Sure, sure. Catch it, if that's what you're in to.

Did you just have this on hand, waiting for the perfect moment to deploy it?

What eldritch horror have u shown me

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UYg16RNY-I

Toupee fallacy

Oh well. There they go. A shame I guess.

Anyway.

It's not a good day to have eyes

Omg, feet.

There's a spectrum of Ace. I got one am a heteroromantic ace, and I'm a dude. So I am attracted to women romantically, but don't want to sleep with them.

It's a very frustrating combination that makes dating difficult.

personally, it's kinda hard to say? i have felt romantic attraction exactly once in my life, so i know i'm not fully aromantic, but also it's only happened once so i'm probably on the aro spectrum somewhere

but yes, there are many people who are asexual but who still feel romantic attraction to others

(and of course, not all attraction is sexual or romantic, there is also aesthetic attraction for example (literally just when you find people pretty), which i do feel, my meme was pretty reductive all things considered, but then again it's just a meme)

Not OP, but typically asexual is perceived as not having any sexual attraction/having minimal sexual attraction to anyone, regardless of gender. It's like the opposite of pansexual (attraction to anyone regardless of gender).

Everything is a spectrum of course, which is why people talk about the graysexual area, where you have some attraction but there's extra things that make it not the "typical" experience of allosexuals (those who experience sexual attraction). Things like Demisexual (attraction only after having a close bond), Aegosexual (having sexual arousal and fantasies, but you don't think of yourself in those fantasies), etc. These are all microlables to help people narrow down how they feel.

So if you have a distinct and noticeable sexual attraction to one gender, you probably are allosexual (straight, lesbian, gay, etc.). Note, however, that romantic ≠ sexual, and you can be asexual but only date men, or be asexual and date both men and women.

Tongue-punching the fart box

Chocolate starfish, leather cheerio, balloon knot.

Hot take: pansexual people are better off than people with a specific genital fetish.

Surprisingly Sonic isn't pregnant here.

was too ADHD to read the list 😔

let’s be real men’s feet are pretty nasty

Yo, check out ballerina feet.

A foot fetish sort of works its way into your brain over time. The synapses for feet and sexual attraction are extremely close to each other, so when you do things like, hold someone's feet during sex, or give them a foot rub during foreplay, there's a chance your brain may start making that connection that feet are an erotic thing. For me, it started after being married for a few years, and she just sort of flexed her toes during sex in such a way that it gave me goosebumps, in a good way. Granted I'd been giving her foot rubs for a few years by that point...but oh...my god. When it clicked that it was a turn on for me, it was a game changer.

Had a friend who was a freak ass like that actually

People's dicks really are putting in overtime

You're not picking up what I'm laying down.

I'm not arguing that feet and breasts aren't capable of providing sexual stimulation from a first person perspective. I'm saying that from a third person perspective, theres nothing about them which inherently arousing; that arousal stems from novelty.

...that's not what secondary sex characteristic means. As the article you linked says, that just means physical characteristics unrelated to the reproductive system that differ between the sexes. Some of the other examples given include the Adam's apple in men and longer arms relative to height in women. While some of these things can be sexually attractive or related to sexual attractiveness in some way, certainly we don't societally put them in the same sexual category as women's breasts.

So is thick back hair

Yes, but I'm talking about arousal. The distinction between the adjective and verb of 'sex' is important lol.

That's interesting

Welll for one, giving your partner a foot massage usually ends up in them feeling better. Nobody does that with belly buttons.

You're conflating intensity with origin. Sure, the fetish feels like a deep, primal need now; but that doesn’t mean it started that way. Addiction feels like a need, too, but no one thinks the first cigarette was “primal.”

Novelty doesn’t mean “casual curiosity.” It refers to the way our brains fixate on patterns of scarcity, secrecy, or taboo. Especially during formative sexual experiences. Feet are usually hidden and rarely touched; in most cultures, they’re also considered dirty or improper to eroticize. That makes them novel stimuli, and novelty is rocket fuel for sexual imprinting.

The reason there aren’t more bellybutton fetishes? Simple: they’re not as hidden or taboo. You’ll see a bellybutton in every second Instagram post, and no one’s getting banned for it. Feet? Covered, ignored, often stigmatized, and that makes them psychologically ripe for fetishization.

Also, you mention the diversity of foot-related fetishes like it disproves the point, but it confirms it. The foot becomes a canvas for a range of niche fixations, because it’s already been elevated to erotic status by the novelty of its cultural invisibility. From there, everything else: socks, polish, squishing and domination branches off.

TL;DR: Just because your fetish feels deep doesn’t mean it wasn’t shaped by shallow cultural patterns. Read a bit deeper.

Even the researchers behind the study say, “I want to stress this finding is not final.” That should tell you something.

The sample size is small and limited to a single cultural group. Meanwhile, we’ve got plenty of anthropological evidence showing that in many societies where breasts are regularly exposed, they’re not treated as sexually arousing. So no, this study doesn’t magically override decades of cross-cultural data.

That said, the idea that breasts signal health or fertility? Sure, obviously. Just like wide hips, clear skin, or symmetrical faces. But biological relevance doesn’t automatically make something a fetish object. We don’t jerk off to white blood cell counts.

And yeah, obesity isn't typically seen as attractive because it signals potential health risks (dont cross post this on tumblr).

The study is interesting, but it doesn’t prove breasts are inherently sexual. It just adds a datapoint to a complex picture where biology and culture play roles.

I mean sure, you do you. If everyone wore gloves in a parallel timeline, you'd probably want chin scratches.

In many tribal societies, the erotic focus isn’t on specific body parts like breasts or feet; it's on signs of fertility, health, and social status. things like wide hips, smooth skin, body paint, scarification, or even dance.

I beg your pardon?

Nudists think people who wear clothes and dont question whether their shame is vindicated are weird. I'm inclined to agree with them lol.

She probably floats with special Pictos that only work when her feet are exposed.

The feeling bro! It’s better than touching grass.

Kudos to the players using the swimsuit skin during the Dualiste fight.

I like squeezing them and making the claws extend and retract.

There’s the wonderbread guy - probably thousands of pictures of women buying wonderbread and talking on the phone about how much they want to burn down the Amazon rainforest.

Another one is this guy who’s into this deadly sunscreen stuff - like lesbians killing each other with evil sunscreen.

Both probably have spent thousands of dollars commissioning artists to draw these fetishes for them.

My weird 4chan archive has a guy where /b/ got together to draw a comic fulfilling his greatest wish - his lizard man OC getting vored, digested and shit out by a tuba.

I mean like the emotion of the person the feet are on

I'm not a furry but you guys rp as much as you want to. Idk