Trump Tells Supporters ‘Don’t Worry About Voting’ On Election Night
3 years ago by Flying Squid to c/politics
What's even sadder is that it's millions of people that some of us used to look up to and respect, now we just have a bunch of sad brainwashed shells of the people they used to be before Trump/conservative propaganda got ahold of them. They broke our communities and now they've broken our families, now all that's left is for them to break is us.
I'm not the biggest Hillary fan but she's been right about the Trump Qult from day 1 and this is a great essay from her about this topic:
Hillary definitely isn't the person who needs to be delivering this message, but the message resounds.
Her being right about the Trump cult doesn't make her any less of a milquetoast Democrat who only started caring about things like gay marriage when public opinion supported it. Any politician who can't stand by values and instead changes tack based on public opinion is a shitheel.
She was right about them being Deplorables and she is right about their isolation and loneliness being part of why they're able to be weaponized.
That doesn't make her any less of the person whose campaign strategy was to promote Donald Trump during the primaries, and then failed to do on-the-ground rallies in swing states that she lost electorally. She actually won the popular election, by quite a bit. She was pretty much one of the few people who could have lost to Trump. Jeb Bush was also running the same year, and after two Bushes and one Clinton presidencies, I think the Democratic party really underestimated people's dislike of political dynasties.
Anyway, right message, wrong person to be delivering it because her fucking hubris and thinking that Trump was gonna be easy to beat is part of what got us in this stupid fucking festering mess.
USA: We couldn't possibly elect a president dumber than GWB
GOP: Hold my beer...
Just because Donald Trump is a moron doesn't mean George W Bush wasn't incredibly stupid. Both things can be true.
Let's not forget that Bush only graduated from college because his parents donated money to keep him from being given failing grades and flunking out.
There are entire buildings on the Yale campus that only exist because W was such a poor student.
Bush was an average student academically, not excelling but also not failing. He excelled in social skills though. He was able to remember names and details of everyone in a room. He was convivial and enthusiastic. He was a member of many clubs, groups, and societies. He was proof that being liked is sometimes more important than being smart.
Trump is not either. He's proof that if you keep telling people that you're better than them then lots of them will believe you.
Just because Donald Trump is a moron doesn’t mean George W Bush wasn’t incredibly stupid. Both things can be true.
I'm not saying otherwise, but do you remember when parody movies were all the rage, and GWB was always portrayed as having the intelligence of a 5 year old?
Example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BAM5hMMp0M
“I’m for us. You know how you spell us, right? U.S. I just picked that up. Has anyone ever thought of that before?”
Tell me this doesn't sound like a line from one of those.
What could be a more fascist thing to say?
If somebody else gave incorrect voting instructions, that would be election interference.
Yeah, I think there's a difference between tricking people into making invalid votes and straight-up asking them not to vote.
im7andthisisdeep
imMAGAandthisisdeep
No Don, no one has thought of that. Just like no one has ever remembered “person man woman camera TV” before.
sigh everything is terrible lol
Well, that's because Look, having nuclear—my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart —you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I’m one of the smartest people anywhere in the world—it’s true!—but when you’re a conservative Republican they try—oh, do they do a number—that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune—you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged—but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me—it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are (nuclear is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what’s going to happen and he was right—who would have thought?), but when you look at what’s going on with the four prisoners—now it used to be three, now it’s four—but when it was three and even now, I would have said it’s all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don’t, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years—but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us.
Sometimes you have a thought or idea that you think is 100% unique and original and then you do five seconds of Googling to discover that not only have a lot of other people thought of it before, but they thought of it long before you ever did and may already be a thing you never knew about. You have a Today I Learned moment and life goes on.
...and then there's whatever the fuck this idea is that should have never even left his mouth to begin with. It's one thing to drop this granule of insight down on the bar while you're sharing a beer with your pals after you've had one too many already. It's another to hear it come from someone that once led the country and some people think is smart. Holy Jesus.
When will Jason Bateman be cast as Batman?
I'm really high and I really don't mean this to come across as critical but what was the thought process in adding the s to bateman? If you skip the s the joke still makes sense and you get to keep the last name intact.
1969 - Hogan's Heroes. Col. Klink is shown a insignia button found in the woods. "it says 'us'" he says (to canned laughter)
So only 54 years ago confirmed evidence that it had been thought of before
Sounds like another coup attempt being foreshadowed by Trump
Yeah, though I wouldn't be surprised if he legit didn't really want to be president in the first place, but the opportunity to fleece more people was too great for him to pass up so he just ran with it and can't stop now.
The grift is 100% there but I think he does want to be president again because he believes that that will absolve all crimes.
Not in Georgia!
deleted by creator
I don't think Trump realizes we're all aware of what he's capable of.
Unfortunately I'm in a red blood state with some really corrupt officials. I can't trust that my mail in ballot won't be "lost"
Fill out your mail-in ballot, then just drop it in the secured ballot box at your polling location. Then DeJoy doesn't get to fuck with your vote.
Didn't South Park already kind of pick up on the fact that Trump gives off the vibe that he doesn't REALLY want to be President, he just wants the perks of campaigning?
Mr. Garrison in like a whole 8 months of clips basically plots and plans on how he can get OUT of it, only to keep finding himself in situations where he somehow gets further in the polls.
This feels exactly like that.
He just wants his name in lights. It's a personality disorder.
He doesn't want to do anything. He never has had to.
It's not talked about how just so seriously mentally ill trump is. The Goldwater rule is probably for the best, but trump is, well, just look into the DSM. Way worse than Goldwater.The wiki captures it as well.
I went to a lecture of a criminal psychologist recently about psychopathy. Psychopaths are often also narcissists, and there are a number of personality traits to identify them. The more traits one has, the more likely the person is a clinical narcissist. Trump would check all those boxes, every single one.
I’d never heard of the Goldwater rule but wow it makes sense that that rule is named after that asshole
You mean how he looked completely miserable election night with everyone else around him celebrating?
::Puts season 26 episode 6 on the watch list::
I never knew that such a large portion of our population was so far below what I would have thought was the average intelligence until I heard they thought this man was smart. This guy is an idiot and that scares me to think what that means about his cult members’ intelligence levels.
No one dumb enough to think this guy is smart should be trusted with any adult responsibilities; not gun ownership, not voting and definitely not reproducing.
This is apparent to me every day at work. The public washroom has an indicator beside it that will light up green with the words "OCCUPIED WHEN LIT" any time the door is locked from within. This is a very obvious indicator, though to the average person, green mean go. And every single time I'm using it, you bet your ass some fucking Neanderthal approaches that door, immediately becomes confused over the meaning of occupied, and decides it must be synonymous with vacant. They then grab ahold of the handle and not once, not twice, but often attempt to rip that fucking door down three times before their meat brain tells them "DOOR LOCKED!". You can literally feel the desperation and confusion in every one of those attempted breaches.
Every. Fucking. Time.
And I don't shit at work, so I'm not often in there more than a couple of minutes. I think I'm going to start bellowing "GREEEN MEEANN GGOOOOOOOO!" from inside every time this happens.
One of customers told me how much he likes Trump thinks he his smart. This was after him and his son were talking about how dumb Biden is.
I have lost respect for customer and wouldn't want him our his company working on my floor.
This gem also from the article should have made even the really stupid people in the audience walk out.
I'm for us. You know how you spell us, right? U.S. I just picked that up. Has anyone ever thought of that before?
By definition almost half of the population has an IQ of below 100. And IQ is obviously a flawed metric by itself, you can have a high IQ and still struggle with getting through a day without saying something stupid.
Me after reading the headline: "Haha, that's hilarious! Yes, Trump voters, don't worry about voting!"
Me after reading the article: "Well, that was disturbing."
You don’t have to vote, don’t worry about voting. The voting, we got plenty of votes.
Why does it sound like he's got a mountain of fake ballots sitting in a warehouse that he's gonna drop from a blimp or some shit.
I honestly don't think he wanted to be president the first time. It would have made sense for him to make a big show of running, but lose, and just embrace the publicity.
Of course that assumes a level of foresight and planning that he hasn't demonstrated since, so it's hardly a firmly held belief.
I think he's much too fragile of ego to intentionally lose. I doubt he even let his kids win at games as children.
Partly because I doubt he ever actually played with them but also because he's a complete cunt.
Had he lost in 2016, I think he would have been secretly happy about it, but would have publicly griped about "stolen elections" and the like. Then, he would have gotten paid to go on talk shows and give speeches for 4 years about how the Democrats stole the election from him and how he could easily fix every problem facing America (without actually giving a single detail on what he'd do).
2016 was not the first time he ran. He had multiple presidential bids in previous election years, most of which amounted to nothing other than free publicity for him and a stroke of his own ego. He was never taken seriously and would always bow out after raking in some donations that he probably embezzled.
Then 2016 happened and suddenly everyone was taking him seriously this time. I really do believe he didn't expect to have a chance at winning against Hillary and that's the only reason he didn't bow out early in the race like he usually did. He was having fun shit-smearing the other Republican candidates live on stage at debates and must have thought nobody would actually vote for him. The look on his face when they announced the winner wasn't the look of someone overjoyed to have been elected President.
He needs to win. The crimes he's committed are obviously crimes, well documented, and he has gone right up to the line on publicly admitting this. The only way he stays out of jail is if he wins and pardons himself. Or if the hamberders block his heart in the next year.
"Watch the voters"
We already have poll watchers, is he really trying to go full 1933 nazi and have his zealots "monitor" voters?
Great.
Watch them for what exactly? For... Voting for another candidate? I don't understand. Like. They are looking for fraud? What would that look like?
I don't get it. Like if I went and watched the people at my local voting center, I would see a bunch of senior citizen voulenteers handing out ballots, and then I would see people putting their ballots into the big scantron machine thing. That's what it would look like. That's what it looks like every time.
He doesn't want them "watching" for anything. This is a dog whistle for textbook voter intimidation tactics.
Sane people may be too scared to show up and vote because they actively fear for their safety due to threats of violence or social reprisal.
Watch that be what all of these mass shootings have been about. People hanging out in some random chat room or forum getting talked into shooting up schools, movie theaters, churches, concerts, etc... And the whole thing ends up being connected to this creepy cabal of people like Roger Stone and Steve Bannon. They get people to stand around the polling places with AR's and then people are afraid of becoming another statistic.
If you have 2 people charging into a voting place and being stupid they get arrested. If you have 100 people then the voting place gets shut down for safety.
Shut down enough places in the other guys territory and you win.
Florida 2000. The Supreme Court gives itself the power to supersede the Constitution and Congress and the State Secretary. They then hand the election to the GOP. (Who promptly lost the recount but too late, SCOTUS said so!)
He has said this shit each election how are people surprised still?
Lol, not nearly enough compared to American conservatives. 30% to 69%. You are outnumbered over 2-1.
I am not an American, I just look at statistics for everything.
It's so he can start bitching more and more after he loses again and his cult can try to overthrow the government again.
He wants to break the system, dumbasses.
He is prove the system is already broken. When in a democracy, voters who can read and write, who are impoverished and on avg can't even afford a $500 emergency vote for a billionaire, I'd say that is a failure of the system.
edit: I am not saying billionaires are worse than anybody else, I am just saying their interests probably don't have a lot of overlap with the avg voter.
It's ok, I'll say it, billionaires are greedy fucks killing our society, individuals who should not exist in a functional society.
To prove it, just how rich can someone get without making any unethical choices?
Imagine waking up with billions of dollars. What would you do with it? If you say keep it and try o take more from the populous then you are an enemy of the populous. They have brain damage from greed. They are worse than everyone else.
I would spend all but 1 billion on just buying wetlands and the legal resources to make sure they never get touched. Doing good the laziest way possible.
With the remaining billion I will start my own space program.
Oh don't apologize! Let me show you something:
- 10,000 seconds = 2.8 hours
- 100,000 seconds = 27.8 hours
- 1,000,000 seconds = 11.6 days
- 10,000,000 seconds = 115.7 days
- 1,000,000,000 seconds = 31.7 YEARS
I haven't even lived for a billion seconds yet and I was born in 94! A billion is a truly obscene high quantity. I don't think there's a moral way to gain that much wealth, and if there is, it's an exceptionally rare possibility.
I am 1,735,668,000 seconds old, and so I have seen some shit. Donald Trump is just an unseemly hiccup in an insignificant span of time. There were ghastly horrors before him and there will be ghastly horrors after him. These nuisances seem important because this is your now, you'll realize how little they meant when this is your then. As in, it seemed so important then, while you look back at the Land of Then from the clear hilltops of After.
They are objectively worse - it's immoral for a billionaire to exist (meaning to amass that amount of money, not to physically exist). You can't get to that point without knowingly/actively hurting others. They are worse people, period... and you don't have to cover your bases and backpedal on this point. Starts to sound line the famous "temporarily embarrassed millionaires" quote.
That’s why the Electoral College exists
If people are voting for Trump then they will put their votes towards a better alternative
Ironically Hillary Clinton had 3 million more votes than Trump. Without electoral college it would have been a Hillary Presidency.
We've had 6 presidential elections in the 21st century. The Republican candidate won the popular vote one out of those 6 times. Yet we've had 3 Republican Presidential terms resulting from those elections.
Yes, it doesn’t work as intended but political parties weren’t intended either
Only in certain polls, and as we have seen time and again, the polls don't mean shit. Bernie was leading in the polls this far out from the election in 2019. "Somehow" he isn't president.
Hell, Hillary was leading in the polls on, and after, election day 2016. She won the general election.....
Agreed. If the Superbowl was "won" by the losing team 17% of the time people would riot.
Only in certain polls,
.. specifically the majority of polls published in the last week: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/...
That being 8/13 at the time of writing with Biden only leading in one.
"The polls"
If I go outside and ask the three young kids riding their bikes what their favorite ice cream is, I've joust conducted a poll.
Apropos to this specific scenario, if I go to a chocolate lovers convention and ask their favorite ice cream flavor, guess which flavor might leaf the way. Now what is while along the question, I was wearing a t-shirt that says "vote for chocolate and I'll give you $20 bucks".
"Chocolate is leading in the polls, okay... You know it, I know it."
I mean, to a degree, polling in general is still conducted with a very antiquated structure that tends to bring in responses predominately from the underemployed, undereducated and elderly (so huge cross section of enthusiastic trump voters over represented in those groups). But my specific point here was that he's ambiguously citing "polls" and not a specific poll - They aren't all created equal and in fact, you can bet the ones that trump would proudly reference are typically biased as fuck in how they ask questions and analyze results.
Asking your supporters to engage in voter intimidation for the next election when you've been charged, and will be tried shortly, for leading an insurrection after the last election seems like a great game plan. /s
I can't imagine being this guys lawyer. You must either be eating a handful of Tums every night, or your just as loony as him and actually don't see how everything he says and does it toxic to himself and everyone in his orbit.
Maybe the ones that aren't co-defendants with him ... yet. Although helping him win a 2nd term gets them what? If he gets his 2nd term, and the GOP gladly allow him to assume his dream of being dictator:
- he will have just as much chance of paying them (probably less than 1%).
- he would also have no need for the law/lawyers/judges. I think anyone that could challenge him would be in the first wave of the "purge" .
It seems that his remaining lawyers are grifters rather than true believers...
their real goal is to drag things out in hopes of a second term for Trump.
... their real goal is to drag things out because they get paid by the hour.
"Dont worry about voting, just intimidate and threaten the other people who are voting."
Other clips from the rally went viral as well, including Trump saying, “I’m for us. You know how you spell us, right? U.S. I just picked that up. Has anyone ever thought of that before?”
No, Donnie. No one has ever thought of this. You're the first, you beautiful genius. /s
"Very stable genius."
I'm very concerned.
Diminishing faith in elections is one of the fourteen characteristics of Fascism.
Related Beau of the Fifth Column:
While I agree with the sentiment, Trump did lose by millions of votes. There was a 7.61 million vote differential. He also lost the popular vote to Hillary by 2.9 million votes.
Biden won 81,283,098 votes, or 51.3 percent of the votes cast. He is the first U.S. presidential candidate to have won more than 80 million votes. Trump won 74,222,958 votes, or 46.8 percent of the votes cast. More Americans voted for Hillary Clinton than any other losing presidential candidate in US history.
Going back further, incumbency aside, there hasn't been a Republican who has won the popular vote since GHW Bush in 1988..35 years ago
Those numbers don't matter though.
What they were saying, accurately, was that the election was decided by a few tens of thousands of voters delivering swing states with tight races.
Trump lost by a few million votes in 2016 too, but that's not what mattered then either.
Those numbers do matter for clarity. Saying he didn't lose by millions blurs the truth. Saying he lost by a few thousand votes is not at all accurate when electoral college votes are the only ones that matter, and adding "in a few swing states," only fuels those stop the steal Maga idiots
Those numbers do matter for clarity.
They do not. They only matter in the context of a discussion of the election among those familiar with how the system works, where all parties specifically understand that the popular vote is a meaningless metric as it relates to electing a president.
Saying he didn't lose by millions blurs the truth.
Again that's just factually incorrect. By the same standards, you'd logically have to argue that Trump lost the 2016 election, which is obviously nonsense.
If anything, the opposite is true: using terms like "won" and "lost" based on the popular vote is what's really blurring the truth.
It's like talking about an American football game and who won and lost based on overall yards gained or time of possession instead of the final score.
Saying he lost by a few thousand votes is not at all accurate when electoral college votes are the only ones that matter
Interesting angle, considering this is the first possibly valid point you've made...but that it also completely contradicts the rest of your argument. You've been here arguing the popular vote matters then turn around and say the EC votes are the only ones that matter...bold strategy.
In concession, I'll admit you're right on this one and I stand corrected.
Trump lost by 74 votes.
That was a lot of words to say what you already said, and I corrected. He didn't lose by a small margin, he lost by electoral votes. Saying he only won or lost by a few thousand votes is wildly inaccurate when it is electoral votes that matter
That's what an incumbency is
That would involve planning on his part and he has not demonstrated ability. He responds not plans.
I agree, it would be a complete waste of time for they to vote
I am conflicted between everyone should participate in democracy and them participating in democracy
Everyone should participate and have their voices heard. However, if you think the whole thing is a farce and want to undermine the system from the get go, I'm not gonna be too broken up about it if you choose to exclude your voice from the process.
In some countries (I think Australia is one), you're required by law to vote. If you don't, you get a small fine. I think we need this system because there are a ton of would-be voters who don't see the point. If they were made to vote, I think there'd be greater engagement because they'd be more frustrated at the appalling candidates and demand more because they had skin in the game.
Very well. How has this ended up impacting things?
Let's compromise: everyone adult with a functioning brain should vote.
tRump voters do not believe in democracy though. So I'm good with their uneducated hateful vote not being cast.
Right but it's consistent. He's going to keep pushing the election lie until he rallies another coup.
you need to get out of your media bubble, but hey the most pro-worker/pro-Union president in American history "can barely read from (a) teleprompter" vs. the attempt to overthrow the nation is funny guy
The irony of a horse complaining about having of two possible riders, the one that is weaker, is clearly lost on a lot of people. If Biden was as weak as you said, wouldn't that be a good thing for @buzz as Biden would also be less capeable of opressing @buzz? If the (according to him) more virile Trump was elected, he would have a more virile guy with his boot on his neck.
Most people don't want less oppression, they just want someone who will oppress the people they don't like instead of them. In fact, I think given the choices A) I get oppressed 2x but people I don't like get oppressed 3x where x is my current oppression, and B) everyone gets oppressed less, most people would choose A.
It's not even that he can't read. How much of that is his speech impediment?
Coveffe hambargee...... I know, woman camera tv........ that is the idiot you are going to vote but you claim that Biden couldn't read..... ohhh the irony.
So, no good argument there then. Good to see that you'd gladly vote for a traitor.
You're willing to vote for the fascist candidate because he's funny? Even if Biden is senile, at this point, I'd vote for a dead possum over Trump simply because the dead possum wouldn't try to overthrow the country.
assuming they're not a troll, i wouldn't be surprised that people would vote for trump because it gives them a chuckle to hurt other people because remember "If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you." President Lyndon B. Johnson
Biden can barely read from teleprompter.
Even if I granted your premise here (and I don't), Trump and
. He needs to be in a hospital, not in the Oval Office. (Preferably a prison hospital.)
Because he’s is funny, I’d vote trump.
Biden can barely read from teleprompter.
My dude, have you heard Trump speak lately? The thinks he ran against Obama in 2016, that Obama is Joe Biden's boss, that Jeb Bush got us into Iraq, and that World War 2 hasn't happened yet. My point is, if you're going to try and use the "Biden is senile" talking point, every single criticism also applies to Trump. Trump is only 4 years younger than Biden, which would make him exactly as old as Biden was when he started his first term. Not exactly the picture of youth or virility.
Look - election system is really lame in US, you gotta vote for 2 oligarchic parties that dont care about you and force candidates down our throats. The choices given are just unhealthy - but us system is what created these choice.
A wise man once told me "Never let perfect be the enemy of good.". I understand the apathy of never feeling like you are represented by the leaders you vote for, but the perfect candidate will probably never come around in your lifetime and you will always have to settle for what you've been dealt. If you sit down and evaluate the candidates rationally, the choice is obvious. There's an absolute mountain of achievements Biden has raked in during his first term. Trump, not so much. Plus the whole attempted coup thing should make anybody think twice about giving Trump a second term, full stop.
Our best hope is that Biden dies of old age before electiins so we can have a new candidate
Who would you vote for, if you had your choice of candidates? Because I can tell you that if your answer isn't "Kamala Harris", you're going to be suuuuper disappointed if Biden does actually die in office.
Best hope is that both of them die before the elections, all the traitors in the government who supported Trump's bold-faced coup get put up against the wall, and we implement ranked-choice voting. None of that is going to happen, so the best we can hope for is putting trump's ass in a orange jumpsuit made for someone who is actually 6'9 and 215lbs before the election.
Seems like he is calling for his supporters to swarm polling stations and scare away anyone who looks like a Democrat. He is counting on violence or the threat of it to give him a win.
He's calling for a coup. And not subtly.
I think it's going to end up like how he discouraged mail in voting. The real crazies live in red areas, they are going to scare their own voters away.
I really hope you are right.
Let's game this out the way some of the comments are saying.
Scenario 1: Proud Boys and other right wing militant groups stand around polling places with open carry weapons to intimidate Democrat-leaning districts. Maybe it doesn't chase everyone away, but we know a lot of election officials are complaining about threats and have quit. So it's going to have some effect. Enough to swing the vote? I don't think that matters. It's still election interference.
Scenario 2: right wing militants show up, and so do various antifa groups to counter them. Maybe antifa show up armed, maybe not. Either way, it's an escalation. Escalating tensions with guns present significantly increases the chances that someone uses their gun, regardless of who shoots first. The first shots in a civil war? Then the right wing militants win, because they've been agitating for this for years. Who wins is immaterial to the millions of people who will suffer as a result.
Scenario 3: polling places are reinforced with police and National Guards as necessary to prevent any election interference. They can be present to "observe" but they're not allowed to intimidate anyone. This is the only scenario I can see where democracy is defended and preserved.
Agree or disagree? What am I missing? Where am I wrong?
You're missing that the police etc and the proud boys etc are the same group.
Nah, he's missing: 4. The Fat Boys only show up in red counties, having no impact whatsoever. They pass out drunk in the parking lot of the voting locations and their wives and kids have a quiet night to themselves.
They forget to vote. They don't intimidate anyone because the few liberals who live there voted early. They later complain it was "rigged".
all kinds of people vote by mail including Donald Trump
All of them? Curious.
A few bad apples spoil the bunch, homie.
Sure, ACAB. But that doesn't mean every cop who shows up to keep the peace at polling stations will enable right wing violence. Especially not with the press watching.
I mean it doesn't matter because it's election interference that will happen again and again because we don't seem to have the political will to stop it. Unless we get Scenario 3.
I think he thinks he'll lose, and he thinks a big loss is actually less believable to his supporters than a close loss, so he's trying to create a big loss, which will make more of his supporters Jan 6 2.0.
I'm not following that logic. If he tells everyone not to vote, and most comply meaning only a few vote, wouldn't the majority of them who didn't vote see the low results and understand that it would be the natural outcome? Where do they think votes come from if they don't vote?
Logic: "he lost by a lot, it's wildly unlikely that it could be rigged by that much."
Emotion: "he lost by a lot, that's impossible, NOBODY I know voted for BRANDON, I love Trump so EVERYBODY loves Trump, IT WAS RIGGED!!1!"
Something, something, democrats, something, something, racist dog whistle, something, something, democrats, something, something, Hunter's Biden laptop, something, something.
I imagine when they look at the lines of voters they categorize people into two bins: normal and not-normal. Trump is asking his supporters to do a Rorschach test but citizens are the ink blots and he's specifically telling them to look for scary things. Their Conclusion: If you see lots of normal people and he loses the election, then it's because of those voters that didn't look normal were there to rig the system.
Yeah I’m ok with that. If you’re a trump supporter, dont worry about voting!
It's the part where he wants those same people to go out and intimidate or attack anyone not voting "correctly" (read: Republican).
Nah I’m ok with that too- make sure you wear your maga hat large and proud, no mask because you’re not a pussy, and say you’re name loud and clear into the cameras to assert your alpha male dominance. Insist how DJT told you it was ok. Make some loud and specific threats against government officials. Then kick back and wait for your all expense paid federal vacation!
The bitch about voter intimidation is that if they pull it off it won't matter that they're caught in the act. There's no mechanism to invalidate an election tainted by overt intimidation, so they can just do it then pardon themselves.
You're probably missing the fact that your ancestors haven't experienced centuries of systemic oppression due to the color of their skin.
There is a long, storied history of voter intimidation, and political violence against people of color, and their right to vote, in the US. This isn't happening in a fucking vacuum.
They don't want anyone in districts dominated by Democrats to vote. That's why they're so keen on voter ID laws and shut down DMVs and other public services in those areas. They usually assume anyone who looks like a minority is probably voting for Democrats and aren't likely to take them at their word.
So if you actually read the article, he’s effectively encouraging his supporters to engage in active voting interference.
Sounds like a solid campaign to me.
I wonder if he was just doing the Costco greeting from Idiocracy
“So, we have to be careful. You got to get out there and watch those voters,” Trump said, adding, “You don’t have to vote, don’t worry about voting. The voting, we got plenty of votes.”
He's saying that he's going to win by force. And he probably will. It's over.
It isn’t over until it’s over. If I have to face armed gunmen to vote I will. People in other countries are brave enough to do it, I can be too.
Yeah, I'm a bit concerned about that myself. I live in a red state, but a blue city that is 43% black. They have arcane voting laws that force you to stand in line for hours. I can definitely imagine a scenario where long voting lines in the city are attacked by white nationalist gunmen, and all the law-abiding unarmed voters are defenseless. This won't stop me from voting or having my long gun in the truck, but it is something I've been concerned about.
@spaceghoti hit the high points. The presumptive nominee for President of the United States for one of two major parties is openly fascist, with exactly zero consequences. He has a lot of people on his side, many of whom are already in positions of power in government, in all three branches, and in the press.
There have been plenty of opportunities for consequences to be laid upon these people who are still working to overthrow the foundations of democracy. None have been laid. None. I have zero faith in the ability of a democratic government to be able to put down this fascism.
Are you a trump shill?
You are free to browse my comment history to make your own judgment on that. Or go fuck yourself, your choice.
You forgot the "or ... your choice" part.
We will disagree until at least powerful fascists see real consequences. This very post is about Trump telling his followers to go strongarm polling places, voters, and election workers. And they will. They've already made life hell for some election workers. They've already been threatening House members over the Speaker votes.
It's getting worse, not better. It will continue to get worse. A lot worse. More people will die, and as yet, the people who are fomenting terrorism with their speech are not being held accountable at all.
They're saying democracy in the US is over. The slow walk of prosecutions against the Jan. 6th insurgents, particularly its organizers, has given the fascists the confidence to do it again at a national level. We'll either have to fight back with equal violence, flee, or submit to their dictatorship.
The slow walk of prosecutions against the Jan. 6th insurgents
A sane legal system takes time. While I agree the organizers have mostly gotten off scott-free, it's because they know how to keep themselves in the grey area even knowing full-well how the uneducated, violent people will react to their messages. The rubes have gotten hard time and I feel potential rubes have taken some notice. They'll still play the victim all day, but they seem less hesitant to join calls to action.
It didn't help that America's top cop (AG Merrick Garland) deliberately held back on the investigations. It's not just my opinion. Multiple observers came to the same conclusion.
they seem less hesitant to join calls to action.
I'm hoping you mean "more hesitant".
Nope. Don’t vote. Show up with guns and attempt to steal it.
Like they proved in court dozens of times since 2020?
You're in a cult, get educated, snap out of it
Nah, they're just a downvote troll. Look at their history. Account created yesterday and already at -522 comment karma. This is why reddit ended up capping downvotes at -100 because idiots like that person used to love to make a game out of seeing who could get the most downvotes.
Instead, hiding the downvotes makes troll comments look reasonable and even popular as they brigade a community to upvote their narrative. The average user has no way to combat or discourage it.
just a bunch of stupid fucking trolls, aren't you.. idiot children..
The PCM Nazis made their way to the fediverse.
RemindMe - 13 months. :)
I'm not going to say Trump has NO path to victory, he does, but it won't be a landslide. There are also a growing number of paths that would take him out of the race before the election even happens.
Edit Pretending Trump has no path is partly how he won in 2016. No vote can be taken for granted.
Imagine being such a sycophantic cuck that you are willing to publicly argue that some fuck, who wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire on the side of the road, is going to win in a landslide after already losing the popular vote twice.
Especially on a post where that same dumbshit just told the rest of your cult members not to vote, and you all hang on his every word like it's water in the fucking desert. I'd say this was a joke, but there ain't nothing funny about it.
I'm sure you thought whatever that is supposed to mean was very clever.
It's really funny. All those power phrases and one-upmanship games played by Trumpetts are like people who roll coal or drive loud muscle cars - people waving around their tiny-dick-insecurity energy for everyone to see, somehow convinced they're hiding anything.
Or all those conservatives obsessed with which consenting adult another consenting adult is sleeping with. Though there I'm pretty sure it's just repressed jealousy because I can't imagine giving that much of a fuck about an issue that I wasn't deeply personally invested in.
Oh do tell us more.
Why are we enabling and feeding trolls?
This isn't reddit, where the interface hides comments with too many downvotes.
Being unpopular doesn't go against the rules.
@lemmy.world
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
go to feed...
@lemmy.world
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
go to feed...
I hate this timeline so much.
save