Accelerationism

6 months ago by Bad to c/comicstrips

[green, speaking, looking smug]
Okay, hear me out, here's the plan…
We go full apathy, basically we let capitalism fully spiral out into fascism. Once it's done, people will rise up and the system will collapse under its own weight. From its ashes, with our help, a better society will rise. This is how we win.

[we now see that green is tied up in front of a bleak wall, along with a group of other people, being aimed at by a firing squad of characters in fascist uniforms]
[green, smiling] OK?
[blue, pissed] Dude…

https://thebad.website/comic/accelerationism

RedFrank24 139 points 6 months ago

Accelerationism isn't just being apathetic, it's actively making things worse. It's voting for Trump because the DNC didn't elect Bernie Sanders.

Lenin was much the same. He knew a revolution wouldn't happen if things got better, so he did everything he could to make things as bad as humanly possible. When the provisional government came along, granted free speech rights and universal suffrage, Lenin was vehemently opposed to it, because you can't have a communist revolution when stuff is going well. A stable government is not one you can overthrow.

path: 0 23418874, hotness: undefined, score: 139, children: 21
silverneedle 24 points 6 months ago

A stable government is not one you can overthrow.

Governments (nations) are in their nature not stable. Governments can be overthrown at any moment. It is a question of how many are willing to participate, which is not that many.

because you can’t have a communist revolution when stuff is going well

Not Lenin's reasoning, nor is it as a statement true. Revolutions have happened exactly at points where things were looking up, take the transitions that have happened in history where monarchies were superseded by the liberal state. It is not a cyclical trend where, oh no, we have some sort of downtrend in productivity or some other sort of crisis and then the magical revolution comes to save the day. Revolutions happen because systems are forced to adopt organisational structures that satisfy (novel) needs, not because of shittiness.

path: 0 23418874 23419351, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 2
stickly 1 point 6 months ago

Revolutions happen because systems are forced to adopt organisational structures that satisfy (novel) needs

It's just that somehow those novel needs are always coincidentally "people can't afford bread"

path: 0 23418874 23419351 23429231, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
silverneedle 3 points 6 months ago

Just as a counterexample: revolutions have been spurred on by the need to stop military conflicts and territories not advancing quickly enough relative to other countries. What you always see are demands by a section of people that evolve into movements, like that of capitalists to transform the peasant class and employ it.

Revolutions are not one-sided phenomena. They are not merely riots in the street carried out by the most impoverished. Capitalists themselves are moving beyond the demands that defined their class two hundred years ago. In the United States they are moving away from competition as a pervasive principle to very intentional centralisation. There has been a push to abandon antitrust legislation. For the individual capitalists this is needed and a logical step, but it fuels their own demise long term when it becomes a societal trend. You only need a comparatively tiny spark from below release the potential energy accrued by capital.

What you have in mind are certain narratives on the French revolution. Conversely I can ask why countries that experience famine or affordability crises don't experience revolutions.

path: 0 23418874 23419351 23429231 23430869, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
yogurt 17 points 6 months ago

When the provisional government came along, granted free speech rights and universal suffrage

The provisional goverment was unelected and self-appointed, arrested people for arguing in favor of refusing to fight in WWI, and after months of protests said they would allow women to vote whenever they got around to having an election but women couldn't vote until 20 and men 18.

Lenin wasn't opposed to the provisional government when it came along because he was in Germany and didn't know how mad a lot of people were at the random gang of Chuck Schumers from the Tsarist government who had declared themselves in charge, ignoring the Soviets that were already forming an elected government, and spent months stalling their version of an election so they could keep the incredibly unpopular WWI going.

Lenin started opposing the provisional government after 20k awol marines with machine guns showed up at his office saying they hated it, he said ok and then spent a couple months writing a book to explain why the angry guys with guns have a point.

If he was trying to be accelerationist he would have just hyped up the marines and let them shoot everybody instead of following the path of least resistance to a stable government that could last 6 months without a coup.

path: 0 23418874 23423256, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
Riverside 16 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23418874 23424984, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 11
Ensign_Crab 3 points 6 months ago

How many actual Bernie supporters voted for Trump?

There has never been a centrist who cares.

path: 0 23418874 23424984 23434494, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA -4 points 6 months ago

so i was part of a group of friends in high school. we campaigned (at the high school, by wearing buttons and thinking up stupid slogans, not really getting involved in politics) for the green party because by our logic, we couldn't convince democrats to vote republican because they were too smart for that. but we could trick them into voting green.

of my close friends group in high school, only half to 3/4 of us ever grew up. there's one friend in particular i'm thinking of though, he was a "bernie bro" online until bernie lost. after the 2016 election he told us that he tried to commit voter fraud for the russian candidate. in a way that would get noticed and his first vote rejected, also a method that had been discussed online on forums associated with agent krasnov and promoted by agent krasnov himself, but my friend has always been a dipshit. i mean hell so have i. evidence, paragraph 1.

path: 0 23418874 23424984 23426082, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 9
Riverside 6 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23418874 23424984 23426082 23429473, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Doc_Crankenstein 4 points 6 months ago

You have anecdotal "evidence" with a sample size of 1 and using it to make a sweeping, generalization statement.

path: 0 23418874 23424984 23426082 23426512, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 7
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 1 point 6 months ago

i'm having a conversation, not making sweeping generalizations dude. get over yourself.

path: 0 23418874 23424984 23426082 23426512 23426585, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 6
Objection 16 points 6 months ago

I think you forgot the part where the provisional government wanted to keep drafting people to feed into the pointless meat grinder of WWI, which Lenin opposed rather strongly.

path: 0 23418874 23420451, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
UnderpantsWeevil -16 points 6 months ago

It’s voting for Trump

Accelerationism is when you vote. And the more you vote, the faster things get

path: 0 23418874 23420146, hotness: undefined, score: -16, children: 3
EvergreenGuru -7 points 6 months ago

I voted for Biden and things did indeed get worse. Now we see that Trump was voted in and they are getting worse. Soon we will vote in a new Congress and then a new President and things will continue to get worse.

Thankfully I stopped voting after Biden, so my bad luck 🍀 has peaked.

PSA to all the “voters” out there. I no longer worry about politics because I know that things can only get worse. 😎

path: 0 23418874 23420146 23422097, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 2
UnderpantsWeevil -9 points 6 months ago

Thankfully I stopped voting after Biden, so my bad luck 🍀 has peaked.

I mean, you joke. But folks really do seem to believe there's a karmic curse on people who "vote wrong". That's the entire theory of Leopards Eating Faces, anyway.

path: 0 23418874 23420146 23422097 23422276, hotness: undefined, score: -9, children: 1
EvergreenGuru 1 point 6 months ago

That’s just cause & effect.

Are things going to keep getting worse? Probably.

Do you need to vote if that’s the case? Not really, but it’s an external locus of control. You feel you have power because you got to choose who made things worse.

path: 0 23418874 23420146 23422097 23422276 23422354, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
socsa 112 points 6 months ago

This isn't even the stupidest point of accelerationism. That's the assumption that your personal utopia will emerge from the ashes, instead of something much worse.

The simple fact of the matter is that there is no path to "perfect" which doesn't track through an infinite amount of "better" first.

path: 0 23420961, hotness: undefined, score: 112, children: 10
morto 90 points 6 months ago

Reminds me of this meme:

image

path: 0 23420961 23421576, hotness: undefined, score: 90, children: 1
PrimeMinisterKeyes 55 points 6 months ago

Or this one:

path: 0 23420961 23421576 23422394, hotness: undefined, score: 55, children: 0
benjirenji 8 points 6 months ago

I don't think utopias are a bad idea in general, but if they somehow are only reachable by collapsing most of the current system before any groundwork can even be attempted... a form that can be developed in parallel and take over at some point makes much more sense.

Think about the transition and hopefully it doesn't require nuclear war.

path: 0 23420961 23427759, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
Katana314 4 points 6 months ago

Obviously, we shouldn’t need to detail “villains bad” in media, but with so many of them having “from the ashes” plans, I’d like to see more heroes deconstructing their approach like this.

path: 0 23420961 23421528, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Donkter 1 point 6 months ago

Yeah the take plays against their point and into the hands of fascists. A common retort from "capitalists" goes "well why doesn't your economic system compete on the free market? If it's so good it will rise to the top." You believing your ideology will defacto rise from a blank slate after society collapses lends credence to that argument. (Which is flawed in so many ways)

path: 0 23420961 23422109, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Riverside 1 point 6 months ago
path: 0 23420961 23425092, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 4
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 5 points 6 months ago

"no serious political movement" my dude, statesian republicans are maybe not explicit statesians [edit woah oaky maybe too many drugs] accelerationists but like, i'm gonna lose teeth because of them.

and don't say they aren't serious because just because they're dipshits, they're still a major political party and killing people. that's pretty damn serious.

path: 0 23420961 23425092 23425984, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 3
Objection 5 points 6 months ago

This is exactly the problem. "Supporting policies that make things worse for the average person" is not the same thing as "accelerationism." Some people are just wrong, or they have different motivations (like making them and their friends rich). If accelerationism just means making things worse, then everyone is an accelerationist to everyone who disagrees with them, it loses any real meaning.

There may be a handful of actual accelerationists in the party, but they're mostly driven by material interests and a whole bunch of brainworms, not by some accelerationist strategy.

path: 0 23420961 23425092 23425984 23426817, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Riverside 2 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23420961 23425092 23425984 23429486, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 2 points 5 months ago

they're more advocating for destruction of everything because some of them believe they have to destroy the world before their god will return

path: 0 23420961 23425092 23425984 23429486 23440078, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
AeonFelis 44 points 6 months ago

Okay, but capitalism dystopia is not going to look like that. In real capitalism, that wall will be covered in advertisements and motivation posters.

path: 0 23421099, hotness: undefined, score: 44, children: 4
altkey 6 points 6 months ago

Me and who 😳

get shot rearing an ad for Amazon(tm) Bezz-box(r) rented apartments on Mars.

path: 0 23421099 23421763, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
greyscale 3 points 6 months ago

No need to market to you when they simply extract your labour and rent and you buy the swill that is cheapest to you.

path: 0 23421099 23421424, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
AeonFelis 5 points 6 months ago

Advertisers will never go obsolete. They are too good at advertising themselves.

path: 0 23421099 23421424 23423665, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Doc_Crankenstein 2 points 6 months ago

Marketing is more than just selling products, it is a form of social manipulation and conditioning in the constant bombardment of information. It keeps the people not only buying your products but conditioning them to think that they need your products in the first place.

path: 0 23421099 23421424 23426471, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Riverside 36 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23425239, hotness: undefined, score: 36, children: 11
sobchak 30 points 6 months ago

A lot of the far right is accelerationist. They've been hoping for a "race war" for many decades. Then there is the newer Effective Accelerationism/Network State/Dark Enlightenment stuff that the ultra wealthy seem to be into.

path: 0 23425239 23426287, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 4
Lost_My_Mind 9 points 6 months ago

Wow.....a race war would not go well for the far right.

When I hear "far right", I think of middle aged angry white guys. We already HAD that war! At least in the united states....it was in the 1800s, and it did not go well for those who supported racial discrimination.

And that's underselling the whole thing quite a bit.

path: 0 23425239 23426287 23427019, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 3
Pman 5 points 6 months ago

Yes and no, the confederates lost the war but their whitewashing of history has quite a bit of staying power to the point that states like West Virginia and Ohio who had massively supported the Union in the Civil War are now more likely neo confederates and agree with the south take on "the war of northern aggression" which they started by attacking federal forces and raiding federal weapons depots while backing out of the federal government allowing it to pass a law they cite as the reason they backed out of it, rather than it being able to pass because they backed out. Also the war still left separate but equal and racial discrimination on the books and the last chattel slave in the US was freed during world war 2. So what the south (Pro-confederate states) and Americans who swallowed their propaganda learned was that fighting a war without seeding the ground everywhere first with their point of view and taking over things from the inside, like they did under Wilson, arguably the worst US president of the 20th century, and Trump just took that playbook and took it farther than the public was ready for but still pushed and those special interest groups that supported him had the choice to renounce him and be reviled by both major political wings of the US or back him to the hilt while he destroys the US from within, because if you can't get everything you want at least you can make sure nobody else gets anything either.

path: 0 23425239 23426287 23427019 23427902, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
sobchak 1 point 6 months ago

That's a good point. I grew up in rural Ohio a couple decades ago, and confederate flags were quite popular. In my youth, I remember going to one guy's trailer to bring back some more beer, and every threshold in his trailer had a confederate flag. Many of the people in the little, almost all-white towns, were somewhat afraid of the somewhat bigger towns that had a decent black population. I still see similar things where I live now, where my older neighbors living outside of a major city, are somewhat afraid of the city. Curiously, I live in the actual south now, and don't see confederate flags nearly as often than I did in rural Ohio.

path: 0 23425239 23426287 23427019 23427902 23429910, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Doc_Crankenstein 4 points 6 months ago

Didn't exactly go horribly for them either. Reconstruction ended early and a lot of concessions were made on behalf of "the economy" and "unifying the nation".

They should have let Sherman finish what he started.

path: 0 23425239 23426287 23427019 23434049, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
chicken 6 points 6 months ago

idk, I feel like in particular the arguments I've had advocating for UBI with people arguing against it from a left wing perspective, those arguments often tend to be basically accelerationist (that it would be bad to improve things for people in a way that enables the continued existence of capitalism) or at least gesture at that. And as others have pointed out, the right is even more outwardly accelerationist.

path: 0 23425239 23427552, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
orbitz 4 points 6 months ago

Aren't all the Plantir people (well people with money high up) epushing for an accelerationist movement with their stuff? I would think the billionaires are serious is all. Mean it sounds freaking stupid to me but I don't have the bullhorn that the people who have all our private data does is all. However with the US they're using project 2025 as a starting point before they buy up everything after it breaks. Least that's what it appears, mean the VP is picked, groomed and supported by Theil. Just have to let them break enough then swoop in and mould a society they wanted. It's not something 99.99% of what people would want from what I can tell.

Perhaps I'm missing some subtly which I will say I haven't really looked into the definitions a lot but I don't think with current forces is as much of a strawman as it may seem is all. Though I don't think people on that side would want the same outcome as Mr Green is all.

path: 0 23425239 23426342, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 3
Riverside 3 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23425239 23426342 23429430, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
Doc_Crankenstein 3 points 6 months ago

Yea, the right wing aren't destroying the system as people seem to claim. They are just moving it into the next stage of its logical evolution.

Fascism is Capitalism in decay. We have already reached Late Stage Capitalism, and now the Imperial boomerang is coming home. We did this to ourselves by not dismantling it sooner. We tried in the early 1900s with the communist and anarchist worker movements that occurred but then McCarthyism and the 2nd Red Scare really fucked everything up.

path: 0 23425239 23426342 23429430 23434109, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Riverside 2 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23425239 23426342 23429430 23434109 23434817, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Lost_My_Mind 1 point 6 months ago

I believe nuclear war will bring a better planet.

I mean, there will be no more humans alive, but thats what will make the planet better!

path: 0 23425239 23426999, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
TankovayaDiviziya 29 points 6 months ago

Literally Ernst Thälmann. He said to let the Nazis take power, and then the whole world will see how incompetent they are, and then his communist party will surely rise up! But there are no prizes for guessing what happened to him in the end!

path: 0 23423524, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 7
Objection 23 points 6 months ago

The candidate the social democrats wanted won and he's the guy who appointed Hitler chancellor! There was a three way race between "literally Hitler," "guy who will put Hitler into a position of power" and "not Hitler" (Thälmann) and somehow libs are still mad that "not Hitler" was on the ballot.

The social democrats were the ones with the brilliant plan of punching left in favor of a "center"-right coalition, and they actually won and got what they wanted and wound up in the camps as a direct result of it!

No prizes for guessing what happens when you trust the bourgeois parties to be an ally against fascism.

path: 0 23423524 23426120, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 2
Alcoholicorn 11 points 6 months ago

Who the fuck is downvoting this?

path: 0 23423524 23426120 23429342, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
Doc_Crankenstein 1 point 6 months ago
path: 0 23423524 23426120 23429342 23434131, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Riverside 14 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23423524 23425180, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
Butterphinger 6 points 6 months ago

Capitalists: take notes on what the Nazis did wrong and tiptoe around it

path: 0 23423524 23426576, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
yogurt 5 points 5 months ago

Wrong guy. Thallman gave a speech in Hamburg in May 1932 about the launch of the Antifa organization criticizing anybody thinking they can benefit from Hitler taking power and warning you can't play with fascism. Then a book in the 1970s picked out where he's quoting the idea he's against and only quoted the quote trying to manufacture this convenient ironic twist where actually communists deserved to die in death camps.

The head of the SPD social democratic party paramilitary wing Reichsbanner gave a speech in February 1933 (right after Hitler took power, right before the Reichstag fire) and did actually say "after Hitler our turn" arguing it was good to let Hitler expand the military because the SPD would get a cool new army when they won the next election.

path: 0 23423524 23443283, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 2 points 6 months ago

choked on a bone in a pie eating contest, which was weird because it was an apple pie?

path: 0 23423524 23425009, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
finallymadeanaccount 28 points 6 months ago

people will rise up

The line in the sand as to what's acceptable has been redrawn so many times, if the people haven't risen up by now, they never will. You're stuck with the rancid orange colostomy bag until he either pops his clogs, or chooses to leave.

path: 0 23427702, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 4
DrDickHandler 13 points 6 months ago

Nope. Fascism is there to stay for the next decade regardless of what happens to Trump.

path: 0 23427702 23427990, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 1
Corkyskog 2 points 5 months ago

There is an economic calamity coming that most people alive have never witnessed and barely understand the magnitude of from their history books. Were probably 6 months to a year away from it, it really depends how much fertilizer is getting out of Hormuz right now.

That will be a turning point. Either people use that to come together and turn away from fascism or fascism cements itself. Either way, I predict much hardship in the foreseeable future.

path: 0 23427702 23427990 23484998, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
iglou 5 points 6 months ago

Oh, no. People will rise up eventually. It's just a shame that most people turn out to be olympic athletes in mental gymnastics and delay the realization to the next generation(s).

path: 0 23427702 23429939, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
Holytimes 0 points 5 months ago

If people are not actively starving they basically never rise up. That's been true though all of History.

It takes SERIOUSLY major direct impact to people's day to day life in meaningful ways to kick start a revolution.

path: 0 23427702 23429939 23484950, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
hiawatha98 21 points 6 months ago path: 0 23418934, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 0
Formfiller 17 points 6 months ago

After WW2 65 million people were dead and 50% of the boys and men in Germany were dead. Everyone loses with fascism

path: 0 23423085, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 7
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 4 points 6 months ago

oh goodie. question that has absolutely no bearing on reality whatsoever: so in Austria and Germany there had to have been people who, before WW2, were crippled. I know war leaves people crippled but i'm curious as to the fate of those who were crippled before the war. No reason whatsoever ignore the cane and wheelchair and cabinet full of glue.

aw who am i kidding they're gonna turn me into glue

path: 0 23423085 23425047, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
Formfiller 3 points 6 months ago path: 0 23423085 23425047 23429569, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Riverside 1 point 6 months ago
path: 0 23423085 23425126, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 4
Formfiller 3 points 6 months ago

Because I’m stuck in the United States of Israel

path: 0 23423085 23425126 23429577, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
Riverside 0 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23423085 23425126 23429577 23429587, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 2
Formfiller 3 points 6 months ago

So the fate of the turd Reich is historically relevant to the current situation we face.

path: 0 23423085 23425126 23429577 23429587 23429609, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
AlbynRailroad 15 points 6 months ago

The real solution btw is just a better consensus mechanism in our electoral process in the form of STAR Voting.
It is quite literally that simple.
The lack of choice (as explained in Duverger's Law) is what kills our politics and helps the media portray all political battles as us vs them and not "What shade out of a million shades of gray should this policy be?".

tl;dr - STAR Voting is quite literally a panacea for nearly all the extreme ills that plague our politics - even a large portion of "voting doesn't matter so I won't" apathy....because to vote "strategically" under STAR Voting is to just vote honestly and every vote matters. No revolution required - just a better electoral process. I'm happy to answer any questions.

path: 0 23420756, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 6
stickyprimer 14 points 6 months ago

Someone do a version of the comic with this guy’s comment as the text of the first panel, please.

path: 0 23420756 23420827, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 2
AlbynRailroad 1 point 6 months ago

Hah! Well I took the comic to mean that the accelerationist gets exactly what he wanted and pays for it in the end when things go to hell.
Thing is if we implemented what I'm talking about (which is literally just a law about how we vote...we already have legislation that does this...we just amend it) there would be no upheaval.
The electorate would vote more honestly.
Campaigns would become more positive.
News media would become more policy focused.
There would be no firing squad - just a return to normal policy-focused (not party-focused) politics.
It would actually be quite boring.

path: 0 23420756 23420827 23427805, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
stickyprimer 2 points 6 months ago

First time?

path: 0 23420756 23420827 23427805 23428445, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Riverside 6 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23420756 23425012, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
stickly 2 points 6 months ago

For the same reason they're happy to burn the only habitable planet humans will ever have: they're going to play with fire in search of optimal profit, even to their own eventual detriment.

People act like raw, naked, decayed capitalism is a totally stable system where all actors work perfectly together to rationally suppress the proletariat in perpetuity. But it's not that. Capital has accumulated to the point of a handful of individuals butting heads over all of the earth's resources.

There's no longer a cabal of dozens of cartels coordinating in abstract lock step. There's like 10 dudes that can meet in a room. Applying dialect-materialism to that is using Newtonian physics on a quantum scale.

Petty grudges and irrational emotions take control at that scale. A few of them get the idea that they can eat the others by leveraging the proletariat and all bets are off.

Will it certainly happen? Not necessarily. But more individuals have deposed through creative leveraging of legal mechanisms than those spontaneously pulled from their beds and shot. There's no reason to not be prepared if the opportunity presents itself.

path: 0 23420756 23425012 23429044, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Doc_Crankenstein 3 points 6 months ago

Sure, but only if you naively believe that electoralism is an acceptable system. Many, many anarchists would vehemently disagree with you though.

path: 0 23420756 23426556, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Objection 15 points 6 months ago

Accelerationism is really dumb which is why it's such a popular strawman.

Does someone have a different opinion? Well, it could be that different people have different ideas about how the world works as well as different priorities. But that's all complicated and nuanced and forces you to contend with different perspectives. Instead, just assume that everyone has your perspective because it's just inherently obvious to everyone, but some people are intentionally trying to make things worse because they're stupid and evil.

Virtually no one is an actual accelerationist.

path: 0 23420532, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 1
theuniqueone 6 points 6 months ago

Yep very few actual believers but if you don't support their "pragmatic" suggestions that throw billions under the bus they accuse you of this.

path: 0 23420532 23421822, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
mtpender 8 points 6 months ago

iMrSdCKEr6bbrxd.gif

path: 0 23418818, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
Pman 7 points 6 months ago

Governments that raise up against a totalitarian regime in anger rarely end up in a peaceful and prosperous place if they succeed, see France, Lybia, Rome, the Soviet Union/Russian Empire, China every time, Japan (under the shogunate), Egypt (Arab spring), Sudan, Somalia, Assyria (7th century BCE between 612 and 609 BCE), and so many more.

path: 0 23431085, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 4 points 6 months ago

well this is going to make you happy. i just read this comic and was coming here to post it :3

path: 0 23424993, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
Bad 2 points 6 months ago

It does, thanks, that's pretty cool ! 🥰

path: 0 23424993 23425550, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
kent_eh 3 points 6 months ago

Once it's done?

Facissm doesn't end on its own. It needs to get pushed out.

path: 0 23422119, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
theuniqueone 3 points 6 months ago

Almost nobody is arguing this maybe i should give you the benefit of the doubt but I just can't people hating your "nicer" imperialist genocidal capitalists don't believe this.

path: 0 23421795, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
someguy3 8 points 6 months ago

Please use punctuation.

path: 0 23421795 23422029, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
lovingisliving 2 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23418966, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 34
doughless 22 points 6 months ago

Potentially at the expense of all non-microbial life.

path: 0 23418966 23419124, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 23
turdas 7 points 6 months ago

I don't think that's on the cards. Non-microbial life has survived 70% of the planet's forests going up in flames as a consequence of a massive asteroid impact, and the ensuing years or possibly decade+ of planet-wide ash and dust clouds blocking out the sun. And that was just the latest mass extinction event.

You're giving humanity far too much credit by assuming we'd be capable of anything comparable right now.

path: 0 23418966 23419124 23420186, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
lovingisliving 1 point 6 months ago
path: 0 23418966 23419124 23420186 23421682, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
lovingisliving -12 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23418966 23419124 23419263, hotness: undefined, score: -12, children: 20
lugal 14 points 6 months ago

The problem is capitalism. Don't make it about humans as a species when there are countless counter examples we can learn from

path: 0 23418966 23419124 23419263 23419453, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 11
UnderpantsWeevil 7 points 6 months ago

The problem is capitalism.

The Soviets were shit on environmentalism for a long time. We didn't see a serious environmental movement in China until the early 2000s. We've never really seen one in the USSR, prior to its collapse.

path: 0 23418966 23419124 23419263 23419453 23420269, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 6
lovingisliving 4 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23418966 23419124 23419263 23419453 23421446, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
ripcord 2 points 6 months ago

The problem is about greed and corruption. Communism doesn't fix that.

path: 0 23418966 23419124 23419263 23419453 23420752, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
Soulg 6 points 6 months ago

I mean if you hate yourself that much there's other options than trying to take us out with you

path: 0 23418966 23419124 23419263 23419481, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
lovingisliving 2 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23418966 23419124 23419263 23419481 23421493, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
SalamenceFury 3 points 6 months ago

Even parasites are important to the environment. Also, if you wanna be dragged down to hell, don't pull us with you.

path: 0 23418966 23419124 23419263 23420118, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
lovingisliving 3 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23418966 23419124 23419263 23420118 23421511, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
UnderpantsWeevil 1 point 6 months ago

humans are just another parasitic and unchecked species that is probably going to learn about their own environmental limits the hard way.

Humans are the exception precisely because they can see the axe falling and move out of the way.

Outside of the fossil fuel dominated US/Saudi sphere, we've seen an enormous collaborated effort to curb greenhouse gases. Not everyone is ignoring the risks and consequences.

What we have the capitalist West is a conscious choice between short term profit and long term survival.

path: 0 23418966 23419124 23419263 23420235, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
lovingisliving 2 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23418966 23419124 23419263 23420235 23421610, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
ripcord 3 points 6 months ago

There's pretty much no evidence we will wipe ourselves "out" through climate change.

Really really fuck ourselves over? Sure. But it's not going to kill literally everyone.

We have to figure out how to live together with the planet one way or another, and one day.

path: 0 23418966 23420741, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
lovingisliving 2 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23418966 23420741 23421550, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
UnderpantsWeevil 2 points 6 months ago

There’s also climate accelerationism

Trump has done more to curb emissions with the closing of Hormuz than the last five presidents combined.

path: 0 23418966 23420210, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
lovingisliving 3 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23418966 23420210 23421526, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
stickly 2 points 6 months ago

Also, petrochemicals are a requirement for any sort of transition to alternatives. Humanity has been binging for nearly two centuries on free energy through hard oil dependence.

If we don't tirate off of that the shock will (functionally) kill us. The thought that halting that consumption will solve everything is like an extreme alcoholic thinking quitting cold turkey will work.

path: 0 23418966 23420210 23421526 23429163, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
stray 2 points 6 months ago

I'm fine with the logic of a species going extinct because they destroyed their own ecosystem, but intentionally accelerating that process is what I can only describe as evil. It's doing massive harm for no benefit. It won't save the planet's current inhabitants from further damage; the real motivation is genocide against humans.

path: 0 23418966 23429315, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
DaMummy 1 point 6 months ago

Only if you consider that the world revolves around humans.

path: 0 23418966 23419803, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
zbyte64 0 points 6 months ago

That's iike living in a house that is falling apart and saying if I just let it fall apart completely then I won't need to fix the house

path: 0 23418966 23419478, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 2
lovingisliving 3 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23418966 23419478 23421663, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
BillCheddar 1 point 6 months ago

And then we'll just rebuild!

...on top of the pile of debris that was a home...and lacking assets.

path: 0 23418966 23419478 23420982, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Samskara 1 point 6 months ago

This is the firing squad for counter revolutionaries.

path: 0 23481672, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Malyca 1 point 6 months ago

When you lay it out like that it does sound quite idiotic doesn't it?

path: 0 23422463, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Riverside 5 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23422463 23425075, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
justaman123 1 point 6 months ago

Except it should be drones instead of people

path: 0 23420678, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
RememberTheApollo_ 1 point 6 months ago

Pretty much the same plan as the Republicans, right? They were all about burning it down but plenty of them are arriving at the “Dude!” stage.

path: 0 23422528, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
BlackLaZoR 1 point 6 months ago

This but socialism

path: 0 23431046, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
DGen 0 points 6 months ago

Yeah. Shit can hit the fan to make space for Something new. But thats a huge "could". There is also space for something even worse.

path: 0 23425084, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
Grail -1 points 6 months ago

What accerationists don't realise is that the average liberal already knows the US is fascist and evil billionaires control everything. That average liberal wants change. But they aren't doing anything, because they're thinking "surely when it gets REALLY bad, people will rise up". Just like the accelerationists. Accelerationists and liberals are the same group.

path: 0 23418902, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 39
surewhynotlem 62 points 6 months ago

I think they're thinking "shit I can barely survive and have two jobs and I don't want my kids to starve and I'm taking care of my elderly parents. I can't go riot or my whole family will suffer."

path: 0 23418902 23419032, hotness: undefined, score: 62, children: 1
Grail 10 points 6 months ago

That too. Making things worse doesn't help the revolution. Making things better helps it. Now that Trump's in charge, it's only gotten harder to use direct action and civil disobedience.

path: 0 23418902 23419032 23419564, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
UnderpantsWeevil 5 points 6 months ago

average liberal already knows the US is fascist

No. They always think the current moment is the exception and everything way very respectable and dignified historically.

That's why you've got liberals venerating Reagan, Clinton, and Bush, having completely whitewashed the horror of those presidencial eras from their minds.

path: 0 23418902 23420185, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 33
SatansMaggotyCumFart 8 points 6 months ago

I don’t think you can find a liberal who thinks the Reagan or Bush presidencies were anything but bad.

path: 0 23418902 23420185 23420565, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 25
UnderpantsWeevil 3 points 6 months ago

“Did we ever think we would see the day when we would say, ‘Please bring back George W. Bush’?” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said during an interview with Evan Smith last week. “We really did work together.”

path: 0 23418902 23420185 23420565 23421283, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
SatansMaggotyCumFart 6 points 6 months ago

I’d rather get shot in the arm instead of the head but that doesn’t mean I think getting shot in the arm is good.

path: 0 23418902 23420185 23420565 23421283 23421463, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Objection 2 points 6 months ago

I don’t think people get that this difference makes a difference. As a millennial going through college during the GW Bush years, there was at least a Republican party that cared about America, cared about non political government institutions and the service those members participate in, etc. Since the tea party that shit changed. And I don’t think it’s hard to believe Mitt Romney actually cares about this country and means what he says on this thing. I feel disgusted defending Romney, but I kind of miss it when it was guys like Romney were the political opponents in power and not these MAGA folks hellbent on destroying democracy and politicizing the institutions critical to America.

I just found 96 liberals who fit that description.

path: 0 23418902 23420185 23420565 23420732, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 21
someguy3 7 points 6 months ago

Saying "hey they might have cared a bit about institutions compared to maga" is not venerating.

venerate /vĕn′ə-rāt″/

To regard with deep respect or reverence. synonym: revere. Similar: revere

Not the same meaning at all. Not even close.

So no you didn't find 96 people that fit that description.

When you mingle meanings like that, I'm just gonna leave it at that.

path: 0 23418902 23420185 23420565 23420732 23422184, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
SatansMaggotyCumFart 4 points 6 months ago

You found 96 people who upvoted the comment saying Trump is worse than bush was and that Mitt Romney would be better than Trump is.

There’s nothing there saying Bush or Reagan were good.

path: 0 23418902 23420185 23420565 23420732 23420830, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 18
ripcord 1 point 6 months ago

By comparison they were great, at least.

path: 0 23418902 23420185 23420565 23420714, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
BillCheddar 5 points 6 months ago

That is pure nonsense.

You aren't going to find liberals venerating Reagan, Bush, and Clinton because those people only exist in your mind. They don't exist in reality.

path: 0 23418902 23420185 23420963, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 4
UnderpantsWeevil -1 points 6 months ago

You aren’t going to find liberals venerating Reagan, Bush, and Clinton

How Democrats Came to Feel Nostalgic for George W. Bush

“Did we ever think we would see the day when we would say, ‘Please bring back George W. Bush’?” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said during an interview with Evan Smith last week. “We really did work together.”

Why Do Democrats Keep Embracing George W. Bush?

Former Democratic Representative Katie Hill tweeted, “In a million years I never thought I’d be crying watching this, thinking how much better we’d all feel if Bush were president today. Wtf.”

path: 0 23418902 23420185 23420963 23421104, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 3
someguy3 5 points 6 months ago

Saying "we worked together" isn't venerating JFC.

venerate /vĕn′ə-rāt″/

To regard with deep respect or reverence. synonym: revere. Similar: revere

Not even close to the same thing.

path: 0 23418902 23420185 23420963 23421104 23422239, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
BillCheddar 3 points 6 months ago
  1. That isn't the same thing.
  2. Democrat does not equal liberal.

Do you have anything intellectually HONEST to add to the conversation, or are you done with this sophomoric attempt at propaganda?

path: 0 23418902 23420185 23420963 23421104 23422672, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Grail 3 points 6 months ago

Nobody where I live has any respect left for the USA, except for fascists. Peter Dutton tried following the American model and he lost his seat. We hate your country.

path: 0 23418902 23420185 23421077, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
UnderpantsWeevil 2 points 6 months ago path: 0 23418902 23420185 23421077 23421333, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
13igTyme 1 point 6 months ago

No. Many far left groups we're literally saying the same shit in the comic.

path: 0 23418902 23420851, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
Grail -6 points 6 months ago

That makes them liberals. My purity test for leftism is whether you're actually putting in effort to make the world a better place. Millions fail!

path: 0 23418902 23420851 23420873, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 1
13igTyme 8 points 6 months ago

It's amazing how many things are called liberalism, centrism, or leftism on the fediverse. It reminds me of the way socialism and communism are spoke about in far right groups.

Definitions change to meet the needs of their point. Too many people need a better education and a history lesson.

path: 0 23418902 23420851 23420873 23420967, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
OsrsNeedsF2P -3 points 6 months ago

Accelerationist here. I think it's more of a coping mechanism. I basically support all protestors and people motivated to make change, regardless of which side they're on.

path: 0 23429982, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 3
ALiteralCabbage 2 points 6 months ago

I genuinely don't get this stance - are you as okay with far right marches as pro-worker strikes and pickets?

path: 0 23429982 23431183, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
OsrsNeedsF2P 2 points 5 months ago

It's not that I treat them equally, but I'm happy to see people fighting for change, if that makes sense

path: 0 23429982 23431183 23461397, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
ALiteralCabbage 1 point 5 months ago

I guess so - better something than nothing?

path: 0 23429982 23431183 23461397 23463567, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
HazardousBanjo -4 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23421692, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 9
theuniqueone 5 points 6 months ago

Except they don't believe this at all and maybe we should fight so there is no pro genocide option instead of one you assign lesser pro genocide.

path: 0 23421692 23421806, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
HazardousBanjo 1 point 6 months ago

Except they don't believe this at all

I know, they don't believe in objective reality.

and maybe we should fight so there is no pro genocide option instead of one you assign lesser pro genocide.

  1. I never assigned Kamala as the lesser of two evils nor the less damaging and less genocidal. That was/is simple reality, and more genocide and atrocities are now happening in part due to these people's inaction. The blood is partially on their hands too
  2. You're entirely missing the point. The choice was either voting Kamala or aiding Trump with inaction, thus causing far more death and suffering. There wasn't an alternative. If there was, I would have also chosen it. We aren't free from reality just because its grim and horrible.
  3. We can fight against genocide while also not surrendering to fascism. Hence the point of the comic.
path: 0 23421692 23421806 23421987, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
green_red_black -1 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23421692 23422158, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 6
HazardousBanjo 3 points 6 months ago

I'm sure the people of Iran, and the Hispanic folks being sent to concentration camps, or anyone who relied on US aid programs are grateful for your extreme shortsightedness and inability to do very basic situational analysis that you couldn't see the blood puddle under Kamala was smaller than under Trump.

I'm sure they'll get on their hands and knees to praise you before their little girls' school is bombed or the ICE agents put their gun in their mouths and pull the trigger.

You're such a brave warrior/activists and your actions are so amazingly effective at saving lives. /s

path: 0 23421692 23422158 23422241, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 5
green_red_black -3 points 6 months ago
path: 0 23421692 23422158 23422241 23422686, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 4
HazardousBanjo 2 points 6 months ago

Less death and destruction is always a better option. Its a simple matter of the Trolley problem, and if you can't figure that one out, you got major issues.

I haven't even jumped into the fact that getting actual progressive and anti-genocide politicians in office went from difficult to nearly impossible because millions of pathetic psuedo-leftists decided they'd rather collapse the US from flawed democracy to fascist shithole with nukes.

path: 0 23421692 23422158 23422241 23422686 23422864, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
Psythik -4 points 6 months ago

As a Millennial this is basically how I feel about Gen Z. Why are they so apathetic regarding everything? If anyone gets passionate about anything because they want something done about the rise of fascism, you get labeled as "crashing out"! It's annoying as fuck!

path: 0 23422311, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 9
PlexSheep 8 points 6 months ago

Why are you generalizing a whole generation?

path: 0 23422311 23423244, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
jaggedrobotpubes 2 points 6 months ago

Advertising stupidity, the only reason anyone ever has.

path: 0 23422311 23423244 23424954, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
vivalapivo 6 points 6 months ago

As a millennial, you should understand that there's no coherent volition behind surplus objects like Gen Z. Do you remember how the US just added every muslim to the list of terrorists or how suddenly all single mothers in the UK became a parasite?

path: 0 23422311 23423171, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Lumisal 5 points 6 months ago

Trump was elected under millennials, not Z. Americans in general are apathetic - it's a culture issue, not a generational one.

I see that difference extremely clearly now that I live in Finland.

path: 0 23422311 23422579, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
potpotato 1 point 6 months ago

“The youngest voters and those entering middle age tacked hard to the right. Gen X — which slightly favored president-elect Donald Trump with a one-point margin in 2020 — shifted 9 points toward Trump this cycle. Gen Z favored Vice President Kamala Harris by 11 points, compared to 24 points for President Joe Biden.

…

Gen Z's big shift to the right wasn't entirely unexpected. Teens were twice as likely to identify as more conservative than their parents compared to millennials 20 years ago, per a Gallup and Walton Family Foundation study conducted last fall.”

-Business Insider

path: 0 23422311 23422579 23423084, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Lumisal 3 points 6 months ago

Trump was elected under millennials *the first time.

And the second under both.

Not to mention, even your own thing shows they were still more "left" leaning (as left as you can get with establishment democrats at least) overall. But then again, you post from an unheard of source that then quotes the right wing business insider, so I'm not surprised you didn't catch that their conclusion doesn't make sense (Biden was the candidate up until literally a few months before the election, when it quickly swapped to Harris. 11 points in that context is quite high all things considered).

path: 0 23422311 23422579 23423084 23429029, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Geobloke 4 points 6 months ago

As a millennial who remembers massive climate change and anti Iraq war protests I get it.

path: 0 23422311 23422666, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
1984 2 points 6 months ago

Stop crashing out... :)

No but I think its because of never ending negative things happening. People stop to care because they cant affect it.

path: 0 23422311 23422787, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
bridgeenjoyer 2 points 6 months ago

My friends just say I'm crazy and I'm on the dark web for using Lemmy and telling them how bad google and fb are 😆 they dont believe anything I tell them.

path: 0 23422311 23482020, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
ripcord -7 points 6 months ago

No replace Capitalism with Communism and it works 100% as well. Has happened, even!

path: 0 23420681, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 0
comicstrips
comicstrips

@lemmy.world

login for more options
25775
8211
10293

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. *� Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. *�️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. *� Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. *�️ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. *� Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      ✅ Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. *� Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 🖐) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 🖐) will be removed.
  7. *�‍☠️ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      Sí, por favor [Spanish/Español]
  8. *� Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss
  3. GPrime85

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links
Other Comic Communities of Interest

go to feed...