I think also rich people need to have poor people otherwise they won't be seen to be rich. Also wealth = power
Supermarkets destroy food if it doesn't sell. We can always feed the world. We just don't.
3 days ago by VetOfTheSeas to c/workreform
I think also rich people need to have poor people otherwise they won't be seen to be rich. Also wealth = power
you make a good point, but i think of "rich people" as the families who have been unimaginably wealthy for hundreds of years. not musk, not bezos, bill gates, etc. the "old money" doesn't care if you know they're rich--in fact they would prefer you didn't. they just want to control the trajectory of your life in order to keep you in your place, and prevent you from encroaching on their position of power.
think warburgs and rothschilds, not the idiotic rich people flaunting their wealth on twitter
i mean, fuck musk and bezos and all the rest too. call me a conspiracy theorist, but i'm skeptical of the notion that these people are actually the "richest" of all rich people
While raising their children, Bill Sr. and Mary instilled in them a strong work ethic, the importance of community and the significance of helping others.
https://people.com/...
that could all be a lie of course, who knows...
yes, bill gates's parents were loaded. i'm talking about families that have been too wealthy to measure for many many generations, since banking was invented
desire or ability to control people’s lives
no. the desire is there. and in some cases the ability too.
but they are still muppets, controlled by people more powerful than they are. the fact that elon musk, the "richest man in the world" doesn't get everything he wants should tell you something.
you need to change your mindset away from thinking people like elon musk are the top of the food chain. he's fucking not.
Yeah but that's the power part though
money and power are intimately connected, but they are not the same thing
Yeah. A rich person can't exist when no-one's poor.
A lot of that "destroyed food" is animals who lived their entire lives in tiny, filthy cages just so that they could be killed and rot in a plastic bag.
I mean the cow probably doesn't care if you needlessly killed it to throw away the meat or to eat it.. both are unnecessary and both result in the same outcome for the cow. Both are also destroying the planet. "Predator/prey" is a great appeal to nature that I am sure many people use to justify themselves lazily shuffling through Walmart to throw frozen burgers into their cart.
i mean lots of wolves, lions etc only eat half the sheep ... have you ever seen a half-eaten sheep? i have
Not even, there's no biological need to eat animals or what they produce. We've established that much. It's just a choice, a preference, a form of cruelty ("I don't need to eat you, but I will chose to do so because it pleases me, now suffer and die without bothering me"). Throwing their corpses to waste is just the cherry on top.
Based on our growth as a species/taking over ecosystems, if certain animal populations in the wild aren't culled (have a certain number of their population killed), it will be bad for the local ecosystem.
There are arguments that allowing animals to do this, instead of humans, will not always guarantee the impact we want, either.
(Fun wolves in Yellowstone video in case you like video essays and want to go off on this tangent: https://youtu.be/Y9sQdMrEX2g )
Personally: I don't hunt and I rarely buy meat, but I still eat it from time to time and am upset when it goes to waste. I don't like the idea of a factory farm, but "here we are."
Final thought: the best way to decrease meat consumption is to make the alternatives easy to prepare and alluring to more of the population.
Final thought: the best way to decrease meat consumption is to make the alternatives easy to prepare and alluring to more of the population.
I learned long ago that ethics won't win out. It comes down to cost and convenience. Alternatives need to be cheap and easy.
Based on our growth as a species/taking over ecosystems, if certain animal populations in the wild aren’t culled (have a certain number of their population killed), it will be bad for the local ecosystem.
This isn't relevant to farmed animals. Farmed animals can't overpopulate because we are the ones controlling their population.
I think unethical farming is present in every large system, no?
Yes. This isn't a "capitalism" problem, this is a "see animals as products" problem.
It's two different problems. We started seeing animals as beings fairly recently, and the movement to actually not make them suffer is fairly new. In previous generations the reason we didn't do it properly was mainly "we don't want to", now enough of us do want it, and profit driven reality prevents it.
The same can be said for it all. Big grocery is a cancer. But so are over priced farm to table country stores. We need pricing to make sense because in the end we all lose.
I do a lot of big events at big convention hotels, and you would be shocked at how much amazing food they throw out. I know you think you know, but trust me you have no idea.
Big events are irregular things with hot, fresh food, so it doesn't surprise me. It would be nice if the food could go to a food bank, but that one would be a logistical nightmare compared sending a regular, but small amount of baked goods from a local grocery store to a local food bank.
Impossible. There's no way you could possibly imagine it.
I once saw a hotel throw out at least a dozen delicious pork roasts (I grabbed a couple before), 2 entire queens of key lime pies, and too much of everything else to quantify. It was a massive banquet for 2000+, and they made lots more food than they needed.
These events are not "irregular things," as one poster put it. That was only one banquet, on one night, in one hotel. I am in one of the major convention cities, and banquets like that go on EVERY night, in multiple hotels. Some hotels are hosting multiple conventions at a time, AND multiple large companies attending those conventions, as well as their Local Social events like Weddings and Bar Mitzvahs. The food waste is mind-boggling.
One of the favorite things I watch for is cheese. As we're leaving, I always take a stroll past the dishwashing room, where there are always queens (rolling racks) lined up full of dirty dishes. I guarantee that on one of those queens is the cheese tray that was on the buffet, and it will contain four or five multi-POUND blocks of barely touched, expensive cheese that is going to go straight into the trash. I can usually grab a block of cheddar, blue cheese, Swiss, maybe a couple more. I probably take home $1000 in free cheese every year.
I understand that they have to carefully monitor the food safety protocols, but I don't know why vans from food banks can't be waiting at the hotels at 9 pm at night, to collect any leftover food, and rush it back to refrigeration, to be reheated and served the next day.
Or even that night. I'm sure hungry homeless people wouldn't mind waiting until 10 pm to eat, if it meant a feast like pork roast mashed potatoes, and key lime pie.
The fact that at this time in history we have the world's first trillionaire and we padlock the dumpsters we throw food away into is a disgrace. The future will not look kindly on us that we let this stand
We live in an absolutely disgusting world.
The world is full of the most beauty, I watched a heron fish in a pond earlier, the air and shade were perfect, it was majestic. It's just the handful of absolute assholes making it all suck so much.
I recently went to the store to buy some pastries before closing—you can already know where I'm going with this. The pastry cupboard was empty so I went to check the lady who cleans them out. They were all in three big boxes stacked on top of each other, filled with soon to be thrown pastries. I took two and paid full price, knowing how ridiculous this is in contrast with the rest having been thrown in the trash 10 minutes later. I'd much rather go a day or two without food knowing that nothing gets wasted and no one goes hungry than what shameful consumerist nonsense we have now.
To my shame I worked at a supermarket bakery in my early 20s I would empty all the bulk bins into a garbage bin and into the dumpster every night. I complained multiple times that it could be bagged and donated, they relented and let me pack up expired prebagged breads to a shelter but never the bulk stuff.
I would at least eat as much as I could as I threw it out but there was only so much I could do.
it's probably wise not to patronize places like that if possible.
I totally agree, but not with its feasibility. Wouldn't this only be possible in a non-globalized world with far fewer humans where everyone could grow their own food and be self-sufficient within their communities? I'm pretty sure I can't get my lentils locally. Similar reasoning my other foodstuff; waste is pretty much the standard. Or I'm just making excuses because I've grown accustomed to the convenience of getting all my stuff in one place.
The works of the roots of the vines, of the trees, must be destroyed to keep up the price, and this is the saddest, bitterest thing of all. Carloads of oranges dumped on the ground. The people came for miles to take the fruit, but this could not be. How would they buy oranges at twenty cents a dozen if they could drive out and pick them up? And men with hoses squirt kerosene on the oranges, and they are angry at the crime, angry at the people who have come to take the fruit. A million people hungry, needing the fruit- and kerosene sprayed over the golden mountains. And the smell of rot fills the country. Burn coffee for fuel in the ships. Burn corn to keep warm, it makes a hot fire. Dump potatoes in the rivers and place guards along the banks to keep the hungry people from fishing them out. Slaughter the pigs and bury them, and let the putrescence drip down into the earth.
There is a crime here that goes beyond denunciation. There is a sorrow here that weeping cannot symbolize. There is a failure here that topples all our success. The fertile earth, the straight tree rows, the sturdy trunks, and the ripe fruit. And children dying of pellagra must die because a profit cannot be taken from an orange. And coroners must fill in the certificate- died of malnutrition- because the food must rot, must be forced to rot. The people come with nets to fish for potatoes in the river, and the guards hold them back; they come in rattling cars to get the dumped oranges, but the kerosene is sprayed. And they stand still and watch the potatoes float by, listen to the screaming pigs being killed in a ditch and covered with quick-lime, watch the mountains of oranges slop down to a putrefying ooze; and in the eyes of the people there is the failure; and in the eyes of the hungry there is a growing wrath. In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage.
John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath
They need the poors to fight their wars and work on their factory floors.
And to focus on perceived races, while keeping women and queers in their places.
(I'm working on the last line, too long)
It seems to me that affordability starts with housing, because it is usually a household's single largest monthly expense. And it seems to me the best way to make housing more affordable is to make it non-profit. That doesn't necessarily mean city owned or other public housing, nor does it mean tax payer funded or subsidized housing, but having apartment buildings owned by a non-profit organization that charges tenants only enough rent to cover the organization's expenses without any extra going to an owner as profit. And the thing is, non-profit housing isn't only theoretical. It exists right now, but it's relatively rare. The reason is for-profit landlords don't want it because they can't compete.
Let's say you have two identical apartment buildings, but one is owned by a non-profit housing cooperative and the other is owned by a private landlord. The non-profit housing cooperative is going to have the same ongoing expenses (property management, maintenance, etc) as the private landlord, because the apartments are identical, but rent will be lower at the non-profit housing because they charge only enough rent to cover expenses whereas the private landlord charges rent to cover expenses plus some for his own personal profit.
yeah, in germany a few weeks ago the news made the headline that for-profit rent-out company vonovia makes 30c profit for every 1€ revenue. that's extreme. that means they're charging almost 50% more than they had to to operate at-cost.
also in vienna there's a lot of city-owned apartments and rents here are really affordable. sincerely, written from my 550€/month apartment (roughly $600/month)
also a huge roadblock to lower construction costs is unnecessary complex building codes, zoning laws, and again zoning laws.
There is also the rent-to-own option, which nearly no one uses. After paying the rent for X years, it's your house now - a portion of the rent went toward buying the place. It should be transferable to another person or paid out if needed.
That's how you generate generational wealth, even in lower-income situations.
Credit where credit is due.
I live in NYC and voted for him, but I honestly thought he'd be bogged down by an entrenched bureaucracy and not actually do much.
It was worth the price of admission just to see the Lesbian Fire Commissioner.
edit = The Fire Commissioner was an EMS Chief before getting promoted. Back in 1995 most of the front line EMS workers hated the idea of being pulled into the Fire Department. They liked being independent. It took a long time, but now the tail is wagging the dog.
You wouldn't last a minute at a lesbian fire.
Ten seconds, fifteen if I've just been in a previous fire. I'm bi-flammable btw.
You flamed out twice??
The self own? Those are rare.
Report To the Commissioner.
Underrated 1970s movie
Like they used to say on Reddit.
Pix or it didn't happen.
Oh they call me the fireman, cause baby that's my name...
It was worth the price of admission just to see the Lesbian Fire Commissioner.
Why? Is she building a series of canals to divert water for firefighting? Because that would be legit funny. Because it's a dike.
Happy pride month. I think/thought Lesbians took ownership of that term, stripped it if it's derogatory meaning... and I'm meaning it endearingly. Not like the F word. That's loaded with historical context and I wouldn't use that. That'd be like a white guy using the N-word endearingly...that's really just not possible. Exception for Bob Dillan in "Hurricane", of course. If I'm wrong please let me know.
I work returns in a Costco. In fact, I'm typing this on my phone in the little office we have in receiving.
Food either gets sold or gets pulled for various reasons. Pulled food goes first to the local food banks. What can't go to them goes to a farm, a local pet rescue group, and to a wildlife rescue and rehabilitation group.
Anything left over from all that goes into a bin to be turned into high grade compost, which gets sold for $5 for a 20lb bag.
It takes time and money to do this, and it gets done anyway because the will is there.

Me when there are Costcoposters
TBH though I love Costco. They actually pay their employees well, value their customers, and do things correctly. It's living proof that things could be different it's just a group of around 300 people set the incentive structures and propaganda used to program everyone and everything...
Well, before Costco I worked at Walmart. You can imagine the difference in environment
In my country I used to work at one of the largest supermarket chains and I was very pleasantly surprised to find that we donated any food that didn't sell to our local food bank called "Nourished For Nil" which would then take the ingredients and cook some meals and then you could go get a box of food from them once a week for free, no questions asked.
We have too good to go, it's an app where shops can sell stuff that is near end of life at a discount. Some shops are better than others, we spent £3.99 for a portion at a local bakery recently and got 2 huge bags of baked goods.
Food doesn't get wasted and it costs very little compared to it's regular value. There is also a charity that focuses on similar things but elitist cunts friends and family have said I can't go there because I am not starving. They make it sound like a food bank when it's a shop selling products cheaply - or it was, they closed recently. Wanted to go but heavy social pressure/judgement not to put me off..
Olio is a similar one that takes the food a bit before close, and distributes it to whoever can pick it up from their "food waste heroes" at no cost
Thanks. Just downloaded it. In my area it looks like mostly baked goods.
If I decide to pick up later I can get pizza.
I might have to not use this app. I kid.
If you know anyone else in your area that has used it ask them for recommendations. Some shops give stuff that is technically a deal in the sense that I paid £5 for £18 "worth" of produce but that is only because they sell a sandwich for £8.
Independent bakeries have been much better than chain coffee shops/cafes in our experience. Plus who doesn't want to support independent bakeries? Shame the butchers isn't on there, could do with a massive haul of surprise meat for when I plan to do a BBQ.
You mean like the president who literally called his voters stupid and does exactly the detrimental shit to the country he ran his campaign on? Yeah, I get the skepticism, lol.
Yes, yes and of we made everyone who makes 250k/yr pay 3865$/mo for ubi income of 1800$/mo for everyone in the country it would work out. It would take like 5 years for a solid treasury/trust to accumulate. It would be able to happen though.
I just woke up. I'm not even out of bed. Why you gotta make me sad before I've even put socks on???
He's trying to build out a changed Democratic Party in NYC. They way, even if he goes, there are others who will implement a better government.
Supermarkets destroy food if it doesn't sell. We can always feed the world. We just don't.
Somehow, I dyslexic speed-reading misread that at first as:
Supremacists destroy food if it doesn't sell. We can always feed the world. We just don't.

I've always called it first glance dyslexia
I worked at Panera bread (not a grocery store at all) in college and we would donate the leftover baked goods at the end of every night to a food pantry thing. Also they would let us take some home too. It was pretty nice.
I think they are some kind of regional franchise though so it could have just been ours
When I'm president, I'm going to spend every dicking dollar on education, so the masses understand that a single person doesn't make as much difference to 360M people as those 360M We the People do to themselves.
My twelfth grade English teacher told me the machines are broken, they just don't know they're broken, so the bigger machine made of machines grinds on. There's a scene in the matrix about this, how the average person is so dependent on the matrix they will fight to defend it.
What truly is possible to the human form? Society is 1776 updated to 2026. What if we just started fresh, what would we make and be then? Would it be 1776 2.0, or something else entirely? I think of democracy afforded in the modern day where only a republic was good enough before with the communication potential available then.
Who will not eat fresh produce. It takes a lot of work to prepare a healthy meal from scratch; with employers not giving us enough time and money to invest into healthy, tasty, varied meals, people resort to eating fast junk.
I don't think critics realize supermarkets need their millions to buy the next batches of food.
Heaven forbid right?
a few of the stores here, including both 'grocery' stores, do contribute close-dated and past-dated foodstuffs that isn't actually spoiled or bad to the local food pantry, who then distributes it to a huge line of people each week.
some weeks it's a pretty light box to pick up, but every now and then there will be a package of porterhouse or t-bones at the bottom of the box underneath all the "should've been eaten a week ago" produce.
Im in connecticut and my govenor is up for primary. He's done okay, but you can tell he is trying to compete with the younger fella up for the D primary. I hope the younger fella wins, but in the meantime 70ish old Lemont is trying to make headlines with "proposals" (nothings passed) that are based on policies that would benefit the working class.
I love to see the fear. I should write the old man and ask him to endorse his younger canidate. Near certain these guys just dont want to give up their comfortable positions of power due to some psycological desire.
We have a couple of services where I'm at now, where as food approaches its best before date, it goes into the app where you can order it at a discount and then go pick it up in store. If it can be frozen, they'll also freeze it to prolong its shelf life, like if it's fresh sausages that aren't selling.
I once got a large box of like 50 frozen burgers (frozen by default, not fresh to frozen) for like 80% off because they'd reached the best before on the box. They weren't freezer burned or anything like that, they were perfect.
A lot of places would have just thrown that out.
At least one local hypermarket does sell food at discounted price before they go off. Some poorer families rely on them.
Supermarkets should be able to write off the expenses (transportation, stagging, etc) related to donating soon-to-expire foods to food banks. And not just normal income deductions, but actual direct deductions from taxes. That is, if you spend $1000 loading and shipping expired food to the food bank, you pay $1,000 less in taxes.
Truly incentivize giving food to the poor.
It sounds great on the surface, but you just know there are total assholes out there who would exploit the system with artificially inflated shipping costs to the point where they're hardly paying tax at all. This, as is commonly said, is why we can't have nice things.
Yeah, there's solutions to this problem and the idea that all of them don't do this a failing of the store's management.
France had to pass a law that banned food getting thrown out that could be given away.
I also noticed that Costco started offering more prepared chicken foods after it became more well known that their cheap rotisserie chickens would fill dumpsters at the end of the day.
Fred Meyer (owned by Kroger) sells close dated food at half price. Produce with blemishes is set aside and sold in reduced price bundles. I am sure they still throw away plenty of food, but the reduced prices do seem to attract buyers (myself included). Some items just never make financial sense at the regular price, but half price? I'll take it.
Hypermarket? How does that compare to a supermarket?
This isn't always true. I was a volunteer at a Salvation Army food bank, and there would be crates upon crates upon crates of near expiry/day old bakery stuff/etc coming in from a local supermarket.
Don't get me wrong, it's not nearly enough. But there are some glimmers of hope within the rubble.
Not sure where you're coming from, other than I know they had some kind of negative reputation in the past, I think for anti-LGBTQ stuff?
Either way, once I was in there seeing what they were doing, I'm not going to throw any shade their way. Never once did I see religion being pushed on a single person, nor anyone turned away for any reason. Granted that is one particular food bank, I can't claim it represents the entire organization.
Here is a good list.
My dad grew up in the Army, my grandmother was part of it until her death in mid 00s. I saw how they treated the people they were helping, if you looked too nice for help you got none (I fit here when I was on the verge of homelessness in the late 90s, despite volunteering with my grandmother in years previous), if you looked too bad you got no help.
Their soup kitchen gave small portions and always had leftovers. This was thrown away, not even given to the volunteers.
Aren’t political positions like titles which just give privileges and very little responsibility.
/s
I ate so well for a few months as a student until the local Waitrose started chaining their bins shut. Quite a lot of people did in fact, which is presumably why they started chaining them shut.
Ok so what happens when you put food that close to going off onto a ship for a few weeks? You're just shipping rotten food to people.
The problems of logistics isn't "a choice" it's a very real thing.
Since the advent of GMO, starvation ls largely about political instability and conflicts. It's hard to get food to warzones. Something to think about before promoting violence as a solution to a problem.
Yeah famine in Gaza isn't because of economic forces it's because of Israel deliberately starving them. There has been enough humanitarian aid available to feed the starving for decades at this point, the sticking point is people with guns getting in the way.
Do you think people in Africa starve because some evil capitalists decide they want people in Africa to starve? Food can't get to people when there's a lot of people with guns shooting at each other.
When people hate, they will only care about doing violence against their enemies and not care about it causing people to starve. Would you call upon Hamas to put down their weapons to prevent people from starving? If not, that's choosing to let people starve.
Title says "feed the world" not "feed local people".
Why wouldn't you just say "supermarkets should donate food to local food banks"?
Socialist brainrot prevents leftists from being able to communicate effectively with the working class.
Not like this problem is unique to US and other countries have solved it 50 years ago.
The main problem is this :
A supermarket could donate food that will expire shortly to anyone or any charity. But if that near to expiration date food makes someone sick for whatever reason, that person could sue the supermarket. Insurance companies would charge a lot to cover that risk so stores opt to throw it out rather than do the morally correct thing and donate it because it costs them money reducing profit for no return to the stockholders.
If the US would pass a law shielding companies from lawsuits related to donated food, then this could become the norm
If the US would pass a law shielding companies from lawsuits related to donated food, then this could become the norm
Well good news then! That law is set to be passed in just thirty years ago
This idea is a myth used to excuse immoral behaviour.
You, households and restaurants, also throw away food. Putting this on supermarkets sounds a little too easy. The ones I know sell leftovers, give to charities, have bins for YOU to give to charity, and throw away food with contamination risk. The last thing we all want is to make "the world" sick and get sued for it. While we're at it, check out the Food Hero App: https://www.foodhero.com/. There are some people who actually try.
Because it’s basically illegal for them to give it away. If they gave away expired food they would be sued to oblivion within a week because current laws make them liable for any sickness/death that occurs from it.
As previously pointed out by another user, if you are talking the US than, the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Act of 1996 shields donated food. It is absolutely a choice not to donate it.
That leaves plenty of room to be sued actually. It provides limited liability, not zero liability, and would be put to the test almost immediately.
It has not though and it's been on the law books since the fucking 90s. Get real. If it was going to fail in court it would have already.
Stop championing for shitty companies.
But we’re in a topic about supermarkets throwing their food away instead of donating it lol
Also it wouldn’t “fail” in court because like I said, it is limited liability. It can fine you no liability sometimes, full liability other times.
No one is “championing” anything, merely explaining what prevents what is being discussed.
Give away perfectly good in date food instead of selling it?
So for food that doesn’t last a week to begin with?
yeah it's politics' job to feed everyone, agree. however, food waste in general is not the bad thing that you think it is.
food production naturally fluctuates. there have been over 20 volcano eruptions (example) in the last 2000 years that led to recorded famines. it's only a matter of time till the next one happens. it's not preventable, the only mitigation is to have enough surplus food production capability to make it through even if 30% of crops fails.
and having surplus food production capability necessarily leads to food waste.
and having surplus food production capability necessarily leads to food waste.
Nobody is complaining about that.
The complaint is that there is surplus production, and simultaneously 1. the production is actively wasted and destroyed, while 2. people are going hungry.
That's like saying 'your kid has a horrible disease, and in this syringe I have the cure for it, but I'm just gonna squirt it down the sink instead because why not'.
Don't know about your shit hole state, but in EU trade of expired food is strictly forbidden.
Because of health concerns.
at least in Germany it is not strictly forbidden, but the responsibility switches from the manufacturer to the seller, which is why most stores just toss it in the bin.
@lemmy.world
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
Our Goals
go to feed...
@lemmy.world
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
Our Goals
go to feed...
the peasant class exists to generate more money for the owner class, not the other way around.
always has been
edit:
save