This is the first time I've ever heard this had a name.
This is the first time I've ever heard this had a name.
Cornell... How quaintly plebian... Lol
Yeah, this is some basic stuff, but I guess it's good to have formalized to teach people. I don't recall what method I was taught, but it was something similar to this. I don't ever remember using it so formally though. Just basically outline what you're going to go over, and then fill it all in. I think almost all formal structures like this should be abandoned once you understand how they function, and it should be adapted to what works best for you. The formal version is just a starting point.
I think being super formal like this method really pays off when you have to collaborate. Far easier, more efficient and accurate to say "Look a section IV.c and tell me what you think." Rather than "that one part with the dude, ya know"
Most writing outlines are for yourself though, but yeah, when it's in an organization you need something formalized, at minimum just so you can quickly find what you need to find. If every person has their own system of organizing things then it's going to be a mess.
Nice. Been a while since I’ve seen that. I used mind maps, then structured. This seems like the clean version but mine I could write on a chalk/whiteboard before I hand wrote it in the Harvard format. 2000+ word essays, several pages long, MLA style. Always an A.
Hell ya. It shows when you build it on a good frame
Dude was a multidimensional being from an alternate future where magic was real and he copied history books. Occam’s razor man, sometimes the simplest answer is the right one. /s just in case.
I'm actually teaching some students who honest to God are in their early teens and LITERALLY cannot string two sentences together. I never want to hear anybody tell me about how writing assignments were a waste of time again, because I can PERSONALLY vouch that if you don't practice it, you literally cannot do it at all.
Essay writing (for example exercises that you are arguing for one side vs the other) is major part how you learn critical thinking.
I suspect that the educated people who were anti vax during covid most likely paid others to write essays for them.
I think it can play a part and help many though your statement feels as though you're implying it's required for critical thinking. I could be wrong however. I bring it up because I don't feel like the essays I've had to write contributed to my understanding of critical thinking as much as empathy did.
If you didn't mean it that way, carry on! If you did, I'd be very interested to learn what makes it intrinsic to the critical thinking framework.
It's not about understanding critical thinking it is about thinking critically.
When you write an essay to compare and contrast, or pick a position about specific subject you know that you can't use your for feeling or use some random guy on Facebook you still have to back it up if you want to get a good grade. It doesn't even matter what your position is, as long as you do work. You know the teacher won't accept any bullshit. It purposefully is also given topic that you are unlikely to know about so you do that work.
This is what teaches you critical thinking skills, that you can apply in your life in the future for new things.
People who has others do this work for them or attended colleges that didn't do this got nice disservice done as it is much easier to lie to them.
The easiest method to string two sentences together is to simply forget to use a period, right?
LITERALLY cannot string two sentences together. I never want to hear anybody tell me about how writing assignments were a waste of time again
If these young adults can't put two sentences together, then it seems like their writing assignments were definitely a waste of time.
Theyre not doing the assignments is the point I think
That is the point, yes.
Which is another thing. The ones who never do the reading assignments have ABYSMAL reading comprehension. And I don't just mean like, they can't find symbolism - I mean:
"Bob picked up the scissors off the counter." "What did Bob pick up?" "...I don't know."
It's legitimately scary.
Skim the book, read a couple reviews online, find a couple random quotes from the book, then write a 10 page comparative essay discussing how the book relates to American exceptionalism and do it again next week.
True story: I once made up an entire book during recess because I forgot the assignment. The teacher probably was aware but gave good grades because I was the only one who kept on going instead of summarising the book in under a minute.
In other words no, we don't need ai.
I did one of those "month long large research" ones in like an hour the night before and got an A and the teacher ended up using it as a good example of writing.
Which is hilarious because I got a low B in that class because the rest of the writing was graded so subjectively on the content that I stopped caring lol.
My daughter got nearly mobbed by her co-students for "not telling which AI she used for writing her papers". Her papers were regularly applauded for her good writing. She hates AI with a vengeance and wrote all her papers on her own. She is just good at this kind of thing.
And now anyone who is even remotely good at creative writing or even just passably literate with a good vocabulary are forever going to have their works called into question.
On the other hand, there is no better praise than having some Gen Z kid with terminal brain rot accuse you of talking like an AI model. I accept that implied insult like a gamer accepting a hackusation - I'm winning so much that you can't discern cheating from skill.
Written by hand. Not just once, if you wanted a good grade. You needed at least one draft to correct mistakes. And, some teachers required the paper to be written in ink.
But, I read the book, too.
We taught my son to read, we knew we couldn't trust the schools to do it well. He read above grade level all through school. Being able to read well means you'll always be able to learn. Schools don't want us to be knowledgeable, they want us to be useful to the billionaires.
Good on you as a parent. The majority of parents can't be arsed to teach their children anything.
Teachers can only teach so much without mommy and daddy help. I spent 4 years teaching math at my very small local school. I taught kids from 4th grade to 7th grade. Class size was as small as 4 and as large as 16. I learned very quickly that I needed to be part Grandpa, part child psychologist, part special ed and a teacher. There is no way I could teach every student everyday in the best manor that each of them them needed.
One kid had parents that didn't care. One came from a dirt poor home and I mean dirt poor. Another was ADHD, another autistic, another was very smart and had to either help the other kids or be bored. Others had broken homes and couldn't even live with either parent. Aunts and Grandmothers were raising them.
Tell me, how am I supposed to teach all the math that is needed to all of those kids every day and at a level that meets your exceptions? You should try standing in front of a classroom sometime.
The best thing you can do for your children is to take and active hand in their education at all levels. Whether is reading, math, science, or history. Be involved!
we knew we couldn’t trust the schools to do it well
I am old enough to be taught to read at school (as in actually read and understand). But damn did I not expect school was going to fail next generation even here
Written by hand.
Why not use sticks on a cave wall?
I mean, that's still a pretty decent question after reading the book...
I had a teacher warn us about this by telling us about a student who watched Hook instead of reading the short story by Walter Van Tilburg Clark. One is about a juvenile hawk and was written 70 years ago, and the other has Robin Williams and pirates. He said the kid got like a 3/100 on the quiz.
idiot that I am in elementary school did this with Jurassic Park for a book report. I thought I was so damn clever. My teacher read the book, pretty much every adult at the time read the book, I did not read the book.
I want my slop to be the product of mental doubts, long nights of writers block, and pain and emotional toll that writing can have. Doesn't matter if it's a basic email, a treatise, or a multi volume study.
I need to feel the labor and toil while reading. AI is just empty calories.
The year was 2010. I was taking a required English class for my degree. The final was a surprise hand written essay. That final might as well have been raising a barn for most of the class.
I might have been in trouble if it was cursive. Fucking capital G
I had an art history class that had hand-written essays for every question on every exam. You brought your composition notebook to class and sat there writing two or three paragraphs for every question. There weren't very many questions (6-8 IIRC), but still it was pretty grueling.
Or asshole teachers that have a long form essay exam but only give A if it is not only correct but beautiful and excellently written, not even for an English or writing course.
That is close to how all exams were in high school in my country (except for stuff like languages and math). No notes, just blank answer papers and the questions you needed to answer. Then you would just write from what you remembered, from the lessons and the course book. Some questions required longer answers, some you could write just a short paragraph for, depending how many points you could get from them (usually 2-6, the full points for the exams were up to 60). This would continue in some university courses, there just would be only two or three questions, that required long essay answers.
In the lower grades the answers required would get longer as you moved grades up, and you would have all sorts of easier things too (some direct short questions etc.). Multiple choice questions were parts of some language exams. In math classes you would solve some equations, and the important part was showing how you got the result. So even if you were wrong, you could still get almost full points, if you fumbled some single thing.
I am always shocked to hear, when people tell their exams were multiple choice questions. That does not even teach you anything?
Dipdipdip, "And today Sally went to the market" dipdipdip "and ran into" dipdipdip
How much smarter did that make you? Do keyboard users seem like complete fools relatively?
Me, taking the state exam. Had Crime and punishment as the topic. I read maybe at best a third of it a few years before the exam and remembered basically nothing. The book bored me to death and I just couldn't get through it (like most monthly book assignments we had). Bullshitted my way through it. Got a B. I genuinely couldn't believe it, lol.
one of our literature teachers had a thing about students who didn't read the books from the course and she was giving out a "free one" to any student who would bullshit their way through report creatively. barely anyone ever managed to get a grade that way though because it wasn't creative enough.
Catcher in the Rye is a tail as old as time about a famous MLB catcher turned wheat farmer and written by JB Salamander.
C+
LMAO I hated the Great Gatsby and guessed the ending, even some subtext. It was so bad that everyone that read the book, couldn't for the life of them answer that question right on the test. I have bullshitted tests, papers, and a variety of things by having forming an opinion on the subtext, actual text, and unearned confidence. If I had time, I would read opinions and papers of others to form opinions that could hold more water than a teaspoon (in my opinion). These clankers that lean on LLMs are doing themselves a MASSIVE disservice.
pfff. the Great Gatsby was nothing. now let me give you a book that we hated. Cry the Beloved Country. We had to bullshit discussion groups about it. And we were good at it.
Never heard of that one, sounds like US nationalist propaganda or some kind of propaganda. As a high school boy The Great Gatsby was a snoozer. Wasn't particularly challenging, decent example of how they spoke in that era.
It was about running out of water in Africa, and the teacher who had us read it was wildly liberal and probably leftist, but he was not explicit about his politics the way the right wing teachers were. (he was the dude with the sign in his class that said Resist! on the wall, and he had us journal one act of creative resistance every week as our writing assignment. The more creative the better. He and I got along well)
It makes me wonder what the underlying themes are within this book now and why you actually hated it now (will probably give it a read). Honestly, teachers like that who can get students that engaged with school and create interesting weekly assignments like journaling an act of creative resistance is pretty badass! Acts of resistance instead of just laying down and letting oppressive numb nuts walk over you is pretty powerful.
Man, it's so rare to have teachers that passionate about teaching. Glad you had that experience.
So true, I would write entire essays off of the summaries on Wikipedia. My teacher's either didn't notice or didn't care.
The older I get, the more I realise that the teachers understood that we didn’t read the materials and didn’t respect the process, didn’t put earnest effort in, effectively lied our way through high school.
We all used pinkmonkey.com.
But still. We who tried at the literal eleventh hour to deceive and feign knowledge. We were best in breed.
I shudder to think about my generation in leadership roles.
We got good marks because of pluck, audacity, and sheer tyranny of will. Not because we deserved them. And it was known, to an extent, by both sides.
We are looking at each other in a mirror.
As an autistic kid with learning disabilities I felt that I was set up to fail and cheating (if you want to call it that) was the only way to pass. It's not like those who made the curriculum gave a shit about kids like us.
No AI but the sources at the bottom of a Wikipedia page were the real MVP.
I remember getting told not to use wikipedia as a source and that was pretty obvious. We also got told it was a great jumping off point and that the listed sources could be used. I feel like Wikipedia is the only thing I trust anymore.
My HS English classes were heavily discussion based, and I learned pretty early on that if I didn't have time to read the entire assignment for a class that I'd better get pretty interested in a couple of random sentences across the chapters we were supposed to read. Had to dredge up some meaning about word choice from a pretty narrow selection and make the commentary on it sound good so the teacher wouldn't call on you any further.
I think it wasn't until college that I wrote entire papers without finishing the whole book though.
I think I only ever did that once or twice, and it was not for a good grade. Yeah, English was definitely not my strong suite... even now. But I can at least write a mean story and/or fanfiction when I don't have writers block. And I don't mean something you'd see a young tween write on DeviantArt.
That's more than cog suckers could ever hope to achieve.
In high school I took first place in the essay contest at the regional academic decathlon competition with an essay on Frankenstein (the assigned novel for that year).
I hadn't read Frankenstein.
Encyclopedias, a library card, and a typewriter
copy paste baby worksited bump up font woot woot
It's been a while since I was in school, but it annoyed me that for things like this teachers rewarded either parroting whatever they told us or just mindlessly copying content we found somewhere else (also quantity > quality, which sucked also because we had to write everything by hand). If AI could at least make them value actual thinking for a change, it'd be nice.
Let me tell you about the time I failed a class for doing extra work. It was a graduate level ethics class, the only F I have on my transcript (and, of course, EVERYONE who sees my transcipts wants to know why I failed ethics in grad school):
The class was Christian Ethics (I was in a theological program) and I had already begun doing my own reading in postmodern theology, which overlapped a lot with Christian ethics. So, when I wrote papers, I drew upon the work I had been reading (which was extra from what was on the syllabus), articulating different approaches to ethical issues based on that work--like I assumed one did in a graduate level course. Every paper I got back was graded terribly. Guys in my class who barely read stuff were acing the class. I couldn't understand. So when I got my failing grade, I considered a few options, deciding on taking a directed study with the professor of the class in the hopes that I could better understand what went wrong.
It was halfway through that directed study that I realized the dude just wanted me to regurgitate the syllabus back at him. He wanted me to basically parrot back his own stuff. Once I figured that out, I did much better. But my wife thinks it's hilarious that I got an F in grad school for doing too much work.
I had a philosophy exam where one of the questions was a riddle.
I'm guilty of perhaps learning a bit too late that in school you're supposed to learn how to learn as opposed to learning every specific thing that they teach you.
What you went through is a prime example of the "don't-get-too-involved" that seems like a workable approach to many things in life, and that teacher was maybe well aware of the irony of it all.
Wound up teaching at a private school for a few years. My class? Ethics. Word got to the aforementioned professor that I was doing this and I was told that he just raised his eyebrows and chuckled.
What I think bothered him, and why he gave me poor grades, was that I was attempting to articulate my own thoughts (which, to me is what graduate level coursework is about) whereas he was expecting me to demonstrate that I understood what he was teaching before I did my own work (which, again to me, is more reflective of undergraduate level coursework). I had the best grades of my life while in grad school and I did that same level of "extra" in all my other classes simply because I loved learning the material. That ethics class was the only low spot. Oh well.
Is this supposed to be against "AI" or against school? Both?
The underlying problem here isn't "AI" so much as the "education system" being based on pointless exercises that a computer can now do better.
We don't make students do endless, multiplication problems anymore either.
Learning writing skills and learning to do math are not "pointless exercises". My kids drill math problems and practices writing (sometimes even by hand with a pen and paper!) and they go to a public school.
Testing reading, writing, and math comprehension are important skills to learn. If you think these skills are pointless, you're good and fully fucking cooked.
I always read the book, the book was good. But it's 19 years since I left highschool and I still don't understand the rules about essays.. Write about the thing but also don't write about the thing.
My highest mark for an essay was 4/10 My highest mark for fictional story writing is 19/20.
Please don't reply to me telling me how to write essays, it's nonsense and every person who thinks it's important are fucking insane..
No seriously if you reply to me to tell me how to write an essay in going to ignore you... Essay writing is for people who don't have any personality except hating the world.
Ahaha well the down arrows tell me that my drunken rant about Australian highschools ideas of essays two decades after I failed my last essay means I'm either completely lost or the Australian education on essays back in 2003-2006 was different to modern essays.
I'll take the downvotes with the knowledge that I'm still right and the idea is writing a multi-paragraph essay about a metaphorical subject and using different stories to back up my claim while also not actually talking about those stories.. That is how I recall the teachings in my highschool.
Take from the above what you want.
It's ok to not give a damn to correct that, it's your life.
My highest mark for an essay was 4/10 My highest mark for fictional story writing is 19/20.
I went to bed last night watching a 3hr video essay about an analog horror story about parallel universes colliding with reality in a dark forest scenario.
That is to say, an essay was then translated to a video medium as a vehicle to deconstruct a long form fictional writing project in another medium, in a manner that was itself fictional story writing.
In conclusion, you literally have no idea what an essay is, why the fuck would anyone jump to tell you how to write them first?
@lemmy.world
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
go to feed...
@lemmy.world
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
go to feed...
I wrote them by hand, in cursive. But not before I made a harvard outline.
But seriously if anyone out there is actually trying to write an essay, the harvard outline model is legit for organizing and setting up.
save