Dude was a piece of shit. Why are you so eager to defend him?

It's okay to be happy awful people are dead.

Would you say the same for Hitler? There is a line for everyone

rich greedy people are going to treat you the same regardless

you are simping for a man that wouldn’t pee on you to put you out if you were on fire

how naive must you to be to think bring nice to them will change their behavior

You can see how polarized this opinion is. Not speaking ill of the dead is a religious power thing. The idea that all deaths deserve a quiet respect is pushed by a class of elderly people in positions of power.

You can bet that when Donald Trump dies there will be parties. Some humans have no redeeming qualities and that needs to be acknowledged more. Peter Thiel, Elon Musk need to know NOW how people will regard them after death as the cancers of society they were.

Lemmy is good at that. Some of the worst examples of humanity are on this site.

you're right.

look at all the good stuff Adolph Hitler gave the world!

It’s terrible for the health of the Fediverse, too. And probably a legal liability.

“Where’s the sunscreen?”

Meh, I don't wish death on anyone, but that doesn't mean I have to be sad that a shitty person died.

this isn't complicated

the social contract basically boils down to, you at a baseline do right by me and in return I do the same for you

assholes like this and other rich fucks try to game this system for profit by literally harming parts of our lives via loopholes

when ass fucks say lets hurt person ‘insert something that has no impact on anything’ like skin color or sexuality that is wrong

when people talk about wishing death on people that are literally fucking with our lives it should obviously not be the same

whether tanking a video game falls into that bucket is nuanced but people like the united health fuck are easily fair game

It’s wrong to wish people dead

I had this attitude 20 years ago. I no longer do. I've come to realize that there are certain rich fucks who are actively harming humanity directly (Hitler, Kissinger, Reagan, world leaders who send the poor to useless wars), and if they died and their death prevented more suffering, that's a good thing for humanity. Even the rich fucks that just hoard money are actively robbing from the poor to do so, and some of those people die as a result.

How many people does a person have to kill before they are too far gone to save, and are just evil? How many levels of indirection does it take before they wouldn't be considered evil? What happens if a person indirectly kills millions of people? Is that still far enough to call them evil?

These are the questions you should ask yourself when you try to plot out your own moral compass.

Wait, why do you hate lemmy for this? I think who you actually hate are humans. Reddit and all the other modern social media platforms have the same issues, because they too have humans.

That pretty much nails my feelings. Charlie Kirk is a huge piece of shit and I'm glad he died honestly. But I'd be a worse person if I made a personality out of mocking him for being dead. Can't we just take the win? Fate decided a bad person was over. I wish that could be that.

Stop hating Lemmy. For me, it's my way of communicating that I'm a Misanthropic Anti-Natalist. I can do my part to sway the public opinion that humans should all go extinct. I can spread the idea of humans being the monsters, the true enemies of the planet and all it's life. I can see it slowly taking hold of the world, people coming to terms with our monstrous nature. Someday in the far future, perhaps we all choose to self-terminate. We are not divine nor special, just meat.

documented recent speculation that we don't know he was involved with? his brother yves was the ceo at the time of all this drama. Claude was just a stakeholder.

it's clear that nobody knew who the fuck he was before this thread and suddenly everybody is trying to spin a story

Please don't downplay the harmful pracrices those leaders/executives have on teens and children. They are actively exploting them for money. Just because the harm isn't immediately visible, doesn't mean it won't have lasting effects.

The other is making games with bad monetization and bad business practices.

You're horribly underplaying what the Guillermot family has done as the heads of Ubisoft. There's plenty of articles that have come out about how they're actively (and illegally) suppressing unionization in Ubisoft. They're also actively lobbying to prevent regulation in the US and Europe.

But of course you didn't include that because it doesn't support your argument. Just shut up you intellectually and morally bankrupt bootlicker

They're part of the same class.

Honestly the only helicopters I'd trust are VTOLs that lean more toward the plain side of things, mostly because then they can glide and don't just rush towards the ground.

See you at the next antivax meeting.

This is why baby shark blew up. You know what else babies like? Ice cream.

We've blown it wide open. Watch your backs and sleep with one eye open!

I can't imagine people that got rich by exploiting people and cutting corners have the strictest maintenance regime, either.

Guess those rich people are just going to have to start buying commercial jets. What a nightmare!

You mean last week. Cars slaughter 580 people a week.

How often does Bezos end up in a plane? How often are you in a plane?

They fly small planes, in a lot of cases they fly themselves.

We might not learn their names, but we definitely learn about the aircraft and how many people died.

Now that I had ent considered. There’s importance squared. A second layer.

I’m tired of humans. I’m now identify as one of those gay frogs Alex Jones is so strangely passionate about.

And in the current case, did he cause any direct or indirect death? Did he chose to cause someone death?

And what are you talking about? Our current case of fascism is a direct result of unregulated capitalism, courtesy of neoliberalism.

Not gonna argue on that because it is true. Still, fascism wouldn't strive as it does without those who only logic is "I don't like them so he deserves to die". That's the logic behind german innaction when jews were getting oppressed, and I prefer fight that now than wait for it to be the majority logic.

Being angry at capitalist excess is a good thing. Saying that someone dying horribly is ok because you disagreed with how it ran is business isn't.

Fascist rely on that communitarian instinct to trives. Nazism rise came partly from clever propaganda gymnastic. To the rich, they said the problem was bolcheviks who spread unrest into the masses. To the poors, they said it was the rich jews who fattened on their labor.
To both they found a scapegoat remote enough to avoid having them interact enough to realize fascism bullshit, and that's how they won.

Fascism always tries to dehumanise part of society to make them the scapegoat for real issues, and gain momentum. Refusing those easy narrative is the first and more important step to refuse fascism.

lol just dedicate your life to it, no big deal!

What you’re saying is probably true, but I don’t think he deserved to die burned in a crash for such things.

That warrants the dead penalty then. Justice is served!

I did a search for his name alongside the sexual harassment accusations, and I don't see his name listed anywhere. It's suspicious that so many around him are accused, but I don't see Claude named anywhere.

That means he deserved to die?