[Meta] 🚧 Under New Management 🚧

2 months ago by dohpaz42 to c/comicstrips

Update 1: I edited the *📽️ Credit Where Credit is Due* rule to be more clear about attributions, watermarks, and cropping of comics. Also I fixed some spelling mistakes.

Update 2: I edited the *🧬 Keep it Real* rule for clarity. Keep it coming!

Update 3:
I edited the *🏘️ Community Standards* based on user feedback.
Updated the formatting of the rules to remove spoiler tags.
Be more concise with some rules.

Good day/evening folks!

Note: Please read until the end; there is a lot here, so if you want to skip straight to business you can search for "Call to Action" and "New Rules" to get right to it. I won't be terribly offended. 🥹

Last night (2026-04-08 America/New_York time) I was approached and asked to moderate this community. It seems our esteemed @lawrence@lemmy.world has found themselves otherwise occupied and unable to commit time necessary to maintaining the community. Whatever their reasons, we thank them for their service and wish them well in whatever they are doing now.

My name is @dohpaz42@lemmy.world. You may call me dohpaz42, dohpaz, doh!, jerkface (with love!), or whatever; just don't call me late for dinner. I have been a Lemmy user since July 2023, and it's been a wild ride. Love me or hate me, know that I took this post with the intention to be a fair and impartial mod. I do understand that I may will make mistakes, but I promise that if you come at me respectfully, I will listen. I may not agree with you, but I will listen. I only ask that you do the same for me and my (eventual) team.

A little about moi:
  • I am a divorced father of two young boys
  • I am a web developer who dabbles in devops
  • I am not an arch user (sorry, not sorry 😏)
  • I enjoy hobbies like: 3d-printing, household DIY, video games, woodworking
  • I like to watch Sci-Fi, Fantasy, and Horror (Stargate SG-1, Supernatural, Star Trek (TNG, DS9, etc), Night/Dawn/Day of the Living Dead, Paranormal Activity, etc)
  • Cooking (Send me gluten-free recipes!)

Call to Action

If you are interested in helping to moderate this community, please let me know by DM. I will evaluate each request on the merits of the person making the request. This will mostly involve a user's post/comment history and modlog history.

Note: Having a modlog history does not automatically exclude you from being a moderator, but I do want to make sure that whomever helps helms this community can do so in a respectful and positive manner. Mods will be held to a higher standard than regular users.

I also have a modlog history. Some of it was (in my opinion) unwarranted, and some of it (upon reflection) was very much warranted. I believe in second (and possibly third) chances. I've been there too, and I've still been given this opportunity. So to honor that opportunity, I am willing to give (almost) anybody a chance.

New Rules

I have decided to start out with a rewrite of the rules. Nothing dramatic, but I feel there are a couple of things that can be refined and improved upon. Before I make it official and update the sidebar, I am open to your feedback first (see below). Once the feedback is given, and any revisions made, I will post the new rules to the sidebar. I will accept feedback (comments in this post) until Saturday, April 11, 2026 at 3PM EDT (19:00 UTC).

Note: If you moderate a similar community, and wish to be linked in our sidebar, please leave a comment and I would be happy to add it to the list.

And without further ado, here are the new rules:

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. *� Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. *�️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. *� Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. *�️ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. *� Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      ✅ Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. *� Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 🖐) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 🖐) will be removed.
  7. *�‍☠️ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      Sí, por favor [Spanish/Español]
  8. *� Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Web of Links
KoboldCoterie 103 points 2 months ago

*� Keep it at PG/PEGI 7

Can we add an 'unless tagged NSFW' addendum to this? There's plenty of quality NSFW things that get posted here (e.g. Oglaf comics) and I for one would be sad to see them go (or to have to create a new community for those things).

Edit: To add to this, looking back at post history, it looks like we get about 1 NSFW post per week here, give or take. Have those really been problematic enough to warrant a ban (when appropriately tagged?)

path: 0 23134821, hotness: undefined, score: 103, children: 29
NeilNuggetstrong 49 points 2 months ago

Yes please, the nsfw feature is there for a reason

path: 0 23134821 23134867, hotness: undefined, score: 49, children: 2
dohpaz42 6 points 2 months ago path: 0 23134821 23134867 23136037, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
rob_t_firefly 4 points 2 months ago

Excellent!

path: 0 23134821 23134867 23136037 23146038, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
dohpaz42 25 points 2 months ago

The original rule stated:

Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.

The adult content is already a rule; I was merely rewording it and trying to offer a clearer definition of "adult content". However, if the community so desires and posts can be properly tagged NSFW, I wouldn't be against adding onto this rule.

But, I also do not want this comm to devolve into yet another porn depot. There are instances for that already.

path: 0 23134821 23135253, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 12
KoboldCoterie 27 points 2 months ago

Sure, but the original rule was not being enforced. Presumably given that we have an active mod, now, you're planning to enforce the rules. Basically all I'm saying is, I'd prefer that the content that has been getting posted be allowed to continue to be posted. Nobody's looking for hardcore pornography, but the occasional risque comic should (IMO) not cause problems, as they haven't been for quite some time.

path: 0 23134821 23135253 23135314, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 2
moakley 6 points 2 months ago

Except that one time my original comic got removed for having the word "balls" in it.

path: 0 23134821 23135253 23135314 23136170, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
KoboldCoterie 10 points 2 months ago

Woah, look at Satan over here trying to corrupt the youth with his raunchy comics. Glad we had someone on deck to remove that before anyone saw it.

path: 0 23134821 23135253 23135314 23136170 23136239, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
Bbbbbbbbbbb 18 points 2 months ago

It does look like the community overall enjoys the more adult themed comics sometimes splashed in here, and theyre not super frequent and we havent devolved into a porn spot yet.

Like others have said, Oglaf is fun and can be very raunchy, their site is 18+ and at times they have some safe PG13 to PG comics in their arsenal. Besides them, Cyanide and Happiness are very PG to PG13 and then on occasion they post very R rated content.

I think as a community we can generalize what we enjoy without going overboard and a NSFW provides a clear boundary to people in settings where looking at this content can get them in trouble. While I understand wanting to keep things relatively family friendly we shouldnt be the guardians over other peoples children.

path: 0 23134821 23135253 23135428, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 2
SharkAttak 3 points 2 months ago

Funnily I also thought of Oglaf as an example: the strips go from normal funny, to explicit sex scenes functional to the funny. As others have stated we could tag the 'explicit for the joke' ones, not allow the 'explicit for the explicit' (aka porn), and generally allow the casual boob or blood here and there. For example, the Yellow Paint strip posted in this thread shouldn't be PG-anything IMO, being slapstick blood of little cartoony characters. (without reaching Happy Tree Friends levels, of course)

path: 0 23134821 23135253 23135428 23136327, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
dohpaz42 1 point 2 months ago path: 0 23134821 23135253 23135428 23136060, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
grue 7 points 2 months ago

I feel like allowing tagged NSFW would work as long as it's legitimately a comic strip, and one that isn't exclusively porn. (So, like, that recent Jucika would be okay, an Oglaf would be barely toeing the line, and anything beyond that would belong somewhere else. Or maybe Oglaf would be on the wrong side of the line, IDK.)

path: 0 23134821 23135253 23139708, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2
dohpaz42 3 points 2 months ago

I don't follow either artist, and have only seen mentions of them like how you describe. So my thought process is likely going to be case-by-case.

path: 0 23134821 23135253 23139708 23139871, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
grue 4 points 2 months ago

I picked them as examples because both have recently been posted here.

Here's the NSFW Jucika I mentioned (note: none of the other Jucika strips are NSFW), and I can't find the Oglafs anymore because I think you removed them.

On a related note, it would've been easier for me to search (and especially, to check the modlog since the image is gone and you have to go by title alone) if the name of the strip were in the title.

path: 0 23134821 23135253 23139708 23139871 23146226, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
SlurpingPus 4 points 2 months ago

‘Jucika’ comics were popular in the past week, and those are definitely adult-oriented, even without explicit nudity.

path: 0 23134821 23135253 23136154, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
Signtist 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I read that rule and was worried those would have to stop. I've enjoyed the ones I've seen so far, and would like to see similar posts be allowed to continue.

path: 0 23134821 23135253 23136154 23136992, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
scrubbles 0 points 2 months ago

Hey Jerkface :)

Completely get where you're coming from. I'll admit I like the occasional saucy spicy comic. I'd suggest we start with the allow tagged NSFW, and then see what happens. If it gets to be too much a new community could be spun off.

I moderate a few, and I've seen people too eagerly try to spin off new communities like reddit, but here it takes a long time for any traction to happen. So while I'm for more communities, spinoffs should be once there is a critical mass, like a ton of NSFW comics.

path: 0 23134821 23135253 23140451, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
helpImTrappedOnline 12 points 2 months ago

I'd be in favor of using PG-13 as the baseline, not PG. A lot of the stuff here I probably wouldn't show a 7 year old. Lemmy isn't exactly a children's site anyway.

NSFW tags can be used for anything you wouldn't show a minor, but keep in mind this isn't a porn community - adult topics and suggestive content are okay, but actual porn is not (unless we do want to allow it???).

Going with the PEGI ratings for sexual content might be a bit more helpful. (There's a bit of interpretation leeway because this is written for games not comic strips)

This [sex] content descriptor can accompany a PEGI 12 rating if the game includes sexual posturing or innuendo, a PEGI 16 rating if there is erotic nudity or sexual intercourse without visible genitals, or a PEGI 18 rating if there is explicit sexual activity in the game. Depictions of nudity in a non-sexual context do not require a specific age rating, and this descriptor would not be necessary. Wikipedia

If I'm reading this correctly, PEGI 12 is if it subtly references sex in someway, or if a character is in a "sexy" pose; a "let's Netflix and chill" or "is that pickle in your pocket" type of thing.

PEGI 16 is the sex scene on TV that your parents always seem to be watching when you walk in. It doesn't show main parts of the act, but you know what they're doing.

PEGI 18 is just porn.

From those descriptions, I suggest allowing PEGI 12 with no tagging necessary, PEGI 16 must be tagged, and PEGI 18 is not allowed.

I'd get rid of the last sentence of the wiki description too to make it simple - if there's nudity tag it as nsfw.

Or even simpler; If you'd get arrested for showing it to a 16yr old, tag it. If you'd shoot your "creepy uncle" for showing it to your 16yr old kid, tag it.

I'd apply similar rules for violence, pegi 12 is fine, pegi 16 tag it, and pegi 18 is guro/NSFL and not allowed.

path: 0 23134821 23138526, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
thesohoriots 5 points 2 months ago

Along these lines: I have some that, while not explicit in language or violence, are phenomenally dark. Like, they wouldn’t require a “nsfw” tag, but I wouldn’t explain them to the PG audience. Is it PG in visual content/language, or in spirit?

path: 0 23134821 23135313, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
dohpaz42 2 points 2 months ago path: 0 23134821 23135313 23136057, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
thesohoriots 2 points 2 months ago

That seems to clarify pretty well for what I had in mind for tagging something NSFW for content (esp. the nosy coworkers bit — “what are you laughing at?” And then not wanting to show them).

path: 0 23134821 23135313 23136057 23136510, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Zwiebel 4 points 2 months ago path: 0 23134821 23135414, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
KoboldCoterie 3 points 2 months ago

I just quickly scanned for NSFW tags, so I'm sure I missed some that're not pornographic but would be disallowed under the strictest interpretation of this rule.

I agree, though, that things that have been getting posted should be allowed to continue, while extreme pornography (or an excessive devolution towards being a strictly NSFW community) should not be allowed.

path: 0 23134821 23135414 23135491, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
dohpaz42 1 point 2 months ago path: 0 23134821 23135414 23136055, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
dohpaz42 1 point 2 months ago path: 0 23134821 23135982, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 5
KoboldCoterie 4 points 2 months ago

Graphic content of any kind will not be tolerated. This includes gore, pornography, or violence.

This still edges out Oglaf, as well as some of the other things that have been posted even within the last few weeks. "Violence" is also extremely open-ended. Is someone slapping someone else violence? Is Lucy pulling the football out before Charlie Brown kicks it violence? Is Snoopy pretending to be the Red Baron violence? Even on a very generous interpretation, 'violence' edges out a lot of comics that both have historically been allowed and would by any reasonable metric be fine for anyone old enough to use Lemmy to view.

Edit: Maybe it would help if you pointed out some things that have been posted in the last month or two that you would consider to be in violation of this rule? If there are none, then we probably don't even need to be having this discussion.

path: 0 23134821 23135982 23136104, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 4
dohpaz42 3 points 2 months ago

There is an episode of X Files that beautifully illustrates how even with the best of intentions, someone will always find a way to mess things up. We could go around in circles for days on what constitutes acceptable and not acceptable, and still someone somewhere will find a way to exploit whatever rule gets made. Instead of getting lost in the minutia of wording, let's see if we can focus more on the spirit that the community has built?

path: 0 23134821 23135982 23136104 23136321, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
KoboldCoterie 2 points 2 months ago

I suppose that's what I'm afraid of. We've done just fine without having an (enforced) rule governing it up until now, and the community hasn't devolved into anything. I think we've all experienced cases in the past where a new mod has come into an existing community, started to enforce the rules in different ways, and it's caused the dynamic of the community to change. We have a good thing here, right now; it's (IMO) the best of the 'Comic' related communities on Lemmy; I just don't want to see that change because of some overzealous censorship.

If you look back through the past few months, upvotes/downvotes are a pretty good indicator of what's good content and what's not. Beep's posts that specifically omit attribution get downvoted; there's sexist boomer humor comics that got downvoted; the few NSFW comics that got posted were upvoted. Body shaming, negativity... all downvoted. Can we perhaps just use community sentiment as the benchmark, except in cases where something is clearly an off-the-rails violation?

path: 0 23134821 23135982 23136104 23136321 23138417, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
edgemaster72 35 points 2 months ago

See I'd have just made an anti-Beep rule and called it a day, good on you for really diving into the role o7

path: 0 23139023, hotness: undefined, score: 35, children: 1
dohpaz42 14 points 2 months ago

Best. Response. Ever!!! 🤣

path: 0 23139023 23139034, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
tanisnikana 30 points 2 months ago

Thank you so much, jerkface! We really appreciate you stepping up.

Hopefully this puts an end to beep’s shenanigans.

<3

path: 0 23134790, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 1
dohpaz42 10 points 2 months ago

❤️

path: 0 23134790 23135289, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
dohpaz42 29 points 2 months ago

In response to those who have mentioned the PG/PEGI 7 rule, how does this work for a compromise?

🏘️ Community Standards

Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances. Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.

Graphic content of any kind will not be tolerated. This includes gore, pornography, or violence.

Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as safe and enjoyable. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.

path: 0 23135965, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 9
tyler 10 points 2 months ago

Just an fyi that would exclude Oglaf since I would say it’s very hard to say it’s just lewd and not full on porn for a lot of it.

path: 0 23135965 23136169, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 2
Bbbbbbbbbbb 6 points 2 months ago

I think my only issue is that comedy is a form of content that pushes the boundaries. I know my personal form of comedy would have most things I enjoy broadly marked NSFW and its kind of hard to know what the future line in this community will be for graphic content.

path: 0 23135965 23136169 23136826, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Cassa 2 points 2 months ago

I'd say that oglaf is nudity, not porn - after all its not trying to be for masturbation and gratification 🤷

path: 0 23135965 23136169 23137247, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
tesvi2027 4 points 2 months ago

That's reasonable.

path: 0 23135965 23136122, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Doc_Crankenstein 4 points 2 months ago

No gore or pornography is understandable but the "no violence" thing seems a bit too much.

"Violence" is such a vague term and, considering storytelling, violence is a main driver of conflict in many stories. Fights break out and being able to tell these stories of strife and conflict is something we should be encouraging, not limiting.

path: 0 23135965 23137751, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
Micromot 3 points 2 months ago

Graphic violence is banned not violence in general

path: 0 23135965 23137751 23145035, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
venusaur 2 points 2 months ago

Let’s roll with it and then pull back if we need to. Any way to have a vote on or have visibility into some of the preliminary content removals to massage the right threshold for things like violence?

path: 0 23135965 23139952, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
CanadianCarl 2 points 2 months ago

I would add a nsfw tag rule, that breaks pg/pegi7 rule. For comics like custard's, or others.

path: 0 23135965 23153215, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Cassa 1 point 2 months ago

this seems as a fair rule ☺️

path: 0 23135965 23137279, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
TheTechnician27 28 points 2 months ago

Man, jerkface, I really appreciate you taking on this responsibility, but I'm really wary of a hard pivot to "no adult content"/PEGI 7. I'd even be slightly skeptical toward PEGI 12, but PEGI 7 is pretty restrictive and leaves out really good content that's non-offensive to social media platforms like Lemmy where users are expected (not formally in LW's ToS, but nevertheless expected) to be at least 13. (edit: I'm a dummy; I forgot LW's ToS were 18+. The 13+ assumption was sort of threadiverse-wide, but I totally whiffed the LW-specific part.)

I wouldn't gripe too much over PEGI 12 and allowing for the NSFW tag for exceptions (because that covers 13+), but PEGI 7 is saying "let's keep it appropriate for users who shouldn't even be browsing Lemmy unsupervised".

Anyway, your diligent moderation is better than beepsville, and I still really appreciate the hard work I know you're willing to put in.

path: 0 23135237, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 4
dohpaz42 6 points 2 months ago path: 0 23135237 23135974, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
TheTechnician27 9 points 2 months ago

That looks pretty cool! Really looking forward to seeing this community get to thrive.

path: 0 23135237 23135974 23136029, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
BurgerBaron 3 points 2 months ago

Thank you, yes this is fine.

path: 0 23135237 23135974 23136101, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
MrKaplan 3 points 2 months ago

fwiw, LW/PFW require local users to be at least 18, or, if higher, whatever their local laws define. for other instances this is of course nothing we can control.

path: 0 23135237 23135444, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Bad 26 points 2 months ago

Finally, the beepening is over.

Good luck moderating this place, hope my provocative content doesn't create too many moderation headaches, I've stirred up the userbase quite a few times in the past :)

As a former mod of some big communities, make sure to always remember it's a volunteer task and not a job. You don't owe anyone explanations, you're allowed to be wrong, you can take breaks, even if you're doing your best some people will dislike you no matter what. Keep it cool or it might affect your mental health. Remember this comment if you ever feel burnt out!

path: 0 23144788, hotness: undefined, score: 26, children: 2
craftrabbit 2 points 2 months ago

Hi Bad, please never stop stirring up the userbase :))

path: 0 23144788 23161301, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
Bad 2 points 2 months ago

🫡

path: 0 23144788 23161301 23161322, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
surewhynotlem 23 points 2 months ago

+1 for attribution

-1 for PG. We've been unmoderated for probably over a year now, and it hasn't devolved into anything. Starting to enforce a PG filter now is an active change. Not a passive continuation.

path: 0 23135619, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 2
dohpaz42 6 points 2 months ago path: 0 23135619 23135972, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
surewhynotlem 3 points 2 months ago

Yep that sounds good!

path: 0 23135619 23135972 23137608, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Cassa 21 points 2 months ago

This seems great!

I am concerned for the family friendly rule😅 Will nsfw comics be banned? will jokes that are sexual in nature be banned? There is this one comic that often just has casual nudity f.ex - would that be banned?

path: 0 23134922, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 6
dohpaz42 6 points 2 months ago path: 0 23134922 23135284, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 4
tesvi2027 3 points 2 months ago

I think it would be great if adult humor comics were not allowed or at least restricted (only posted on certain days?) I used to follow r/comics, which is plagued by low-effort, repetitive content where the punchline is boobs, especially ones featuring oversexualized female characters which is really tiresome.

path: 0 23134922 23135284 23135389, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
KoboldCoterie 4 points 2 months ago

As a point of interest, it's been a very long time since there was an active moderator here; anyone could have posted anything and it would have stayed up, and yet... it hasn't happened. The sub has been fairly clean and organized, with only the occasional, I'd argue tasteful, adult-oriented comic. None of us want it to devolve into a cesspit of low-effort NSFW content; we just want the status quo that has been passively established to be maintained.

path: 0 23134922 23135284 23135389 23136040, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
TheTechnician27 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah, the argument that this is some kind of problem is silly. We've already run the experiment to see it doesn't happen, and if it somehow becomes a problem (seriously unlikely), jerkface is an active mod and can change in response to community feedback.

path: 0 23134922 23135284 23135389 23136040 23136782, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
dohpaz42 1 point 2 months ago path: 0 23134922 23135284 23135389 23135977, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
dohpaz42 1 point 2 months ago path: 0 23134922 23135976, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
moakley 20 points 2 months ago

Very glad to see this. Obviously this whole thing is happening because of that one troll who was removing attributions from comics. So my question for you is: can you go ahead and remove everything he ever posted here?

Because as long as the unattributed versions are sitting out there, they're liable to be reposted elsewhere, making it harder to find the real versions. It should be stopped at the source as soon as possible.

Other than that, I see that everyone else is already on you about the PG thing.

My origin story on Lemmy is that the first thing I ever posted here was an original comic that I hadn't put anywhere else. It was a Lemmy exclusive, which obviously is not a thing people really do. It got removed because it had the word "balls" in it.

So I posted it to reddit. It hit the front page immediately, and it's been reposted tens of thousands of times across the internet since then. Not to toot my own horn or anything, but I think that means it was some premium content, which seems like something the largest webcomic community on Lemmy would want.

Anyway, I'm actually fine with not allowing full-blown nsfw content here, but "balls" should be allowed.

path: 0 23136517, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 11
dohpaz42 6 points 2 months ago

We will work on the attribution/watermark issues. I have a feeling it'll take time and community effort. But, as I am going through every report, I am seeing that people are commenting and conversating, and I do not want to take that away from them. Also, a lot of the posts have attribution in one form or another, despite the image being cropped. This was either done by the poster as body text, or by a community member.

Anyway, I’m actually fine with not allowing full-blown nsfw content here, but “balls” should be allowed.

This you?

path: 0 23136517 23138590, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 7
moakley 9 points 2 months ago

You're missing my point. If I drew a comic and signed my name on it, and some jerk removed my signature, it doesn't matter if I get credit in the comments. Because that image is going to get reposted elsewhere, and my name is no longer with it.

In some cases he even used AI to "upscale" comics, and it made changes to the art. All of his posts need to be nuked. They're poisoning the well.

path: 0 23136517 23138590 23138918, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 6
dohpaz42 4 points 2 months ago

I agree with you. I do. But keep in mind that I am coming in after the fact; after other people have taken the time to contribute in one form or another via comments. They have also made efforts to post the correct sources in the comments. Now, going forward this will not be tolerated at all (this is why I am trying to update the rules). I consider cropping and "AI upscaling" to be vandalism, and it will be dealt with accordingly. I have also reached out privately to said individual to let them know my feelings on the subject. It's going to take time and effort.

path: 0 23136517 23138590 23138918 23139008, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 5
moakley 3 points 2 months ago

Can you clarify something else for me? Is the offender in this case not being banned? Because he is way, way past third chances, and I don't think the community is ok with that.

path: 0 23136517 23138590 23138918 23139008 23144563, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
moakley 3 points 2 months ago

Ok, but you can just remove the vandalized comics. Otherwise they'll continue to do damage. Taking them down doesn't hurt anyone.

The efforts in the comment sections were towards this end - to try to stop the harm he was doing.

path: 0 23136517 23138590 23138918 23139008 23140677, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
TheFrirish 6 points 2 months ago

Does anyone have a list of all that troll's accounts? I would like to block them all because that is beyond stupid.

path: 0 23136517 23138468, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
nocturne 5 points 2 months ago path: 0 23136517 23138468 23145226, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
UnderpantsWeevil 2 points 2 months ago

Beep Beep

path: 0 23136517 23138468 23145226 23145555, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Denjin 14 points 2 months ago

Tough on Beeps, tough on the causes of Beeps!

path: 0 23145921, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
Baaron87 12 points 2 months ago

Hi Dohpaz42! Welcome and thank you for doing a bit of a pulse check and getting some input from the community.

I’m one of the many lurkers that typically just browses and rarely comments or posts but I wanted to post a little feedback on your proposed updated rules:

I would like to ask that you consider including something about the comics themselves being cropped/modified before posting.

I know there will be times where a person mistakenly uploads a modified one randomly found on the net, but recently there have been a ton of posts (comments as well) where the one user in particular, decided that cropping the images are justified and will link to places like Reddit or the main website for their comic (e.g. xkcd.com) without the direct link/attribution. Followed by taunting others who point it out in other threads. It is causing unnecessary drama in the community obviously.

Thank you

path: 0 23135093, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 5
dohpaz42 16 points 2 months ago

📽️ Credit Where Credit is Due

This is the rule that was meant to address that issue.

Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.

Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!

How does this sound?

Edit: Updated with more verbiage based on other feedback.

path: 0 23135093 23135366, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 4
Baaron87 8 points 2 months ago

Yep, I think that covers it better and doesn’t leave any wiggle room for those in bad faith to keep saying “oops!”

Thank you!

path: 0 23135093 23135366 23135397, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 2
dohpaz42 7 points 2 months ago

I just updated it again with more words. :)

path: 0 23135093 23135366 23135397 23135447, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
Baaron87 4 points 2 months ago

Nice! I really like that and I’m sure most people will too. Thank you again! :)

path: 0 23135093 23135366 23135397 23135447 23135711, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
CanadianCarl 3 points 2 months ago

https://imgops.com/ this is a better reverse image search tool. It allows you to check google, bing, yandex, tineye, etc.

path: 0 23135093 23135366 23153581, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
GrantUsEyes 10 points 2 months ago

Hello, and thanks for stepping up.

Bots and AI are cool...

Does this mean the no AI generated comics rule is gone?

Edit: no, it's still in place.

Honestly, I think most people here, me included, don't want AI content in this community. It's low effort and there's already other places for gen ai stuff :S please, reconsider this one.

path: 0 23135968, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 5
dohpaz42 15 points 2 months ago

...but we value genuine human effort in posts... This is not the place for that sort of thing.

I was trying to be concise, and cheeky, but I see where that might be confusing. Let's see if we can make this more clear:

Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.

I am also open to any suggestions you or others may have on wording this better.

path: 0 23135968 23136195, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 1
GrantUsEyes 3 points 2 months ago

Thank you! I asked for clarification because I'm not a native english speaker and I didn't quite get the initial wording :)

path: 0 23135968 23136195 23136506, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
BurgerBaron 6 points 2 months ago

"Keep it Real" is literally the rule name.

Plus the "Bots and AI are cool... BUT" part seem clear enough to me that AI slop posting is against the rules.

path: 0 23135968 23136188, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
GrantUsEyes 5 points 2 months ago

I'm not a native english speaker, so I may have misunderstood:)

path: 0 23135968 23136188 23136490, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
BurgerBaron 4 points 2 months ago

That's fair, the rewrite is better now it rhymes!

path: 0 23135968 23136188 23136490 23136580, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
otter 10 points 2 months ago

Welcome!

For the rules, could you use different formatting? A lot of users use mobile apps, and some of them don't format markdown the way Lemmy does. The spoiler tag in particular doesn't get rendered in a lot of them.

For example, this is what I see in Boost:

Perhaps you can do something like

## Rules

1: 😇 Be Nice!

- Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: **friendly**

2: 👶 Keep it at PG

Which will format like this


Rules

1: 😇 Be Nice!

  • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly

2: 👶 Keep it at PG


You could also shorten some of them to make it more likely that people will read them. For example, moving this to the bottom of the rules section, or taking it out entirely:

Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanantly banned from posting.

I also liked the old sidebar's guidance on "complete stories" because it sums up what this community is intended for and differentiates it from "comics" and "memes". I don't know if it needs to be stated explicitly, but you could potentially include it right at the top with the description line.

I'm also happy to help out if the moderation load gets too much to handle. Feel free to add my LW account if at any point the team could use more hands: https://lemmy.world/u/otter

path: 0 23135833, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 6
MrKaplan 7 points 2 months ago

maybe worth to name and shame those apps with lack of proper lemmy markdown support.

and ideally check if that has already been reported to their devs, and doing that if it hasn't been done yet.

path: 0 23135833 23135915, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2
RustySharp 4 points 2 months ago

Usually it's the ones that were once a Reddit app, modified to work with Lemmy. I've not seen one specifically written for Lemmy/PieFed to not support spoilers.

path: 0 23135833 23135915 23136174, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
racketlauncher831 1 point 2 months ago

But shall markdown be mandatory for a client? I thought the rules shall be as accessible as possible to every one.

path: 0 23135833 23135915 23156620, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
helpImTrappedOnline 4 points 2 months ago

It looks like the asterisks in the spoiler title are messing with the spoilers.

😇 Be Nice

Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.

::: spoiler 😇 Be Nice ↩️ Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: **friendly**. :::


**😇 Be Nice!**

Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.

::: spoiler **😇 Be Nice!** ↩️ Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: **friendly**. :::

↩️= return/line break, not sure how else to show that in code block without adding an extra empty line, which would break the formatting

path: 0 23135833 23136168, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
dohpaz42 4 points 2 months ago

Great feedback! I certainly can reformat things to be more user friendly. I admit that I can be wordy, so if you have any other suggestions for making the rules more concise (while staying clear), I am happy to hear them! And I will certainly take into you into consideration for moderator.

path: 0 23135833 23136143, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Doc_Crankenstein 2 points 2 months ago

Boost gang!

path: 0 23135833 23137841, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Slacking 8 points 2 months ago

Thank you for taking on the responsibility, the little background info does inspire confidence. Very cool.

I kind of preferred the rules as they were. This is kind of a wall of text, hard to parse and will probably mostly go unread.

I think keeping the old and just adding the anti bot rule and attribution rule is fine. Just saying attribution must be kept on the image frame if possible is enough. I think bumping up the 2 limit per day max is alright but 5 might be a lot. Quality over quantity and all that.

I'm really against any kind of heavy handedness for raunchy comics, especially if it's about the joke and not the image itself. Having people tag the NSFW stuff (ie actual nudity, sexual content, dildos, etc) is fine imo.

For violence, I mean, we are all adults here and it's cartoon violence in any case. It just feels a bit puritanical to be hard on this kind of stuff. It doesn't really feel like a problem.

Sorry if this is overly critical. Thanks for the help!

path: 0 23137646, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 2
dohpaz42 3 points 2 months ago

I appreciate your honest criticism. Please revisit the post as I have updated some of the rules based on feedback, as well as the formatting. Hopefully it'll be a little easier to parse.

path: 0 23137646 23138534, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Slacking 1 point 2 months ago

The bullet points make it much easier!

path: 0 23137646 23138534 23156786, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
fireweed 8 points 2 months ago

I haven't seen this mentioned (sorry if it was and I missed it), but I want to question rule 2a:

Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.

Even in the newspaper days, it was common for comic strips to have ongoing plots, with each day's strip presenting the next part in the story (with the plot usually starting on Monday and being resolved by week's end, although some were ongoing serials, iirc Dick Tracy was like this). So the way this rule reads, it sounds like you would need to publish all strips from the same storyline together.

I think the rule is intended to prevent someone from breaking up comics that were initially presented together and intended to be read in one chunk, or otherwise truncating a comic (e.g. the meme version of "this is fine"). If that's the case, it's a reasonable expectation, but the current wording is unclear. It's hard to recommend alternative text since so many exceptions exist (what if the panels were originally posted one at a time? what about bonus panels? What if the bonus panel was only published to patreons? What if the strip was reformatted from a graphic novel for mobile-friendly re-publication? etc etc.) But maybe something like this would work: comics should be posted in their original format (e.g. multi-panel strips should not be split up). But this is already covered somewhat by rule 4a: "Comics should [...] be unmodified." So maybe rule 2a is unneeded and only causes unnecessary confusion?

path: 0 23150972, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 5
Bad 6 points 2 months ago

Also plenty of all timer comics are just one panel with no "full story" to it (eg. some of Gary Larson's works, some of Thurber's more absurdist works, etc.)

path: 0 23150972 23152474, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
craftrabbit 2 points 2 months ago

What I think this rule is trying to accomplish is making it impossible for someone to see a post where the punchline is missing because it's in the next strip or something like that.

With that interpretation, posting a Love and Hex strip, for example, would be fine, since, while it has a pretty defined overarching story, each strip contains a joke with a punchline on its own as well without having prior context. But, suppose Love and Hex comics were posted only two panels at a time and someone posted one of those two-panel strips here. The post wouldn't make sense to anyone without additional context.

To me, it seems like this is what the rule is trying to accomplish and that seems like a sensible thing to have. If that is the case, the rule should probably be rewritten to something like "Comics should be enjoyable as they are posted and not require additional context" for clarity.

path: 0 23150972 23161278, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Grimy 1 point 2 months ago

I don't really feel like this sub is the best place for ongoing plots, or at least when it comes to not understanding the current comic if you missed one. But idk, maybe as long as the previous ones are linked in the body and there's a limit to how long the plot can be (say 5)?

You make a good point about different formats. Sometimes, it's better off reformatting it. I don't see the harm in it as long as proper attributions are kept and added. I'm thinking of the comics that get posted in four independent pictures mainly, there's a lot of it on Reddit.

Maybe 4a can have a "unless it's for a better mobile format" at the end (someone could probably word it better than me).

path: 0 23150972 23164897, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
fireweed 2 points 2 months ago

The issue I'm raising here is that (again using an example from the newspaper days) you can have a singular strip that's "complete," with its own setup and punchline, that's still part of an overarching story.

Imagine, say, Garfield, where on Monday Jon takes Garfield to the vet, Tuesday through Friday's strips take place during said vet visit (each strip featuring its own joke that could be understood on its own, but is enhanced by the context provided by the other strips that week), and then on Saturday Jon takes Garfield home, ending the vet visit saga. Posting the "complete story" would require posting all six comic strips together, even though they were published separately and (more often than not) are still understandable (and hopefully funny) even without having read the other five strips that constitute the "complete story."

path: 0 23150972 23164897 23168907, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
Grimy 2 points 2 months ago

Ya I agree. A rewording is probably in order.

path: 0 23150972 23164897 23168907 23169649, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
cannedtuna 8 points 2 months ago

I’ve been wondering for a bit what happened to lawrence. Glad to know someone is stepping in.

path: 0 23135537, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
venusaur 7 points 2 months ago

Thank you!

path: 0 23139955, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
davidgro 7 points 2 months ago

I'm really liking the revised rules as of this comment. Thank you for taking this on!

path: 0 23141323, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
Grimy 6 points 2 months ago

Really not digging the pg-13 stuff. Lemmy has an older demographic than most social media. And it's certainly not up to us to censor in case of someone's spouse (???).

I'm fine with disallowing full nudity but NSFW is meant for stuff that can be seen at a glance, not for a coworker or kid breaking into our phones and actually reading the content.

Yes it was like that in the rules before but it was not enforced and it doesn't seem like something the community thinks needs rectifying.

Tagging anything mildly spicy isn't a compromise! I do not surf here with the NSFW on, most people don't either. I'm not on Lemmy to look at porn but that doesn't mean I want it clear of anything related to sex. This isn't a church.

Sorry if I'm being a dick, but reading the comments, it seems like most people have a problem with it and you haven't properly addressed it.

"Raunchy" is fine, anything with explicit sex or nudity behind a tag. No censorship for the jokes actual content (text) whatsoever. It's that simple.

Thanks in any case, I'm just happy that loser finally got banned.

Edit: Maybe I'm over reacting. It depends on how intense you are about the whole thing. Browsing the most upvoted this month, these's quite a few comics that could potentially fall under the umbrella. I mostly want to avoid missing out on content just because of mild sexual themes.

path: 0 23152835, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Pyro 5 points 2 months ago

I think the PG 7 rule is a bit too strict. We can enjoy occasional comics with adult themes without devolving into porn and graphic gore.

path: 0 23136218, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
dohpaz42 2 points 2 months ago path: 0 23136218 23136420, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
MaryReads 5 points 2 months ago

Heya, lately there's been some people posting strips of TERF/Nazi creators. Could you please add a rule that bans posts of strips from those creators? Even if the content in a specific strip is not harmful, it stresses me out seeing them posted if I know the author of said Comic-Strip wants to see me dead. I'm unsure about the wording but maybe "No posts from authors with a history of harmful content"?

path: 0 23247171, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
BurgerBaron 0 points 2 months ago

Happy too see Felix got banned so hard they rage deleted their account.

path: 0 23247171 23332085, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
FelixCress -1 points 2 months ago

Happy to see you are still wrong about almost anything 😂

path: 0 23247171 23332085 23339781, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
Doc_Crankenstein 5 points 2 months ago

Finally. Glad to have a mod here. Not really too keen on the PEGI 7 rule, censorship is pretty useless of a concept but I understand I'm in the minority here around that but making it literally cartoon levels of censorship feels overkill.

No 18+ material is fine, I understand cultural controversy around this type of content, but limiting the scope of artwork to not be able to include depictions of violence, blood, or character death (going from the included description of PG/PEGI 7) is something that is incredibly and arbitrarily limiting and something that I personally am against in a sub centered around storytelling and artistic expression.

Otherwise it looks like this sub might be turning around and we can be rid of a few problems plaguing it.

path: 0 23137682, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 4
dohpaz42 2 points 2 months ago

I am not against adult material. I have updated the rules, so please reread them and let me know what you think. The whole point of this post is to get feedback and refine ideas. :)

path: 0 23137682 23138550, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
Doc_Crankenstein 3 points 2 months ago

This was my first comment made after reading. I did see and respond to your other comments on this post after I had made this one. This was just my first response to the post itself.

Welcome aboard, jerkface(with love). Glad to have ya.

path: 0 23137682 23138550 23138712, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
dohpaz42 3 points 2 months ago

There are now over 100 comments. It's getting difficult to keep up. 😅

path: 0 23137682 23138550 23138712 23138799, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Doc_Crankenstein 3 points 2 months ago

Understandable.

People have been waiting for the mod announcement post for a while here. Not surprised it blew up.

path: 0 23137682 23138550 23138712 23138799 23138879, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
nocturne 4 points 2 months ago

Removal of the spoiler tags definitely made the rules more difficult to read.

A version history of rule changes would have been helpful.

A community of this size really should have more than one mod. I do see you are looking for more mods though.

A jump from 2 a day posts to 5 seems like a bit much. I think 3 would be a better place.

path: 0 23145308, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
racketlauncher831 4 points 2 months ago

Proposal of a new rule: Every post must have the author's name and name of the series (if any) in the title in a given format.

Purpose: for users who want certain contents filtered out.

Example: [da Vinci][Jesus's Delicious Meals] The Last Supper

path: 0 23140996, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 4
dream_weasel 3 points 2 months ago

That's a good idea.

Typically though it seems that posters of comics are self sorting. So if I don't want to see the anime chick I just block that one person and she goes away. It is a little heavy handed to the person who posts them though I guess...

path: 0 23140996 23146480, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
racketlauncher831 2 points 2 months ago

I agree. In most cases that works.

However sometimes a poster posts more than one series, and more than one posters post one series.

To control a pollution (figurative speech) we control the source.

path: 0 23140996 23146480 23156578, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
dream_weasel 1 point 2 months ago

It feels to me like the title gets pretty polluted that way if the poster has something else to say about it, but being filterable is always a plus.

path: 0 23140996 23146480 23156578 23160863, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Grimy 1 point 2 months ago

Proper tags would be a blessing. I'd love to see an [OC] tag as well so we can show proper appreciation. Someone mentioned a language tag for foreign languages, it could be a simple [ES].

path: 0 23140996 23164972, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Mac 4 points 2 months ago

Should i just unsub now before i get banned for using normal adult language?
Miss me with the fuckin family friendly shit.

That's exactly what this formerly unmoderated, yet tame community needs: ti be forced into being PG. 🙄

path: 0 23137863, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
dohpaz42 11 points 2 months ago

You do whatever the fuck you feel is the best thing for you. But, before you go, feel free to check out my revisions that I've made. And thanks for the fucking feedback! :)

path: 0 23137863 23138557, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
Mac 4 points 2 months ago

I appreciate this reply.

path: 0 23137863 23138557 23138772, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
tyler 4 points 2 months ago

No Arch!? Bah. We need a new mod already!

Just kidding. Good luck at modding!

path: 0 23136204, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
wolfrasin 3 points 2 months ago

Please reconsider censorship of adult content. This rule is most unwelcome

path: 0 23138357, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
dohpaz42 4 points 2 months ago

The idea was never to censor adult material. But, you and a lot of other people have made your case, and I have updated the proposed rules. Hopefully it helps me more clear.

path: 0 23138357 23138615, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
wolfrasin 2 points 2 months ago

Yes, thanks!

path: 0 23138357 23138615 23144991, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
lena 3 points 2 months ago

I think the 7th rule could be modified a bit, Lemmy has language-tagging functionality built-in, so the rules could just mandate that every post be tagged properly (without the [Language] part of the title).

path: 0 23148255, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
grue 4 points 2 months ago

On one hand, yes. On the other hand, if it's a comic that might still be funny without the words -- or if it's translated, as the rule requires -- then you might still want to see it even if it's foreign to you. Unfortunately, AFAIK the way the built-in function works is all-or-nothing: you select the language and you see every post in that language, or you don't and they're all hidden.

Also, it's annoying to use that function because you can't set a default for stuff you write, so you have to select it from the drop-down on every single post and comment.

path: 0 23148255 23150043, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
lena 0 points 2 months ago

Also, it's annoying to use that function because you can't set a default for stuff you write, so you have to select it from the drop-down on every single post and comment.

The alternative is writing [Spanish] on every single post, which is a bit more annoying.

Otherwise I agree, you also can't select multiple languages apparently (if it was possible, you could select Spanish and Undetermined, for example). I guess we can hope Lemmy devs consider to implement multi-language posts. Until then, the tags in the title seem like the best solution.

path: 0 23148255 23150043 23150520, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
RustyNova 2 points 2 months ago

Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI

Is it fine to use clients that send posts to multiple communities at once? I'm working on something like that for comics like Exocomics that can be posted to here, nonpoliticalcomics, and the exocomics community

The post are genuine human. It just removes the copy pasting I need to do (on mobile as well)

path: 0 23165854, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 6
dohpaz42 2 points 2 months ago

The use of "bots" is meant to mean unattended, artificial interaction, as directed by pre-programmed scripts/actions. Is this what you're working on?

path: 0 23165854 23166611, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
RustyNova 2 points 2 months ago

Not at all. It's literally your "new post" UI for whatever client you use, but instead of only one community, you can select multiple.

But for some people "bot" is any automatic thing, and I rather not tempt faith

path: 0 23165854 23166611 23167206, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
dohpaz42 3 points 2 months ago

I appreciate it. But if you are making the posts yourself, then as far as I am concerned, that's not bot-like behavior. Good luck on your new app!

path: 0 23165854 23166611 23167206 23167234, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
grue 1 point 2 months ago

Cool idea, but please tell me you're implementing it as proper cross-posting so that they're linked together for everybody else.

path: 0 23165854 23194477, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
RustyNova 1 point 2 months ago

Nah. Cross posts are bad. Some clients bug out and don't display the image, and if the original post is deleted on community A, it's deleted for community B.

Could add the links for the other posts in the body of the post tho.

path: 0 23165854 23194477 23201830, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
grue 1 point 2 months ago

No, you're confusing cross posts with image hosting. Cross-posting doesn't re-upload a separate copy of the image, but it should make a separate copy of the post itself. I'm pretty sure that if you were programming your own tool for it, you could make it copy the image too, while still counting as a cross-post.

I'm totally on-board with the notion of not wanting thing B to be deleted when thing A is, but I also want to see at a glance all communities [A, B, C, ...] where discussion on the same topic is occurring. I would go so far as to say that intentionally breaking that is bad and should cause instance admins to prohibit use of your tool.

path: 0 23165854 23194477 23201830 23202352, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
wizardbeard 2 points 2 months ago

Welcome! Will be back later to discuss the suggested rules (other people have mostly said my concerns already), but for your awareness there was a thread requesting moderator rights of this sub a week ago that may have been missed by the admin that appointed you: https://lemmy.world/post/45162418

That might be a good place to start on finding additional mods.

path: 0 23136146, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
dohpaz42 3 points 2 months ago path: 0 23136146 23136388, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
fireweed 1 point 2 months ago
path: 0 23150943, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Speiser0 1 point 2 months ago

Could you please clarify in the rules which definition the word "should" follows?

path: 0 23147830, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
mesamunefire 1 point 2 months ago

Appreciate you!

path: 0 23162339, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
GreenKnight23 1 point 2 months ago

Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.

thank god! Lawrence was an overzealous nutjob when it came to moderating anything that could be lightly mistaken as "perverse".

dude is probably an heir to the Kellogg fortune.

path: 0 23165645, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
lmmarsano 1 point 2 months ago

submitted 2026-04-09 20:12:57 +0000

I will accept feedback (comments in this post) until Saturday, April 11, 2026 at 3PM EDT (19:00 UTC)

That was slightly less than 2 days.

How about basic web accessibility[^general]: at the very least a text alternative[^alt-text][^technical] or link to a web accessible alternative?
It ought to be prerequisite to any web content.
All web interfaces allow setting alt text & URL fields when submitting/editing a post.
There is no valid excuse not to post web accessible content & enforce that as a standard, and it's a basic sign of human decency/respect.

[^general]: general introduction
[^alt-text]: assessing alt text
[^technical]: technical guidelines

path: 0 23197236, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
dohpaz42 4 points 2 months ago

That was slightly less than 2 days.

That was due to my updating the post changing the submitted date. In retrospect, I should’ve added timestamps to my updates so it would correlate better.

I would be happy to add your links to the sidebar as a guide for posters. I will do this tonight after work.

path: 0 23197236 23199393, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
lmmarsano 3 points 2 months ago

Nice.

I would be happy to add your links

There are probably better ones. As a web developer, you may know a few.

The technical guidelines are the most general covering every situation & technology including those unlikely here. We're most likely dealing with Situation B in those guidelines

Situation B: If a short description can not serve the same purpose and present the same information as the non-text content (e.g., a chart or diagram)

It states that following technique

G95: Providing short text alternatives that provide a brief description of the non-text content

plus an additional technique including any of

  • G73: Providing a long description in another location with a link to it that is immediately adjacent to the non-text content
  • G74: Providing a long description in text near the non-text content, with a reference to the location of the long description in the short description

suffices. In practice, that suggests (in order of practicality to minimize effort)

  1. If a web accessible alternative exists (eg, the image came from a web accessible web page), then set the post's URL field to its location and set the post's alt text field to "comic as described in link".

  2. Otherwise, set the post's alt text field to "comic as described in post body", and set the post's body field to a text alternative. The poster will probably have to transcribe the comic. Text recognition technology may assist in that task.

    If the text alternative is short, though, then setting the alt text field to the entire text alternative suffices as described in technique H37.

path: 0 23197236 23199393 23206981, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
dohpaz42 3 points 2 months ago

I just got around to looking at your links, and as a web developer I can tell you that's a lot even for professionals to read, digest, and understand; let alone most people posting to a comic strips community on Lemmy. Not that I am suggesting the people here couldn't understand it, but that it's a heavy lift for the context of people's usage. That said, I did find a link to demonstrate how to add alt-text to Lemmy images using markdown, and I also suggested people transcribe their posts into text and gave an example comic that does that. Hopefully that will help encourage people to post more accessible comics.

path: 0 23197236 23199393 23206981 23207245, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
racketlauncher831 1 point 2 months ago

Proposal of a new rule: The title must match the original title (if any).

Purpose: to prevent poster's bias introduced into the post

Example: [da Vinci] Mona Lisa just started wearing braces

path: 0 23141024, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
beep -43 points 2 months ago
path: 0 23134633, hotness: undefined, score: -43, children: 17
dohpaz42 38 points 2 months ago

You can do a reverse image search to try to find the original comic. But, if you make your best (honest) effort to find the original comic, and still cannot, then post it and tell everyone that you tried! If somebody is kind enough to post the original, attributed, comic or tell you the artist, then you are expected to update your post accordingly. People value an honest effort.

path: 0 23134633 23134770, hotness: undefined, score: 38, children: 5
AzuraTheSpellkissed 13 points 2 months ago

Thank you for moderating here, dohpaz! You are aware of the recent drama surrounding watermarks, with one particular (but actively posting❤️) user cropping out artists' watermarks posting them here? I guess beep is confusing watermarks and an attribution link.

path: 0 23134633 23134770 23135057, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
beep -44 points 2 months ago
path: 0 23134633 23134770 23134814, hotness: undefined, score: -44, children: 3
Agrivar 23 points 2 months ago

Learn to read. Better yet, learn to read the room. Your actions are not appreciated by the majority. Don't do it just for me though, as I'm about to block your latest account.

path: 0 23134633 23134770 23134814 23135274, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 0
dohpaz42 21 points 2 months ago

If the watermark, or any other attribution, is a part of the original comic, then yes that counts. The idea is that a comic should be presented how the artist intended it to be presented. Posters like yourself are merely messengers working on behalf of the artists. Does that help?

path: 0 23134633 23134770 23134814 23135415, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 1
beep -19 points 2 months ago
path: 0 23134633 23134770 23134814 23135415 23135473, hotness: undefined, score: -19, children: 0
slazer2au 32 points 2 months ago

That is quite the loaded question coming from you.

path: 0 23134633 23134732, hotness: undefined, score: 32, children: 9
chemical_cutthroat 8 points 2 months ago

A new upside in the rules is that there are a max of 2 posts per day per person, so beep is gonna have to find some other fucking community to haunt. Hopefully dohpaz42 doesn't appreciate new account spam to break the rules.

path: 0 23134633 23134732 23134941, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 8
PancakesCantKillMe 14 points 2 months ago

2 is old rules. It is 5 now.

path: 0 23134633 23134732 23134941 23134998, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 7
Catoblepas 4 points 2 months ago

Sidebar should be updated, it still says 2. Unless the update hasn’t federated to me yet.

path: 0 23134633 23134732 23134941 23134998 23135163, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 6
AudaciousArmadillo 19 points 2 months ago

Ah new account to block. Please stay on one instance, thanks!

path: 0 23134633 23134938, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 0
comicstrips
comicstrips

@lemmy.world

login for more options
24236
7231
10290

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. *� Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. *�️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. *� Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. *�️ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. *� Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      ✅ Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. *� Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 🖐) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 🖐) will be removed.
  7. *�‍☠️ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      Sí, por favor [Spanish/Español]
  8. *� Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss
  3. GPrime85

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links

go to feed...