The weirdest part is the fact he probably never been close to his mother too.
The weirdest part is the fact he probably never been close to his mother too.
Which is weird, because lots of guys have been that close to his mother
Her
It might be the same problem
I took his comment to mean that the lack of connection with his mother is why they can't establish connections with other females. Not that they were to bed their mother.
Too many people in the world have received too few hugs from their mothers.
I think it's better out there than keeping it to some little incel groups. Also, there is no shame in being a virgin.
i'm not a virgin. I'm a dipshit. there's a DIFFERENCE
you and me baby...
That’s the one where they drive trucks on the ice right?
That used to be fun
–A pirate wanting to explain his wife who he considers his family.
Aint nothing but mammals, doing it like they do on the discovery channel
It’s a shame that song lost momentum.
Is the beard in this room with us?
I'm still flabbergasted by this ridiculous outrage, like, it was crazy. Calling a bit of natural peach fuzz a beard, crazy work. These incels and weirdos really are twisted ass dudes.
Humans are mammals, so we're a bit hairy, that's genuinely not out of the ordinary for a regular woman to have a bit of peach fuzz. What isn't normal is making it seem abnormal, these chuds, they're truly tragic in so many ways.
it's ragebait.
if you raged and took this seriously, they won.
the point of posts like this is to make people flip out and get them to reply and push engagement.
and it works. it worked on you.
call them names all you want, you are giving them what they want.
The tag that I added to the above user's handle gives me a good chuckle every time I see them in the wild. Helps balance the rank odiousnesses of many of their comments lol the irony of a troll like them calling something rage bait only adds to my glee.
I didn't take this seriously, it's just confusing that this caused people to actually lose their minds. There's no rage to be felt about this as all I feel is absolutely confused this passes for something to feel outrage over. ROFL It's just weird to me that they never saw a woman up close, and knew that peach fuzz is a thing women have on their faces. I did call them names, but, incel does seem fitting in this case. More than ever.
i also think it's funny how enraged people are you suggest it's rage bait.
because clearly this is some huge problem, instead of stupid internet flaming bullshit.
but ragebait works. people love being angry over stupid bullshit and projecting their angst at imaginary chuds that likely don't really exist.
I have peach fuzz. It's soft and fuzzy and cute--- and you'd only see it if you were in punching range.
🍑☺️👊
Yes, children are born covered in peach fuzz. Sometimes babies even have dark hair covering their backs that fall out and leave just the peach fuzz behind.
We're mammals after all :)
Nah, this one is more homophobic. Same reason why these people are obsessed with absurdly out of proportion breast implants. They need to signal to themselves and to the world that they definitely definitely aren't ever even thinking of men as attractive. Yet somehow also a subculture obsessed with every man's testosterone levels and muscles.
Look again. Cox wrote the tweet and shared the image from the guy questioning the hair. Cox is woke as can be. This is another comment from him:
A few of you, I think, read this wrong and have been angrily DMing to let me know women DO have hair. I promise you, I know this. ❤️ I’m just sharing another persons hot take.
Also the tweet is from 2022 and I dearly hope he left the nazi cesspool by now.
Also weird: knowing what your wife's sister does to her pubes.
Honestly, I don't even want to have this much hair, I want fur instead, like our chimp ancestors.
Chimp fur is quite coarse and awfully similar to thick, dense human body hair. I'd prefer something softer, like cat hair, but not chinchilla hair. That is too high maintenance.
This obsession with women not having hair sort of has pedo vibes to it
Jesus, lemmy is treasure of cringe lately
It is a facet of idolizing youth.
That took 0.0000000001 seconds to find.
That source, and the article is garbage. Post something from credible source, or from peer reviewed paper.
Thanks for letting us know I guess 🤷
Incels still haven't discovered mammals have hair. Its impressive really
If mammals have hair why is the incel bald? Checkmate.
When video games suddenly are able to simulate normal body hair after decades of perfectly smooth polygons because fine body hair was just too much for GPUs to handle.
Just another case of a desperate need to touch grass.
My kins women can be a hell of a lot hairier than that, like my great great aunt who taught me to fight.
Because we're all still hairy apes even if the hair got a lot shorter.
I still want to, if I ever get enough "fuck you money" to buy a ps5
They're worth it at full price IMO
Eh... Very visually beautiful, but for some reason, the gameplay just didn't appeal to me much and I couldn't really get into it much. Didn't help that (at least in the beginning of the one I played) the story seemed bland, vague, and a bit confusing.
Still, though, visually wonderful. Amazing graphics and art.
🏴☠️
Instagram has set some astronomical standards, especially for women.
Just wait until they find out about how pubic hair works!
When I was a teenager, my porn obsessed guy friend eventually... tried to hook up with a girl (he was eventually unsuccessful). Hours later, his disgusted shocked complaints and confusion about the overgrowth amused and embarrassed us all. Like he expected this normal person to be like what he saw in the videos online.
I had a guy friend who made out with a girl he thought was hot, and he was shocked and disgusted by the amount of peach fuzz that was visible on her face up close. He lost interest in her because of it.
I hooked up with this guy later on, and he made a comment about how much arm hair I had. It seemed weird to me because we'd known each other for years. The fact that I don't wax my arms shouldn't have been a shock.
G*mers
There was a similar reddit thread about this game character a couple of years ago in which a guy had posted his screenshot of his "improved" model of her for everyone to admire his work and was defending his modding of the character to "beautify" her because he didn't like her "masculine" qualities such as facial hair, not having a "feminine shaped face", skinny waist, voluptuous bosom, etc. The consensus through most of the thread was that the guy was a chud. But he really ground his heels in on the fact that he didn't think female video game characters should be in any way "ugly" (to how he saw them).
and then they added peach fuzz
Its so dumb, Aloy isn't even ugly and also she is basically a warrior cave person in a post apocalyptic world run by robot dinosaurs. What do they expect her to look like exactly?
My grandma was the same way
she was a classy lady
I hope it's only rendered on close-ups? Not gonna waste performance on minuscle details you don't see normally.
Afaik, the ingame model has no facial hair at all. It's only on the box art.
You’re also looking at the back of Aloy’s head while you play and focusing on the giant robot trying to eat you so it’s not really something you see anyway
Things like that are usually photo mode or cinematic only. Things where you can either expect the player to not notice mild latency, and you can turn off the rest of the universe except for what's on screen.
Games are shockingly good at hiding absolutely everything that doesn't need to be sent to the render system.
Kotallo is a beard
no beard
i didn't say has
It's a game about robot dinosaurs. I don't think they're making their money on realism, exactly haha. But someone else mentioned how it could broaden the player base and that makes sense
If you mean financial benefit, yeah, I can see your point.
The studio probably doesn't set out with an exact artistic vision, and then arrive there as quickly as possible. Much more likely they decided 15 (or whatever) artists is enough for this project, and they are paying them until the project is done. For the artists, that means if they've met the bare minimum, then chasing smaller and smaller things to keep busy... Keeps them busy.
Likewise, the studio is (hopefully) still within their estimate for the art budget, so there's no one breathing down their neck about cutting costs there. It's not worth it to fire people just because the work is done, especially if they might need that capacity for something close to release.
Technically, the director (or someone) probably could tell them "That's everything for now. Doomscroll until we need you again", but that's not really best for anyone - so effort spent on meaningless detail wins.
I hate that I have to clarify that I don't like the new GoW because Ragnarok was bad, not because woman lead — all because of these low T creeps who are jealous of digital women having more facial hair than them.
Yeah, I didn't really like the 2nd Horizon, not because they made Aloy less hot, but because the writing just wasn't as good and progression basically mandates the stupid crafting hunts for hyper specific animals.
I didn't mind that part of the sequel. The writing wasn't as good though but my main issue weirdly was just that they give you a bunch more weapons and tools and no reason whatsoever to use most of them. Kinda fumbled with the design there, where in the first you needed every tool depending what you were facing off against.
Peach fuzz
DEI chins and now woman BEARDS smh my head
When her face isn't taking up more than 50% of the screen, the beard isn't rendered. Mipmaps for Level-Of-Detail
The beard is likely only rendered in cut-scenes, and that's likely it.
No triangles were harmed in the making of this beard
Edit: The original post (coward) read something like
I get that women have beards, but why waste gpu cycles on something so unneccesary
Don't you know there is a triangle shortage!
/s
Hair is the one hardest and most GPU time consuming object to render realistically. OP was correct to ask about the sense of doing it in the first place
However to gripe at that, one would tend to want there to be evidence of the game being seen as particularly poorly performing. Horizon is not a game series known as struggling to keep up, so it's silly to try to blame a non-existant problem on the model detail.
It could make more sense if the game was known to struggle that they couldn't afford the performance budget to do such a subtle detail, or they didn't manage LoD right.
Was it cut scene or in game graphics? In game sure sure but cut scene probably ok with the render farm the devs have.
I doubt you can see that in game unless it photo mode and even then it may only render if close. If they didnt do it that way that'd blow my mind on the efficiency of code.
No triangles were harmed in the making of this beard
you have been made mod of c!trianglestastebetter
I mean yes, but also is that really detail we need in a game? I would rather have better performance tbh.
Do you think those individual hairs are being rendered while running around in game?
Ahh if its just box art that makes more sense I guess.
Wouldn't it be a similar amount of graphics used as putting in a man's beard?
Horizon Forbidden West was designed to run on most people's PCs and the PS5.
Real representation of women in media is important, yes.
With Horizon Forbidden West now available on PC, benchmarks have revealed whether the game plays better on AMD or Nvidia hardware. While GeForce GPUs put in a respectable performance, it's clear that the port runs best on Radeon graphics cards.
Despite its origins as a PlayStation 5 exclusive, you don't need the best graphics card to play Horizon Forbidden West. In fact, the game appears to run well on aging pixel pushers, providing you're willing to turn down a few settings and make use of dynamic resolution scaling (DRS).
AMD's victory in Forbidden West has been certified by Computer Base, which tested more than ten graphics cards across multiple generations and manufacturers, using a Ryzen 9 7950X3D CPU to get its results.
Normally you don't see the individual hairs with a mans beard do you? More of a mesh and texture over it.
Actually starting about ten fifteen years ago it was a big trend in games to add realistic hair that models individual strands and how they react to movement and gravity. Bunch of games have a real hair setting or something like that, Witcher 3 did it and boy did you need a beefy rig to handle that when it came out.
Back then it was TressFX and NVIDIA HairWorks. Real good hair with physics is making a comeback, that new Dragon Age no one played has excellent hair.
Ragebait.
Anyone capable of zooming in on an image and using an ellipse tool on it isn't that dumb.
Never doubt the determination of a G*mer to hate on women.
How old are all y'all? This game isn't that old, and hard R Gamers were screeching about Aloy's facial hair and other parts of her design constantly, till they found out she was gay. All this is ignoring that when the first game released the character was a minor and chuds still screeched about how she wasn't attractive enough.
Because it's part of how you get realistic light scattering in the photo modes and visuals that people like?
You can't have realistic graphics without doing the things that make something look realistic.
It's the same reason they spend time figuring out how light moves through cheek skin: if the light doesn't do that you look like a plastic sculpture and it's wrong.
Love a good fuzzy peach.
I've always seen the argument coming from incels who want their game women to look like anime, but this is the first realistic take on it.
Yeah, i don't want to spend money on a new graphics card because some artistic vision includes peach fuzz. Realism in video games has met a new point where, we dont want to spend money on seeing more realism.
Like it's cool to see some realistic hair but i dont want to smell Geralt's unwashed anus when i havent visited a bath house in a while. I cant speak for everyone, but realism isnt always necessary or better.
Wouldn't it be a similar amount of graphics used as putting in a man's beard?
Also did most people have to upgrade their graphics cards to play Horizon: Forbidden West? I thought it was scaled to most people's setups?
With Horizon Forbidden West now available on PC, benchmarks have revealed whether the game plays better on AMD or Nvidia hardware. While GeForce GPUs put in a respectable performance, it's clear that the port runs best on Radeon graphics cards.
Despite its origins as a PlayStation 5 exclusive, you don't need the best graphics card to play Horizon Forbidden West. In fact, the game appears to run well on aging pixel pushers, providing you're willing to turn down a few settings and make use of dynamic resolution scaling (DRS).
AMD's victory in Forbidden West has been certified by Computer Base, which tested more than ten graphics cards across multiple generations and manufacturers, using a Ryzen 9 7950X3D CPU to get its results.
It's ironic he brought up Geralt when Witcher 3 actually had a setting specifically for realistic hair that did stress your system if it wasn't powerful enough.
Wouldn't it be a similar amount of graphics used as putting in a man's beard?
Yes, but a beard on a man makes up a significant part of his appearance. A few barely visible hair do nothing for graphics except waste performance - a negligible amount tho, tbf.
But then again, afaik, the in game model has none of this facial hair. It's just on the box art.
Horizon Forbidden West added a "photo mode", I think mostly just to show off how good the graphics can be (when nothing is being animated). It does look awesome. If you zoom the camera in, you get anatomically correct facial features.
There might also be some conversation scenes with close-ups of Aloy. Depending on your graphics settings, you might get some extra details rendered.
I am absolutely convinced that the game is not rendering fine hairs while you're fighting robot dinosaurs, since, as you suggest, that would be kind of ridiculous.
But, hey, you really kicked the shit out of that straw man! Great job!
It's funny you bring up Geralt when Witcher 3 has a specific setting just for realistic hair, and that setting would stress your system if it wasn't up to snuff. Picked a poor example there.
That's my point exactly though. Allowing someone to turn off Nvidia Hairworks so you can play on weaker hardware or get more fps is the right move. You had the choice and it should look good either way.
Part of the problem is everyone is on UE5 and UE5 does everything for you, which means the art of designing a game engine to efficiently do exactly what you want it to do for your unique game is a dead art. True innovation in game design is gone, so all you have are massive budgets trying to push as many photorealistic details down a standardized pipeline as possible to make a game look AAA.
And that engine runs and looks gorgeous even on an old 2060.
That’s a lot of “peach fuzz.” Y’all a bunch of Osama Bin Laden lookin women.
Is this your first day on the internet?
I’m sorry for hurting your feelings.
@sh.itjust.works
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
go to feed...
@sh.itjust.works
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
go to feed...
Imagine telling on your own virginity this hard in public
save