Plex increasing Lifetime Plex Pass cost to whopping $750

3 months ago by dantheclamman to c/technology

Plex has announced a massive price increase for the Lifetime tier of its Plex Pass plan. Starting in July, Plex...
Dagnet 342 points 3 months ago

my lifetime pass for jellyfin cost me $0, pretty good value

path: 0 23823261, hotness: undefined, score: 342, children: 38
The_Picard_Maneuver 82 points 3 months ago

I didn't get into self-hosting until recently, and people recommended Jellyfin, so I don't even know what I'm missing with Plex, if anything. It feels like Jellyfin does everything I need.

path: 0 23823261 23823695, hotness: undefined, score: 82, children: 34
hperrin 108 points 3 months ago

You’re missing getting to pay for it. Imagine how good it would feel to see $750 less in your bank account.

path: 0 23823261 23823695 23823897, hotness: undefined, score: 108, children: 14
tempest 57 points 3 months ago

I mean Plex definitely has a value add. Around here people will scoff but Plex is far easier to work with for non technical users.

If you shared your library externally Plex was definitely easier it's just that they have started to extract value from that which does suck.

path: 0 23823261 23823695 23823897 23824919, hotness: undefined, score: 57, children: 13
W98BSoD 4 points 3 months ago

Plexamp is GREAT; I’ve not found another app like it that works with a home hosted music streaming server.

path: 0 23823261 23823695 23823897 23824919 23833976, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
TwiddleTwaddle -2 points 3 months ago

Easier sure, but it comes at the expense of all traffic (even streaming to a device on your local network) going through their servers. If you have an internet outage or their servers go down, you can't even stream media locally with Plex. No such issues with Jellyfin.

Edit: apparently my frustrations about this were based on something I set up incorrectly, so +1 point for Plex working locally without internet, -1 point for ease of use/setup if I had this wrong for years without knowing it or finding the fix on my own.

path: 0 23823261 23823695 23823897 23824919 23825036, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 10
Dagnet 14 points 3 months ago

You got the arr stack up too? Feels like magic when it's all setup

path: 0 23823261 23823695 23824434, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 8
The_Picard_Maneuver 5 points 3 months ago

No, not yet. I took forever to manually rip what I have, which was a lot, and I'm still working my way through boxes of music (which I'm also hosting on Jellyfin). I'll figure out that step next.

path: 0 23823261 23823695 23824434 23824588, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 6
Appoxo 10 points 3 months ago

Trash-guides will be your savior

path: 0 23823261 23823695 23824434 23824588 23824659, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
mic_check_one_two 9 points 3 months ago

If you haven’t already, you may want to look into FileBot. It’s the only reason I was ever able to properly rip and rename all of my files so Plex/Jellyfin can automatically detect them.

path: 0 23823261 23823695 23824434 23824588 23826090, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 2
Dagnet 2 points 3 months ago

Ah fair, just take your time and feel free to ask

path: 0 23823261 23823695 23824434 23824588 23825146, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
LadyMeow 4 points 3 months ago

It does feel magical :D

path: 0 23823261 23823695 23824434 23826482, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
CH3DD4R_G0BL1N 8 points 3 months ago

You’re missing the early days when plex lifetime pass was ~$50usd and jellyfin wasn't a thing (that I know of). I believe Kodi was the only real competitor at the time, and it was much less friendly.

Plex has slowly moved in a less user friendly direction, but still meets my needs and I’ve easily gotten over $750 in value from the…almost 20 years, wow…I’ve been using it.

path: 0 23823261 23823695 23831863, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
ITGuyLevi 7 points 3 months ago

I felt the same way with my Kodi installs, I had a pi in every room that used a shared library db so I could pause in one room and resume somewhere else, nfs shares for media, a config file and done.

I bought a lifetime Plex pass a decade or so ago and shifted everything except my music to Jellyfin about a year ago. Now I'm looking into dispatcharr to round everything out.

path: 0 23823261 23823695 23823939, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 3
Appoxo 2 points 3 months ago

Dispatcharr is pretty neat for m3u streams.
Working great with jellyfin

path: 0 23823261 23823695 23823939 23824666, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
ITGuyLevi 1 point 3 months ago

Nice! I'm giving it a go with some dumb free m3u's now and so far it's been pretty great. I haven't tied it into Jellyfin or Plex yet but one I decide on a decent iptv provider it'll be happening.

path: 0 23823261 23823695 23823939 23824666 23825881, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
mic_check_one_two 5 points 3 months ago

Jellyfin is amazing for a lot of things, but it shouldn’t be available externally. There are a few critical security concerns that devs have openly stated will never be patched. And that makes it a non-starter for sharing with people who can’t figure out how to use a personal VPN connection. It may be fine for me and my household… But there’s no way I’m going to be able to walk my tech-illiterate grandmother through it over the phone.

In contrast, Plex makes sharing server access very easy. Since they run a centralized server to handle all of the “which servers do I have access to, and where are they located” automatic discovery traffic, sharing content is as simple as sending an invite link. That centralization flies in the face of what Jennyfin stands for, so they won’t ever implement it. I even have a burner Plex account that already has access to my server, which I can use to sign into TVs when I don’t want to bother with the whole account setup process. Handy for things like parties, because I have a few “just hit play and drunk people will enjoy it” types of playlists ready to go.

Basically, Jellyfin for yourself and your household. Plex for everyone else. Luckily, the two will happily run side-by-side without any issues.

path: 0 23823261 23823695 23825917, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 4
The_Picard_Maneuver 7 points 3 months ago

I'm not confident enough in my knowledge to ever open up my server externally, even after reading some methods that are allegedly safe (or relatively safe). I'd just rather not take the risk of me misunderstanding something or failing to keep current with vulnerabilities.

I suppose I see the appeal if Plex handles that without hassle, but man... not for $750. Lol

path: 0 23823261 23823695 23825917 23826656, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
kata1yst 3 points 3 months ago

This is a concern if you just port forward through a router. This isn't a problem if you simply use a reverse proxy, which is standard and normal and expected and not difficult at all.

path: 0 23823261 23823695 23825917 23826248, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
mic_check_one_two 8 points 3 months ago

It’s a concern even with a reverse proxy. The reverse proxy encrypts your connection from A to B, but does nothing to stop the various security concerns that have been noted. Because those concerns don’t rely on intercepting unencrypted traffic. If you can reach Jellyfin’s main log in page, you can exploit it. Full stop.

The only way a reverse proxy would stop someone from being able to exploit it is to include a separate login on your reverse proxy, meaning attackers wouldn’t even be able to hit Jellyfin’s landing page unless they know your proxy’s password. But notably, this breaks basically everything except for browsers. All of your smart TVs, mobile apps, etc would stop functioning, because they’d bounce off of that reverse proxy login page.

path: 0 23823261 23823695 23825917 23826248 23826370, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
Agent641 51 points 3 months ago

Apparently they are going to DOUBLE that amount every year! Outrageous!

path: 0 23823261 23825168, hotness: undefined, score: 51, children: 0
clav64 1 point 3 months ago

Ha, I came here to make this joke.

path: 0 23823261 23834655, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Dagnet 2 points 3 months ago

Ok, you got dibs on this joke next time plex raises prices

path: 0 23823261 23834655 23834791, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
SirMaple__ 85 points 3 months ago

Couldn't pay me to use that software lol

Used Kodi and now using Jellyfin.

path: 0 23826020, hotness: undefined, score: 85, children: 0
just_another_person 71 points 3 months ago

I thought the last couple moves were the nail in the coffin, but this might be it 🤣

path: 0 23822974, hotness: undefined, score: 71, children: 24
kibblebits 63 points 3 months ago

Unless, like me, you got it for $49.

Still, jellyfin.

path: 0 23822974 23823070, hotness: undefined, score: 63, children: 19
Mynameisallen 18 points 3 months ago

Exactly, got mine with an Nvidia shield purchase, still moved to Jellyfin like a year ago and never looked back

path: 0 23822974 23823070 23823196, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 14
kibblebits 5 points 3 months ago

Was the conversion easy? Could you keep your watchlist and whatnot?

I have… a lot of data.

path: 0 23822974 23823070 23823196 23823471, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 13
Mynameisallen 12 points 3 months ago

Um honestly I didn’t even try to port shit, I’ve only got about 12 TB of stuff anyways so it was easier to just start fresh

path: 0 23822974 23823070 23823196 23823471 23823491, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 10
Appoxo 6 points 3 months ago

Option 1: Sync to trakt, then backsync to jellyfin
Option 2: Use something like yamtrack to track it externally
Yamtrack can ingest plex and jellyfin. Just no backsync :/

path: 0 23822974 23823070 23823196 23823471 23824703, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
Dsklnsadog 6 points 3 months ago

I thought the last couple moves were the nail in the coffin, but this might be it 🤣

I got it for 20 bucks! Good times!

path: 0 23822974 23823070 23823444, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 3
db2 1 point 3 months ago

37.5X price hike

path: 0 23822974 23823070 23823444 23824214, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
Dsklnsadog 3 points 3 months ago

Buy low, sell high. Follow me for more financial tips!

path: 0 23822974 23823070 23823444 23824214 23828787, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
CosmoNova 15 points 3 months ago

I think it is. A price hike this massive can only mean they‘re banking on panic buyers who think they can save hundreds of bucks if they buy it now. Meaning Plex probably knows it‘s over and they just want to make as much money as possible before filing bankruptcy or something. At least that‘s what it looks like to me.

path: 0 23822974 23823864, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 2
mic_check_one_two 18 points 3 months ago

My guess was almost this. They obviously want to cash in on the panic-buyers. But I don’t think it’s because they’re going under. I think the goal is to put the lifetime pass out of reach for most people, meaning they’ll default to the subscription instead. Because Plex wants people on subscriptions. They’re more reliable income, which the company can more accurately budget for. There’s a reason everything is moving towards SAAS, and Plex is doing the same. This is simply an attempt to push/lock everyone to the subscription model instead of the single purchase.

path: 0 23822974 23823864 23826233, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0
Pika 1 point 3 months ago

I have to agree with this, I think they bet on more people subscribing as a result of their external connection subscription requirement, didn't and are panicing because they don't want to downscale enough to be able to be maintained.

path: 0 23822974 23823864 23824815, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Pika 5 points 3 months ago

the plex lifetime pass is a solid "stop beating him he's already dead" scenario for me because I lost any interest in it like 4 price ups ago now.

path: 0 23822974 23824761, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
rob_t_firefly 63 points 3 months ago

It's still hilarious to me that Plex, a project forked from the XBMC (now Kodi) free open-source app for organizing and playing one's own entirely legally obtained video files, is a big streaming business thing that charges people money.

It's like finding a tree in the forest that gives out infinite free apples, and then setting up an apple-selling table right next to it stocked with apples you obviously got from that tree.

path: 0 23835896, hotness: undefined, score: 63, children: 5
ragebutt 7 points 3 months ago

This happens all the time in FOSS

Someone comes in, contributes a bit, then forks, then closes it off once they realize there’s a path to monetization.

Plex is a particularly egregious example: the initial author forked xbmc to make a mac port. This led to a crazy amount of popularity very fast and they saw the path to monetization. They soon after created plex server separate from the client and went to the crazy step of rewriting everything GPL so they could fully close source.

This is legally fine but ethically fucked; they had a derivative app that technically no longer shared code with kodi but there was the fact that design cues, data structures, etc were mostly inherited. Plex wouldn’t exist without kodi. And that’s totally fine, derivative works should be allowed and encouraged. But what’s fucked is that they made serious efforts to close source and give nothing back to the community that they were built from. Code? Nothing. When they got 40 million in VC? nothing.

See also a bunch of players in 3d printing, notably Bambu at the moment. But they’ll keep getting away with it thanks to a combination of governments that are like “money is more important than fairness or progress” and idiotic consumers that are like “oh I have to spend 30 seconds longer figuring something out? Ugh fuck you im gonna buy what some YouTuber was paid $400 to recommend”

path: 0 23835896 23845897, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
canthangmightstain 6 points 3 months ago

No… it’s like picking up those apples, shipping them across the country, and then charging customers a delivery fee. Which is perfectly reasonable because time and fuel cost money.

Plex helps you (and others) stream from your library pretty brainlessly. Sure there are other options, but all of them are more complicated.

path: 0 23835896 23842068, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
Landless2029 4 points 3 months ago

This is it. People have always paid for convenience.

Just look at console vs PC gaming.

Steamdeck made Linux gaming mainstream because it's brainless. Backed by proton.

But console has a vice grip on some communities / groups due to a long standing "plug and play" sales pitch. Now they're stuck because "my friends are there."

My brother-in-law is a sysadmin and stuck on Playstation due to his friends. Doesn't even own a gaming PC because "he doesn't have the time to tinker."

path: 0 23835896 23842068 23843068, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
brucethemoose 1 point 3 months ago

Technically, it’s like facilitating the shipping of those apples, but leaving the customer to ship.

Plex server->client streams don’t go through Plex’s servers themselves, but directly from server to clients. P2P. AFAIK the only exception is when something goes wrong and it falls back to a Plex-hosted server as an intermediary, which should be rare.

That’s still a pretty useful service though. Getting P2P reliable and easy isn’t trivial, and is one reason why open source projects haven’t really supplanted it yet.

path: 0 23835896 23842068 23843541, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
some_guy 5 points 3 months ago

I've never used any of the features they've added after they allowed me to host my library of ripped optical media ~2013-2014.

path: 0 23835896 23838062, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
osanna 63 points 3 months ago

almost a fucking grand for a media server that you host yourself, and only really rely on their login servers for. Can anyone else say "enshittification"?

path: 0 23829194, hotness: undefined, score: 63, children: 17
kogasa 38 points 3 months ago

They provide the apps, metadata servers, and relay service. It's a lifetime pass. IMO that's worth the price it used to be, $70 or whatever. The new price is just absurd, they want you to pay periodically for life because people spend more that way.

path: 0 23829194 23829412, hotness: undefined, score: 38, children: 16
auzy1 17 points 3 months ago

Do they provide the metadata services though? Pretty sure that's still handled by imdb and such

Been looking at jelly fin. I have a lifetime with Plex but it feels like they're headed for bankruptcy anyway.

And seems the same. Only problem is that the docker server keeps crashing on my Synology unfortunately

path: 0 23829194 23829412 23831207, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 15
kogasa 7 points 3 months ago

They have a sorta proprietary metadata service that is presumably based on imdb, thetvdb, etc. but they also handle detection and collection of metadata regardless of where the information ultimately comes from. It's nothing that Jellyfin doesn't do though.

I'm sticking with Plex since I have the lifetime pass too, but the writing's on the wall, I'm ready to switch to Jellyfin whenever Plex dies or ruins itself

path: 0 23829194 23829412 23831207 23831600, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 11
CH3DD4R_G0BL1N 7 points 3 months ago

That’s where I’m at. Ride my <$80 lifetime license till the wheels fall off and see where jellyfin is at that point.

path: 0 23829194 23829412 23831207 23831600 23831956, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 6
W98BSoD 0 points 3 months ago

Why not move to Emby?

path: 0 23829194 23829412 23831207 23831600 23834015, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 3
localhost001 3 points 3 months ago

The docker implementation on synology is pretty bad. I ran my setup on there for about a year before I got fed up. Ended up picking up a mini-pc and installing unraid on it, which has a much better way to run and manage docker containers. Only downside is having two machines now with the storage pool over the network. A bit more complications rather than direct attached storage.

path: 0 23829194 23829412 23831207 23840014, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
theherk 1 point 3 months ago

I run docker with about 10 services on a DS923+ with no issues.

path: 0 23829194 23829412 23831207 23840014 23845890, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
olympicyes 1 point 3 months ago

Why was it bad with Docker?

path: 0 23829194 23829412 23831207 23840014 23845709, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
melfie 36 points 3 months ago

I think software subscriptions are a scam, but I don’t mind buying a perpetual license that is only good up to a certain version with additional fees for newer versions. It’s also fair to charge a recurring fee for something that has recurring hosting costs like a VPN, cloud storage, etc.

If they weren’t such dipshits, the “lifetime pass” should have been a perpetual license you can keep using as long as you want, but charge an optional fee for newer versions if you want to upgrade and get more features. They should also have offered a hosted service to make your instance available to others and charge a monthly fee for that. I think people would’ve been fine with all that.

path: 0 23827514, hotness: undefined, score: 36, children: 7
hasnt_seen_goonies 24 points 3 months ago

Well I don't like seeing well reasoned, thoughtful comments in my hate thread. We are supposed to be kicking them while they're down! Not pointing out how a small change would ameliorate the issue and fix everything!

path: 0 23827514 23827571, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 1
toynbee 1 point 3 months ago

Nothing can ameliorate the ineptitude of Principal Skinner Plex.

path: 0 23827514 23827571 23841009, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
OnfireNFS 20 points 3 months ago

I've always thought the licensing for Jetbrains IDEs is a pretty fair way of licensing software. If you stop subscribing you still get access to the last version of the software you paid for but you don't get new versions anymore. And if you stay subscribed you get a loyalty discount after your first and second years. So it provides an incentive to stay subscribed long term but if you do leave you still get access perpetually to the last version you bought

path: 0 23827514 23829134, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 2
aim_at_me 4 points 3 months ago

I think thats really fair too. I might adopt that for my startup.

path: 0 23827514 23829134 23831980, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
lemming741 3 points 3 months ago

I use a package at work that lets you update within the major version. So you won't get the bells and whistles of the new one, but you'll get security updates and big fixes for 2 years or so. After that, you're using a mature and polished product that you can ride another 10 years if you want.

path: 0 23827514 23829134 23831980 23832405, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
MountingSuspicion 3 points 3 months ago

I think part of the issue with moving from physical media as a form of software distribution is that people ship buggy software all the time. In addition to making more money via subscription, the company can ship updates whenever it wants. This often means that 1.x may have bugs still present in 1.z, but 1.z has features not originally included in 1.x. At a certain point you're maintaining several versions of your product to test bug fixes, since 1.x users still deserve the bugs fixes but technically shouldn't have the 1.z features. Better companies would be able to handle that, but nowadays bug fixes get extremely low priority since they're spending a lot of dev time trying to attract and retain users with shiny new features, so that means active development on older versions for longer. Obviously the subscription revenue is also generally appealing.

path: 0 23827514 23834353, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Dozzi92 2 points 3 months ago

My software for work operates this way. You buy a license, it just works. They add new features, and you pay to upgrade. They never add features that break it. It seems like a reasonable model.

path: 0 23827514 23833659, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
piranhaphish 33 points 3 months ago

This is almost certainly a ploy to get an influx of buyers before the cutoff of July.

They want to round up all the people that they think were considering a lifetime pass, but were holding out.

I guarantee you when July comes they're going to reduce the cost to somewhere less than $750 and much closer to the current price due to "we listen to our customers" when really it was the plan all along.

They're using the Decoy Effect and FOMO.

path: 0 23834066, hotness: undefined, score: 33, children: 1
mrnngglry 4 points 3 months ago

Or maybe they want monthly/annual/whatever subscribers, not lifetime, and so they're making the lifetime pass prohibitively expensive. I have a lifetime pass I purchased a few years ago but after running Jellyfin alongside Plex for a few months, I don't think I could recommend Plex to anyone who simply wants to host their own media.

path: 0 23834066 23839172, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
unitedwithme 32 points 3 months ago

Wow... Rough! I get they've "added value" over time, but they've also enshittified it too...

If only Jellyfin were simpler to setup for the masses...

path: 0 23823179, hotness: undefined, score: 32, children: 31
Romkslrqusz 22 points 3 months ago

If only Jellyfin were simpler yo setup for the masses…

This.

I got in on Plex Pass at $150 so it’s a no-brainer to keep it up for my friends and family who are less tech inclined, but I’m running it concurrently with Jellyfin on my server.

path: 0 23823179 23823308, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 19
hperrin 9 points 3 months ago

Wait. Jellyfin’s client isn’t any harder to set up than Plex..

path: 0 23823179 23823308 23823985, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 18
halcyoncmdr 15 points 3 months ago

It very much is on some TVs. While there are apps in the corresponding store for Roku, WebOS, Android TV, and Xbox, that still leaves out Playstation and Samsung for instance. Samsung has more than 50% marketshare of premium TVs.

While you can install an app by jumping through hoops, it's not an easy one click install which is what average users need. You can install a Jellyfin server by clicking next a bunch of times. You can get your media there by dragging and dropping it into the media folder. You can install the TV app on most TVs just as easily, but for Samsung you need to do all sorts of extra steps.

A quick Google does give step by step instructions on reddit for instance... but it requires users to download a specific version of Tizen Studio with the CLI (which most people are scared of, they need a GUI to use their devices). They need to connect to their TV remotely via that tool. They need to generate and install security certificates. They need to get specific versions of the Tizen Jellyfin app, that aren't managed by the Jellyfin team, from a random Github. Then rename those files to extract them, inject their certificate, rebuild the package, and send it to the TV remotely... all in the CLI.

That is WAYYYYYY too complicated for the average person. Even with the step by step instructions, people skip steps and skim things without even thinking about it. Most people can barely click next a bunch of times to install things without messing it up somehow. Anyone who's ever worked support can tell you that. My parents and probably half my friends would NEVER be able to follow those instructions without messing it up to connect to my server. And that even assumes they have a PC to run the software in the first place, many people no longer have a PC, they just have their phone and maybe a tablet.

On the other hand, Plex has an app in the Tizen store. Emby, which Jellyfin was forked from, also has a Tizen app in the store. Those people can just go and click install and they're done.

path: 0 23823179 23823308 23823985 23824978, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 6
Anafabula 6 points 3 months ago path: 0 23823179 23823308 23823985 23824978 23826012, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 3
hperrin 0 points 3 months ago

Your information is outdated.

path: 0 23823179 23823308 23823985 23824978 23826281, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
ITGuyLevi 3 points 3 months ago

Not in my experience, but I keep my Plex up for my brother. I shifted away personally a year or so ago because I couldn't watch at work anymore (despite self hosting, login still requires a connection to Plex... Which is blocked at work). With Jellyfin, I can just auth against my Authentik server.

path: 0 23823179 23823308 23823985 23824057, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
unitedwithme -1 points 3 months ago

But how do you encrypt remote streams? That's the issue with JF, outside the home there's no streaming encryption, so what's to stop you from DMCA notices? For some family, were running a Wireguard VPN through Ubiquiti but nobody else can with ease. At least not that I'm aware of.

path: 0 23823179 23823308 23823985 23824628, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 9
Jason2357 7 points 3 months ago

Best solution is probably what those commercial pirates do -buy a bunch of cheap android boxes and pre-configure with your choice of client and VPN, then hand those out. Something goes wrong, they bring it back.

path: 0 23823179 23823308 23823985 23824628 23824796, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
Appoxo 4 points 3 months ago

You all afraid like the feds are monitoring your home network between each other...

path: 0 23823179 23823308 23823985 23824628 23824769, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
Scrollone 3 points 3 months ago

Nobody is going to deep inspect your home packets.

There's a big difference between running a piracy home server between you and your friends and downloading torrents where you announce to everybody that you have that particular file.

path: 0 23823179 23823308 23823985 23824628 23830496, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
kata1yst 2 points 3 months ago

Just use a reverse proxy. Everything goes over https.

path: 0 23823179 23823308 23823985 23824628 23826292, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
hperrin 2 points 3 months ago

I don’t know why you have trouble with this. Everything runs through the same SSL protected connection. Router -> Nginx Proxy Manager w/ TLS -> Jellyfin.

path: 0 23823179 23823308 23823985 23824628 23826229, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
hperrin 7 points 3 months ago

The reason Jellyfin is harder to set up is because they don’t run TURN servers. Those cost a lot of money, hence why Plex keeps raising their prices. I wouldn’t be surprised if Plex’ “lifetime” subscriptions didn’t last for much longer.

That being said, Jellyfin is fairly easy to set up. You just have to watch some tutorials.

path: 0 23823179 23823963, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 8
Pika 7 points 3 months ago

I'm waiting for plex to announce that lifetime subscriptions don't cover certain features like secure connect, and that those features will require an addon if enabled. The writing is on the wall.

path: 0 23823179 23823963 23824948, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 7
kratoz29 1 point 3 months ago

Does that affect me if I already use my own reverse proxy or Cloudflared? I think not.

path: 0 23823179 23823963 23824948 23826394, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 6
Scrollone 1 point 3 months ago

At that point, if you have your own reverse proxy, just use Jellyfin.

path: 0 23823179 23823963 23824948 23826394 23830509, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 5
tumblechinchilla 4 points 3 months ago

I had zip experience self hosting home lab or with linux. I messed around in ubuntu for a couple weeks then just ran the commands on the jellyfin documentation for setup.

It mostly just worked. Web ui started right up and i loaded my library. So glad i never touched plex.

path: 0 23823179 23823598, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
wyldrstallyns 2 points 3 months ago

"Added value": prescribed, trickled-out, tiptoed smidgens of steps forward

"Enshittification": unscripted, greed-backed, frantic, top-speed Thomas Salto tumbles into the corner and off the mat.

Yep, sounds about right. "Progress".

path: 0 23823179 23823562, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Blackmist 29 points 3 months ago

Jellyfin Lifetime Pass continues to be better value.

path: 0 23831576, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 2
Auli 9 points 3 months ago

I heard their quadrupling their lifetime membership.

path: 0 23831576 23833310, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
Guilvareux 3 points 3 months ago

Oh bugger, I might actually have to start still paying nothing

path: 0 23831576 23833310 23835115, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
clav64 25 points 3 months ago

Jellyfin: free Cloudflared: free

path: 0 23834666, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 6
rumba 6 points 3 months ago

Jellyfin behind Cloudflared is probably the best move ATM.

It's not specifically against TOS, they do provide you some modest protection against infiltration.

combine that with running it from a container with RO access to your media and you have a damn nice home solution.

path: 0 23834666 23839079, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
dlsloop 3 points 3 months ago

While Cloudflare tunnels do work, streaming Jellyfin through them is technically against their TOS and they could shut you down for doing so. Instead, I recommend setting up Pangolin with a cheap VPS. Although, it will cost ~$5 a month or so.

path: 0 23834666 23837883, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
dantheclamman 2 points 3 months ago

You don't have to use a tunnel, for example I use a reverse proxy to a domain I own, and set a cache rule so cloudflare doesn't get mad.

path: 0 23834666 23837883 23838626, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
juice702 2 points 3 months ago

I really need to take a weekend to learn Jellyfin and set it up in my environment.

path: 0 23834666 23836242, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
garbage_world 1 point 3 months ago
path: 0 23834666 23838670, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
toynbee 1 point 3 months ago

I have a static IP (didn't particularly want it but my ISP required it for port forwarding for some reason). I'm not currently hosting anything, at least not anything externally accessible, but when I did I had a tiny AWS instance configured as a reverse proxy to a separate reverse proxy VM in my house. It worked for me and if anything I hosted ever got compromised it escaped my notice.

However, I think the advantage of using something like Cloudflare rather than the way I did it (and as it sounds like you might) is threat mitigation. Especially stuff like DDoS protection.

path: 0 23834666 23838670 23840883, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
CompactFlax 22 points 3 months ago

Turns out, lifetime is difficult to budget for

path: 0 23824440, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 1
NekoKoneko 11 points 3 months ago

It would be fine if Plex wasn't hooked on VC capital and needed to make the line go up constantly. Most self-hosters like me have zero interest in what they are funding with subscriptions.

path: 0 23824440 23826555, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
Railcar8095 21 points 3 months ago

To be clear, you still need your own HW and electricity, right?

path: 0 23831937, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 0
Imgonnatrythis 21 points 3 months ago

I saw this email and it just read as a desperate cash grab for a company that doesnt plan to be around in 3 more years. Pathetic.

path: 0 23827456, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 0
gdtf 18 points 3 months ago

As if there weren't enough reasons to use jellyfin already.

path: 0 23831452, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0
themachinestops 17 points 3 months ago

Yep, definitely heading for bankruptcy.

path: 0 23832467, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
atrielienz 15 points 3 months ago

I paid... $74.99 for a lifetime plex sub in 2014. Is this the same service?

path: 0 23824511, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 5
LodeMike 10 points 3 months ago

No it's worse. Old accounts are grandfathered in to downloads when a library is shared with another user. Otherwise the library recipient needs a plex pass too.

path: 0 23824511 23825357, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
mic_check_one_two 5 points 3 months ago

Yes, if you bought the lifetime pass years ago, you still have it. This price increase only affects people who don’t already have a lifetime pass.

path: 0 23824511 23826165, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Appoxo 2 points 3 months ago

Afaik, if you didnt have the lifetime pass

path: 0 23824511 23824675, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
atrielienz 4 points 3 months ago

Original lifetime Plex Pass for $74.99!

That's what their email said. So my understanding is I must have been grandfathered into the pay one time and have it forever thing.

path: 0 23824511 23824675 23824783, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
Appoxo 3 points 3 months ago

yup

path: 0 23824511 23824675 23824783 23829513, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
silentjohn 15 points 3 months ago

Wait, ya'll are paying for Plex??

path: 0 23834266, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 1
lepinkainen 2 points 3 months ago

Paid 70€ maybe a decade ago

Best bang for buck so far

path: 0 23834266 23838894, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
dudesss 14 points 3 months ago

As always, donate to the FOSS alternatives instead.

In the case of Youtube Premium, donate to Ad Blockers instead.

path: 0 23833859, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
normalentrance 13 points 3 months ago

Sigh. I still enjoy my Plex pass that I bought for < $100 but this is another sign to bail on them. I don't particularly like them trying to further monetize my collection.

I do like the ease of sharing with friends and it does generally just work. But this is bad.

path: 0 23836369, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 1
sunbeam60 4 points 3 months ago

The rate of change in their eco system certainly does not justify the price they’re charging. Still, an IPO looms and business gotta business, so here we are. Ready for those stock options to tank and the boat to sink.

path: 0 23836369 23841531, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Hakuso 13 points 3 months ago

And they'll likely "forget" you are lifetime as often with them as they did with us early adopters who got it for cheap.

There's a reason I use Jellyfin, now. Well, more than one.

Plex kept trying to charge me again, and every time I looked at it there was more clutter and spam being forced in front of my face by their "partners."

Kodi on device, great interface especially when you are using touch, if I need remote access I swap to Jellyfin. There's even plugins to sync between the two so your stats and history don;t get messed up by using both.

path: 0 23827054, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
muusemuuse 13 points 3 months ago

People still use plex?

path: 0 23826780, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 12
modus 13 points 3 months ago

I do. It works well enough and my grandmother doesn't have to configure Tailscale. Would I buy a lifetime pass today? Hell no. But I got in early, so why not?

path: 0 23826780 23828147, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 2
SaharaMaleikuhm 4 points 3 months ago

Next step will be to turn every lifetime pass into a 20 year pass or smth.

path: 0 23826780 23828147 23829640, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
MaggiWuerze 4 points 3 months ago

Then I still have 10 years in mine, maybe Jellyfin can manage to catch up to Plex in that time

path: 0 23826780 23828147 23829640 23830173, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
ripcord 4 points 3 months ago

Yes millions

path: 0 23826780 23828499, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Scrollone 1 point 3 months ago

Yes. I prefer Jellyfin, but I have three friends with media servers and Plex is the only way to easily connect to all of them at the same time.

I wish Jellyfin had a federation feature.

path: 0 23826780 23830455, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
muusemuuse 1 point 3 months ago

WireGuard. Done.

path: 0 23826780 23830455 23834597, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
Scrollone 1 point 3 months ago

Good luck installing Wireguard on my mom's LG webOS TV.

path: 0 23826780 23830455 23834597 23837298, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
muusemuuse 1 point 3 months ago

Point the tv to a pi acting as a WireGuard proxy. It’s not hard.

path: 0 23826780 23830455 23834597 23837298 23838451, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Crit 1 point 3 months ago

Jellyfin has been very slow for me and buggy especially when it comes to UI and if you try anything fancy like the sync play stuff. I tried it again not long ago and it just pales in comparison. Don't get me wrong as a free offering it's fantastic but I paid for a lifetime sub for Plex years ago, this just works.

path: 0 23826780 23832492, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
muusemuuse 2 points 3 months ago

I have literally none of those issues and I’ve run it on Ryzen desktops and pi’s. It’s fast and light and zippy. There something wrong with your setup.

path: 0 23826780 23832492 23834589, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
Crit 1 point 3 months ago

Yea man sure, apples to apples ran it on the same hardware as Plex, yet Plex doesn't have any issues with playback or slowness.

path: 0 23826780 23832492 23834589 23835580, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
muusemuuse 2 points 3 months ago

This does not disprove my point.

path: 0 23826780 23832492 23834589 23835580 23838462, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
PerfectDark 13 points 3 months ago path: 0 23843265, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
Fmstrat 12 points 3 months ago

Hmm, perhaps I should sell my lifetime pass. I won't, but I should. (Switched to Jellyfin long ago)

path: 0 23832623, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 4
auzy1 2 points 3 months ago

What are you hosting jellyfin on? I find it crashes when scanning on my Synology

path: 0 23832623 23833396, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
Xanvial 4 points 3 months ago

I hosted my jellyfin in Synology DS224+, but I need to upgrade the RAM first, 2GB is not enough for jellyfin, I added 16GB so it has 18GB total now

path: 0 23832623 23833396 23835903, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
demonsword 3 points 3 months ago

I guess it depends on which synology/ size of media collection. I also host jellyfin on a synology (DS923+), in a moderate-sized media collection (~ 9TB) and it never crashed

path: 0 23832623 23833396 23837925, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Fmstrat 2 points 3 months ago

I'm currently using a mini PC in my 10" rack, but also ran it on an old server that used to be my desktop.

path: 0 23832623 23833396 23845747, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
galacticworm 11 points 3 months ago

I have 2 Plex licenses I bought for something like $80 AUD each, but I then went and bought an Emby license and moved 6 months ago. I have tried Emby, Jellyfin and Plex. If anyone if curious on some feedback

  1. Plex has the best interface, it is logical and everything works. That said, the stuttering on some the Apple TV on hdr /4k files for years without being fixed was the breaking point for me

  2. Emby has some quirks in the player where some functionality isn’t logical, the android apps on a 4K Tele look terrible, but the server software itself is fantastic

  3. Jellyfin does what it says on the box, but it is terribly slow to index and is very basic. I use it to host some music, but that is about it

path: 0 23823994, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 8
minfapper 6 points 3 months ago

Also, I found the Jellyfin default client(s) to be pretty mediocre. But they have an excellent Jellyfin for Kodi plugin.

Now, Kodi has had 2 decades of development and has just about everything you could ever want from a client (way better than Plex IMO).

path: 0 23823994 23824217, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 6
leoj 2 points 3 months ago

Can I use Kodi the same way I use plex? Like can it be my replexment?

I just want to watch content on my home network 99% of the time, and occasionally use it on my phone/tablet/laptop while traveling (if I have good internet)?

I was always under the impression Kodi was something else...

path: 0 23823994 23824217 23824255, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 5
Appoxo 1 point 3 months ago

Everything the jellyfin mobile app can do via vpn (or without if you feel brave)

path: 0 23823994 23824217 23824255 23824745, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 4
leoj 1 point 3 months ago

totally, have Jellyfin as well actually but tbh it doesn't always feel super stable, especially if I leave my home network.

Not sure what Kodi is exactly though.

path: 0 23823994 23824217 23824255 23824745 23834794, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
W98BSoD 0 points 3 months ago

The free Jellyfin apps are bad on iOS and AppleTV.

path: 0 23823994 23834076, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
spitfire 10 points 3 months ago

Just checked: I’ve paid 10% of that 12 years ago. Inflation is really bad ;)

path: 0 23824341, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 2
pHr34kY 4 points 3 months ago

I think I got it on sale for 5% of that.

I use jellyfin now. Plex was too bloaty and restrictive.

path: 0 23824341 23824651, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
spitfire 4 points 3 months ago

Good for you! I’m still finding it useful and doing exactly what I’ve paid for.

path: 0 23824341 23824651 23824872, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
sturmblast 10 points 3 months ago

What a joke. Plex isnt worth paying for

path: 0 23833542, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
Eh_I 9 points 3 months ago

Sure, can I bundle it winRAR subscription?

path: 0 23845427, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
NOT_RICK 9 points 3 months ago

Insane

path: 0 23823199, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
THE_GR8_MIKE 8 points 3 months ago

Died before I could even buy a home to set up my own home network with.

path: 0 23823440, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
wyldrstallyns 18 points 3 months ago

Buy a home? 🥹 If you're in the US, you were born decades too late for that, citizen. 🤌🏼

path: 0 23823440 23823620, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0
o_O 7 points 3 months ago

Plexamp is the reason I'm still using Plex. I'll fully transition to Jellyfin as soon Finamp (or another music app) incorporates robust caching to handle internet deadspots.

path: 0 23841879, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
jjlinux 6 points 3 months ago

Jellyfin

path: 0 23832110, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
W98BSoD -4 points 3 months ago

Emby.

path: 0 23832110 23834082, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 1
jjlinux 3 points 3 months ago

Wao, I didn't even remember that existed. It wasn't bad, but had many kinks if I remember correctly, but that was about 5 years ago. Have they made any actual improvements, specially in the remote streaming part?

The reason I settled for jellyfin (after running Plex and then Emby) is because it just works, and bugs are ironed out rather quickly.

path: 0 23832110 23834082 23835030, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
SCmSTR 6 points 3 months ago

Welp, looks like I'm never buying, and therefore using plex

path: 0 23831758, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
SnotFlickerman 6 points 3 months ago

Ho-lee shit.

I remember when they were like $90 and I got mine discounted at $45.

path: 0 23823493, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
MaggiWuerze 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah, i got mine for like 80€ 10 years ago. Really have to wonder what's going on there. Tripling the price can't be expected to increase sales and combined with the last few changes they must be aware of the reputation damage

path: 0 23823493 23823651, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
wowashootingstar 5 points 3 months ago

I did pay 120 or something 8 years ago, I didn’t mind the price at the time but this is not worth it for ppl who don’t don’t have it.

path: 0 23828124, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
SulaymanF 5 points 3 months ago

I have a lifetime pass already but I’ve been souring on the app as they changed direction.

Previously it was the best app for running your own personal streaming service. It lets you share your library with friends and it even had its own group watch feature allowing multiple people to watch the same stream together. It was perfect for remote friends and family, brilliant during Covid…. And they removed it for no obvious reason.

Now the company spends more and more time trying to promote their own ad-laden video streams, they want us to rate movies and presumably sell that data. The company lost its way.

Lifetime Plex was still worth it with those features at $200, not at $750. If I had to do it all over again I’d probably use JellyFin.

path: 0 23845207, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
3abas 4 points 3 months ago

And they removed it for no obvious reason.

$

path: 0 23845207 23854743, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
BiscuityCat 5 points 3 months ago

I never had the chance to try Plex, but how does it compare to Jellyfin? What kind of features does Plex have and Jellyfin does not and vice versa?

Examples of basic features I'm missing in Jellyfin:

  • Create a user-defined collection (like group of favourite movies)
  • Adding user-defined tags
  • Filtering by tags or any meaningful filtering
  • Filtering by languages (however this could be done by using combination of 2 different plugins that add tags and create collections)
  • [Important] No movie/show relations (e.g. The Lord of the Rings 1 -> 2 -> 3)
  • No way to know if movie/show belongs to any collection
path: 0 23825218, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 13
ernest314 4 points 3 months ago

given they finally finished their database refactor, maybe they'll finally start adding some of these

(copium)

path: 0 23825218 23825479, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
LodeMike 4 points 3 months ago

I use Plex

  • Create a user-defined collection (like group of favourite movies)

Collections exist along with ratings.

  • Adding user-defined tags

I think you have to be admin to do that bevause it's part of the library metadata. Shared libraries would have to use playlists or collections which are per user. I don't use Jellyfin so I'm not sure what you're referring to.

  • Filtering by tags or any meaningful filtering

Filters work well. Similar to iTunes. The filters aren't listed in alphabetical order for some fucking reason, though.

  • Filtering by languages (however this could be done by using combination of 2 different plugins that add tags and create collections)

I think you can filter by movie language? Never done this. I don't think it cares about the languages available in the audio streams.

  • [Important] No movie/show relations (e.g. The Lord of the Rings 1 -> 2 -> 3)

None on Plex.

  • No way to know if movie/show belongs to any collection

There's automatic collections but there isn't a UI element that shows if a movie is missing from a collection or vice/versa.

path: 0 23825218 23825448, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 3
Armand1 2 points 3 months ago

You can filter by audio and subtitle languages. Most of my movies have more than one language track and it identities them correctly.

path: 0 23825218 23825448 23826148, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
LodeMike 1 point 3 months ago

Oh neat

path: 0 23825218 23825448 23826148 23826166, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
BiscuityCat 2 points 3 months ago

Thanks. It looks like Plex does have more user friendly features, but still no info about relations. That's a bummer.

It is really important to know the watch order (even if I had to specify it manually). When I think about it, Jellyfin probably fails even for the simplest watch orders like The Lord of the Rings; not to mention Stargate (Movie 1 -> Show -> Movie 2+3).

path: 0 23825218 23825448 23831217, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
dantheclamman 1 point 3 months ago

Kodi has movie group/collections. I don't remember about Plex, it's been a long time since I used it

path: 0 23825218 23826477, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Zorque 1 point 3 months ago

You can't make collections in Jellyfin? It's available on my server

path: 0 23825218 23826988, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 6
BiscuityCat 2 points 3 months ago

Maybe I have missed it somewhere? The UI is pretty confusing.

path: 0 23825218 23826988 23830997, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 4
Zorque 2 points 3 months ago

Here's what I see regarding collections:

How to get to them:

The context menu that allows you to add them:

This is in web browser, but the mobile app seems to function much the same way. Only difference seems to be that you have to go into the media page to click the three dot menu on mobile. As far as I can tell, this is the default UI for Jellyfin.

path: 0 23825218 23826988 23830997 23844438, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
BiscuityCat 2 points 3 months ago

Thanks. I did miss that one. I was looking for a "Add to this collection" button inside a selected collection.

However I'm not sure if this collection is visible only to a user that created it, or an admin has to create it and it is visible to everyone?

path: 0 23825218 23826988 23830997 23844438 23844498, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
Zorque 2 points 3 months ago

The access to collections is pretty obvious (in my UI), it's at the top with the movie/shows/etc selection. I think it's a little more complex to start making them, and I believe they're personal instead of shared. It might also not show up until you make at least one.

Im not at home, so I cant show you a screen shot, but I'll try to remember when I am.

path: 0 23825218 23826988 23830997 23836051, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Scrollone 1 point 3 months ago

Maybe some apps don't support that? But I don't think Plex app does that either

path: 0 23825218 23826988 23830512, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
cantankerous_cashew 4 points 3 months ago

It's just a matter of time before they convert the "Lifetime Pass" to a subscription. Absolutely nothing prevents them from following the Adobe playbook and declaring that they'll be dropping support/updates for the "lifetime edition". Future feature updates & security fixes will then be gated behind a $29.99 monthly subscription

path: 0 23827507, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
wyldrstallyns 4 points 3 months ago

Oh, I'm already on the Lifetime Hard Pass and it's all but free —ad-free, slop-free, greed-free, bullshit-free, etc.

IIRC, the cost is ~$5/mo for upkeep, took me no time at all to set up, and I get to listen to/watch whatever the fuck I want, whenever & wherever I choose.

Fuck Plex. I hope it dies gurgling & terrified. 🥰

path: 0 23823436, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Bwaz 3 points 3 months ago

"Lifetime" -- a.k.a. until Plex folds

path: 0 23856172, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Janx 3 points 3 months ago

It must be so easy to be a CEO these days. Whether you do a good or bad job, whether the company is thriving or not, the next step is enshittification. And the playbook is always the same: raise prices, layoff workers, make the product or service worse, fuck over your customers. Rinse and repeat...

path: 0 23824580, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
demizerone 2 points 3 months ago

Someone is getting greedy.

path: 0 23826963, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
RememberTheApollo_ 2 points 3 months ago

Hahahaha….yeah.

path: 0 23826891, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
thedormantotaku 2 points 3 months ago

Digging their own grave

path: 0 23834610, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
GreyEyedGhost 2 points 3 months ago

Image

path: 0 23824150, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
leoj 2 points 3 months ago

sooooo Jellyfin time?

path: 0 23824218, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
W98BSoD -3 points 3 months ago

Emby time.

path: 0 23824218 23834092, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 2
leoj 1 point 3 months ago

I have not tried emby, is it much/any better than plex or jellyfin?

path: 0 23824218 23834092 23834817, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
W98BSoD -3 points 3 months ago

try it and see.

path: 0 23824218 23834092 23834817 23838718, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 0
bitjunkie 2 points 3 months ago

Fucking lol

path: 0 23823608, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
djdarren 1 point 3 months ago

I've got Jellyfin running through my Hetzner VPS via Tailscale from a crappy spec 2014 Mac mini, and I'm a fucking idiot.

Fuck Plex.

path: 0 23824452, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
DigDoug 1 point 3 months ago

Jesus fuck.

Time to learn how to safely expose Jellyfin, I guess.

path: 0 23823819, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 15
frongt 8 points 3 months ago

VPN. There is no safe direct option.

path: 0 23823819 23823858, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 10
hperrin 3 points 3 months ago

I’ve had my instance open to the internet for about two years with no issues.

path: 0 23823819 23823858 23824007, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 9
frongt 6 points 3 months ago

So far. That you know of.

path: 0 23823819 23823858 23824007 23824046, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 6
hperrin 3 points 3 months ago

I mean, the worst that could happen is they delete everything on the server and I have to spend time restoring from a backup. Not exactly the riskiest thing to do.

path: 0 23823819 23823858 23824007 23824046 23824077, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 5
Pika 4 points 3 months ago

depending what is on it, and your risk factor, theoretically an attacker can check known resource paths to confirm or deny whats on the server. That's my main complaint currently on it is that the jellyfin team is aware of the fact that it doesn't need authentication, but are looking for some miracle solution that won't toss legacy clients out in order to fix, so therefore the issues are just perpetually open.

edit: it looks like some of these issues may be being worked on now that they moved the problemic protocal into a plugin. I hope that that means they will close them in the next few releases!

path: 0 23823819 23823858 23824007 23825015, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
dogs0n 1 point 3 months ago

I'm on your side. I don't really see the difference hosting Jellyfin or Plex to the internet.

If you want max security and headache for jellyfin, set up a VPN like they say, otherwise keep it exposed, It's very unlikely for your server to be targeted and It hasn't been worth the hassle for me.

Edit: well not directly directly, do the minimum and put it behind a reverse proxy that adds HTTPS of course, but thats recommended in the docs so yah

path: 0 23823819 23823858 23824007 23833649, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
ohshit604 3 points 3 months ago

VPN is the safest way for most, but if you do want to expose it to the internet just blacklist all IP’s and whitelist the known few, maybe slap Fail2Ban on it but honestly doesn’t make much of a difference.

Traefik’s DDNS Allowlist plugin works great for such a task.

path: 0 23823819 23826923, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
ItsNotImportant24 3 points 3 months ago

Setup up tailscale and run jellyfin and your services all through it and you're good.

path: 0 23823819 23824303, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
W98BSoD -2 points 3 months ago

Great; how do I do that on a Roku streamer?

path: 0 23823819 23824303 23834104, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
Noggog 1 point 3 months ago

Best I've done so far is crowdsec + pangolin geoblocking to just my country. I cant install tailscale subnet routers at all my friends to get their TVs to work. Non starter.

path: 0 23823819 23830331, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Kkk2237pl 1 point 3 months ago

One question, lets say that I bought this subscription. What kind of advantages has it, does it cache your media? Or if you have multiple users, you still need to be able to upload media to miltiple users?

path: 0 23837998, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 7
Crit 4 points 3 months ago

It's the same as the regular subscription benefits, just permanent.

path: 0 23837998 23838562, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 6
Kekzkrieger 4 points 3 months ago

Permanent as in as long as its lucrative. Then some investor buys Plex, stoops honoring Lifetine Subscription (aka transforms them) and you are left with nothing.

path: 0 23837998 23838562 23838895, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
rumba 4 points 3 months ago

based on the history of other companies, permanent until they sell the company and buy some island, at which point they'll freeze all updates (feature and security) to Plex and release PlexGO for a fixed monthly fee.

path: 0 23837998 23838562 23838895 23839008, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Phoenix3875 2 points 3 months ago

It's not permanent, but lifetime. When they go bankrupt, they'll just eliminate those subscribers.

path: 0 23837998 23838562 23839173, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Kkk2237pl 2 points 3 months ago

But how about those benefits. Is there caching or no?

path: 0 23837998 23838562 23838669, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
Crit 2 points 3 months ago path: 0 23837998 23838562 23838669 23838759, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
rumba 2 points 3 months ago

No, there isn't.

There are a lot of gated features, the most useful of which is a low quality proxy that transcends CGNAT and Firewalls when you really need to share a video but don't have a real ip.

Gating hardware encoding is a pretty dick maneuver IMO.

path: 0 23837998 23838562 23838669 23839041, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
BlackVenom 1 point 3 months ago

We need a support group for the whiners.

It's been dirt cheap and you still don't have to do it.

At the end of the day the core of the software is free. They still have to support and develop the clients and services.... Go shit on emby or the other one for how unfriendly they are to deal with.

path: 0 23843850, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
Doomsider 0 points 3 months ago

Garbage take which amounts to bootlicking. To each their own though.

path: 0 23843850 23846541, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
BlackVenom 1 point 3 months ago

Lmfao bootlicking

path: 0 23843850 23846541 23872011, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Mwa 1 point 3 months ago

thats more expensive then a AAA game.

path: 0 23856788, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
gnuplusmatt 0 points 3 months ago

never been a plex user, Jellyfin from the start, but if people are buying this for remote watch, tailscale is pretty easy to deploy, or wireguard is on a lot of routers these days

path: 0 23827247, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 8
ripcord 2 points 3 months ago

I'm.not walking my in-laws through setting up tailscale to route to me from their TV

path: 0 23827247 23828519, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
dantheclamman 1 point 3 months ago

Yeah, they clearly should charge for what they provide, dynamic DNS and user experience. It's just about the cost/benefit, which is debatable

path: 0 23827247 23827299, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
W98BSoD -1 points 3 months ago

Great; how do I deploy it on a Roku streaming box?

path: 0 23827247 23834113, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 5
penguin 1 point 3 months ago

Like they said, on the router

path: 0 23827247 23834113 23841350, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 4
W98BSoD 0 points 3 months ago

No; I’m not replacing hardware at remote locations to make this work. Plex works with everything that’s out there already.

I’ll ask again; how do I load Tailscale on my Roku streamer?

path: 0 23827247 23834113 23841350 23854550, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 3
penguin 0 points 3 months ago

Then keep using Plex. You can't use tailscale on a Roku because Roku doesn't allow it, you have the most locked down, unmodifiable streamer out there. Almost any decent modern router or android based streamer can run tailscale. Even Apple TV with its notoriously closed off ecosystem can do this. If you're attached to Roku for some reason then keep using Plex. When it's time to upgrade hardware look for options that are more open.

path: 0 23827247 23834113 23841350 23854550 23856645, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 2
Quexotic 0 points 3 months ago

And the software doesn't even work right most of the time anyway. It's easier to set up a file share and run it in VLC.

path: 0 23836624, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 2
some_guy 4 points 3 months ago

I dunno what's different between us, but I've found it to be rock solid for over a decade. I host it on a Mac mini.

path: 0 23836624 23838074, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
dantheclamman 1 point 3 months ago

For me I was trying to host it a few years ago on an Nvidia Shield. Found it kept forgetting media and had other performance problems. Was probably a function of trying to use media from an external drive, and maybe bugs with the Nvidia Shield implementation, android scoped storage issues, etc. I went to Jellyfin on a Pi and have found that mostly bulletproof

path: 0 23836624 23838074 23838692, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
pr06lefs -7 points 3 months ago

If I knew what plex was this might bother me I guess

path: 0 23827420, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 1
x_pikl_x 0 points 3 months ago

Literally just a media server you can watch your downloads from or steam your mp3s

path: 0 23827420 23828183, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
technology
technology

@lemmy.world

login for more options
87357
21246
15760

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


go to feed...