It somewhat is for some people. Like where are you going to meet people of the opposite gender? I don't think most women want to be hit on at work, gym, grocery stores, whatever. Men are starved enough for attention that many of us will appreciate any, anywhere, anytime, but I'm not into guys.

We need a real-life amulet of Mara tbh.

My experience using Bumble was great. I treated it as a background task that I want expecting immediate results from. When I was killing time, I'd swipe instead of using socials. When I matched, I'd chat briefly to see if she seemed ok, but then quickly asked to meet. Found my wife using it. My adult daughter found someone on Hinge and he's great. I'd recommend trying apps to everyone looking.

anti-trust

As if that were a thing anymore.

Someone needs to patch that hole but we know the current government won't...

Absorbing other companies is illegal under anti-trust

Huh?

okcommie

OnlyMLs

Moderation would be a nightmare, especially since Lemmy is used within many jurisdictions.

From my tests, it is full of fake bot account, bugs (my account simply vanished, twice, without reason), and moderation is basically nonexistent.

None of my 30+ interactions was with a genuine human, all of them were crypto scams, or similar scams.

It comes from a good idea, but god it is badly done.

Archer

Asian People Meet

Babyboomer People Meet

BB People Meet

Black Christian People Meet

Black People Meet

Black Professional People Meet

BLK

Catholic People Meet

Chinese People Meet

Chispa

Delightful

Democratic People Meet

Divorced People Meet

Genxpeoplemeet

Her

Hinge

Indiamatch

Interracial People Meet

Italian People Meet

J People Meet

Latino People Meet

Ldsplanet

Little People Meet

Loveandseek

Marriage Minded People Meet

Match.com

Match Japan

OkCupid

Ourtime

Pairs

People Meet

Pet People Meet

Plenty of Fish

Republican People Meet

Salams

Seniorblack People Meet

Single People Meet

Sniffies (minority stake)[63][64]

Stir

The League

Tinder

Upward

Yuzu

For a list of items like this, it makes sense to use either an ordered list

1. Item one
2. Item two
3. Item three

or an unordered list

- Item one
- Item two
- Item three

neither of which require extra spaces or extra newlines

You can also put a backslash before the new line

Like\
this.

Like
this.

If you want each entry to appear on a new line, you need to put two spaces at the end of each line.

Line 1 Line 2

Interesting, I had no idea and always wondered what was the deal with line breaks here. I only know how to do the paragraph breaks. Thanks!

For now.

IIRC, Pepsi and Coca-Cola are not owned by the same parent umbrella corporation. But you are generally right. Again, IIRC, there are like six companies that own something like 85% of brands in grocery stores.

Pretty much. Pepsi and Frito lay are one thing now.

As others have noted, they benefit from you being a continued customer - not finding a forever match. What better way to achieve that then never letting you match a real human at all?

Most of these platforms operate by showing you profiles of others, and showing them profiles of others, and requiring some kind of mutual match to start a conversation. I very much doubt any of these services create bot accounts to do this, and to be fair, they don't need to. The bots are created by scammers hoping to run a scam on lonely people.

The better apps do things to remove bot accounts. Hinge, for example, doesnt have many bots atm ime. Tinder, meanwhile, has been losing marketshare for the past several years and is becoming more lax about policing bots (not that it was ever particularly stringent...) in order to inflate user numbers to show to their shareholders.

People tend to match with bots because the bots will try to match with basically anyone, and because the profiles are made with pics of hot people.

For anyone who has adopted an effective strategy in dating apps, bots are not a problem. You can identify bots quickly and easily because bots don't go on dates. So if you match with someone cool, ask them out not long after you match. Most people who are actually using a dating site to find a partner (long term or otherwise) want to go on dates, so this is normal and expected. Any effective strategy minimizes long, drawn out conversations with people (since these convos almost always go no where anyway, even with real people), which is the opposite of what scammers want (finding people desperate and lonely enough that they will make an emotional connection with someone they have never met in real life).

But the biggest problem people have with bots isnt actually getting scammed, but rather, the emotional turmoil of seeing the notification that you got a match, then realizing it was just a bot. This can be effectively delt with by getting more human matches by becoming more attractive and getting better pictures to show off this attractiveness, and having modes outside of OLD to get dates so your whole romantic life isnt caught up in the internet (which, btw, is also attractive)

It's not technically independent since Badoo (owned by Bumble) is a very popular dating app too. Those two apps/companies have a weird history (Badoo's owner funded Bumble), but Bumble was also started by an ex-Tinder employee.

And looking at their Wikipedia entries, Bumble seems to be publicly traded with Blackstone owning a significant portion of the company. Bumble also bought Fruitz (another dating app) a few years ago.

And kept in business by a thriving community of convention-attending Republicans.

Publicly traded is even worse tbh

The problem is meeting ppl organically is impossible now because we've been priced out of 3rd spaces. Ppl can't afford $15 beers or $300 concert tickets.

The proof lies in them not bothering to ask, "Why did you reject this person?" If they actually took note, they would zero in on your type immediately and send you only people of that type and you'd match within weeks. They don't want that lol. They want you to hang around...

Yeah it's one of those cases where basic material interest ought to cast suspicion on the apps in my view.

Can you point me in the direction of these failed attempts? I'm tempted to try something similar and would rather learn from others' mistake first.

Changend ownership since. They got bought out.

Good on them. It really felt like a genuine attempt by a few math nerds back in the day, if you read the blog. Hope they made bank.

Though I never met The One^TM^ on there, I had a few hook-ups that I really needed at the time. If I hadn't already met The One^TM^ through other means at that time, I would've abandoned ship as soon as I heard that it got sold.

Except they can't get the same punishment as people like 'going to jail' and will instead get a stern talk or maybe even gasp a slap on the wrist

Perhaps I should have written "simple" instead of "easy".

But yes, the road to implementing solutions is blocked by rich people and class traitors.

I’m sensing a bit of /s

No, there's actually no evidence that they work. Period. Not because people don't know what they want--although that's true--but because they can't predict how people will feel in person. Attraction is incredibly complicated, and it doesn't come down to checking a whole lot of boxes. The idea of 'market value' is pure incel bullshit; that's the reason that incels do things like looksmaxxing, and it's also the reason that it utterly fails.

At best, they can help screen people for core values, e.g., I'm not going to be able to get along with an evangelical christian, and I'm certainly not going to be able to date anyone that believes that firearms should be banned or heavily restricted. But even that's difficult, because people that seem to have radically different values can still have good relationships with each other.

Most of it is a placebo effect.

https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/...

1 - you are awesome. That is some decent research QUICK that I am not as inclined as you to do. 2 - glad you keep a level head. The lines turn into threads, and threads turn into full blown garments. And before you know it you have undone your own fabric of reality. Unable to stitch the tattered scraps back together...

Ask me how I know.

It's just trying to get you engaged to ultimately pay. You can have matches and they'll be super far in the cue forcing you to buy matches or access to seeing them.

The prices to make the apps functional are incredibly high.

Besides, I don't think they need to engineer anything to be bad. Dating random people outside your social network and interests is just not a recipe for success. Much easier to date people in the same environment as you: work, school, friend group etc...

Dating apps cant do that. Matching people you kinda know is really weird and awkward lol

But they do have competition, as I mentioned earlier. There are other well known and used dating sites, and people always have the option of simply leaving the house to meet someone.

At the end of the day, they are incentivized to find you a match, because a dating app that actually generates matches and dates is far more valuable than one that doesnt.

If your complaint is "this business won't give me their services for free", then that's not a real complaint. They're a business, and businesses exist to make money. Last I checked, the price of a hinge subscription for a month was about $30. You could easily spend that much on a few drinks in a night at a trendy bar.

Is tinder full of bots? Yes. But also, tinder is something of a sinking ship, and the bots keep their numbers inflated while not fighting thr flood saves on expenses. I've had much better luck on Hinge.

That is an awesome idea for a dating site. You should make it, and when it starts finding people their soulmates within a month, it will quickly become the most profitable app in the world and you'll make oodles of money.

Or else you'll figure out some flaw in your plan, and it will end up about as good at finding people matches as showing them a random assortment of people on the site.