then when they'd go to file the claim, we'd require a doctors note, so now they also have to cough up a $20 copay and a whole afternoon just to get a note saying "yup, this person is sick". And that's just one of the many ways people got fleeced. During COVID, a lot of travel insurance claims got denied because illnesses resulting from pandemics aren't covered in some policies as well

path: 0 2272278 2279493 2280118 2280355, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
scrubbles 3 points 3 years ago

not surprised at all, I've found it's just better to learn the cancellation policy of your items. Most hotels are full refund if they know >48 hours, and if less usually you'll at least get points/credit back which for me I'll absolutely use next time. Not worth the premium and the hassle to get cash back if I only find out less than 48 hours ahead of time

path: 0 2272278 2279493 2280118 2280355 2280775, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Efwis 5 points 3 years ago

Thanks for your input, it helps not make me sound like a conspiracy theorist or anti-biz whack job

path: 0 2272278 2279493 2282761, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
bitsplease 1 point 3 years ago

nothing conspiracy theorist about it at all. If anyone gives you sideways looks when you mention that insurance is a scam, just point out the very simple and undeniable fact that insurance companies are (very) profitable. That means, by definition that the average customer pays more in premiums than they get in payouts, and not just a bit more, a lot more, as that profit they make is after they pay their thousands of employees, award multi-million dollar bonuses to their executives, pay for their bigass skyscrapers, and all that other shit. If insurance was a "fair" deal, they'd be losing money from the administration costs

Always self-insure if you can afford it

path: 0 2272278 2279493 2282761 2283020, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Wanderer 2 points 3 years ago

Travel insurance is my big one. Why would you not get that? That seems like such a stupid risk not to get that.

Like if I get hit by a car in the middle of nowhere and they got to fly my home because the medical care there sucks. That's going to cost an absolute fortune. Even having to send my dead body home will cost my family loads.

path: 0 2272278 2279493 2286067, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 7
bitsplease 6 points 3 years ago

Why would you not get that? That seems like such a stupid risk not to get that.

Pretty much for all the reasons I said in my comment - you'll almost certainly spend more on premiums for travel insurance than you'll ever claim (this is true of all insurance) and the expenses incurred by self-insuring are generally manageable. Even in the two situations you refer to, we're "only" talking about costs of a few thousand, and both of those are highly unlikely events that most people go their whole lives not dealing with. you're much better off putting the money you'd spend on that travel insurance into an emergency fund to cover those kinds of unexpected expenses.

Insurance is only a good financial call if you risk completely bankrupting yourself by not having insurance, otherwise you're just trading potential lump sum costs for small continuous costs, and the premiums will generally always wind up being more than what you're saving (because if they weren't, then the Insurance companies wouldn't be making so much money).

That being said, it's your money, if you'd rather accept that you're paying more over a lifetime on travel insurance than you're saving just to have the peace of mind that you won't have to dip into savings for any incident that happens before or during the trip (assuming your incident doesn't fall under one of the many carefully crafted exclusions that the insurance companies add to their policies to prevent paying out, which it probably will), then by all means, buy it - but if you're buying it because you think it's the financially savy move, and you have at least a few grand in your bank account for emergencies, then you're kidding yourself.

path: 0 2272278 2279493 2286067 2286314, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 5
ZodiacSF1969 4 points 3 years ago

I just read a news article this week about a young Australian man on vacation in Indonesia who got in an accident. His family now face costs of around $350,000 because his insurance didn't cover riding motorized scooters.

I think travel insurance is generally wise to have, and to be aware of what you are covered for. This is an example both of the potential costs and how if you don't read your policy carefully they will fuck you over.

path: 0 2272278 2279493 2286067 2286314 2288516, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Wanderer 1 point 3 years ago

you'll almost certainly spend more on premiums for travel insurance than you'll ever claim (this is true of all insurance)

Yes I agree but it's about how you value risk. Losing $100 on travel insurance is better than losing $1,000,000 on hospital bills. The risk is different obviously but I'm not worried about $100 for peace of mind. I have even gone to war zones were my insurance was invalid but I had it in safer places because it's all about risk.

Even in the two situations you refer to, we're "only" talking about costs of a few thousand, and both of those are highly unlikely events

That's just where your wrong and there is no point continuing this discussion. You don't think people have to pay a fortune for medical cover when you have no insurance? Sure some countries might cover that and their might be mutual care agreements. But not having insurance in a place that won't pay your hospital bills. That's madness. Your argument works if you artificially make up costs sure.

I have personally know loads of people to get in accidents when travelling, I have myself. I have only heard one person being hospitalised and getting sent home but it happens and it isn't cheap.

path: 0 2272278 2279493 2286067 2286314 2291855, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
thecodeboss 5 points 3 years ago

I got travel insurance recently for a hiking trip with my wife. We had an emergency and my wife had to be airlifted out by helicopter, and we were so glad to have the travel insurance because it covers emergency evacuation up to $10,000 (and the helicopter costed around $5,000). Awesome, right?

Well... actually no. Turns out, the terms of our policy dictate we needed to call insurance first and have them organize the airlift. Since we dialed 911 and organized the helicopter ourselves, our insurance won't cover it. I guess it's my fault for not reading the fine print, but it feels pretty scummy from the insurance company. Even if we had read the fine print, in the moment I don't think I would have remembered as my immediate instinct is to contact emergency services.

path: 0 2272278 2279493 2286067 2294236, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
ZodiacSF1969 16 points 3 years ago

That's not a Ponzi scheme. Sorry, but this misuse of the term really grinds my gears.

A Ponzi scheme is a specific scam promoted as an investment, but in reality the payouts made to early victims come from the incoming money paid by new investors.

path: 0 2272278 2288420, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 3
Efwis -1 points 3 years ago

Might as well be, the patron still gets screwed

path: 0 2272278 2288420 2304919, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
Malfeasant -7 points 3 years ago

Aka social security...

path: 0 2272278 2288420 2290469, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 1
Fjaeger 1 point 3 years ago

Where is social security pitched as an investment?

Edit. Now that I think about it, government retirement funds actually kind of fill those requirements. At least where I live.

path: 0 2272278 2288420 2290469 2293496, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
theshatterstone54 6 points 3 years ago

Oh my god, thank you so much! I'm glad I'm not the only one that sees it. They get money, they invest that money in pension funds, and then they try not to pay that back. The only things stopping it from being one legally are some slight changes such as the investment part and the part where they pay back to people in need, not people at the top.

path: 0 2272278 2277467, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
Efwis 2 points 3 years ago

Unfortunately, like all big business, they don’t care about anything but fleecing the little guy

path: 0 2272278 2277467 2278822, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
ImplyingImplications 76 points 3 years ago

A large portion of art/artifacts are forgeries. Everyone is alright with it because galleries and collectors want to brag about having some unique old art piece and forgers are very good at making pieces that would fool anyone who is just looking at it.

path: 0 2268238, hotness: undefined, score: 76, children: 5
GCanuck 42 points 3 years ago

My personal conspiracy theory is that almost all art the public is exposed to is a forgery. Why show the plebs the real thing? We wouldn’t notice a difference anyway.

path: 0 2268238 2268573, hotness: undefined, score: 42, children: 3
CrabAndBroom 23 points 3 years ago

Maybe whenever you hear those stories about a famous work of art being stolen and later recovered, they've actually just stolen the forgery and the galley just puts up a new fake one.

The robbers then can't sell it because they have a worthless fake and the 'real' one is clearly on display in the gallery, and they can't expose the fraud because then they'd out themselves and go to jail.

The perfect scam!

path: 0 2268238 2268573 2271780, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 0
RivenRise 11 points 3 years ago

That's what they do with a lot more paintings that you would think. Not because they don't want the plebs to look at them but because being exposed to the environment would cause irreparable damage to it. So they have experts make recreations and display those.

path: 0 2268238 2268573 2277370, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
bitsplease 4 points 3 years ago

This isn't really a conspiracy theory is it? I thought it was something they were open about that they often have replicas on display for security/preservation reasons

path: 0 2268238 2268573 2279794, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
some_guy 5 points 3 years ago

There was a fantastic interview on The Jordan Harbinger Show podcast with a professional forger. I'd recommend searching for it. I've been meaning to give it a second listen for a few years, but have too much other content.

path: 0 2268238 2278802, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
mojo 69 points 3 years ago

Lotteries. They're just tax for poor people.

path: 0 2287379, hotness: undefined, score: 69, children: 7
NathanielThomas 7 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2287379 2289470, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 3
mojo 36 points 3 years ago

The people who do lottery tickets are poor people who need the money. The government funded programs should be coming from the rich people.

path: 0 2287379 2289470 2291363, hotness: undefined, score: 36, children: 2
NathanielThomas -5 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2287379 2289470 2291363 2291852, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 1
mojo 32 points 3 years ago

rich people dont get taxed for shit, that's the whole problem

path: 0 2287379 2289470 2291363 2291852 2292956, hotness: undefined, score: 32, children: 0
Andiloor 3 points 3 years ago

I think most people buying a lottery ticket know that it's a loss on average. I think people buy it for the experience and the dreams that it represents. From that perspective, I don't think that it's a scam for most people but rather just buying a slice of fantasy

path: 0 2287379 2315349, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
mojo 3 points 3 years ago

You quite literally described the scam part though, selling false hope

path: 0 2287379 2315349 2317180, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Quickswitch79 1 point 3 years ago

Well no, because thousands of people have won it all over the world. Yes, it might be 14 million to one, but for a couple of quid I don't care.

path: 0 2287379 2315349 2317180 2318463, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
son_named_bort 68 points 3 years ago

The McDonald's Monopoly promotions

path: 0 2274694, hotness: undefined, score: 68, children: 5
DragonTypeWyvern 15 points 3 years ago

Wait, they were scams?

I knew employees fixed a couple, but...

path: 0 2274694 2275929, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 2
legion 37 points 3 years ago

It wasn't McDonald's themselves that were scamming, it's more like the trusted 3rd party they engaged to run the promotion had a bad actor that used his position to fix the game.

path: 0 2274694 2275929 2276335, hotness: undefined, score: 37, children: 1
ch00f 3 points 3 years ago

He began stealing winning game pieces after a supplier mistakenly provided him a sheet of the anti-tamper seals needed to securely conduct the legitimate transfer of winning pieces. Jacobson first offered the game pieces to friends and family but eventually began selling them to Gennaro "Jerry" Colombo of the Colombo crime family, whom he had met by chance at the Atlanta airport.[11] Colombo would then recruit people to act as contest winners in exchange for half of the winnings.[9][10]

And that’s just the start.

https://en.wikipedia.org/...

path: 0 2274694 2275929 2276335 2309660, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
beanz00_ 5 points 3 years ago

I remember getting like 3 tickets for "part 1 out of 2 for a free car" a few months ago when they were doing the monopoly thing. I now realise that the employees probably just took all the part 2 ones for themselves.

path: 0 2274694 2291668, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
Simba 13 points 3 years ago

They definitely didn't because they count the sleeves that those prize pieces are on.

What really happens is they print 5 million part 1 pieces and like 10 part 2 pieces.

path: 0 2274694 2291668 2293466, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
beanz00_ 66 points 3 years ago

printer ink, it costs them like 3 cents to make each cartridge and they sell it for so god damn much.

they also go out of their way to have chips in the cartridges and in the printers that make the printer not function if any ink is even running low, doesn't matter if you want to print something in black and white you had better fucking buy more cyan ink

path: 0 2291572, hotness: undefined, score: 66, children: 12
StThicket 25 points 3 years ago

The whole issue here is that people fall for the trick of buying the cheapest printer available, that is clearly way cheaper than what it costs to build. Then people get cranky for having to buy these proprietary cartridges which are way overpriced to cover the cost of the printer.

The easiest solution is to buy a laser printer (unless you need photo finish on your prints). It's a higher initial cost, but it never dries out. Would it cost me more that an ink printer in the long run? Maybe, but with my infrequent printing, i wouldn't have to replace dried out cartridges every year.

path: 0 2291572 2295178, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 5
rifugee 3 points 3 years ago

Anyone who buys a color laser printer should be aware that the initial cartridges, at least from HP, are not as full as refills, so you will have to replace them fairly soon and it is expensive. That being said, the refills will last a looooong time.

Also, and the main reason why I purchased one, the printer will just work, even if you don't print anything for a couple of weeks, or months even. I went through a couple of inkjets (not the cheapest ones), which would constantly get dried out, a head clogged, etc, before I said "fuck it," and sprung for a laser. My wallet isn't that happy, but it sure is nice not gambling on whether the damn printer will actually print.

path: 0 2291572 2295178 2307730, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 4
sunbeam60 5 points 3 years ago

I had an amazing multifunction colour laser printer. It always worked. It scanned straight to OCRd PDF which it placed on an FTP server. It was full duplex, in printing and scanning. It copied ultra-quickly. The toner was endless, or so it seemed. It was everything I needed and wanted in a printer.

But my wife thought it was “ugly” and “too big”. It became a real sticking point, this thing. So eventually it was replaced by a shitty ink-jets so “we could print good photos at home”. Now it’s clogged up to fuck, no amount of head cleaning works and she’s complaining about the shitty quality prints.

Stand your ground on a good printer. Stand. Your. Ground.

path: 0 2291572 2295178 2307730 2312294, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 3
rifugee 1 point 3 years ago

Damn, that's a nice printer you have had there.

We need a law that makes it illegal for someone to cause you to lose your beloved printer, despite the way it may look. We need an anti-discrimination law to protect them because they can't protect themselves. We can call it the Stand Your Ground Act...wait.

path: 0 2291572 2295178 2307730 2312294 2313323, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
stebo02 20 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2291572 2293789, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 1
StThicket 1 point 3 years ago

y'all need to stop buying ink printers from HP

FTFY

path: 0 2291572 2293789 2295028, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Scrollone 10 points 3 years ago

Do yourself a favour and buy a Brother laser printer. You'll thank me later

path: 0 2291572 2307305, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
neumast 1 point 3 years ago

Did the same some years back. Only black and white laser, but this thing just works!

path: 0 2291572 2307305 2310439, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
MooseBoys 3 points 3 years ago

Hardly “unnoticed” - it’s just a fundamental part of the business model.

path: 0 2291572 2294635, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Corkyskog 1 point 3 years ago

I just assumed the manufacturing process required unicorn blood or something.

path: 0 2291572 2294635 2308119, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
zabadoh 61 points 3 years ago

Toothpaste.

You only need to squeeze out an amount the size of a pea on to the bristles of your toothbrush.

The image of squeezing along the entire length of the brush bristles was concocted by an ad agency, a la Mad Men, to make consumers use their toothpaste faster, hence buy more product.

path: 0 2305363, hotness: undefined, score: 61, children: 6
fidodo 11 points 3 years ago

I've never used that much. I just assumed it was to look nice since a pea sized about would look silly in a picture. I think it I used that much my mouth would be so full of foam it would be uncomfortable

path: 0 2305363 2308536, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
afox 1 point 3 years ago

Aquafresh baby!

path: 0 2305363 2308536 2325252, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Corkyskog 11 points 3 years ago

I swear it's also why they made that newer garbage cap design that slowly leaks toothpaste and gums up unless you carefully clean the end and fully close it every time. I know y'all know what I am talking about!

path: 0 2305363 2306313, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
Hexarei 5 points 3 years ago

The garbage flip cap instead of the good old screw on lid

path: 0 2305363 2306313 2311746, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Duchess 1 point 3 years ago

in fairness the directions on the back of the tube still state you should use a pea sized amount. i feel like that's not all that helpful though, peas come in lots of different sizes.

path: 0 2305363 2388197, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
afox 1 point 3 years ago

Fools up your game. Tom's toothpaste is so absolutely classy. My gums never felt this good. Better ask jeeves.good ass toothpaste.

path: 0 2305363 2325333, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
alokir 57 points 3 years ago

Credit scores are a scam to sell credit cards.

You take small loans each month via a credit card that you have to pay back. This increases an imaginary number that lets you take out bigger loans in the furure.

This is all tracked by private companies that you trust with your personal data. That, or you'll not be able to take out a loan if you want to buy a house or start a business.

If you have a good credit score it means that you don't overspend or forget to pay, which you can also achieve with a regular debit card by default. This doesn't serve people, only the banks who expect that a number of people will overspend or not be able to pay their loans back.

Credit cards alone aren't the problem. Forcing them on people with the credit score system is.

path: 0 2298324, hotness: undefined, score: 57, children: 7
dQw4w9WgXcQ 16 points 3 years ago

Coming from a civilized country where the credit score is calculated by looking at income, taxes and property, I cannot fathom how the US credit score calculation is supported by anyone.

path: 0 2298324 2299228, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 2
CapeWearingAeroplane 10 points 3 years ago
         o
        / \ Morals
       /   ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
Money /
‾‾‾‾‾‾
path: 0 2298324 2299228 2303773, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
Corkyskog 7 points 3 years ago

A lot of people actually like it because it really doesn't work the way OP said it did. They are partially correct, but you also get rewarded for perverse incentives. If you double pay your CC, it will actually slightly lower your credit score. If you have a lot of credit cards with no balance, that can also lower your score. The quickest way to buildup credit in the US is to get a card that has a 0% 18 Month introductory interest rate. Pay the minimum balance each month, and save the cash to pay it all off in 17 months. You will accumulate credit like crazy, holding a balance strangely increases your credit (until the balance gets too high or you start missing payments, then it will take a nosedive).

Interest, late fees, holding a balance, a lot of the bad stuff is actually weirdly good for your credit in the US. I mean it makes sense... they want to reward people who are stupid and pay interest, but actually have enough income to keep making payments forever.

When someone from the US remarks about their credit score, it always causes me to raise eyebrows. You can be poor and have a high credit score, it's incredibly common.

path: 0 2298324 2299228 2307977, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
Toribor 10 points 3 years ago

One way to make credit scores more consumer friendly would be to make it totally transparent what data is collected, retained and transmitted when calculating the score. If you want to open a new line of credit, instead of having businesses look up all this shit behind your back you'd request a letter of credit and provide it to the business yourself, knowing exactly what is in it.

But no, instead it's a total mystery how it is calculated and you just have to hope that they don't get confused and make a mistake because it can wreck your life if they do.

path: 0 2298324 2307344, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
alokir 13 points 3 years ago

In many countries, mine included, there's no credit score system. We recently took out a bigger loan to buy a house and what we had to provide was:

  • proof of a steady income (in our case from our employer)
  • 3 months of bank account history (to prove that we don't overspend)
  • written permission that they can request our data from the central (government operated) loan database

That's it. From these they could tell that we are safe to loan money to because we'll most likely be able to pay it back.

I don't see how a credit score system is essential when you can provide them with the necessary data only when it's needed.

path: 0 2298324 2307344 2307595, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
Limit 2 points 3 years ago

You can "game the system" by picking credit cards that offer some kind of cash back incentive, and don't carry balances month to month. For example the chase freedom card does 1% on all purchases and 5% on specific categories that change every quarter. I've had this card for like 9 years, I've never paid any interest because I pay it off monthly , and we make lots of "free" cash back. The key here is don't go get a credit card and buy stuff you can't afford, that should be hammered into youth from the beginning, just buy what you can afford, and if you're disciplined enough you can put all of your purchases on the card and benefit from the card incentives for basically free.

path: 0 2298324 2323913, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
argues_semantics 2 points 3 years ago

I can’t agree with this more.

Transferring points earned to airlines can also net you some incredible deals on flights as well. I’ve booked several tens of thousands of dollars on business/first class travel over the years at a fraction of the cost. With the addition of free hotel upgrades and car rental upgrades, you can use credit cards to your advantage.

The caveat is that it takes some amount of expendable income to play.

path: 0 2298324 2323913 2344929, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
LEDZeppelin 53 points 3 years ago

Mormon church

path: 0 2268000, hotness: undefined, score: 53, children: 1
jballs 3 points 3 years ago

Trim out the first half of that sentence and you'd have yourself a top comment.

path: 0 2268000 2281404, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
the_q 44 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2271701, hotness: undefined, score: 44, children: 1
ComradePorkRoll 20 points 3 years ago

"I own this machine and everything you create with it" is a fundamentally flawed way to run a society.

path: 0 2271701 2278136, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 0
atlasraven31 41 points 3 years ago

Tax-free charitable organizations

path: 0 2267802, hotness: undefined, score: 41, children: 6
galloog1 21 points 3 years ago

In a society with capitalism at its core, externalities exist. That's a fact that everyone agrees with. Nonprofits help mitigate those gaps. Calling all nonprofits scams is misguided at best. I think OP is looking for something more specific. What nonprofits?

path: 0 2267802 2269523, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 2
bady 5 points 3 years ago

Yes, I'm looking for more specific cases.

path: 0 2267802 2269523 2270040, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
atlasraven31 -4 points 3 years ago

I was trying to be tongue-in-cheek but specifically the Roman Catholic Church in a historic context.

path: 0 2267802 2269523 2270040 2270102, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 0
cynar 6 points 3 years ago

There are a lot who have an extremely positive impact. It's a small minority that causes a huge number of issues.

I personally help out with a non profit charity and we get a lot done with not a lot financially. The reduced taxes are a huge help.

path: 0 2267802 2273036, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
bitsplease 3 points 3 years ago

There are a lot who have an extremely positive impact. It’s a small minority that causes a huge number of issues.

I would argue it's the other way around frankly

path: 0 2267802 2273036 2279856, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
jamkey 4 points 3 years ago

To be fair, there are some good ones out there. I worked for a drug-rehab company in the 90s as the IT head that got mostly government funding for a 6 month-rehab-program for non-violent drug offenders (mostly stuff like heroine, cocaine, etc.). We also had an in-prison program but I don’t think that was as effective. Of course to get government contact money we would have to meet lots of strict guidelines too.

I definitely more wary of ones that don’t get any public funding and therefore have practically no guardrails and less forced transparency.

path: 0 2267802 2284772, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
ArchmageAzor 40 points 3 years ago

Old Egypt was full of pyramid schemes way back then

path: 0 2296488, hotness: undefined, score: 40, children: 0
HobbitFoot 40 points 3 years ago

Bernie Madoff should have been caught years before he did.

path: 0 2268319, hotness: undefined, score: 40, children: 4
JokeDeity 14 points 3 years ago

There's zero chance the SEC wasn't fully aware of what he was doing, just like they're fully aware of what Ken Griffen is doing.

path: 0 2268319 2269418, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 3
HobbitFoot 4 points 3 years ago

They probably weren't fully aware because they didn't want to be.

path: 0 2268319 2269418 2269713, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
some_guy 0 points 3 years ago

What's the logic behind this take? I would think they'd stop him if they knew.

path: 0 2268319 2269418 2278881, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
theshatterstone54 4 points 3 years ago

Not if they profit off it

path: 0 2268319 2269418 2278881 2280508, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
rippersnapper 36 points 3 years ago

Luxury handbags that cost $60k. Not just a handbag, but to diversify your investment and launder money.

path: 0 2271606, hotness: undefined, score: 36, children: 0
netburnr 35 points 3 years ago

Bitcoin

path: 0 2267911, hotness: undefined, score: 35, children: 1
Guster 7 points 3 years ago

To be fair, there are much worse projects too that were rugpulled. But I guess these didn't go on long.

path: 0 2267911 2269213, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
Saneless 31 points 3 years ago

That 90% of the people who don't watch sports on Cable TV subsidize it to the tune of 10% of their bill for the 10% of people who watch it

path: 0 2307708, hotness: undefined, score: 31, children: 0
kambusha 29 points 3 years ago path: 0 2270956, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 4
bady 6 points 3 years ago

Surprising that no one noticed the double prime symbol for inches instead of the single prime symbol for feet. The scammer was like "well, I didn't lie, you weren't careful enough and it's not my problem!".

path: 0 2270956 2274309, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
bitsplease 5 points 3 years ago

Wouldn't they have noticed that there were only 3 stories of windows on the blueprint?

path: 0 2270956 2279732, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
ZodiacSF1969 2 points 3 years ago

There's a Tom Scott video on this, the truth behind it seems murky.

path: 0 2270956 2290134, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
some_guy 1 point 3 years ago

Wow. I hadn't heard of this. What a clever (and shifty) scam.

path: 0 2270956 2280546, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Colour_me_triggered 29 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2317771, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 14
Piecemakers3Dprints 10 points 3 years ago

Hey, you said oppression four times.

path: 0 2317771 2318761, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
aceshigh 5 points 3 years ago

Patriarchy

path: 0 2317771 2319367, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
Colour_me_triggered 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 2317771 2319367 2323915, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
aceshigh 2 points 3 years ago

the catchall term is that they're all examples of hierarchies.

path: 0 2317771 2319367 2323915 2324110, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
moitoi 0 points 3 years ago

You forget neoliberalism.

path: 0 2317771 2328634, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
dukeGR4 -7 points 3 years ago

calling capitalism a scam is moot, the other viable alternative, socialism is even worse.

also, no country on planet earth is pure-capitalism, not even in US. Northern European countries have proven that market economy with the right taxation policies can effectively distribute income. I wished more wokeist knew about this or at least bothered to do a bit of research.

path: 0 2317771 2325108, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 3
moitoi 1 point 3 years ago

You're mixing socialism and communism. Going from here, you see more than two options what make it a non-binary issue.

Communism itself has multiple variations. What we saw until today with fever exceptions wasn't communism either. It was dictatorship using communism. At the beginning, they may believe in the ideology but once in power, they took another path.

path: 0 2317771 2325108 2328867, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Colour_me_triggered 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 2317771 2325108 2331833, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
moitoi 2 points 3 years ago

The issue here is the lack of regulation. Regulations work. What doesn't work and is a scam is "the free market will autoregulate".

path: 0 2317771 2325108 2331833 2332789, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
muhdsalm -8 points 3 years ago

I hope you don't mind we disagreeing with the second and the last point :)

path: 0 2317771 2323444, hotness: undefined, score: -8, children: 4
Colour_me_triggered 2 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2317771 2323444 2323896, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
muhdsalm 1 point 3 years ago

Nope, because if I was I probably wouldn't be here 😊

path: 0 2317771 2323444 2323896 2338762, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
Colour_me_triggered 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 2317771 2323444 2323896 2338762 2345009, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
ModernRisk 28 points 3 years ago

Theranos ‘company’.

path: 0 2294002, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 1
bady 11 points 3 years ago

Oh yes, I've heard about this. Thanks for reminding.

Adding more details for others:

Founded in 2003 by then 19-year-old Elizabeth Holmes, Theranos raised more than US$700 million from venture capitalists and private investors, resulting in a $10 billion valuation at its peak in 2013 and 2014. The company claimed that it had devised blood tests that required very small amounts of blood and that could be performed rapidly and accurately, all using compact automated devices which the company had developed. These claims were later proven to be false.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theranos

path: 0 2294002 2295091, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
CanadaPlus 27 points 3 years ago

ITT: Things people personally think are scammy, but not actual legally-defined scams.

path: 0 2286668, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 2
SigloPseudoMundo 12 points 3 years ago

When a scam is good enough it gets put into law.

path: 0 2286668 2289051, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
MooseBoys 10 points 3 years ago

Also people completely omitting the “unnoticed” aspect.

path: 0 2286668 2294645, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
Mostly_Frogs 27 points 3 years ago

Chiropractic medicine

path: 0 2268484, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 5
wintermute_oregon -2 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2268484 2269500, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 4
ijeff 10 points 3 years ago

The few things they do that work are still better delivered by physiotherapists and massage therapists without the pseudoscience.

path: 0 2268484 2269500 2275306, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 3
bitsplease 5 points 3 years ago

Yeah, going to a chiropractor for joint pain is like going to a witch doctor who has you drink willow bark tea for your headache. Yeah it might help, but a real doctor could have just given you an aspirin, and they'd actually be able to tell if there was more going on that needs treating.

path: 0 2268484 2269500 2275306 2279982, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
joenforcer 0 points 3 years ago

My Urgent Care doc prescribed me some muscle relaxers and sent me to a chiropractor when I injured my back doing deadlifts so figure that one out 🤷

path: 0 2268484 2269500 2275306 2279982 2295206, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
Anti_Weeb_Penguin 24 points 3 years ago

Windows

path: 0 2268303, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 3
theshatterstone54 7 points 3 years ago

The OS? Yes for sure. The glass stuff? Not too sure about that.

path: 0 2268303 2280529, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
Anti_Weeb_Penguin 5 points 3 years ago

Why would you want windows when you can live in a basement with no sunlight?

path: 0 2268303 2280529 2282374, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
MooseBoys 5 points 3 years ago

ITT: “something I don’t like” —> “scam”

path: 0 2268303 2294687, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
dotslashme 22 points 3 years ago path: 0 2270376, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 3
bady 5 points 3 years ago

Took a glimpse at the article and it seems they could've gone uncaught for longer if they were a little more careful with the dates!

path: 0 2270376 2273976, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Saintpaul 5 points 3 years ago

That was a fun read. Thanks for posting.

path: 0 2270376 2273255, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
some_guy 4 points 3 years ago path: 0 2270376 2278860, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
vd1n 21 points 3 years ago

HR departments in corporate jobs.

path: 0 2288259, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 3
MooseBoys 17 points 3 years ago

I’m not sure you know what the word “scam” means.

path: 0 2288259 2294735, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
Simba 14 points 3 years ago

You don't want to deal with the shit HR handles for you.

I'm sure there are plenty of bad, bureaucratic messes, but 3/4 of the HR departments I the last 10 years have been quite helpful.

The outlier was just not very communicative, but otherwise good.

Maybe it's the industry. I work in clinical so we're used to documenting the fuck out of everything. HR mandated documentation is just another step to cover all of our asses.

path: 0 2288259 2293438, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 1
vd1n 5 points 3 years ago

My experience with them is basically them trying to convince people to stay at the job when the job is overworking people underpaying people etc. Staying never payed off. More of a dead end job scenerio

path: 0 2288259 2293438 2304039, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
airportline 20 points 3 years ago

ESG and carbon offsets as an effective way of combating climate change

path: 0 2315709, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 0
Spliffman1 18 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2267994, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 3
OrangeXarot 4 points 3 years ago

pants

path: 0 2267994 2269463, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
galloog1 3 points 3 years ago

I definitely notice when I am not wearing pants.

path: 0 2267994 2269463 2269552, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
zabadoh 1 point 3 years ago

Or is it social expectations to wear pants that were developed by subtle marketing by the pants corporations?

E.g. All the marketing you have ever seen shows models wearing pants. Therefore you believe everyone, including yourself, must wear pants all the time, because you believe this the norm.

path: 0 2267994 2269463 2269552 2305612, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
stappern 17 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2268411, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 11
passably9 4 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2268411 2270146, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 10
stappern 5 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2268411 2270146 2270374, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 9
NikkiDimes 4 points 3 years ago

How so?

path: 0 2268411 2270146 2270374 2275369, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 8
stappern -3 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2268411 2270146 2270374 2275369 2282490, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 7
HawlSera 16 points 3 years ago

Battle Passes

But in history it took forever for people in Holland to realize that Tulips are not worth entire plots of land

path: 0 2319305, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
BigBen103 16 points 3 years ago

Lottery's the expected value is always lower than the prize of a ticket. And even if you win it is on the back of other poor desparete people who lost. An then there is the fact winning often leads to a lot of other problems.

path: 0 2285793, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 1
ch00f 2 points 3 years ago

Lottery’s the expected value is always lower than the prize of a ticket.

I mean, of course it is? Zero-effort sources of income kind of have to have a net negative expected value. Or else nobody would have any reason to do anything.

Now you could definitely argue that the low-odds of winning aren’t made entirely clear to the customers, but I know a lot of people pay their $2 a week just for the high of fantasizing about what it would be like to win.

path: 0 2285793 2309575, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
dukeGR4 15 points 3 years ago

Phoebus Cartel, essentially the few oligopolistic light bulb companies got together and colluded and intentionally reduced the lifespan of light bulbs.

path: 0 2325137, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 6
twix 7 points 3 years ago path: 0 2325137 2325878, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2
PipedLinkBot 4 points 3 years ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/zb7Bs98KmnY

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

path: 0 2325137 2325878 2325882, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
nilloc 4 points 3 years ago

The rate at which our LED bulbs are failing (usually over-driven leds or garbage capacitors for the power supply), has me thinking it’s still a thing, only less formal and more profitable.

See dubai bulbs for why.

path: 0 2325137 2329374, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
reddithalation 2 points 3 years ago

this one wasn't really that bad, yes they shortened the life span of the bulbs, but incandescent bulbs were a solved problem at that time, and longer lasting bulbs meant that they must produce less light. that bulb that's lasted a 100 years or whatever, is very very dim, and that's why it's still going. also, dimmer (longer lasting) bulbs are less efficient for the amount of light you get, and some of the lightbulb manufacturers were also power companies, which were struggling with energy and so had reason to want more efficient lightbulbs. here's a great video on the topic https://youtube.com/watch?v=zb7Bs98KmnY

path: 0 2325137 2329714, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
moitoi 13 points 3 years ago

Neoliberalism!

The second is financialization.

Both are huge scams still running.

path: 0 2328692, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
Piecemakers3Dprints 13 points 3 years ago

Religion. The absolute first.

path: 0 2318748, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 4
muhdsalm -9 points 3 years ago

Agree to disagree.

path: 0 2318748 2323446, hotness: undefined, score: -9, children: 3
Balthazar 1 point 3 years ago

Then why did the religious schidm happen that created the Protestant faith?

path: 0 2318748 2323446 2324271, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
muhdsalm 1 point 3 years ago

I'm Muslim, don't know much about that. Wasn't it politically motivated though?

path: 0 2318748 2323446 2324271 2338742, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
pewgar_seemsimandroid 2 points 3 years ago

according to the history of the world video (you should know what im talking about) it started because you were able to buy yourself out of hell

path: 0 2318748 2323446 2324271 2338742 2342530, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
earthseedle 13 points 3 years ago

The Bernie Madoff investment scandal. Started in the 1970’s and continued into the 2000’s. It eventually dissolved in 2008 during the financial crisis. There’s a really great documentary on Netflix about it.

path: 0 2318949, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
nudnyekscentryk 12 points 3 years ago

Religions

path: 0 2315696, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 6
muhdsalm -7 points 3 years ago

What did they ever do to you?

path: 0 2315696 2323455, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 5
TALL421 2 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2315696 2323455 2337033, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
muhdsalm 1 point 3 years ago

tried to fucking brainwash and indoctrinate people straight from birth.

Great, so teaching kids what the parents believe is brainwashing now? Yep. Anything you learn when you are born is brainwashing. That's right.

Ok, I'm just kidding. I get what you're trying to say. Religion demands that you believe everything your parents taught you. The thing is, Islam commands this (first line of Islamic Laws by Ayatollah Sistani):

"A Muslim’s belief in the fundamentals of religion (uṣūl al‑dīn) must be based on personal insight [i.e. grounded in reason], and he cannot follow anyone in the fundamentals of religion; i.e. he cannot accept the word of someone who knows about the fundamentals of religion simply because that person says so. "

Generally be incredibly two-faced

Yep, too many 'saints' use Islam to defend their actions. It's sad really.

path: 0 2315696 2323455 2337033 2338705, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
nudnyekscentryk 2 points 3 years ago

did you really create an account only to defend religion as a concept? and not see the irony of the situation

path: 0 2315696 2323455 2328106, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
muhdsalm 1 point 3 years ago

Not exactly. Switched to lemmy from reddit, first thing that came up 🤷

path: 0 2315696 2323455 2328106 2338360, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
nudnyekscentryk 1 point 3 years ago

Okay

path: 0 2315696 2323455 2328106 2338360 2339049, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Geostorm 10 points 3 years ago

1950 to present antipsychotics whose severe side effects are written off as crazy talk.

path: 0 2277333, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 4
Mindlight 8 points 3 years ago

Care to elaborate?

path: 0 2277333 2280217, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
Geostorm -1 points 3 years ago

Today lack of insight or "anosognosia" was protested in massachusetts https://www.madinamerica.com/... September last year I was told by pro-perjury republican suffolk, new york judge I was not fit to decide. Whether to be assaulted with risperdal, haldol causing Nystagmus eye spasms blatantly against the Quran which northwell banned twice. Alaska Supreme Court acknowledges least restrictive (Olmstead) treatment must be tried first.

I never hallucinated nor self harmed and haven't defended my exes and dog for 3 years during no probable cause, sans investigation false arrests. For peacefully protesting the "delusion" I was invited 5 years ago twice on 90 Day Fiance by a Doomsday Preppers producer. Free charity 125 page lithography Google and 100 page quack Law books don't make me qualified, but a doctor silently passing by the hallway counts as an evaluation www.dropbox.com/sh/p4hbeqa7e74j4lk/AAAl2RN_pmlCDoeg9MXHVe4Ca?dl=0

thorazine, the first antipsychotic, was injected "in emergencies" of talking about fish, crickets, Jesus into an alabama senior citizen who felt safer in the worst state. nassau university medical center pharmacist said she was at the maximum dose but co-workers demanded increase. chemical restraint is illegal everywhere, these are not meant for falling asleep which "pacing" or benadryl, Ativan can help.

neuroleptic malignancy syndrome resulted in May 24, 2020 death perhaps a heart attack, multiple women there stopping menstruation, diabetes, sometimes did not cure the few who hallucinated; kidney, liver damage. Politely asking for FDA label printout and discussing experiences with peers gets your freedom of association revoked in contradiction of state patients' Bill of Rights. $25 billion/year False Claims Act defrauded from 25 million Americans.

path: 0 2277333 2280217 2291770, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
some_guy 6 points 3 years ago

I have taken an antipsychotic for insomnia at different times. Can you elaborate on what you're saying? It isn't clear to me. Severe side effects, however, have been extremely clear at different times. Are you saying those are downplayed to the point of gaslighting?

path: 0 2277333 2280299, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
ZodiacSF1969 0 points 3 years ago

The side effects have been well known for a long time. I can see pharma companies downplaying them, but in modern times the risks are well understood. Do you have an example?

path: 0 2277333 2288334, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
_I_ 10 points 3 years ago

The one I'm running right now, and you don't have a clue, Kevin!

path: 0 2275305, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
LBRABO 9 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2268507, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
SouthEndSunset 9 points 3 years ago

Are we allowed to mention capitalism and brexit?

path: 0 2329677, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
albertsy2 9 points 3 years ago

Religion

path: 0 2329660, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Guster 7 points 3 years ago

G2A

path: 0 2269227, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
tomcatt360 1 point 3 years ago

That's where I get my occasional Windows license, nothing else.

path: 0 2269227 2290961, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
WeAreAllOne 7 points 3 years ago

Banks.

path: 0 2285850, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 5
jackpot 3 points 3 years ago

elaborate

path: 0 2285850 2289979, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 4
Simba 4 points 3 years ago

They can't.

Unless they're referring to scummy mega-banks that exist by fucking over the little guy with random fees, hard to close accounts, and other scummy practices like Wells Fargo, BofA, etc.

But banks as an institution? No.

path: 0 2285850 2289979 2293502, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
ErC 0 points 3 years ago

Lol. "Banks are good. Except those giving banks services"

path: 0 2285850 2289979 2293502 2296594, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
spongebue 2 points 3 years ago

"Banks are bad. Mattresses are good, store money there."

path: 0 2285850 2289979 2293502 2296594 2307781, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
purahna 1 point 3 years ago

look friend, they had to make laws outlawing bank runs. You know what that means? They don't have all your money. And not only that, but the state is willing to use violence on you if you threaten their right to not have all your money. This sounds cut and dry.

path: 0 2285850 2289979 2305947, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Razp 7 points 3 years ago

Bitcoin

path: 0 2314957, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
Piecemakers3Dprints 2 points 3 years ago

NGL, I've been on both ends: had a good friend give me 13 BTC when they were less than $0.10 apiece, and I've no idea what happened to them. On the other hand, I may've also sold near the ATH of 2017 and taken my entire family on a no-expense-spared Christmas trip fully paid by said profits. Still... 13 BTC at that latter moment would've been worth near a quarter mil. 🥹🤷🏼‍♂️

path: 0 2314957 2318872, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Dirk 5 points 3 years ago

Compound interest

path: 0 2269010, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 7
rich8n 9 points 3 years ago

In what way is compound interest a scam? Who has been "scammed" by compound interest and how?

path: 0 2269010 2269159, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 6
Rodeo 12 points 3 years ago

For most of history charging interest was considered very unethical. There's even a derogatory term for it: usury.

It's a rather recent phenomenon that usury has become acceptable.

path: 0 2269010 2269159 2269360, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 5
MrTulip 13 points 3 years ago

Yep. The one time Jesus got violent in the Bible, it was against the money lenders.

path: 0 2269010 2269159 2269360 2269651, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 1
rich8n 0 points 3 years ago

And that means it's a scam today how exactly? The Bible was pretty explicitly against a lot of things. Are they scams? Is wearing two different fabrics a scam? Is eating shellfish a scam?

path: 0 2269010 2269159 2269360 2269651 2400737, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
rich8n 1 point 3 years ago

Ok, but its archaic status as immoral does not make it a "scam" today.

path: 0 2269010 2269159 2269360 2400665, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
Rodeo 1 point 3 years ago

It's a scam because it's literally free money for the lender. They do no work, they generate no value, but they still get paid.

path: 0 2269010 2269159 2269360 2400665 2418984, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
cedeho 5 points 3 years ago path: 0 2325408, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
poudlardo 4 points 3 years ago

Replies are wild, i love it

path: 0 2275821, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Spacebar 4 points 3 years ago

MLMs

path: 0 2268610, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
AlmightySnoo 3 points 3 years ago

Rent

path: 0 2268875, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
AndreyAsimow 2 points 3 years ago

The US dollar with no backing value

path: 0 2268053, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 7
naught 15 points 3 years ago

Yeah? What should back the currency? What would have happened to the dollar if it was still pegged to gold? What is the difference between an artificially scarce natural resource and a currency backed by a superpower?

path: 0 2268053 2269876, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 2
scrubbles 19 points 3 years ago

Like gold value has any meaning lol, humans are still just "ooo shiney"

path: 0 2268053 2269876 2270007, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 1
naught 6 points 3 years ago

That's exactly my point. Gold shills sit around and wax on about how it's a cure-all and how the gold standard was better blah blah without understanding the basic reasons why it had to go.

path: 0 2268053 2269876 2270007 2276075, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
moobythegoldensock 7 points 3 years ago

It’s backed by the government. Yes, if the government falls apart the dollar will be worthless, but if the government falls apart a lot more will happen than just the currency dying.

path: 0 2268053 2275549, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2
RivenRise 6 points 3 years ago

That's my reasoning behind trusting banks with my money. If shit goes down to the point I can't get my money out of a bank then it won't have much value for long anyways and I have bigger issues.

path: 0 2268053 2275549 2277679, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
moobythegoldensock 4 points 3 years ago

Nowadays, yes. Back in the day a run on the bank could screw everyone.

path: 0 2268053 2275549 2277679 2277897, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
tungah -5 points 3 years ago

The days are numbered on this one, probably.

path: 0 2268053 2269098, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 0
pewgar_seemsimandroid 1 point 3 years ago

school system

path: 0 2342409, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
teft 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 2267816, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
lupercalia 1 point 3 years ago

Life

path: 0 2344329, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
jaackf 1 point 3 years ago

Renting

path: 0 2330385, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
TrismegistusMx 1 point 3 years ago

The United States of America

path: 0 2268563, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
disconnectikacio -5 points 3 years ago

Christianity, Cocacola, all "luxury" brand, russia is strong, McDonalds, burgerkin, kfc, google "dont be evil", microsoft, facebook/meta, etc

path: 0 2286923, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 3
mojo 4 points 3 years ago

A lot of that needs elaboration

path: 0 2286923 2287367, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
ZodiacSF1969 3 points 3 years ago

Lmao yes Coca-Cola is such a scam. Wtf are you talking about?

path: 0 2286923 2290803, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
disconnectikacio -1 points 3 years ago

They selling a dangerous (however is good for clening exhaust pipes🤣) overpriced penny shit, saying its refreshing, while making one of the biggest amount of garbage worldwide.

path: 0 2286923 2290803 2303012, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
somegeek -6 points 3 years ago

Tax

path: 0 2295808, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 1
loudWaterEnjoyer 3 points 3 years ago

You stupid motherfuckers

path: 0 2295808 2296107, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
shinigamiookamiryuu -8 points 3 years ago

Ever since the 90's, almost every protest or riot that has been on TV in the past few decades has been based on circumstances everyone has been misled or lied to about. I say this generally, I'm not speaking about any specific ideology or any particular group. All the protests follow the same pattern of epiphany, yet they keep happening.

The ones that took place during covid scammed us all because covid required those in charge to say "don't worry, us being out in the open didn't cause the virus to spread, we took precautions". Today, covid commercials will say those same groups that those protests were made for were disproportionately affected by covid as if it's because of human right, and nobody is connecting it to the fact the protests happened during a time when every restaurant had plexiglass barriers. Again, not speaking for any group in particular, this was a fault for the Canadian truckers, BLM, those Trump-voting Libertarians, etc.

path: 0 2277732, hotness: undefined, score: -8, children: 2
PlexSheep 4 points 3 years ago

What about protests against climate change, human rights, just to name a few. I disagree.

path: 0 2277732 2294223, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
shinigamiookamiryuu 0 points 3 years ago

You say that like they wouldn't especially be included.

Climate change is an issue, I don't deny that. Nor do I deny it's accelerated by humanity. But it's incredibly inflated. Every decade has "a few decades into the future" as our day of doom, and nobody does anything about Asian countries polluting the Earth, they just ask Western nations to do things. In China, there are cities where you need a gas mask to go out onto the streets, maybe do something about that.

As for human rights, yeah that's the biggest contributor to false or misleading protests, and again I am not speaking in favor of either political wing here. The Tawana Brawley protests, based on a lie. The George Floyd protests (and its satellite protests), based on a lot of glorification and a generalization of their targets. The Harambe protests, not misleading but definitely overblown. The Cecil the lion protests, completely pointless. The White House protests with Q-anon, completely without evidence even if it "seemed" they were right (and was done by a white supremacist group). The pro-Trump protests before that, based on over-heroism. I could go on.

A scam is any ploy made for gain that isn't based on an honest foundation. Protests as of late would thus be scams on a grand scale.

path: 0 2277732 2294223 2296787, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
JokeDeity -20 points 3 years ago

This thread just opened my eyes. I really thought Lemmy being so young would mean the average users would be pretty saavy and intelligent. Nope, same idiots as Reddit and everywhere else.

path: 0 2269470, hotness: undefined, score: -20, children: 4
bady 25 points 3 years ago

You're free to have your own opinions. But please note that your tone is not helpful and you may be just doing what exactly you're speaking against. Let's keep the discussions civil and healthy instead of labelling people.

path: 0 2269470 2270324, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 0
Pandantic 17 points 3 years ago

Cool cool what’s the right answer then?

path: 0 2269470 2269765, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
ijeff 3 points 3 years ago

Like anywhere on the internet, it really comes down to doing your best to exude the kind of energy you want to receive back (and moderation/filtering). There are all types of people around and the key is to just do your best to stay positive. Moderation tools are also more primitive on Lemmy, so, as traffic grows, users will have a larger role to play in reporting and manually curating their feeds via blocking.

If it ever feels like too much, I also recommend taking a break from social media. You may also want to consider other instances like beehaw.org, which goes to great lengths to maintain its particular atmosphere.

path: 0 2269470 2275053, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
greenbean 1 point 3 years ago

Why would you even assume that? It's all just random people. If you have nothing constructive to say, you can fuck off and start your own intelligent community and stop being a toxic shitstain.

path: 0 2269470 2271306, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
dunning_cougar -27 points 3 years ago

The Russian collusion hoax!

path: 0 2269560, hotness: undefined, score: -27, children: 1
kmkz_ninja 1 point 3 years ago

Donald Trump has never lied to get out of consequences.

path: 0 2269560 2282576, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
asklemmy
asklemmy

@lemmy.ml

login for more options
55809
8856
4343

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy �*

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

go to feed...