It's already happened. Someone made an AI generated porn of some influencer and it was a big deal for a few minutes.

I think it is just a matter of time for the disturbing stuff to circulate. If people can create their darkest desires they will.

Then cue debates and political campaigns about AI in general and if we should allow anyone or anything to create depraved images, pronographic or not.

Once again pornography is setting unrealistic standards for women.

Great, more man made horrors beyond comprehension

if xkcd was right about jpeggy porn being niche, i'd bank on terrible AI porn becoming a niche in the future too.

Yeh this site has nothing on some of the insane ai creators on pixiv

i prefer the pregnant woman with huge boobs instead of a pregnant stomach (and also less huge boobs where they normally are)

woman with a dinosaur and a woman without legs for me

🥵

SFW content in an NSFW website. Nice!

I'd throw a hotdog down that corridor, if you know what I mean.

lewd

Finally some good technology

Have a sandwich and a nap then I'm sure you'll be ready to go again

Weakling.

I've been clutching so hard, the pearls fused into my flesh years ago. I've bankrupted myself buying more pearls, inserted one by one into my clenched fist.

Luckily the mere sight of me - a lurching pearlescent beast with glinting pearls for eyes - causes clams to voluntarily offer their own in reverance, my own unending supply.

But then who will you treat like shit?

Technically if you're versed enough then you can already do that but takes some effort

1. Have you seen Demolition Man?

And, 2. Ew. 😅

Why would I want to encourage the flesh trade where real women are hurt? And are limited to what humans are physically capable of?

When I can have AI generated people who are able to do anything imaginable and no one gets hurt?

They'll be arguments that 'once people get used to the fantasies they'll want to try it in real life' but we all know that that just isn't true fr 40 years of video games. There hasn't been any uptick in the events of people eating mushrooms and jumping on turtles or - what ever the fuck a goomba is -

The actual scary use case for AI porn is that if you can get 50 or more photos of the same person's face (almost anyone with an Instagram account), you can train your own LoRA model to generate believable images of them, which means you can now make "generic looking" porn with pretty much any person you want to see in it. Basically the modern equivalent of gluing cutouts of your crush's face onto the Playboy centerfold, only with automated distribution over the Internet...

AI is still a brand new tech. It's like getting mad at AM radio for being staticy and low quality. It'll improve with time as we get better tech.

Personally I can't wait to see what the future holds for AI porn. I'm imagining being able to get exactly what you want with a single prompt, and it looks just as real as reality. No more opening 50 tabs until you find the perfect video. Sign me the fuck up.

It says that we are biologically predisposed to sex, which we are, like animals, which we are.

It doesn't say anything about society, it just confirms the human condition.

On a visual level, we are more interested in genitals than hands? Also, faces.

You can change it to men, but most of the results are intersex(?) or outright women anyway. I guess the training data is heavily weighted toward examples of women.

Some things I was able to put my finger on after looking at a bunch of the images in the feed:

• It doesn't do skin well, treating it more like a smooth plastic than a surface with pores, wrinkles, and fine hairs.
• It doesn't understand lighting, so shadows don't agree with highlights or even each other.
• It doesn't understand anatomy. A lot of the images were fine in this regard but others had misplaced muscles, bones, and impossible limb positioning/truncation.
• It has no idea how to draw vaginas. Nipples are also not well understood, though it does better on average with those. They still look more like a plastic than skin, but most of them were passable at least, while I didn't see a single vagina that looked even close to right.

CivitAI is a pretty perverted site at the best of times. But there's a disturbing amount of age adjustment plugins to make images of children on the same site they have plugins to make sex acts. It's clear some people definitely are.

I remember reading that this may be already happening to some extent, eg people sharing tips on creating it on the deep web, maybe through prompt engineer, fine tuning or pretraining.

I don’t know how those models are made, but I do wonder the ones that need retraining/finetuning by using real csam can be classified as breaking the law.

There was an article the other day about underage girls in France having AI nudes spread around based on photos as young as 12. Definitely harm there.

Surely we should know, right? Cartoons or hentai or whatever must have gone through this at some point?

You haven't been to 4chan lately because that's exactly what it's being used for

Well, to develop such a service, you need training data, i.e. lots of real child pornography in your possession.

Legality for your viewers will also differ massively around the world, so your target audience may not be very big.

And you probably need investors, which likely have less risky projects to invest into.

Well, and then there's also the factor of some humans just not wanting to work on disgusting, legal grey area stuff.

You'd also have to convince them that it's not real. It'll probably end up creating laws tbh. Then there are weird things like Japan where lolis are legal, but uncensored genitals aren't, even drawn.

I'm sure they're out there on the deep web.

This is like a Trainwreck. I can't look away!

Yup. First one genuinely startled me

That's already happening

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

[https://www.youtube.com/...

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

That's very wishful thinking, I'm afraid.

Reduced, maybe, but I don't think it will impact things significantly. The types of people who participate in that do not want an alternative because they do it because they want to hurt and abuse a real person. They want to have power over another human being and make them suffer. An endless stream of porn isn't going to fix that sickness.

It already is being used to make CSAM. I work for a hosting provider and just the other day we closed an account because they were intentionally hosting AI generated CSAM.

It's actually not totally different to Germany's already existing approach. Germany treat pedophiles in their centres and allow sexual offenders to watch "child porn" but with actors who look underage. I don't know if the approach works but it is something I just heard about.

Man, you really do sound like a redditor.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/...

https://www.urbandictionary.com/...

The author isn’t using thirsty, like you’re thirsty for water. They are using the slang version.

I can see how you would misunderstand without knowing that.

Dude, what

Consider another association with thirst: Desperation. In the mind of the author porn consumption is negative so anyone consuming porn is doing this out of desperation, despite knowing better. It essentially describes people being controlled by their base instincts. And thus this site is a trap, luring people against their will.

That is how I would interpret the word thirst in this context anyway. It's not about a critical need, it's about thirst being irrational and highly compulsive.

It's slang. There are tons of words in every language that don't make sense but get used a certain way because that's how people use them. Next thing you're gonna tell me is that in the 1980s when people called things bad you were upset because they actually meant good.

Little known fact - there's more the one person out there, and, those extra people have lots of differing opinions!