TW: sexual assault and rape [PizzaCake]

2 days ago by cannedtuna to c/comicstrips

PizzaCake | Bluesky

TW: Sexual Assault

Transcript

7 Panel Comic

Panel 1: White text on blood red background “TW: Sexual Assault”

Panel 2: A guy holds down a semi-conscious naked girl. Her eyes are closed and tear stained. Her mouth in an expression of pain. Around her are more reaching hands.

Jane Doe: This hurts….there’s too many people here…

I can’t breathe…

Panel 3: Beside the girl lays an empty liquor bottle and an empty pill bottle. Hands press down on her head and chest.

Jane Doe: I’ve got the spins

What’s happening

Who’s touching me?

I don’t want to do this anymore

Panel 4: A group of naked men laugh as they enjoy themselves

Jane Doe: I’m scared…

… if I say stop…

…will they get mad?

I can’t talk anyway…

Panel 5: Blood runs between her thighs. Her legs are bruised.

Jane Doe: Ow! Stop grabbing me!

I think I’m bleeding…

…I want to go home…

Just….gonna….shut….down….

Panel 6: The girl wraps her arms around her legs and closes her eyes as she listens to the barrage of insults, vitriol and victim blaming after coming out with what was done to her.

You can’t cry ‘rape’ whenever you regret sleeping with someone!!

Bitch

Maybe don’t hang out with guys!

Your fault for getting drunk!

Whore

You said yes at first! You can’t take it back!

Why didn’t you push them off?!

Slut

She just wants money!

Stop trying to ruin their lives!!

Attention seeker

Panel 7: “Why are they mad at me?”

dohpaz42 175 points 2 days ago

I am going to preemptively say that if you decide to comment and say anything remotely victim-blaming or stir up any drama against the artist or fellow community members, your comments will be removed, up to and including being banned.

Please consider using the spoiler markdown if you feel the need to go into detail.

:::spoiler Some title suggesting Trigger Warning (TW)
<your experience>
:::

We are all adults here, and can objectively (AND RESPECTFULLY) have difficult conversations when needed. Not everyone has the same experiences, nor the same reactions, and their traumas are very real regardless of what you may see or know about them.

path: 0 26264526, hotness: undefined, score: 175, children: 18
user224 2 points 13 hours ago

I think there needs to be a space between the 3 colons and "spoiler": https://join-lemmy.org/docs/users/02-media.html

While it does seem to work either way on default LemmyUI, it might not work in some clients, including official Jerboa Android app.

Without space

Bad text

With space

Bad text

path: 0 26264526 26286509, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
user224 1 point 13 hours ago

Ok, it seems the first incorrect spoiler also breaks second correct one (on Jerboa), so here it is in a separate comment
::: spoiler With space Bad text :::

path: 0 26264526 26286509 26286582, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
flying_sheep 1 point 13 hours ago path: 0 26264526 26286092, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Kangae_Hishiryo -28 points 2 days ago

I don't think that's a good way to proceed.

You might be blaming victims of false allegations of rape with that, and trust me, I know well how it feels to be raped and to be a victim of false allegations, and both are equally horrible and damaging for anyone who has to live with them.

path: 0 26264526 26269116, hotness: undefined, score: -28, children: 4
dohpaz42 31 points 2 days ago

Please elaborate on what I said that falls under victim blaming?

Edit: I want to make sure I’m clear: I am genuinely interested in what you have to say and I will listen.

path: 0 26264526 26269116 26269563, hotness: undefined, score: 31, children: 3
Kangae_Hishiryo 11 points 2 days ago

Well.

That's because most victims of false allegations have it nearly impossible to even report it. Let alone proving it, that's even harder.

Now, most of persons (mostly women, because it's other story for men, we're considered the de facto criminals unless proven otherwise) that do false allegations, use these tactics: they give consent and after the act they revoke it and cry "rape", because they know they'll be automatically believed by most people. That's in part because of the "Women-are-wonderful" effect. And most of them do that because of two principal reasons: vengeance or free money (remember that there are programs to help people that suffer abuse, and they then abuse of them making false claims).

Now, take into account that most people takes these things (like telling them not to destroy other people's live, or that they just want free money or attention, or that they can't regret afterwards and claim rape as if it were nothing) like rape-denialism and victim-blaming, and trust me, I know that's in part justified, I'm well aware of DARVO strategies that actual sexual abusers can make and that a lot of victims aren't heard because of that... But people who do false claims also use DARVO strategies, they're abusers too although of another type, not sexual, and not every time that someone claims to be abused it's true that they were abused.

It's a hard situation without a clear solution, but this is won't help it to be better.

path: 0 26264526 26269116 26269563 26270220, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 2
diablicja 12 points a day ago

Imho false allegations should be punished the same as rape (only in cases when it can be proven without a shade of doubt that it was false and intentional). Not only because it ruins the life of the accused, but because it makes all cases of rape harder to prosecute. We should completely eliminate "she's making it up" from the equation.

path: 0 26264526 26269116 26269563 26270220 26276266, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
ColeSloth -29 points 2 days ago

You can't really say you want to encourage difficult conversations while at the same time threaten to just block and ban people. That's not having a conversation. That's just surrounding yourself with people who only share your opinion. Even if your opinion is probably the moral one.

path: 0 26264526 26269991, hotness: undefined, score: -29, children: 7
dohpaz42 49 points 2 days ago

Believe it or not, yes I can, and I will. As for what I’ve seen so far, most all comments are in line with being both respectful and thoughtful. This is the type of discourse this topic deserves. There have been one or two comments that fell out of scope and they were dealt with accordingly. This is how moderation works.

path: 0 26264526 26269991 26271382, hotness: undefined, score: 49, children: 3
ColeSloth -22 points a day ago

I'm sure it has been that way. You prefaced it with banning anyone who'd say otherwise.

path: 0 26264526 26269991 26271382 26274189, hotness: undefined, score: -22, children: 2
Seleni 3 points 10 hours ago

So, you’re saying you want to have an aggressive, screaming match focusing on blame-throwing towards victims instead? I mean, you do you, but I’m pretty sure you could just go to Xitter for that.

path: 0 26264526 26269991 26271382 26274189 26288218, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Katana314 1 point 2 minutes ago

If I said “This comic sucks, the linework is terrible” I have doubts the mods would come after me. The specific issue was “victim blaming”, and the mod was specific.

It’s a bit like using slurs, or claiming the holocaust never happened. Such comments are wrong, never add to discussion, and usually come from someone that wants to see a reaction.

path: 0 26264526 26269991 26271382 26274189 26293603, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Holyginz 46 points a day ago

In order to be tolerant, you have to be intolerant of the intolerant.

path: 0 26264526 26269991 26273132, hotness: undefined, score: 46, children: 1
crystalmathadept 35 points a day ago

That’s why it’s ok to punch nazis.

path: 0 26264526 26269991 26273132 26274404, hotness: undefined, score: 35, children: 0
captcha 3 points 2 hours ago

Not every statement is valid as a discussion, imo. Victim-blaming does not seem like discussing anything, and feels to me like those statements about every opinion being valid and then trying to justify something wild. A bit like ‘scientists don't know everything, so my flat earth theory is also valid’

path: 0 26264526 26269991 26292414, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Carrots -86 points 2 days ago

Extend it to downvoting ;)

path: 0 26264526 26264634, hotness: undefined, score: -86, children: 1
dohpaz42 51 points 2 days ago

People are free to express their opinion using downvoting. However, if anyone feels there may be vote manipulation, then by all means ask and we can look into it.

path: 0 26264526 26264634 26264845, hotness: undefined, score: 51, children: 0
Nurse_Robot 109 points 2 days ago path: 0 26264598, hotness: undefined, score: 109, children: 23
Carl 50 points 2 days ago

Is Pizza Cake a controversial artist? Genuine question, because I personally haven’t seen any strips that would make me dislike her. But I also only see the ones that get upvoted on Lemmy.

I guess there will be some chuds who dislike comics like this one, which clearly advocate for something. But that’s pretty standard chud behavior, not limited to any one specific artist.

path: 0 26264598 26266382, hotness: undefined, score: 50, children: 10
garbagebagel 84 points 2 days ago

She got accused of misandry for a particular comic and then a lot of misogynists jumped on board. I don't think she's like the funniest ever, but definitely doesn't deserve as much hate as she gets IMO. Lemmy is better about her than reddit for sure.

path: 0 26264598 26266382 26266883, hotness: undefined, score: 84, children: 1
CrimeIsLegalNow 14 points 2 days ago

Better, sure. Free of the idiots who think they shouldn't ever see a popular comic they don't like in their feed, no.

path: 0 26264598 26266382 26266883 26270658, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
Taleya 41 points 2 days ago

She's visibly female on the internet, so yeah, chuds

path: 0 26264598 26266382 26270432, hotness: undefined, score: 41, children: 0
Serinus 22 points 2 days ago

It's milquetoast pandering to help sell explicit stuff. No reason to hate, but I'm not a huge fan either.

There are worse things in the world than being a little bland.

path: 0 26264598 26266382 26267287, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 5
Carl 19 points 2 days ago

Does the artist do porn commissions or something? I haven’t seen any comics from them that were more explicit than every other webcomic ever made.

path: 0 26264598 26266382 26267287 26267321, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 4
Zos_Kia 30 points 2 days ago

I recently realized she has an only fans, not for porn comics but for regular porn featuring herself. It's as milquetoast as her comics I guess.

path: 0 26264598 26266382 26267287 26267321 26267375, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 3
Zensate -14 points a day ago

No she's just a bad artist with a worse personality

path: 0 26264598 26266382 26274612, hotness: undefined, score: -14, children: 0
mnemonicmonkeys 24 points a day ago

JFC, this is the first I've heard of this story. Shit like this is why all frats need banned from every university. They're all shit

path: 0 26264598 26271617, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 0
mesamunefire 4 points 2 days ago

This aint reddit.

path: 0 26264598 26264745, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 10
Nurse_Robot 58 points 2 days ago

They still show up here my friend

path: 0 26264598 26264745 26265052, hotness: undefined, score: 58, children: 9
ladicius 6 points 2 days ago

Report them, block them.

path: 0 26264598 26264745 26265052 26265405, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 6
churrodestroyer -6 points 2 days ago

Cant report the downvote trolls that never comment or post

Ask me how I know

path: 0 26264598 26264745 26265052 26265405 26265724, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 5
mesamunefire -3 points 2 days ago

Haven't seen them yet.

path: 0 26264598 26264745 26265052 26267485, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 1
GreenKnight23 3 points a day ago

1000004704

path: 0 26264598 26264745 26265052 26267485 26272797, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
erin 80 points 2 days ago

Some of the things I've seen people saying about Jane Doe are truly vile. The mental gymnastics people will go through in order to victim blame are disgusting. I especially cannot stand it when I see other women putting down survivors. I hope Jane Doe gets justice and the coverup has consequences.

path: 0 26267932, hotness: undefined, score: 80, children: 0
ruuster13 71 points 2 days ago

I downloaded a photo of the Cornell 7 last night and Google Photos immediately removed it. It's still sitting in a folder but won't show up in Google Photos. I'm curious if anyone can reproduce this. The lengths they go to censor survivors and protect perpetrators is unacceptable.

path: 0 26267066, hotness: undefined, score: 71, children: 3
waltersf 63 points 2 days ago
  1. Get on grapheneOS or Linux ASAP.
  2. perps

    rapists

path: 0 26267066 26267289, hotness: undefined, score: 63, children: 0
mynona 13 points 2 days ago

My screenshots get listed by Photos but not Downloads. I downloaded the Sun's group shot and screenshotted it with expected results, unable to reproduce (old S21 defaults, no Google backups).

path: 0 26267066 26267574, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
user224 3 points 13 hours ago

That might also just be a bug.
I've had issues with downloaded photos appearing in Google Photos before, usually based on download source. For example, downloading a picture via Termux would cause it to not get detected by Google Photos, however renaming the file in Google Files would solve this.

path: 0 26267066 26286675, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
A_norny_mousse 38 points 2 days ago

Victim blaming. I have seen it happening.

SA warning

It was "but they were both on drugs" and "but they were in a relationship".
Often from women.

Then there's the cherrypicking; one allegation was rape, the other that the guy was grooming her because he was much older than her. People got hung up on the age difference as something that shouldn't be an issue, and ignored the much bigger issue: "what, now I can't try to pick up young women anymore? You're creating an athmosphere of fear and prosecution!" - No dipshit, you just can't rape them.
The same applies to the person who stands with the victim (that was me): "but I've seen you flirting with younger women too! Don't be so sanctimonious!"

Frankly, just trying to support her was a horrible experience. Can't imagine how it must have felt for her. So brave to come forward.
But I wouldn't miss this experience for the world.
I hope you're doing OK.

path: 0 26265278, hotness: undefined, score: 38, children: 24
erin 33 points 2 days ago

Even years later, when I tell my story I get victim blaming comments, even from people I otherwise trusted. I no longer bring it up outside of with other women I feel safe with.

CW: SA

"You can't just take back your consent."

I didn't. I said stop, they didn't, because finishing was more important than my comfort. Consent can be retracted at any time. Stop means stop, and no means no.

"Did you even defend yourself?"

He was bigger, stronger, and had already ignored my "stop" and my "no." I was scared and I shut down.

The person who assaulted me never faced any consequences. I still freeze up during intimacy. I hope Jane Doe gets justice and closure.

path: 0 26265278 26268164, hotness: undefined, score: 33, children: 21
SeductiveTortoise 7 points 2 days ago

If I go out to eat, I can take back my consent at any time. I don't see a difference here.

"This [food] sucks, I'm out."

Shit that this happened to you. I hope you're better.

path: 0 26265278 26268164 26268969, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
A_norny_mousse 2 points a day ago

Thanks for sharing.

Re your first quote:

I wish (these) men would talk about their sexuality a bit more openly. The need for relief. The still widespread tabooing of masturbation, esp. when a woman is present. I believe it would help them understand that what they're doing is wrong - while relief is still possible.

path: 0 26265278 26268164 26276472, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
freely1333 -3 points 2 days ago
path: 0 26265278 26268164 26269937, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 18
Nath 6 points a day ago

Wait. You genuinely believe there are women somewhere who would consent to a conga line of unknown guys just having their way with them while passed out?

That is absolutely not a thing.

path: 0 26265278 26268164 26269937 26275657, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
freely1333 -4 points a day ago

She wasn’t passed out? They were all doing ketamine off each other? She was standing around the room showing off her muscles? Do I believe there are women who consent to group sex? Absolutely.

At least some people here will stand on the facts and still say it was rape for whatever reason but when you have to make things up it kind of shows that you don’t have much faith in what you’re arguing for.

path: 0 26265278 26268164 26269937 26275657 26275717, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 0
dohpaz42 5 points a day ago

No. She was intoxicated. Therefore consent could never be given in the first place.

path: 0 26265278 26268164 26269937 26273183, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
freely1333 -4 points a day ago
path: 0 26265278 26268164 26269937 26273183 26275661, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 0
velma 5 points a day ago

The issue with the Cornell case is that anything she said no to was respected (at least from the documents I have seen)

Why did she keep having to say 'no' over and over again then?

path: 0 26265278 26268164 26269937 26278004, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 11
freely1333 -4 points 21 hours ago

They were different acts you do understand that consent is not an umbrella policy right?

path: 0 26265278 26268164 26269937 26278004 26280024, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 10
velma 4 points a day ago

If you had said “no stop I’m not feeling it” and he said “ugh I’m close can I finish?”

I can't stop re-reading this, jesus fucking christ.

A woman says "No stop" and you don't immediately fucking stop? What the fuck?

What the fuck?

path: 0 26265278 26268164 26269937 26278212, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
velma 3 points a day ago

If you had said “no stop I’m not feeling it” and he said “ugh I’m close can I finish?” and you said “okay finish quick” then your consent would have been back being given.

This is coercion. You don't get to push back on someone saying "stop". That's fucked up.

path: 0 26265278 26268164 26269937 26278003, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
StupidBrotherInLaw 11 points 2 days ago

You missed the title so your spoiler didn't work.

::: spoiler add literally anything here

path: 0 26265278 26265476, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
A_norny_mousse 7 points 2 days ago

Thanks, will fix. FWIW, it works as is was in Piefed.

path: 0 26265278 26265476 26265682, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
multifariace 25 points a day ago

I saw only panel 1 (just the title in a box). I thought it was brilliant. Like, the first comment would be "that's not funny." and response would be "you are correct." then i realized there were more panels. either way it works.

path: 0 26274389, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 2
cannedtuna 27 points a day ago

Sorry. Typically I post the 4 panel versions when artists do the combined uploads, but this one didn’t have that and I usually try to respect the medium and titles the artists give to their work. I thought about giving this one a couple different titles but ultimately settled on leaving the authors comment as is. As the content would be upsetting for many readers I decided to bury the main content in a spoiler warning to avoid a NSFW tag and respect the original post.

path: 0 26274389 26274445, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 1
BigDanishGuy 18 points a day ago

Don't be sorry, this way was so much more impactful.

path: 0 26274389 26274445 26275866, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0
BillyClark 19 points 2 days ago

In the situation portrayed, the guys committing the SA know that they're doing something evil. The victim knows what happened.

I'm not sure why anybody with zero knowledge needs to butt in and attack. How hard is it to keep quiet or supportive?

path: 0 26268748, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 0
Stefan_S_from_H 10 points 2 days ago

No panels, at least on Piefed. Only one image with the text “TW: Sexual assault” in the center.

path: 0 26267743, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 4
erin 31 points 2 days ago

I'm on piefed. The comic is under a TW in the post body

path: 0 26267743 26267828, hotness: undefined, score: 31, children: 2
Stefan_S_from_H 7 points 2 days ago

Oh, a spoiler. Spoilers have a UX problem.

path: 0 26267743 26267828 26267964, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
cannedtuna 7 points 2 days ago

Could be a bug with the client you’re using.

I checked Piefed from Voyager and Mlem and it appears to work fine.

If you’re on web, try this client

path: 0 26267743 26267828 26267964 26268015, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
clubb 6 points 2 days ago

On Lemmy, the actual comic is in the description

path: 0 26267743 26267819, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
vagrantdumbo 8 points 7 hours ago

It is quite interesting how women often are the first in line to victim-blame in such situations. Almost like they feel discomforted by someone who had the courage to come forward.

Image

path: 0 26289695, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
peacepath 6 points a day ago

Christians must condamn rapists toward their god, but support and defend them toward society. For them accusing someone of having comit a rape is wrong and bad:

Matthew 18:6–7

6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
7 Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!

Luke 17:1–2

1 Then said he unto the disciples, It is impossible but that offences will come: but woe unto him, through whom they come!
2 It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones. 

For christians, the one victim of rape have the duty to shut up, and let society live in peace without knowing about it. And them denying the victime's claim is the consequence of their faith.

Of course, christian faith isn't the only cause, but in western society, we won't get progress against rape without get rid of this poison.

path: 0 26277996, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 4
phoenixz 5 points 16 hours ago

This, in one form or another, can be said about all religions.

Ban all religions

path: 0 26277996 26283950, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
Katana314 1 point 5 minutes ago

Ok, very deep, Dracula.

path: 0 26277996 26283950 26293561, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
SmoothyShadow 3 points 14 hours ago

That's a bit reductive, isn't it? Are you saying that all christians would blame someone for speaking up? It feels like it, regardless

Faith is not the evil here, staying hung up on what some people said centuries before us without giving second thought is. And some people do think it over when thinking about their faith. I don't think it's fair to them to say that their own faith is the cause of such hate and sedentarism

path: 0 26277996 26285689, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
peacepath 4 points 13 hours ago

Excuse me, of course all christians do not behave exactly as the bible says. On that point either. They are also told to do not kill nor rape, and some do it anyway, so even if they are told to blame those who speak up, some disobey and support them instead.

Yet most of them behave according to the principles they have learnt, most of the time. And when a scandal that doesn't conrcern them directly spread in the news, it usually iritate them, and their position on the topic usually starts against those who speak up.

path: 0 26277996 26285689 26286311, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Kangae_Hishiryo -9 points 2 days ago
path: 0 26269094, hotness: undefined, score: -9, children: 15
cannedtuna 29 points 2 days ago

So, I've read your comment in full and I've thought about how to respond to this.

This comic, while it does reference a current event with the Cornell 7, also portrays the type of thoughtless and harmful comments victims of rape are forced to endure.

I think you probably already knew your remarks are in line with the type portrayed in the final panel given you felt the need to add a massive text disclaimer and noted yourself that your remarks would "sound unpopular".

  1. You're trying to justify the type of remarks in the final panel rape victims often end up hearing. Those type of remarks are not "reasonable".

You start off with "rape, sexual abuse, and other improper sexual behavior ... it's a serious problem we need to address" and then follow it up immediately with a "but". There is no "but" here. A woman was gang raped for 7 hours and nothing happened to the perpetrators and this type of thing is all too common for women who live through this kind of thing and then are told to "get over it".

  1. You're downplaying the women who aren't believed or never see justice.

I understand you went through a similar situation, as did your mother, and that is absolutely terrible. I'm sorry to hear that to both of you and it's awful that your abuser was never held accountable.

Like I said, I spent a while thinking about how to address your remarks, and it's specifically because you shared your experience, but I have a feeling that was the intent here and I feel like you're using your own trauma as a shield for your other remarks.

You bring up an instance on Discord where someone felt uncomfortable from your interactions and then later talked about it in a vent channel. I don't know the situation, but I do question your use of terms like "simps".

"I barely managed to be found innocent, but she wasn't held accountable either," Dude their Discord mods, what do you want? Take those things to court, not social media mods.

"In the end, she was a woman and I was just a man. Women-are-wonderful effect in action." And yet if the world worked like that maybe more women would get justice for the crime committed against them.

"And that happens a lot, and even if the statistics are low" this just personal experience bias.

  1. Your main argument is just whataboutism. Example: a black man is shot and killed by a cop, people riot. So cops cry "well what about all the cop deaths". This isn't about false allegations. This is about a very real rape that happened and something that many women have to deal with.

Your closing remarks are:

"Yeah, you can't take it back and cry rape everytime you regret having sex with anyone, because you can be the one doing false allegations too."

"Yeah, sometimes someone can tell that has been raped because that's an easy way to destroy someone's life and earn free money from the victims' help programs, stealing resources from actual victims."

And you end it with "Support both kinds of victims"

Basically you refute the situation shown here and end it with a "All Lives Matter" type of statement.

So yes, I will be removing your comment as it does not belong here. This is about rape and what victims go through and is not the place for your remarks.

path: 0 26269094 26270384, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 0
jpreston1986 27 points 2 days ago

Coming in with the "both sides are actually bad" when talking about the ungodly massive amount of rape that occurs and the teeny tiny small percentage of false accusations that happen is a truly adolescent, apologist, and downright horrible take.

"Won't somebody please think of the rape gangs feelings!?"

path: 0 26269094 26269635, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 4
Kangae_Hishiryo -19 points 2 days ago

Because they're both equally bad. Even if there are less false accusations than actual rapes (again, I have sufficient reasons to think that they're not a so small amount, and I have fucking told a small amount of these, some of the most important ones), they're still a serious problem. There should be zero false allegations just as there should be zero rapes. Is that fucking simple.

You don't know how much can ruin a life a false allegation? And even if it doesn't ruin your life, as happened to me out of good luck, it's still as traumatic as a rape. It's a mental rape. They're raping your ability to live in the world without being paranoid about any people or situation.

Again:

I.

HAVE.

FUCKING

SUFFERED.

FROM.

BOTH.

I.

FUCKING.

KNOW.

WHAT.

I'M.

FUCKING.

TALKING.

ABOUT.

And where the fuck did I said that I'm against victims of rape or in favor of gang rapers? Give the fucking cite, don't just put words in my mouth.

path: 0 26269094 26269635 26270035, hotness: undefined, score: -19, children: 3
blartcap_ 18 points 2 days ago

There's a big difference between knowing what one is talking about and knowing how one should talk about what they know.

False accusations being as bad as how women are victim blamed in a gang rape situation is not something that anyone is going to believe just because you declare it to be.

path: 0 26269094 26269635 26270035 26271301, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0
GreenKnight23 8 points a day ago

1000004703

path: 0 26269094 26269635 26270035 26272725, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
blartcap_ 2 points 2 days ago
path: 0 26269094 26269635 26270035 26271290, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
atrielienz 21 points 2 days ago

"You can't take it back" refers to rescinding consent during the act, not after the act. You can agree to something and then back out. That is what consent is all about.

Nobody is saying that false reporters don't exist, nor are they saying that people who will claim rape after the fact (who agreed to the act but have second thoughts after the act is over) don't exist, nor are they saying they don't support the victims of false reporters.

That is not the subject of this comic and is not what is being talked about here.

The absolute best thing to do for all parties involved is to get verbal consent from both parties and to keep seeking that consent throughout the act, and to do such while both parties are sober and know what is going on.

If you want to protect yourself from false allegations, that's my advice. If you want to protect yourself from sexual assault and rape, it's more complicated and there are a lot more things you can do and variables to worry about, but that doesn't mean this advice isn't good for that too.

path: 0 26269094 26269278, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 5
Kangae_Hishiryo -4 points 2 days ago

Well, I assumed that after referred after the act. If is during the act then you can and SHOULD take it back, but then using "after" in the same sense as "during", that's a dishonest use of the language. It probably wasn't something deliberate, but that doesn't make that less misleading nevertheless.

Thanks for the advice anyways. And yeah, I just thought better about this and you're correct, it's not the topic; anyways, I felt the need of express that because these kind of posts can lead to very damaging and misleading statements about that topic, and being someone who suffered from both, I know in first person how they are and that looks unacceptable to me in every way, both types of denialism are the worst things ever.

That's why I hate drugs, alcohol and the like. Nobody can consent under the effects of these substances. Hope they get totally banned sooner than later because they're a huge cause of these kind of problems.

path: 0 26269094 26269278 26269472, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 4
Harvey656 20 points 2 days ago

I have been drunk, many, many times. Yet I have never raped any women, even the ones I have been attracted to.

Substances are not a free pass for rape, never have been never will be. To insinuate substances have any influence on weather or not a person will rape is insane, and unacceptable apology.

Bad men did this, not drugs.

path: 0 26269094 26269278 26269472 26271261, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 2
Kangae_Hishiryo 2 points 21 hours ago

I never said that... What I said is that alcohol amplifies the power of those offenders, and also makes people more prone to abuse others because of they're dishinibited.

It's not that complex to understand.

If we ban alcohol one of the side effects will effectively be a drop, even if small, in rape rates, because there will be one less tool for that.

Love how everyone here is putting words in my mouth.

path: 0 26269094 26269278 26269472 26271261 26280292, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
FistingEnthusiast 15 points 2 days ago

The cause of these kinds of problems is men raping women

Not drugs or alcohol, but the rapists

It's that simple

What you're doing here is, once again, putting the onus on anyone or anything other than the rapists.

path: 0 26269094 26269278 26269472 26270983, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
AWistfulNihilist 8 points 2 days ago

This is rape apology that ignores that cases of false accusation are such a small fraction of overall reports of rape that if you actually think critically, which you are saying to do, you will assume every woman who reports a rape is telling the truth.

Rape is not a case by case basis, rape is overwhelmingly undereported and again, the overwhelming majority of those accusations are real. The rate of "false" reports isn't even as black and white as you think, if you look at a study, see what those study considers "false".

path: 0 26269094 26269211, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 2
Kangae_Hishiryo -4 points 2 days ago

This is not rape apology, what the fuck. I support actual victims of rape as I myself have suffered a lot because of being raped, I just don't support those who abuse of the helps that actual victims need because I've been victim of false allegations too. It's not that hard to understand.

And no, assuming that every woman who claims to be raped is telling the truth is not critical thinking, it's just excessive credulity.

And I have sufficient reasons to think that case of false accusation are not that rare, but even if they were (that they're not), that doesn't make them a less serious problem.

Most of studies present men and women different questionaires, or make focus on different things in one gender or another, they're gender segregated: i.e., in self-report questionaires, men almost everytime receive abuser questionaires and women receive victim questionaires, while the correct thing to do is to make neutral questionaires or give both genders both types of questionaires. If you ask me, that's a very clear poisoning of the well, they're adjusting the answers before they can be done, alterkng what answers are available.

Also, men are more found to underreport sexual abuse, and there is a huge underreporting of false claims because even polices and lawyers tell victims of these (male victims of sexual abuse, and in general victims of false claims) to be a loss of time to try to report them. I know why they say so, because I lived that. Two fucking times.

path: 0 26269094 26269211 26269377, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 1
AWistfulNihilist 10 points 2 days ago

False reports are ridiculously and incredibly rare, even in the most generous study to rape apologetics, the vast majority of rape are perpetrated my men against women, Again I'm just thinking critically like you said to.

The overwhelming victims of rape are women, the overwhelming number of reports are true, to the point where you do less damage assuming they are. That's not to say you ignore a man's claims of rape at all, you take those seriously to, men are also reluctant to report rape for many of the same reasons women are. I'm old enough to have been around when they had to pass a special law to bypass the statue of limitations so men could report their rape by catholic clergy.

Equivocating reports of rape to false reports is just wrong. I'm sorry for what happened to you, but I'm not going to allow what seems like a horrible situation you've been through to color my perception of what you are doing. Which is rape apologetics. You aren't asking us to critically think, you are asking us to respond emotionally to your emotional plea.

path: 0 26269094 26269211 26269377 26270352, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
pastermil -10 points a day ago

Nothing against the message itself. Just how it's being presented itself. The author put a TW upfront, followed by multitude of well-drawn panels, only to censor the important words at the end? It's like a boxer preparing their stance and their whole weight on their fist to launch a punch only to hold back right before it lands.

path: 0 26276608, hotness: undefined, score: -10, children: 3
yyyesss 14 points a day ago

if the artists intent had been lost on some of the audience, i could see this argument. like if they'd used some of the internet acronyms that made it so some readers couldn't tell what they were trying to say, then some meaning would have been lost.

but as this is, there is no question what those words are supposed to be. i had no trouble understanding the message and feeling the weight of it.

i understand your frustration but i feel like you're diminishing or dismissing the impact that's clearly still intact based on a distaste for something the clankers have forced many artists into to prevent being censored.

path: 0 26276608 26278201, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
velma 11 points a day ago

The artist feels it's more important that the message is able to be shared widely.

path: 0 26276608 26277953, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
solarvector 9 points a day ago

Normally I might agree with you, but I think this is a good example of talking about the problem being viewed more harshly than the problem itself. I don't know if that was part of the "artistic vision" but think it's fairly appropriate to the topic.

path: 0 26276608 26278512, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
radiouser -12 points a day ago
path: 0 26278578, hotness: undefined, score: -12, children: 7
velma 6 points a day ago

I'm sure cannedtuna isn't crying about it.

path: 0 26278578 26278588, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
blockheadjt 6 points 19 hours ago

Oh no, blocked by a rapist, how awful!

path: 0 26278578 26282051, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 3
AVincentInSpace -3 points 10 hours ago

It's astounding how quickly leftists leap to conclusions about what someone believes.

path: 0 26278578 26282051 26288363, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 0
radiouser -5 points 15 hours ago

I'm a rapist for blocking someone? Another moron on the block list.

path: 0 26278578 26282051 26284963, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 1
blockheadjt 5 points 13 hours ago

Oh no, blocked by an idiot, how awful!

path: 0 26278578 26282051 26284963 26286617, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
muusemuuse 2 points 19 hours ago

Why?!

path: 0 26278578 26281505, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
radiouser 0 points 5 hours ago

Her social commentary often relies on low-hanging fruit (tackling absurdly obvious moral takes where 90% of people already agree). Because she’s just preaching to the choir it comes across (to me) less like thoughtful humor and more like self-validation for holding standard, "I'm not a total piece of shit" views. While I don't think I've seen a Pizzacake comic I actually disagree with, I just as rarely find one that felt worth making in the first place.

path: 0 26278578 26281505 26290827, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
Stamets -13 points 20 hours ago

PizzaCake posting this comic is pretty fucking wild when, a year ago, she created two comics of her straight up raping someone who was criticizing her...

Edit: It's a reddit link, but see for yourself. If you don't want to click it (understandable)

Ok so for all those asking for context (sadly can't send the comic, it's paid so that'd be copyright offense) -

The comic somehow got my way. It explicitly shows her, having a sex with a man who has no control of the situation, asking him if he still hates her now (after the sex he has no say in). He says no, mentions it's been several hours since this started, and also asks to ejaculate. She replies that she will let him do so tomorrow, and he is horrified.

The panels themselves don't seem violent, and actually resemble fairly innocent sex involving some bondage. The man is not her husband, nor a character I can recognize. The assumption it's one of the commenters might be about the "hate me" comment.

The implication of the text, however, is clearly "now that I forced myself upon you, you love me?" "yes, now that you've raped me I do. Let me cum and go" "nah fam, you're stuck here for at least another day. you don't get bodily autonomy"

It seems to be purposely designed to be forgivable if you don't think about it. It's short, shows more skin than text, and the text can be dismissed if the reader doesn't think about the fact they've been having sex for hours where they weren't friends and the weak party hated the aggressor for these hours.

Edit: turns out there's a continuation comic, with MC holding Guy's member, he has ejaculated and his groin and her hand are soiled. She asks "oh dear... did I ruin your orgasm?" with a seemingly unconcerned or uninterested face. The caption also reads "poor guy (not really, he deserved it)". So, a bit more of the same warning signs that aren't full-blown offenses but might indicate them. Though "he deserved it" is not exactly helping.

Her explanation of the comic also provides no explanation. She claims that there is context that would justify that comic and prove everyone wrong. She doesn't say what it is. She merely says she deleted the original post because it would have given people more ammo. This is the same artist who has routinely threatened moderators and done DCMA takedown requests over edits of her comics. She acts in bad faith so when a comic like this appears, and she claims that she is totally exonerated by some context she refuses to provide... what exactly am I supposed to think?

You can come to your own conclusion. I did mine. That she is a disgusting hypocrite. It's no comment on the comic itself, just who she is as a person.

path: 0 26280840, hotness: undefined, score: -13, children: 15
ZombiFrancis 6 points 11 hours ago

The referenced comics, linked in this thread, involve a fetish involving the permission to cum.

I don't know how you're missing that and making it the basis of hypocrisy.

path: 0 26280840 26287785, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
AVincentInSpace 3 points 10 hours ago

First of all, I read all the comments and it isn't linked, only described, and second of all, the thing about kink is that it needs to be consensual, and if she's doing it to one of her "haters" I'm not going to assume that.

path: 0 26280840 26287785 26288317, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
ZombiFrancis 2 points 10 hours ago path: 0 26280840 26287785 26288317 26288527, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
T00l_shed 5 points 19 hours ago

You got a link to that?

path: 0 26280840 26281554, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 8
drath 15 points 16 hours ago path: 0 26280840 26281554 26284237, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 3
Stamets -5 points 16 hours ago

So, just full on what was described. Remarkable.

That response from her is... nonsense.

The comic had came with additional comments and context on my Patreon page

Then why didn't she share that? The whole response from her is "This is a ridiculous claim to make against me. There exists proof. I will not share it. I'm getting dox'd and people are giving me death threats."

Another comment explains why.

once I saw it was getting leaked and purposely taken out of context, I decided to delete it because I didnt want to give them ammo, which then of course made me look like I was "hiding something" lol you cant really win.

Which makes very little sense. The thing is already out there, you know everyone has seen it, so you delete it and all the context proving its innocence to prevent them from getting ammo? And still after explaining that, she doesn't explain the context that would make it better.

Her whole explanation is just "I'm getting backlash and feel terrible for it, trust me that there was a context that made it better but I'm not going to tell you."

path: 0 26280840 26281554 26284237 26284555, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 2
deltapi 8 points 12 hours ago

The first paragraph specifically says

The comic in question was 100% intended to be kinky, consensual rope play/teasing stuff.

That's pretty clear, isn't it?

path: 0 26280840 26281554 26284237 26284555 26287297, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
Stamets -4 points 19 hours ago

Warning: Reddit link. No one really does. She posted it on her Patreon and has been going after anyone who shared it because you needed to pay to see it. You could probably find it, I haven't. But the whole thread is littered with descriptions of it and PizzaCakes own explanation left a fucking lot to be desired.

path: 0 26280840 26281554 26281938, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 3
T00l_shed 2 points 19 hours ago

Thanks for the link

path: 0 26280840 26281554 26281938 26282023, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
Stamets 2 points 19 hours ago

Of course. I should have posted it at first, that is completely on me. I was distracted. My bad.

path: 0 26280840 26281554 26281938 26282023 26282040, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
raspberriesareyummy 2 points 15 hours ago
path: 0 26280840 26285215, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
Stamets -3 points 14 hours ago

I already covered this and said her explanation made zero sense.


So, just full on what was described. Remarkable.

That response from her is... nonsense.

The comic had came with additional comments and context on my Patreon page

Then why didn't she share that? The whole response from her is "This is a ridiculous claim to make against me. There exists proof. I will not share it. I'm getting dox'd and people are giving me death threats."

Another comment explains why.

once I saw it was getting leaked and purposely taken out of context, I decided to delete it because I didnt want to give them ammo, which then of course made me look like I was "hiding something" lol you cant really win.

Which makes very little sense. The thing is already out there, you know everyone has seen it, so you delete it and all the context proving its innocence to prevent them from getting ammo? And still after explaining that, she doesn't explain the context that would make it better.

Her whole explanation is just "I'm getting backlash and feel terrible for it, trust me that there was a context that made it better but I'm not going to tell you." She has every ability to provide context. She made multiple comments insisting she had context. None was provided. But I'm supposed to just take her at her word after she has DCMA'd people for making edits of her comments and leverages an entire moderator team on reddit to silence criticism? Why?


Which one is it, douchebag?

That. Now, goodbye. Not bothering to engage with you after that.

path: 0 26280840 26285215 26285814, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 0
BrainBow65 1 point 26 minutes ago

Are you intentionally being dense or did you not read the first paragraph of her explanation where she explains its depicting a roleplay scenario? Or, an even dumber take, do you just equate all BDSM with rape? Regardless you're being a fucking idiot.

path: 0 26280840 26293369, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
chungus_eater -75 points 16 hours ago

This seems a little dramatic, no?

path: 0 26284002, hotness: undefined, score: -75, children: 22
CandleTiger 28 points 16 hours ago

Of course it is dramatic! We should not expect people to brush off and ignore assault like it’s a stubbed toe.

path: 0 26284002 26284107, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 9
chungus_eater -37 points 16 hours ago

Yeah but it's not really presenting the facts.

path: 0 26284002 26284107 26284196, hotness: undefined, score: -37, children: 8
softwarist 14 points 15 hours ago

What are "the facts" in your view?

path: 0 26284002 26284107 26284196 26284955, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
Tiral -18 points 15 hours ago
path: 0 26284002 26284107 26284196 26284802, hotness: undefined, score: -18, children: 6
itsjustachairmary 14 points 14 hours ago

Oh right the far-left opinion of 'don't rape people'. Yea.

path: 0 26284002 26284107 26284196 26284802 26286033, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
llacook 10 points 14 hours ago

Go on and list those facts, please. With sources.

path: 0 26284002 26284107 26284196 26284802 26285800, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
SmoothyShadow 9 points 14 hours ago

Sorry, I don't understand what you mean here... For me, it seems like comment you replied to is not looking for any answers, it's self-contained criticism (otherwise, I guess a more appropriate way would be asking a question).

I believe the reason why most people only downvote the comment and don't actually reply to it is because they don't want to take the risk of wasting time debating with someone who, regardless, will probably stay on their point of view...

Now, another thing I don't quite get is, what's the criticism exactly? "Facts"? What does that mean? (it's a real question, I might be dumb by not understanding, but I'd still like to try) The comics says everything there is to say to understand it, or so it seems to me?

path: 0 26284002 26284107 26284196 26284802 26285601, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Smokeless7048 4 points 11 hours ago

On one side "don't rape people" on the other side "do rape people"

Hmm, hard choice.

path: 0 26284002 26284107 26284196 26284802 26287509, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
chungus_eater -14 points 14 hours ago

Thanks for being reasonable.

path: 0 26284002 26284107 26284196 26284802 26285702, hotness: undefined, score: -14, children: 1
godsammitdam 22 points 16 hours ago

I truly believe the world right now is going through an empathy crisis what with the rise of the far right. Humans evolved empathy to better survive and take care of each other. Our neoliberal capitalist world rewards narcissism, individuality, and exploitation. The literal opposite of empathy. It's being un-learned, people are literally devolving because of profit and systemic abuse and violence perpetuated by those at the top.

And you are perpetuating that. Downplaying the lived fucking reality of countless women is utterly disgusting. Real life is dramatic. Because it's real. It's horrible. It's painful. It's terrifying. But that is what this woman absolutely went through. And so many others have as well. And it stays with them their entire lives, constantly following them, the trauma coming back when the body and mind attempt to protect them from experiencing that trauma again.

The state of education is so piss poor, and it's on purpose such that we remain divided so that those on top can continue to escape accountability. Everyone should be educated dramatically about what went on here. Because this is not uncommon. There should be better education of what rape is and it shouldn't be censored or hidden away, it should be given the weight it's deserved. And drug use should be educated as well. The effects, ensuring it's done safely, that there's no such thing as consent when mind-altering substances are involved.

I'm glad this case is getting people to talk. Because it's really exposing how so many people lack empathy and can't see themselves in the position of others. It's getting people to talk about what consent and rape really is. But man is it tough to see so many people downplay the situation and even blame the victim for what happened, or even outright deny that anything happened at all.

And to tie this little essay in a bow, it tends to be those who lack empathy. Which empathy correlates with higher intelligence which correlates with not being a conservative, fascist freak. It's all connected in the end. And we're living through an empathy crisis brought on by neoliberal capitalism and its focus on individuality that places the fault of all bad outcomes on the individual. That is the fight we find ourselves in today.

Be radically empathetic.

path: 0 26284002 26284524, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 6
chungus_eater -15 points 14 hours ago

I'm not downplaying anything. What is this comic even in reference to?

path: 0 26284002 26284524 26285726, hotness: undefined, score: -15, children: 5
flying_sheep 13 points 14 hours ago

Getting raped.

path: 0 26284002 26284524 26285726 26286048, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 2
chungus_eater -13 points 13 hours ago

But what case is this in reference to? I could make a random comic about some tragic event and get people riled up. What's the point?

path: 0 26284002 26284524 26285726 26286048 26286201, hotness: undefined, score: -13, children: 1
abigscaryhobo 7 points 13 hours ago

Specifically this comic is in reference to the "Cornell 7" rape trial that is ongoing right now. A woman alleges she was gang raped at a frat party (and there is a lot of very strong evidence to support that claim, including group chat messages saying "free pussy upstairs" among many other things)

There have been people coming out with the usual "boys will be boys", "how come it took so long to report", "she can't just cry rape because she regretted it days later", and a lot of other victim blaming bullshit.

path: 0 26284002 26284524 26285726 26286228, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
user224 3 points 13 hours ago path: 0 26284002 26284524 26285726 26286243, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Passerby6497 18 points 13 hours ago

No.

If you e ever known someone who has gone through that, it's actually a bit light.

path: 0 26284002 26286621, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0
ChapManiac 10 points 10 hours ago

The fuck is wrong with you?

path: 0 26284002 26288261, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
Sir_Premiumhengst 8 points 10 hours ago

No.

path: 0 26284002 26288327, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
llacook 6 points 14 hours ago

Is it, though?

path: 0 26284002 26285789, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
FistingEnthusiast 4 points 10 hours ago

You're stupid

Don't breed

path: 0 26284002 26288508, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
comicstrips
comicstrips

@lemmy.world

login for more options
25768
8207
10293

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. *� Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. *�️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. *� Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. *�️ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. *� Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      ✅ Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. *� Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 🖐) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 🖐) will be removed.
  7. *�‍☠️ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      Sí, por favor [Spanish/Español]
  8. *� Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss
  3. GPrime85

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links
Other Comic Communities of Interest

go to feed...