The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth

14 days ago by laurenceOfSuburbia to c/memes

mkwt 118 points 14 days ago

If you, as a consumer, directly paid one of the illegal tariffs, you can get a refund via the shipper who acted as an agent for you.

For example, here's the form if you shipped something over the border using UPS and paid an illegal tariff to get it released from customs.

path: 0 25147991, hotness: undefined, score: 118, children: 10
fyzzlefry 43 points 14 days ago

Neat. I paid a business that forwarded the costs to me. Who do I appeal to?

path: 0 25147991 25149607, hotness: undefined, score: 43, children: 3
mkwt 21 points 14 days ago

Depends probably on the nature of what "forwarded the costs" means.

If the business collected the costs from you and then forwarded them to CBP while acting as your agent, then you can demand a refund from them or sue them.

If you agreed to purchase goods for one price while also agreeing to pay a separate "tariff reimbursement fee" in exchange for purchasing the goods, you're probably shit out of luck.

Various shades in between might be arguable or litigatable one way or another.

path: 0 25147991 25149607 25149679, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 2
jaybone 11 points 14 days ago

Do Amazon receipts have “extra tariff fee” as a line item?

path: 0 25147991 25149607 25149679 25151773, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
jumping_redditor 6 points 14 days ago

no, the prices are technically unrelated to tariffs.

path: 0 25147991 25149607 25149679 25151773 25159560, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
I_Fart_Glitter 18 points 14 days ago

Does this mean UPS is going to stop sending me demand letters for extra money on a thing I already bought, paid for and received?

I keep wondering if they’ll escalate, but I’m refusing on principle.

path: 0 25147991 25148959, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 2
mkwt 11 points 14 days ago

If you already received your item(s) and you don't immediately need to do any more business with them, it sounds like they don't have a lot of leverage to get you to pay.

Sounds like that might have been a screw up on their part.

path: 0 25147991 25148959 25149543, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
jaybone 1 point 14 days ago

Maybe they thought it was like income tax, which the government will enforce even if you already got your stuff (money.)

path: 0 25147991 25148959 25149543 25151965, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
jj4211 11 points 14 days ago

Yes, technically the truth. In practice the vast vast majority of consumers bought from a business that imported the item. So it's good to highlight people have options, but the broad point of the post stands, that the businesses have the option of pocketing the difference and most of them seem to be taking that option.

path: 0 25147991 25154672, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
FartMaster69 8 points 14 days ago

That doesn’t matter if you paid inflated prices on already imported goods.

path: 0 25147991 25149435, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
Rothe 7 points 14 days ago

Yeah, the comment conveniently seems to forget that most people paid tariff costs not by directly importing something, but by simply buying the thing at a tariff inflated price in a store.

There's no refund for those, and that is where the largest part of tariff costs has been paid.

path: 0 25147991 25149435 25153395, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
switcheroo 47 points 14 days ago

We pay. Then we pay again.

It's as simple as that and just as fucked up. Our so-called government does not work for us.

path: 0 25161397, hotness: undefined, score: 47, children: 7
Abyssian 11 points 13 days ago

"Pay to play? You mean the peasants get to play? Why?"

Our Terms and Conditions have been updated, please click to agree to the new "Pay to Pay" contract.

path: 0 25161397 25163868, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 2
MonkeMischief 3 points 13 days ago

"By existing within these borders through no conscious choice of your own, you are indicating that you agree to these terms."

path: 0 25161397 25163868 25175967, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
iThinkDifferentThanU 2 points 11 days ago
path: 0 25161397 25163868 25198333, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
raze2012 9 points 13 days ago

Socialize the losses, privatazie the games. It's crazy when people complain about socialism while these billionaire companies get to reap the best parts of it.

path: 0 25161397 25166036, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
ViceroTempus 8 points 13 days ago

Which is why it needs to be burnt, and then built better.

path: 0 25161397 25162751, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 2
muusemuuse 4 points 13 days ago

As per its original design

path: 0 25161397 25162751 25163856, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
heartSagan5 4 points 13 days ago

As proposed by Thomas Jefferson; however, it is not assuredly by design because it was a group effort and the group was mixed.

Either way, the “decline of societies (at around 300y)” would support it anyhow.

path: 0 25161397 25162751 25163856 25165660, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
ArbitraryValue 43 points 14 days ago

I'm not sure what other system is even conceivably possible in the general case. There's no straightforward universal relationship between tariffs paid by businesses and prices paid by the customers of those businesses.

path: 0 25148015, hotness: undefined, score: 43, children: 17
jballs 28 points 14 days ago

I think the best system would be not to allow tariffs to be illegally implemented in the first place. But I realize that's asking a lot.

path: 0 25148015 25150659, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 3
DuncanTheDrunk 11 points 14 days ago

I dream of having a functional government. I know everywhere has issues, but rule by EO from a wannabe dictator is tiring.

path: 0 25148015 25150659 25150716, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
quarkquasar 5 points 14 days ago

Sounds very unAmerican.

How about, instead, all tariffs money paid go directly to rich, land-owning white men?

Now that's closer to the American that I know.

path: 0 25148015 25150659 25151953, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Sirdubdee 2 points 13 days ago

Hindsight is 20/20

path: 0 25148015 25150659 25164645, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Olgratin_Magmatoe 24 points 14 days ago

We could at least not have taxpayers foot the bill for businesses to get free money.

path: 0 25148015 25149121, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 0
darkdemize 11 points 14 days ago

There were some businesses passing the fees on directly to the end consumer via tariff implementation fees, but unless you have something like that itemized on an invoice, I believe you would be correct.

path: 0 25148015 25148439, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
ArbitraryValue 10 points 14 days ago

A business that passed 100% of the tariffs on to consumers via higher prices could still be worse off after getting a refund than it would have been if there never had been tariffs, if demand is elastic enough, so I'm not sure even that sort of data could resolve the question of who deserves what.

path: 0 25148015 25148439 25148730, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
mycodesucks 9 points 14 days ago

Take the total tariff income, divide it by the number of people in the country, and send out the checks.

It's the ONLY legitimate way to handle it.

path: 0 25148015 25149170, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 5
darkdemize 7 points 14 days ago

That sounds fair in theory, but would not hold up as soon as the first person felt slighted and challenged those terms in court.

path: 0 25148015 25149170 25149349, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
mycodesucks 4 points 14 days ago

Let them. It's better than "nobody will let it be fair so we won't even try."

path: 0 25148015 25149170 25149349 25150039, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
ViatorOmnium 1 point 14 days ago

From a fairness point of view, for non essential goods, if you paid higher prices with the tariffs you would also have paid it without the tariffs, so you weren't really harmed by it.

path: 0 25148015 25149170 25152774, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
mycodesucks 4 points 14 days ago

Essential and non-essential are almost meaningless distinctions for most goods people use on a daily basis. I could LIVE on beans and water. Do I NEED toothpaste? Aspirin? How much am I allowed to enjoy something before it's a non-essential good?

People paid more for something because they were forced to, and it wasn't for any economically necessary reason, and the cause was illegal, making it tantamount to theft, and refunds to companies equivalent to receiving stolen goods.

Nitpicking the necessity of the good is a cheap excuse to do nothing, not a gotcha.

path: 0 25148015 25149170 25152774 25152928, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
ViatorOmnium 2 points 14 days ago

If you paid the higher value with tariffs you would pay it any way. And if everyone was willing to pay the higher price then it would already have been higher. That's how capitalism works. No CEO will charge less unless they think it will increase profit through volume.

Companies that increased prices because of tariffs probably lost customers in the process.

path: 0 25148015 25149170 25152774 25152928 25156615, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
jaybone 3 points 14 days ago

I'm not sure what other system is even conceivably possible in the general case

How about a check to taxpayers rather than a handout to businesses who had already marked up and profited from the sales anyway?

path: 0 25148015 25152006, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
jumping_redditor -1 points 14 days ago

do you have proof every buisness did that?

path: 0 25148015 25152006 25159622, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
Rothe 2 points 14 days ago

The system would be not having a lunatic who implements tariffs at a whim and based purely on insider speculation and temper tantrums.

It would at least be a start.

path: 0 25148015 25153420, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
stopdropandprole 1 point 14 days ago

How about lowering prices? Do companies have a straightforward way to do that?

path: 0 25148015 25160293, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Abyssian 40 points 14 days ago

Let's be honest. The highest estimates I find are around $160 billion in illegal tariffs. If we split that evenly it would work out to around $640 for every person over 18 in the country.

What good would giving 250 million people each $640 do? For 99% of them it would be gone as soon as they got it. They'd waste it on things like rent, bills, food, gas money. Temporary things. Within a month almost no one would have anything to show for it.

But giving a relative handful of large companies hundreds of millions to several billion dollars each? For them it's pure profit. Their bills are already paid. They've already used the profits from that year for stock buybacks to get their wealthy shareholders more money and divided the rest giving their executives huge bonuses. And now suddenly they all have huge amounts more profit almost out of thin air.

It's money to invest in AI to replace human labor so the coming years can be even better, to do even more stock buybacks so that the people who own the most stock in each company see huge increases in their net worth, or do give CEOS a second round of yearly bonus. Months and years from now there will still be amazing homes, yachts, private islands, and new faces that we'll all be able to point to as the lasting good that came from this.

path: 0 25159989, hotness: undefined, score: 40, children: 13
Crackhappy 17 points 13 days ago

Man for a second I thought you were serious and was getting my pitchfork ready. Bravo.

path: 0 25159989 25163900, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 1
Abyssian 9 points 13 days ago

I mean... don't put it away. You should still take the opportunity to make sure it's nicely rusty and dull. We do need everyone to have them ready. That sarcastic message of mine is still describing what the government and corporations actually did to us. And they're not raping and killing their own kids. Well... they probably are raping their own kids too. But not killing or possibly eating them.

Since they're now all in charge of investigating and arresting themselves and their buddies and passing laws to stop their own blatant corruption it seems that us stepping in with pitchforks might be necessary very soon.

path: 0 25159989 25163900 25164235, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
dejected_warp_core 3 points 13 days ago

What good would giving 250 million people each $640 do?

You say that, but something a lot like that already happened: https://en.wikipedia.org/...

Most taxpayers below the income limit received a rebate of at least $300 per person ($600 for married couples filing jointly). Eligible taxpayers received, along with their individual payment, $300 per dependent child under the age of 17. The payment was equal to the payer's net income tax liability, but could not exceed $600 (for a single person) or $1200 (married couple filing jointly)

Most everyone I knew spent it on HDTVs. Economic stimulus indeed.

path: 0 25159989 25162968, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
Abyssian 9 points 13 days ago

You think I don't rem... oh Christ, it was 18 years ago? There really are people here who wouldn't remember it.

Yes. I know. I'm sort of surprised anyone could read my post and not see all the sarcasm. I do not really believe that spending money on food or rent is wasting it. It's needing to use that money in order to keep living. Companies getting it all to make the rich richer and buy yachts and new faces is not something I actually consider to be better.

path: 0 25159989 25162968 25163144, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
mangobanana 3 points 13 days ago

No matter what they spent it on, it was still stimulating the economy.

path: 0 25159989 25162968 25176755, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
thermal_shock 2 points 14 days ago

Even if it was $6, refunding it to us and showing a little respect for a major cash grab fuck up would work wonders.

path: 0 25159989 25161786, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
beernacle 2 points 14 days ago

You forgot to add 'in greenland' at the end. That's why they want it they can set up billionaire land while the rest of the world is 50C in summer.

path: 0 25159989 25161513, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
Abyssian 1 point 13 days ago

Ooh, good point. I hadn't thought much on it beyond the minerals thing the news likes to go with. That's far more likely.

path: 0 25159989 25161513 25162075, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
iThinkDifferentThanU 2 points 11 days ago
path: 0 25159989 25198356, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
muusemuuse -4 points 13 days ago

Your argument amounts to “you dont get your stolen money back because you will spend it irresponsibly.”

Thats sovcit-level quackery.

path: 0 25159989 25163888, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 3
merc 9 points 13 days ago

You ate at the onion.

path: 0 25159989 25163888 25164505, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Abyssian 1 point 13 days ago

redacted

path: 0 25159989 25163888 25164306, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
muusemuuse 1 point 13 days ago

Sorry, that response wasn’t for this post, it was for another one. I’m not sure why it went to yours.

path: 0 25159989 25163888 25164306 25164398, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Jollyllama 32 points 13 days ago

I ordered a pair of boots from Mexico, they were shipped with all of the correct paperwork and should not have been tariffed at all. It added ~$60 to the original cost of $170.

When you submit a tariff refund request they warn you multiple times that if your submission is rejected you will be charged $100 per submission. It can be rejected for making a mistake on the paperwork even if they find the tariff was applied incorrectly. I almost didn't submit for it, and a lot of people won't but I decided to risk it. That was a few months ago and I still haven't heard back.

path: 0 25163848, hotness: undefined, score: 32, children: 5
minkymunkey_7_7 22 points 13 days ago

And you never will. Thanks for playing The Decline of Democracy and Sanity.

path: 0 25163848 25164831, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 1
Chee_Koala 4 points 13 days ago

No refunds 😆

path: 0 25163848 25164831 25176303, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
adhdsergio 5 points 13 days ago

What in the jesus brother. I take it you're voting in november

path: 0 25163848 25176178, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
Jollyllama 2 points 12 days ago

I'm voting for Troy Jackson in Maine hopefully he beats Collins. Going to go out canvassing and call some people so that if he loses I can't say I didn't try.

path: 0 25163848 25176178 25182800, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
adhdsergio 1 point 12 days ago

🫡

path: 0 25163848 25176178 25182800 25185323, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
SaharaMaleikuhm 26 points 14 days ago

Americans will put up with anything. Fucking losers

path: 0 25150630, hotness: undefined, score: 26, children: 10
FistingEnthusiast 13 points 14 days ago

It's ironic

They have to work so hard to survive, and yet, when it comes to thinking, they're incredibly lazy

I genuinely pity them, because I know that as a society, they're only in such a situation because they're beaten into submission and apathy

They're placated by unbelievable convenience, having everything an hour's delivery away, and numbed to the fact that that means someone is slaving (I use that term deliberately) for their laziness

The mental gymnastics to justify every part of that shitty, exploitative excuse for a society are endless

And when they see other cultures, where we are actually free, they point and laugh, because they are too ignorant to understand

I spend a lot of time in 'Murica, under duress

I hate the place, I see the cruelty and ignorance, and I would gladly offer asylum to those who deserve it, but even amongst the relatively civilised, that's a small number

path: 0 25150630 25153024, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 5
Flower 11 points 14 days ago

They've been trained from a very young age to never question the system. Pledge of allegiance before classes. Anthem before every match. Flags everywhere. Hollywood teaching everyone America will save the world yet again. It's very hard and impossible for many to break that programming.

path: 0 25150630 25153024 25154543, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 2
NikkiDimes 2 points 13 days ago

I still remember when I first came to the US and my class did the pledge of allegiance. I was so confused, it was like I'd unwittingly joined a cult.

path: 0 25150630 25153024 25154543 25177268, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
FistingEnthusiast 2 points 14 days ago

Oh, I know it

Even those who move to civilised countries still struggle to break the chains sometimes

path: 0 25150630 25153024 25154543 25154713, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Napster153 2 points 14 days ago

Freedom doesn't come with intelligence, morals or ethics, only consequences.

path: 0 25150630 25153024 25155365, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
FistingEnthusiast 2 points 14 days ago

'Murica is one of the least free places I have ever experienced in the world

path: 0 25150630 25153024 25155365 25155441, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
minorkeys 9 points 14 days ago

They are quite pathetic. All these decades of saber rattling and pleasuring themselves to the fantasy of American freedom and democracy only to be led passively by the collar into their prison cells.

path: 0 25150630 25152081, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Tollana1234567 3 points 14 days ago

as long as there things like tiktok, amazon, youtube,etc. yes. and many enough of a income to have creature comforts.

path: 0 25150630 25151820, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
FatVegan 4 points 14 days ago

As long as i can have my 5 dollar burger for 20 dollars delivered home by a guy who makes no money, it's all good

path: 0 25150630 25151820 25153014, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
stylusmobilus 1 point 13 days ago

I’d like to see them at least stop melting down at each other and at least unify to remove their problem. I saw a post in the politics sub about Sanders asking them all to just vote and they’re attacking each other across the entire post. This is probably the smallest of the places out there to discuss but if it’s any indication, the same shit will happen this election as well.

They’re resigned to two options and the sooner they accept it the better off they’ll be. The first one is coming up in a couple of months and as many as possible need to be on one page about it.

path: 0 25150630 25175495, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
BarneyPiccolo 24 points 14 days ago

Fines like this should go to the consumer, but that's impossible, so they should go into the America First Fund (irony intended), which be the seed money to provide the initial funding for all the social programs we need to start - healthcare, college/trade, student loan forgiveness, pre-k, UBI, etc.

As we investigate and prosecute MAGA crimes, any fines and confiscations, which should be harsh (including the confiscation of entire estates of treasonous families like the Trumps or the Ellisons), should be put into the America First Fund. The level of the fund should be mentioned in the evening news every night. Rich people can take note of the Dow, and workers can take note of the America First Fund.

path: 0 25152405, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 0
chahn.chris 20 points 14 days ago

So we were all robbed. Again.

path: 0 25158652, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 1
FudgyMcTubbs 9 points 14 days ago

That was always the plan, my friend.

path: 0 25158652 25159171, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Digit 17 points 14 days ago

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaany moment now....

... it's going to start to trickle down.

path: 0 25158888, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
thenextguy 17 points 14 days ago

Those halftone rosettes bring me back to my printing days.

path: 0 25147860, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 5
marduk 7 points 14 days ago

Good band name

path: 0 25147860 25148307, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 4
thenextguy 6 points 14 days ago

Which? “Those halftone rosettes” or “my printing days”?

path: 0 25147860 25148307 25148362, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 3
marduk 11 points 14 days ago

I think "Back to my Printing Days" could be the title for their album or single

path: 0 25147860 25148307 25148362 25148890, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
jaybone 3 points 14 days ago

It would be a ~2010 style hipster folk band with lots of beards and mustaches and flannel. Probably a standup bass.

path: 0 25147860 25148307 25148362 25148890 25152035, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Zachariah 6 points 14 days ago

yes

path: 0 25147860 25148307 25148362 25148428, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
LovableSidekick 13 points 14 days ago

I kicked a trumper out of my D&D group after I finally got of tolerating his shit. He thought Trump would be better for our economy. No regrets.

path: 0 25159966, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 1
DarkFuture 6 points 14 days ago

We should be doing a lot more than kicking them out of social groups. They're traitors to our nation who are degrading our quality of life.

But we do what we can on an individual basis. I applaud you. I've removed all of them from my life as well. One of the best moves I've ever made.

path: 0 25159966 25160266, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
DarkCloud 13 points 13 days ago

This is why I can't be angry at regular criminals, they're just mimicking the world they see at the top.

path: 0 25165556, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
Kolanaki 12 points 14 days ago

They should go to Free Parking, and if someone happens to land directly on the square, they get the refunds. Life is just a massive game of Monopoly, ain't it?

path: 0 25152504, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 3
Archimedes 7 points 14 days ago

Go straight to jail.

path: 0 25152504 25153067, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
Flipper 3 points 14 days ago

Fun fact. That is not in the rules for monopoly. Of included it drags out the length of the game.

path: 0 25152504 25152801, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Kolanaki 2 points 14 days ago

Yes, it's a common house rule not an official one (tho modern versions of the game do include this and other optional rules in the booklet). But it rarely, if ever, draws out the length of the game. There's only just under 3% of a chance to even land on Free Parking.

path: 0 25152504 25152801 25152836, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
FistingEnthusiast 10 points 14 days ago

The civilised world has always sneered at 'Murica

But now we look upon the disaster with great pity for those who have been unfortunately born there who deserve better

path: 0 25155016, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
korazail 9 points 14 days ago

Please and Thank You.

I want better for us, and I'm fighting for it, but I have very limited personal power to enact change.

The way "we" looked at those "third-world" countries when I was a child feels like how everyone should be looking at us. Our squalor is not that of unclean water (but that is still true in places) or of systemic violence by the government (but that is still true in places) or of lack of reliable food (but that is still true in places). We have cellphones and internet, cars and roads, and air-conditioning, so we should be happy.

Our squalor is in the apathy and even antipathy a bulk of our fellow citizens have towards others.

The fix is education and awareness, but the means of enacting it have been hijacked. How do I reach someone on the west coast to be kind when I can't touch them from the east coast?

There was a post recently, and I'll link it if I can find it again, about Kevin and his truck, and how helping others builds community. Very wholesome. Community has been lost here outside of the uber-wealthy (they all know each other), or the "poor" who need it to survive. The "middle class" has lost the plot.

path: 0 25155016 25158540, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
FlexibleToast 10 points 13 days ago

This was so obvious that anyone paying attention could see this coming a mile away. I'm probably the unpopular opinion, but I think the government should have just not issued any refunds. I would rather the government get funds to potentially use for social welfare than to give it back to businesses. The only problem is that would create an incentive for the government to try it again for another quick payday. Some mechanism would have to be put into place to stop this. Take away the power from the president to issue tarrifs on his own. Which we should probably do anyway.

path: 0 25162031, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 5
ShakeNBake 3 points 13 days ago

But without the refunds, how would Cantor Fitzgerald (where Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's son is the chair) get their money from the rights to the tariff refunds they bought?

path: 0 25162031 25166319, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Formfiller 1 point 13 days ago

Nutlick needs to be the first into the woodchipper

path: 0 25162031 25166319 25176499, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
adhdsergio 1 point 13 days ago

Funded the war didn't they

path: 0 25162031 25176240, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
FlexibleToast 1 point 12 days ago

With only $160 billion? No.

path: 0 25162031 25176240 25181207, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
adhdsergio 1 point 12 days ago

Well of course trump and his cronies took their cut first

path: 0 25162031 25176240 25181207 25181813, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
chilicheeselies 5 points 13 days ago

Don't buy anything not entirely necessary until this shit is done. As usual consumers hold the bag.

path: 0 25176068, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
DarkFuture 4 points 14 days ago

Just wondering how many more times in my life I'm going to watch dipshit Republicans make dipshit moves that require dipshit bailouts that aren't for the people paying for the dipshit bailouts.

path: 0 25160295, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
RamRabbit 3 points 14 days ago

They are available to anyone who imported and paid a tariff. If you did that, you can get a refund. Being ‘a business’ or ‘a consumer’ is completely irrelevant.

path: 0 25154813, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 13
Cruxifux 9 points 14 days ago

The issue being that when these companies imported their goods they passed on the cost of tariffs to the consumer. And then they were reimbursed for the tariff by the government. So essentially this is the consumer giving those companies more money, but with extra steps to try to trick consumers into believing they didn’t.

path: 0 25154813 25157248, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 12
hdsrob 2 points 13 days ago

Most don't even directly pass the cost to the consumer, they pass them down the line to retailers, wholesalers, manufacturers, etc.

Then those companies add the additional cost to the product as the sell them .... So only the importer is getting the refund, and only a handful of very large resellers are actually importers. Most small businesses buy from importers or wholesalers, and they won't get anything back either.

path: 0 25154813 25157248 25163059, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 5
Cruxifux 1 point 13 days ago

But those small businesses have the option to pass those losses onto the consumer, and with blanket effects like tariffs it happens across the board. I own a small construction business, this is what happens when inflation goes crazy for my pricing anyway and it has never made my business not competitive for pricing before.

path: 0 25154813 25157248 25163059 25163698, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 4
hdsrob 2 points 13 days ago

Absolutely. ...

I own a software company, but we sell computer hardware to about half of our clients as well. We passed the increase in hardware to our clients as our suppliers passed it down to us.

But I'm not an importer, and my main supplier imports about 50% of what we buy from them. The rest they buy from manufacturers that import their own product, or importers (or possibly even wholesalers that buy from importers), and we buy some stuff at retail, since we just don't buy enough to justify wholesale.

We absolutely struggle to be competitive, and more so now than before. We don't have VC money, or credit card processor backing that many of our competitors do, so can't give hardware away at below cost, or for free. At the end of the day, we decreased our markup to help keep prices down, knowing that we'll ultimately make it up on software licensing over the next few years.

Even then, our customers are all businesses that paid the increased tariff at the end of the day, so how do they get their taxes back, since most people are suggesting returning taxes to individuals.

The whole thing is a freaking mess, without any real good answer that will actually make everyone happy.

path: 0 25154813 25157248 25163059 25163698 25167516, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
jumping_redditor -1 points 14 days ago

if you wanted a refund you could have purchased the goods from another country and impoted them, accepting the risk that there is no refund.

path: 0 25154813 25157248 25159537, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 5
Cruxifux 2 points 13 days ago

Well I don’t live in the US so I don’t have to do that stupid shit. Bit for american consumers, that wasn’t what was fucking promised. What was promised was a cheque from the government as a reward for enduring the tariff situation. Instead what they got was screwed.

path: 0 25154813 25157248 25159537 25163673, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 4
hdsrob 1 point 13 days ago

I don't think that the government ever promised a tariff rebate to residents directly.

The rapist or Musk may have offhandedly suggested on social media that they would, but anyone that believes anything they say is a fool.

path: 0 25154813 25157248 25159537 25163673 25167470, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
vivalapivo 2 points 14 days ago

IDK, but it does make sense?

The total income of the business is P x C, where P is the number of sold items and C is the cost. Under some model of P(S), businesses try to maximize this product. The tariffs caused an imbalance in this product, but they still were able to maximize it. Only the maximum value of this product was reduced.

Also, the businesses were paying tariffs, so obviously tariffs increased expenses.

Then the government decided to do the reimbursement for the expenses, but not for the difference in maximum incomes.

Thus, on average

  • businesses lost some income

  • government spends all its tariff income on reimbursement

  • customers payed more

  • chineese manufactureres lost some income too

  • GOP and Trump will be reelected because fuck China I guess

path: 0 25161805, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
dejected_warp_core 2 points 13 days ago

IDK, but it does make sense?

For business that were in on the grift, and/or just gouging customers "because tariffs", it absolutely made sense.

path: 0 25161805 25163014, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
vivalapivo 2 points 13 days ago

This kinda works for essential commodities and not for luxury

path: 0 25161805 25163014 25163578, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
demizerone 1 point 13 days ago

That's wealth redistribution.

path: 0 25166356, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
walden 1 point 14 days ago
path: 0 25147695, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Jake_Farm 1 point 14 days ago
path: 0 25148422, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
CptEnder 0 points 13 days ago

They really are speedrunning how fast were gonna Bastille their asses

path: 0 25166949, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
osanna 1 point 13 days ago

Not gonna happen.

path: 0 25166949 25167028, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Zephyr -3 points 14 days ago

Don't fight the system, play the game. Incorporate, become an LLC whose soul existence is taking care of you and run your purchases through that and get all the benefits.

path: 0 25156934, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 4
Funkt4st1c 2 points 14 days ago

Genuine question; whats stopping me from starting a nonprofit solely designed to benefit me specifically, that i funnel all of my money through for tax evasion purposes

path: 0 25156934 25157332, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
JcbAzPx 4 points 14 days ago

You probably can't afford to bribe the right people to make that legal for you. Though, if you're not even a tiny bit risk adverse, you could take the chance that by the time you're caught, you'll have the bribe money ready.

path: 0 25156934 25157332 25158945, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Zephyr 2 points 14 days ago

Generally speaking a non-profit cannot legally exist solely for personal profit or private enrichment.

path: 0 25156934 25157332 25157751, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
TheEighthDoctor 1 point 14 days ago

path: 0 25156934 25157264, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Impractical_Island -4 points 14 days ago

The truth is, God is a unified field of consciousness that arose from the supersymmetry of the ever-present, eternal emptiness to then fold in and on Itself across eleven dimensions to form a topological matrix that acts as a monadic nodal communication system, and short of understanding that, you should be a little bitch and act on what your sorry ass thinks is the nature of the universe. It's rather quite simple to understand.

path: 0 25161517, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 22
BasedMaquisEddington 5 points 13 days ago

I post this in jest, you seem like you can take it in stride 🙂

path: 0 25161517 25163167, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Abyssian 5 points 13 days ago

Never mix Robitussin and speed, this always happens.

path: 0 25161517 25162485, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 16
dejected_warp_core 3 points 13 days ago

Did you have fun this weekend?

Naw. I took too much of the good stuff and I wound up seeing god again. Ruined a perfectly good trip. It was awful.

path: 0 25161517 25162485 25162924, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Abyssian 1 point 13 days ago

I've never been a weed person, probably because it seemed to make people tired and hungry and as a fat kid I was already tired and hungry anyway. Seemed like a waste of money. If I was going to break the law to take a chemical then it damn well better make me see tiny aliens crawling out of the cat's mouth. And I didn't have a cat.

path: 0 25161517 25162485 25162924 25163275, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Impractical_Island -1 points 13 days ago

Sober, minus a little beer and weed, you prejudiced ki.

path: 0 25161517 25162485 25163478, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 13
Abyssian 3 points 13 days ago

Prejudiced against what? People raving gibberish while being a cunt to others by calling them little bitches?

path: 0 25161517 25162485 25163478 25163511, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 12
Impractical_Island 1 point 13 days ago
path: 0 25161517 25162485 25163478 25163511 25164231, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 11
Aedaz_ 2 points 14 days ago

Leibniz posting

path: 0 25161517 25161887, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
Impractical_Island -1 points 14 days ago path: 0 25161517 25161887 25161902, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
QuandaleDingle 1 point 14 days ago

Are you replying to the right post???

path: 0 25161517 25161799, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Impractical_Island 0 points 14 days ago

I.am everywhere

path: 0 25161517 25161799 25161889, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
curiousaur -6 points 13 days ago

Well the companies paid the tarrifs, not the consumers.

path: 0 25164255, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 30
merc 10 points 13 days ago

Yes, then (as expected) the companies passed on the cost to their customers.

If there were a competitive marketplace, retailers would be offering refunds to their customers or putting on huge deals so that annoyed customers didn't switch to a rival retailer.

But, when Amazon has some massive chunk of the market, what happens if they piss off a customer? What are they going to do, go to the mall? The mall closed a long time ago.

path: 0 25164255 25164390, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
braxy29 6 points 13 days ago

i purchase stuff from overseas sellers. i definitely paid tariffs this year.

path: 0 25164255 25165749, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
curiousaur 1 point 13 days ago

If you paid them directly then you are entitled to refunds.

path: 0 25164255 25165749 25175733, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
braxy29 1 point 13 days ago

i'm sure ups and fedex will cough it right up when i ask!

path: 0 25164255 25165749 25175733 25178077, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
NikkiDimes 2 points 13 days ago

How are there still people who believe this?

path: 0 25164255 25177347, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
baconsunday 2 points 13 days ago

Incorrect. There was a famous trendy video of an individual who was told to receive their package they had to pay UPS at drop off for the fees from the tariffs. The delivery driver even understood people weren't happy.

path: 0 25164255 25164379, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 24
innermachine 3 points 13 days ago

This is dependent on how you order. If your buying from overseas and importing you have to pay tarrifs (most of the time, some sellers offer to sort that for you and reflect it in pricing). I have ordered many a part from the UK, India, Australia and japan. All out of country sellers required I deal with customs, except for the stuff from Australia that states they would cover the exporting for me! But yes if you bought from a us based retailer, the retailer imported and already paid the tarrifs for you. But wait, I didn't pay the tarrifs! I paid DHL to deal with the tarrifs for me so DHL actually is who gets a refund not me. Suppose I'll just go fuck myself.

path: 0 25164255 25164379 25164481, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
curiousaur -1 points 12 days ago

They still weren't paying the tarrifs though, they were reimbursing them. If they were truly paying them they would have paid the government not UPS.

path: 0 25164255 25164379 25185651, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 22
baconsunday 2 points 12 days ago

So anyways, as I said, consumers and corporations paid the tariffs. It all depends on how it was purchased.

path: 0 25164255 25164379 25185651 25190025, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 21
curiousaur -1 points 12 days ago

If you paid FedEx or UPS then you did not pay the tarrifs directly. They paid the terrifs, you reimbursed them. So they will get them back. It's seeming like a lot of people who reimbursed companies for tarrifs think they actually directly paid terrifs themselves.

path: 0 25164255 25164379 25185651 25190025 25192825, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 20
GoatSynagogue -22 points 14 days ago

Because businesses are the ones that pay the tariff, not customers of the business. Did the extra tariffs give some companies an excuse to raise prices? Definitely. Does that mean the customer deserves a refund? Definitely not.

path: 0 25151832, hotness: undefined, score: -22, children: 22
ab60753 10 points 14 days ago

Yes.... buuuut they forward that cost to the consumers. The buisneses dont go:"Wops, we need to pay more for items, lets keep the prices the same for the consumers." They increse the cost for the consumers.

path: 0 25151832 25152483, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 6
GoatSynagogue 1 point 14 days ago

Sure, but the customer isn’t paying the tariff. The customer is just paying more for a product. The business is paying the tariff.

It’s a “technically correct” thing, sure, but it’s why customers aren’t owed the refund. Businesses can increase prices whenever they want.

path: 0 25151832 25152483 25154705, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 5
ab60753 2 points 14 days ago

I get what you mean, i think my point is more regarding who the sufferinf party is.

The customer is the end "sufferer". So should have the repirations. This is a wierd metaphot but hear me out. Lets say someone tries to shoot me. I dodge it and someone behinds me gets shot. A judge ordera the shooter to pay for the medical bills. Would it be fair for me to get that money? Or should it go to the person who got shot? Yes maybe i deserve some compensation. But compleatly ignoring the person who got shot feels wrong no?

path: 0 25151832 25152483 25154705 25161283, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
GoatSynagogue 0 points 13 days ago

The person didn’t choose to get shot though, while you still chose to buy the product at the higher price. That’s the difference.

Why the price went up makes no difference to you as the customer.

I get that it sucks that prices went up because of an illegal tariff, but the customer didn’t pay the tariff so they’re not entitled to a refund. The tariff was paid before you bought the product, by the business. The best you can hope for is that prices will go down, but unfortunately that’s unlikely.

path: 0 25151832 25152483 25154705 25161283 25164007, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
DarkFuture 2 points 14 days ago

That would be fine and dandy if tariffs were only for frivolous purchases. Things you could do without. But they weren't. We were FORCED to pay higher prices for thing we NEED due to companies raising the prices due to illegal Republican tariffs.

We were robbed. Again. Period.

And anyone who was robbed deserves compensation.

path: 0 25151832 25152483 25154705 25160419, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
GoatSynagogue -1 points 13 days ago

You chose to pay it. That’s the opposite of being robbed.

path: 0 25151832 25152483 25154705 25160419 25163940, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 1
Epzillon 8 points 14 days ago

Correct me if im wrong. If businesses raise their prices to reduce the impact of tariffs on profits then the person actually paying the tariff (atleast to some extent) is the end customer, no? Is it not then only fair for the person who actually paid for this to be compensated appropriately when it is deemed unconstitutional?

To me it seems insane that the people who already tossed away the problem further down the chain is to be compensated at all when they are not the ones who have primarily suffered the effects of it. Even if they where first in line to deal with it.

path: 0 25151832 25152443, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 3
MrShankles 6 points 14 days ago

And then the refunds come from public tax dollars. So the customer has paid the unconstitutional tariffs twice. It's a blatant transfer of wealth upwards, no other way to really cut it

path: 0 25151832 25152443 25154011, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
Epzillon 2 points 14 days ago

I did not specify where the money comes from. But you are correct in that scenario. However, it would not necessarily have to go that route. If a company pays the government for tariffs, then proceed to get that money back, that money should then be returned to the end-customer that in the meanwhile has paid more. I fall to see how this is paid by public tax money although I am also not american nor do I know the specifics of the US tax system.

path: 0 25151832 25152443 25154011 25154329, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
GoatSynagogue 2 points 14 days ago

Unless they specifically included a new tariff fee or charge, they’re just charging the price they think people will pay.

path: 0 25151832 25152443 25154686, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
thisisbutaname 4 points 14 days ago

Business has to pay tariffs

Business raises price to offset tariffs

Customer pays increased price

Tariffs are deemed illegal

Business receives refunds for tariffs

Customer pays the refund via taxes

How is this anything but a transfer of wealth from citizens (the customers) to businesses?

path: 0 25151832 25152814, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 4
GoatSynagogue 0 points 14 days ago

I mean, simply buying anything from a business is a “transfer of wealth from citizens (the customers) to businesses”, isn’t it?

path: 0 25151832 25152814 25154715, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 3
thisisbutaname 1 point 14 days ago

But you get something in return, which should be of equal value to you

path: 0 25151832 25152814 25154715 25155529, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
GoatSynagogue 1 point 13 days ago

It’s worth what you paid for it to you, otherwise you wouldn’t have bought it.

path: 0 25151832 25152814 25154715 25155529 25163605, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
jumping_redditor 0 points 14 days ago

yes, and if you don't like the exchange rate you don't buy it.

path: 0 25151832 25152814 25154715 25155529 25159655, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
Rothe 3 points 14 days ago

Why on Earth would that not mean the customer deserves a refund? The entire cost of the tariffs has been placed on the customer. No business sold their imported goods at the same price after having paid the tariff fees, they all raised their prices.

path: 0 25151832 25153435, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
GoatSynagogue 2 points 14 days ago

Because the customer didn’t pay the tariff, the business did - unless of course the business flat out added a “tariff surcharge” or something of the like to the total that the customer can see.

Increasing the cost of an item by the amount of the tariff is not the same as making the customer directly pay the tariff. The business was charged the tariff. They were invoiced and they paid it. The customer didn’t. The customer just bought an item at shelf price.

path: 0 25151832 25153435 25154736, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
MrShankles 1 point 14 days ago

You sweet summer child

So you're saying businesses should now cut deep discounts for buyers, because the (already imported) products' tariffs have been paid (AND the business is being refunded for it). Are they going to drop prices now? Are they acting upon market pressures or taking advantage/manipulating them?

If you think a wealth-class has to pay any mind to the invisible hand of the free market... I've got a nice ass bridge to sell ya, at a tarrif-free + ultra-discounted price!

path: 0 25151832 25153629, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
GoatSynagogue 1 point 14 days ago

You’re just making shit up.

I’m saying that the business is the one who was invoiced for the tariff. The customer wasn’t. The business increased the price to cover their extra cost, probably even added some extra profit on top as well, but that still doesn’t mean the customer actually paid the tariff. They didn’t. The tariff is paid on import, not sale.

path: 0 25151832 25153629 25154775, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
MrShankles 2 points 13 days ago

So if the customer paid more to cover the cost, why are the businesses entitled to a refund... that will come from the taxpayers?

path: 0 25151832 25153629 25154775 25163172, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
GoatSynagogue 0 points 13 days ago

Because that’s not how buying and selling products works. The business chose to increase the price due to increased costs. As you said , it was an increased cost to the business - so why would the customer get the refund?

The tariff was paid on import, not on sale.

path: 0 25151832 25153629 25154775 25163172 25164065, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
memes
memes

@lemmy.world

login for more options
22396
9994
13185

Community rules

1. Be civil

No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politics

This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent reposts

Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No bots

No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop

No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

go to feed...