"Pilot had to dive aggressively to avoid midair collision over Burbank airport."

a year ago by Gates9 to c/lemmyshitpost

xkbx 189 points a year ago

Finally, the freedom to have sick plane crashes thanks to deregulation ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿฆ…๐Ÿฆ…๐Ÿฆ…๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ

path: 0 18445358, hotness: undefined, score: 189, children: 5
WolfmanEightySix 11 points a year ago

Well it cost money and held yous back.

/s โ€ฆJustin Case.

path: 0 18445358 18449759, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
Rivalarrival 7 points a year ago

Just to put this into perspective, here's a visualization of the flight data. The two aircraft were never on a collision course. They slightly violated a 5-mile separation requirement: their closest point of approach was 4.85 miles. The pilot did need to respond to the TCAS alert, but that alert was very conservative.

path: 0 18445358 18457171, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 3
neatchee 8 points a year ago

These conservative warnings exist for a reason, though. That being hundreds of lives at stake. What I think would be more interesting is to hear how often these types of events occurred before and after the layoffs at the FAA

path: 0 18445358 18457171 18460901, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 2
Rivalarrival 4 points a year ago

Agreed. The point of a conservative warning is to give plenty of time and opportunity to react without bouncing your passengers off the ceiling.

Fault for the loss of separation seems to be on the controllers. Not all separation incidents are the same, though. This one seems to be rather minor. By my estimation, the encroachment was a maximum of 264 yards, and the duration of that encroachment (without pilot or controller intervention) would have been less than 10 seconds. Too tight, yes. It needs addressed so it doesn't become a habitual violation that could lead to more severe encroachment by these controllers. But there was no real danger of bodily harm from this encroachment.

Fault for an overly aggressive maneuver is on the pilot. There was a risk of injury from that overly aggressive response. The pilot's actions elevated a minor, no-risk event to one that risked serious injury to the passengers and crew. But, he was following instructions from a device designed to improve aviation safety, and the nature of the warnings from that device, an over-response is much safer than an under-response. He has to trust his instruments, and his instruments (erroneously) told him to push the nose down, quickly, lest he hit another plane.

TCAS is designed and intended to reduce risk and prevent harm. In this specific incident, though, it seems like the TCAS-RA actually increased the risk of harm, by calling for an immediate action that wasn't actually necessary to prevent harm. Is there a way to improve TCAS?

I, too, would like to know how often TCAS incidents were recorded before and after the layoffs. Those layoffs definitely harmed aviation safety. But if someone were injured in this incident, I don't think I could point the finger at the controllers or lack thereof. This particular incident seems to suggest a shortcoming in the TCAS system.

path: 0 18445358 18457171 18460901 18463503, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
neatchee 2 points a year ago

Very thoughtful and informed reply. Thank you for sharing your knowledge!

path: 0 18445358 18457171 18460901 18463503 18465067, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
slaacaa 138 points a year ago

This is very dangerous. Time to remove regulations for collision warning systems on airplanes, so dangerous maneuvers like this donโ€™t happen in the future

Tap for spoiler

/s

path: 0 18448210, hotness: undefined, score: 138, children: 2
CatDogL0ver 5 points a year ago

Yeah, just let the pilots fly Tony Hawk freestyle. Time to get creative!

path: 0 18448210 18455767, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
MisterD 1 point a year ago

Time a different kind of fireworks.

The kind that only happens near airports. Hopefully, some of the billionaires who wanted this shit will be part of the fireworks

path: 0 18448210 18461582, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
callouscomic 135 points a year ago

Is gutting the federal government working yet? Is the swamp drained? Is the winning complete? Are my bigoted piece of shit nazi flag flying neighbors satisfied yet?

path: 0 18449097, hotness: undefined, score: 135, children: 6
Screamium 10 points a year ago

It's working for Russia

path: 0 18449097 18451442, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 2
Tuuktuuk 6 points a year ago

Uh, what? Something like 80 % of their economy is now government spending.

path: 0 18449097 18451442 18455759, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
Screamium 4 points a year ago

I meant getting Trump elected to sow discord and chaos in the US has allowed Russia to continue their war while facing fewer repercussions

path: 0 18449097 18451442 18455759 18467549, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
CatDogL0ver 3 points a year ago

Exactly. I don't say those things at work anymore because they are too many of them.

I can't help wondering if they are remorseful.

One thing I know is people don't like to be told. I stop correcting them. The more we point out their flaws, the more irrationally they will hold on to the false beliefs

path: 0 18449097 18455753, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
papertowels 10 points a year ago

A fascinating theory I read is that MAGA is making a big deal out of Epstein because it provides an off-ramp that lets them save face.

Legit I'm like "bruh, you're upset that your billionaire 'grab em by the pussy', 'accidentally' walking into the miss teen usa changing room, 'I'd fuck my daughter if she wasn't my daughter' president is on a list of billionaire sexual predators? I'm glad that something finally looks like it might stick to him but c'mon guys.

path: 0 18449097 18455753 18456241, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
SGforce 3 points a year ago

They will instead irrationality believe that it's working in their favour and be emboldened. They didn't reach their position by being rational. Don't let a bully tell you that you deserved it after he punches you in the face.

path: 0 18449097 18455753 18457513, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
notsure 91 points a year ago

...should we hire more tower administators, and look into the epstein files?....

path: 0 18446152, hotness: undefined, score: 91, children: 9
outhouseperilous 43 points a year ago

Nah, let's cut them and burn the evidence!

path: 0 18446152 18446589, hotness: undefined, score: 43, children: 8
Whostosay 11 points a year ago

Well hold up. I wasn't on that plane so actually yeah you're right.

path: 0 18446152 18446589 18447789, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 7
outhouseperilous 4 points a year ago

See!

path: 0 18446152 18446589 18447789 18448331, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 6
Whostosay 4 points a year ago

Empathy hard

path: 0 18446152 18446589 18447789 18448331 18448354, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 5
CatDogL0ver 72 points a year ago

Remind us who cut funding to FAA?

path: 0 18455727, hotness: undefined, score: 72, children: 10
bigkahuna1986 85 points a year ago

This is Joe Biden s fault. I don't mean he cut funding or anything like that, I mean he was literally flying the other plane. It was full of woke trans immigrants headed to Texas so Democrats can get more votes while simultaneously rigging the election.

path: 0 18455727 18457655, hotness: undefined, score: 85, children: 7
thermal_shock 27 points a year ago

Obama was copilot? Smoking crack in the back in his tan suit? With Dijon mustard?

path: 0 18455727 18457655 18457767, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 5
Alaik 14 points a year ago

Smoking the mustard and putting crack on the hotdog.

path: 0 18455727 18457655 18457767 18458876, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 4
thermal_shock 4 points a year ago

hotdog

why you gotta bring hulk hogan's skin into this?

path: 0 18455727 18457655 18457767 18458876 18459015, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 3
Dozzi92 9 points a year ago

Your response here is an excellent example of shitposting. You are the new moderator. Keep up the shitty work.

path: 0 18455727 18457655 18461917, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
burgerpocalyse 9 points a year ago
path: 0 18455727 18456178, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
theneverfox 3 points a year ago

Which time? In January or in Trump's last term?

path: 0 18455727 18456550, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
zelahdieliekeis 69 points a year ago

Fuck Jimmy Dore, he turned against the queers. Last I saw a video of him interviewing with some bad-faith transmedicalist harassing people at pride acting all innocent like "I'm just asking questions" - his loud mouth was good as 2016 was going down but of course loudmouths don't always know when to shut it.

path: 0 18447051, hotness: undefined, score: 69, children: 6
PolydoreSmith 25 points a year ago

Yeah Jimmy Dore fucks around with Alex Jones. They can both go to hell

path: 0 18447051 18447436, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 2
ZMonster 3 points a year ago

It just blows me away how many people are just responding to this without addressing it...

path: 0 18447051 18447436 18449134, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
rob_t_firefly 6 points a year ago path: 0 18447051 18447436 18449134 18452372, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
prole 8 points a year ago

He's always been a grifter

path: 0 18447051 18449637, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
BenLeMan 3 points a year ago

That's why I stopped watching him in 2017.

path: 0 18447051 18447498, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Gates9 2 points a year ago

Yeah Iโ€™m not a fan but his being directly involved merits the exposure

path: 0 18447051 18454213, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
ImminentOrbit 54 points a year ago

This ain't no shitpost.

path: 0 18456464, hotness: undefined, score: 54, children: 2
TeddE 9 points a year ago

You're right, but I don't think The Internet cares.

path: 0 18456464 18457152, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
ivanafterall 2 points a year ago

You have to admit it'd be pretty shitty to run into another airplane in the sky though?

path: 0 18456464 18465281, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
umbrella 50 points a year ago
path: 0 18457931, hotness: undefined, score: 50, children: 3
D_C 23 points a year ago

Because everybody on the plane shit themselves.

path: 0 18457931 18459000, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 0
Gates9 0 points a year ago

Anything about Jimmy Dore is a shitpost but which sub or whatever is this more suitable for?

path: 0 18457931 18460853, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
Rivalarrival 0 points a year ago

https://youtu.be/VTAUMP2le3c

Without pilot intervention, the closest they would have come would have been 4.85 nautical miles laterally, and at the same altitude.

With the pilot intervention, the closest they came was 4.85 nautical miles laterally, and 500 feet vertically.

path: 0 18457931 18472770, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
blackouttripleseven 43 points a year ago

stuff like this is why i'm lowkey terrified of flying also this isn't a shitpost

path: 0 18460747, hotness: undefined, score: 43, children: 5
Hudell 20 points a year ago

So you'd rather stick to the ground, where you can't dive to avoid an oncoming vehicle?

path: 0 18460747 18463631, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 1
RichardDegenne 14 points a year ago

path: 0 18460747 18463631 18467889, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
Dozzi92 16 points a year ago

Yeah, shitpost needs some better moderation. Shitpost has literally just become post whatever you want. And if that's what it is, I guess that's what it is, but the term "shitpost" to me had always been someone coming and derailing serious threads with nonsense opinions, unrelated pics, etc. So silly trolling.

This post is a picture of a tweet about a near mid-air collision. Unless the second plane was just fucking around, shitflying as they say, I don't know that it qualifies for the low, low bar that is shitposting.

path: 0 18460747 18461909, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
mlegstrong 6 points a year ago

I can assure you some pants were shit on that flight

path: 0 18460747 18460763, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
OrteilGenou 3 points a year ago

Shitpantsing then

path: 0 18460747 18460763 18470313, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
RememberTheApollo_ 42 points a year ago

Put your fking seatbelts on. All the time.

path: 0 18459025, hotness: undefined, score: 42, children: 0
apftwb 35 points a year ago

TCAS is working overtime to make up for the years of neglecting the FAA.

path: 0 18450102, hotness: undefined, score: 35, children: 0
SpermHowitzer 29 points a year ago

TCAS warnings initially come up about 90 seconds before a potential collision, and a resolution advisory comes up about 60 seconds before a collision. A resolution advisory is obviously a serious situation, but itโ€™s early enough that the climb or descent commands are really not anything crazy, not anything outside a normal climb or descent. No one should be hitting the ceiling if a tcas resolution is flown properly.

path: 0 18447417, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 6
Skunk 19 points a year ago

Once the flight smoothed out, Ulasewicz, who was traveling to Las Vegas, said the pilot made an announcement indicating the plane used software to avoid a midair collision.

Apparently it was right before catering service and well into AP flight. As a europoor I only master Airbus so I donโ€™t know how a 737 is supposed to respond to a TA/RA.

Letโ€™s wait for better sources than twitter and nbc.

path: 0 18447417 18448055, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 5
RaivoKulli 10 points a year ago

Do we have two pilots in here

path: 0 18447417 18448055 18448185, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
SpermHowitzer 2 points a year ago

The 737 wonโ€™t fly an RA on autopilot. We have to disconnect the autopilot and auto throttle and hand fly it. Thereโ€™ll be a red box on the PFD that we just keep the pitch outside of, and weโ€™ll be fine.

path: 0 18447417 18448055 18457096, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
Skunk 2 points a year ago

Ok, I just looked at the737-NG PFD RA and it looks different from what I know but I wasnโ€™t aware that you had to hand fly it.

As the aircraft was climbing and with the yoke I guess itโ€™s easy to push it a bit too hard and spill some coffee.

path: 0 18447417 18448055 18457096 18457300, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
DragonTypeWyvern 1 point a year ago path: 0 18447417 18448055 18456559, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Skunk 2 points a year ago path: 0 18447417 18448055 18456559 18456645, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
exu 28 points a year ago

And that's why you always wear the seatbelt

path: 0 18447236, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 1
TheGoldenV 4 points a year ago

Thatโ€™s right. Thatโ€™s why I always wear mine. Even if I have to get up to go to the bathroom or grab something- I still wear it. Sometimes the flight attendants get mad when I cut it off, but I remind them itโ€™s for safety and they usually get it.

path: 0 18447236 18456543, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
normalexit 23 points a year ago

Sitting in an airport right now. Great.

path: 0 18449468, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 4
Agent641 28 points a year ago

Can I have your computer if you die?

path: 0 18449468 18449750, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 3
normalexit 7 points a year ago

I won't be using them, ha.

path: 0 18449468 18449750 18450162, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2
AugustWest 4 points a year ago

Well? Does u/Agent641 get the computer?

path: 0 18449468 18449750 18450162 18455550, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
normalexit 2 points a year ago

I made it through. Maybe next time.

path: 0 18449468 18449750 18450162 18455550 18463254, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Cerothen 19 points a year ago path: 0 18446257, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 1
Korne127 3 points a year ago

I was hoping itโ€™s this and it was!

path: 0 18446257 18448939, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Sergio 17 points a year ago path: 0 18445632, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
other_cat 16 points a year ago

And this is why I don't fly anymore. It was never an enjoyable experience (except takeoff. Wee!!) and now it's even less worth it.

Now I find myself having a depressed opinion on the lack of train options.

path: 0 18454125, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
DesolateMood 14 points a year ago

Don't planes have seatbelts? How did so many people manage to fly out of their seats?

Also friendly reminder to everybody that planes are still the safest mode of transportation by a significant margin

path: 0 18455651, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 33
shane 46 points a year ago

Planes are the safest form of transportation if you look at safety per km travelled. If you look at other metrics, like safety per trip or per travel time then they are less safe than busses or trains.

https://travel.stackexchange.com/a/184330

path: 0 18455651 18456308, hotness: undefined, score: 46, children: 7
mic_check_one_two 6 points a year ago

Last time I posted something about this, it was downvoted to oblivion. Glad to see that didnโ€™t happen here. There are some statistical quirks that make this obvious once you think about it though.

Planes tend to make long trips, so anything measured on a per-km basis is going to be wildly diluted. Nobody is taking a plane to travel a few blocks. Something like a car will tend to make much shorter (but more frequent) trips, so the per-km stat wonโ€™t be diluted. But inversely, the per-trip stat will be diluted with cars, purely because theyโ€™re used much more often.

path: 0 18455651 18456308 18460188, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Dozzi92 3 points a year ago

As with all statistics, you can make the numbers say what we you want. Planes can carry 500+ people, so an incident risks all 500 of those passengers; similar for rail, but not so much for the bus. And I think about bus and there's two different kinds of buses, IMO, the inner city bus that's on the road for hours, but doing few miles while making frequent stops. Not sure what a journey is then, whether it's stop by stop or from start to finish. And there's

So yeah, I dunno. If it's your time it's your time. I don't think any of these means of travel are "unsafe," whatever that means. But I'll still have a couple of beers before I get on the plane, because I'm not afraid of flying, but having a couple beers beforehand makes it better.

path: 0 18455651 18456308 18462075, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
ivanafterall 1 point a year ago

Iโ€™ll still have a couple of beers before I get on the plane, because Iโ€™m not afraid of flying..

Have to admit this is kind of funny.

path: 0 18455651 18456308 18462075 18465341, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
uriel238 2 points a year ago

Bus and Rail rules.

Motorcycles are for the young who don't want to get old.

path: 0 18455651 18456308 18460716, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
burntbacon 1 point a year ago

Everyone wants to shit on motorcycles, but it's as much a red herring as a meaningful statement. You might as well mention that horse riding is 25x more dangerous than motorcycles. And if you really want to get into the weeds, go look up how many motorcycle fatalities are single vehicle accidents, and how many of those are due to speeding or alcohol involvement. So if you don't drink, and don't act like a fool, you're really not all that badly off. Still worse than being in a steel cage for protection, but it's not only for people "who don't want to get old."

path: 0 18455651 18456308 18460716 18463805, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
uriel238 2 points a year ago

I was commenting on the vast difference in the statistical numbers. I have no doubt there are lots of steps that can be taken to decrease the risk of shortened lifespan.

But yes, we can safely engage in high-risk behavior (or in some instances like air racing pilots, come to terms that they will likely -- and preferably -- end their lives explosively and spectacularly). And then there's how James Cameron does super-deep submersible exploration vs. Stockton Rush.

My mother would not only climb up rock faces and summit mountains all over the Sierra Nevadas (and later in other parts of the world) but would lug twenty five pounds of old-school photography gear to show she did it and take pics of the astounding vistas. As a kid I went along with her sometimes, and encountered a few two many poison oak pushes, mosquito swarms, and stories about lost bits due to frostbite. I Belong To The City now (I belong to the night).

path: 0 18455651 18456308 18460716 18463805 18475969, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
SharkAttak 1 point a year ago

Planes have nonetheless huge advantages over the others, like if you have to travel hundreds of km, or across the ocean. Cruising through the Atlantic in a Greyhound would be wild, though.

path: 0 18455651 18456308 18468582, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Marleyinoc 8 points a year ago

It sure feels like that margin has been shrinking in the last year or so.

path: 0 18455651 18456163, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
Dozzi92 2 points a year ago

So I don't know how true it is (or isn't). This wiki article gives a list of "all newsworthy" incidents since 2023. Got two (now three) this year. Five last year. Ten in 2023. But newsworthy is the key word. We have an incident like we did in DC, and in the immediate wake of it there were news reports just about anytime someone sneezed on an airplane (hyperbole).

I'll tell you, my eye test and feelings agree with you, but I just don't know how true it is. And it's hard to avoid getting political, but there is a vested interest in certain news circles to paint a bleak picture (don't take this wrong, I'm in favor of funding government agencies).

So yeah, fuck it, you know?

path: 0 18455651 18456163 18462146, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
AeonFelis -3 points a year ago

They have seatbelts, but for the most of the flight they are unused - you only need to buckle in during takeoff, landing, and if when encountering turbulence.

I guess there wasn't enough time to get all the passengers to fasten their seatbelts before the collision?

path: 0 18455651 18455921, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 22
18107 15 points a year ago

I wonder if you've ever listened to the part of the safety briefing before every flight where they instruct you to keep the seatbelt fastened throughout the entire flight.

Judging by the number of clicks I hear when the seatbelt light turns off, I'd say most people don't.

path: 0 18455651 18455921 18457938, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
rollerbang 14 points a year ago

Where I fly they also always advise to remain fastener regardless of no immediate warnigs. Exactly for situations like this - and others.

path: 0 18455651 18455921 18455985, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 19
theneverfox 2 points a year ago

Yeah, but people are still going to be using the bathrooms and such, even if you assume everyone actually obeys the rules

path: 0 18455651 18455921 18455985 18456192, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 18
dev_null 3 points a year ago

Of course, but it should be the 2-4 people who are actively going somewhere / in the bathroom, everyone else should have their seatbelt on.

path: 0 18455651 18455921 18455985 18456192 18456975, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 12
ivanafterall 3 points a year ago

Pour one out for the poor fella who finally got his turn to poop just before this happened.

path: 0 18455651 18455921 18455985 18456192 18465361, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
yamper 1 point a year ago

because of a few exception cases this is never going to work

path: 0 18455651 18455921 18455985 18456192 18461365, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
stoly 13 points a year ago

You should always have the belt on unless you are standing up for some reason. This story is exactly why.

path: 0 18455651 18455921 18456879, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
Ele7en7 13 points a year ago

If only there were a device to keep you in your seat when something like this happens

path: 0 18471375, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
fubarx 12 points a year ago path: 0 18446831, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
Rivalarrival 2 points a year ago path: 0 18446831 18457186, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
nul9o9 6 points a year ago

I'm flying out of Burbank Monday ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

path: 0 18458099, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
GreenKnight23 4 points a year ago

keep your seatbelt on or that might be true more ways than one.

path: 0 18458099 18459477, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Dozzi92 2 points a year ago

It's cool, this was their incident, so clock reset. Can't happen twice in so short a span, no way!

path: 0 18458099 18461924, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
WanderingThoughts 5 points a year ago

And the same thing happened in Minot, North Dakota not even a week ago.

path: 0 18447199, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Auntievenim 5 points a year ago

Damn

We almost got rid of Jimmy dore

path: 0 18470982, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Phegan 2 points a year ago
path: 0 18461127, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
lemmyshitpost
lemmyshitpost

@lemmy.world

login for more options
40442
26948
14521

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful

Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content

Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam

Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/Explicit

Content


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,

Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

go to feed...