Seriously. Someone let me know when we’re getting off the internet and rioting.
Your lesser evil over 50 years has grown to an uncontrollably large evil
8 days ago by SaltyAmerican to c/latestagecapitalism
Seriously. Someone let me know when we’re getting off the internet and rioting.
Someone let me know when we’re getting off the internet and rioting.
I heard they were just waiting for you, man.
You’re talking to Americans here. Fucking cowards aren’t even willing to block traffic or occupy buildings. The mere suggestion of a response that’s a step or two beyond that, approaching something halfway proprtionate? They’ll piss their pants in fear, clutch their pearls and start attacking YOU more forcefully than they’d ever come at MAGA.
You’re talking to Americans here. Fucking cowards aren’t even willing to block traffic or occupy buildings.
What country are you from again?
In the US system voting third party IS clown-brain shit, though.
And your move is to… keep allowing this and keep your head down?
Congratulations. You have agreed to a political morality where the government’s entitlement to your obedience increases in direct proportion to how willing it is to fucking kill you.
Try protesting armed maybe?
It sure as fuck is.
A fun aspect of the American dream is if you fuck around too much you can lose your job. Which I’ll bet true everywhere but an added bonus is you also lose your health insurance and some people need health insurance to stay alive
really it seems like it's blaming people for just voting & hoping, instead of organizing and building a movement. voting for the lesser evil is not enough.
voting for the lesser evil is not enough.
Evolution can't work if we back-slide.
just voting & hoping, instead of organizing and building a movement.
Let us know when your clip airs on the news.
Evolution can’t work if we back-slide.
"the lesser" evil is still evil, it is still a backslide in your line of argument
Let us know when your clip airs on the news.
Let me know when your strategy of voting for genociders stops the genocide
Evolution can't work if we back-slide
Like, for example, if we let a cop run the country? I agree. Let's force the DNC to back more progressive candidates instead of more conservative ones. Signalling that you'll vote for literally anyone with a D next to their name only incentivizes them to appeal to the right.
One sec, I'm getting a premonition... You're going to tell me to ”vOtE iN pRiMaRiEs" as if the DNC doesn't have a monumental sway in which candidates end up on ballots. I do vote in primaries, for the record
There are always other choices, but those might possibly require actual work and personal risk so they're too scary for the voter brain to handle
It doesn’t help that the two big parties made it so that only the two big parties get coverage at debates and other nationally televised stuff.
There is also the problem that for presidential elections, the electoral college are the ones who actually choose the president. And, while the college usually chooses based on the will of the people, they are by no means obligated to do so.
There are, of course, other issues too. But it is worth reiterating that it is not my, nor your, fault that things are the way they are.
I do lay a lot of blame these days on Alito and Citizens United.
You chose to confine yourself inside that box.
So instead of complaining and bringing attention to a subject we're supposed to shut up and comply? How good of an authoritarian view you have there.
Nope, it’s also a consequence of often choosing the greater evil.
And for favouring short term over long term planning.
And zero-sum thinking.
And us vs them mentality.
And a lack of critical thinking in general.
Long term thinking would be voting third party.
I think you're forgetting that this is the most important election of our lifetimes. If we lose this one, there won't be a next election.
— last election
As of liberals think long term. They are reactionary like their conservative bedfellows
Are you referring to Genocide Joe or Sleepy Don?
genocide joe was still somehow de lesser of the 2 evils
Was he?
Seems to me that, if at the end of your presidency homelessness is up 18% and people can't afford basic food staples, and you're still sending billions in free WMD's to a genocider mid-genocide anyway, maybe you don't get to claim you're a 'lesser evil'.
Americans don't want to admit it, but what you're usually getting is two greater evils in different packages.
Was he?
Yes he was
Just to be clear about language, "lesser evil" and "greater evil" aren't like, classifications of evil like a tier list or something, they are directly comparative. If comparing two evils and one is greater, then the other is lesser, definitionally.
You think that changes the truth?
The only truth here is that this post pushes an objectively false statement.
It doesn't make something "objectively" false just because you disagree with it.
Did you come to that realization on your own? Good job catching up to the rest of the class, it must've been difficult.
They're right, cry about it
Nah, crying about internet comments is magat behavior.
Hmmm. Really seems like the government today is directly the result of not choosing the lesser evil 2 years ago.
The 2024 election was the result of choosing the lesser evil in 2020. You can't analyze these problems by looking at only one election at a time. In the grand scheme of things, Biden winning in 2020 was a net-negative for the country. It gave us four more years of milquetoast centrism that did nothing to reduce the appeal of MAGA. If Trump had won again in 2020, he wouldn't have had four years to prepare for a second term. There wouldn't have been a Project 2025.
Electoral myopia is a mortal sin of Democrats. Every election they pretend that no other election has ever happened before, and no other election will ever happen again.
The 2024 election was the result of choosing the lesser evil in 2020.
Only in that he wouldn't be able to run again in 2024 if we had let the greater evil win.
If Trump had won again in 2020, he wouldn’t have had four years to prepare for a second term.
So your solution to Trump having a second term, would be to give him a second term?
Your lack of nuance and reading comprehension disturbs me.
And that election came as a result of decades of "lesser evil" "strategic" voting, where each election managed to be a worse more decrepit choice than the previous. Looking at these things through the lens of just this specific election is part of what has got us here. The ahistoric approach to politics is why you end up running defense for a genocider who can't even win an election against Trump.
Apparently not allowed to have an opinion here due to a one-way application of rule 4 "lessor evil" rhetoric. So enjoy your uninformed circle-jerk in a joke sub that can't stand up to the simplest of criticisms. You win, congratulations on posting an opinon that is explicitly protected by your mods.
"waaah waaaah you have to hear my clichés about why you have to vote for genociders waaah waaaah"
You could also just formulate what youre saying in a civil manner and not have the issue. Civility is not just about tone, but content and action as well.
If you can't actually engage with the actual critique and facts of the matter, then why would one want to hear what you have to say?
Finally mods applying rules unevenly is something that happens everywhere, stop being pissy because you felt like it happened to you now. When I interact with something on lemmy world and people behave like shit, its me who gets moderated for responding in kind. It sucks, but Im not gonna pretend its something unique to your group.
Now I will say in this instance the rules havent been applied unevenly, youre just a pissbaby.
If you can’t actually engage with the actual critique and facts of the matter, then why would one want to hear what you have to say?
I did engage, with facts. My comment was removed because harm reduction is a contraversial topic in this community.
Per the interpretation of rule 4 by the mods, this is a manufactured echo chamber for 2024 non-voters to jack off about how great they are for not voting for a "genocider". Fine. You all can have your safe space, and I won't bring in basic facts like "if trump didn't win the election because we all voted for someone else then we wouldn't be dealing with 99% of the bullshit we've got today". I get that you all want a fantasy space where people are free to post their protected opinion with uniform agreement enforced by the moderators, you have a right to that. However, you should consider how weak those positions are when people are banned from examining them and poking at the (fairly large and obvious) holes. You know what I'd call a set of unsupported fantasies enforced by authoritarians and banned from basic examination that is detached from the actual results it produces? Religion.
Decades of 'lesser evil' gave us trump
Rule 4 "lessor evil rhetoric"
Post is explicitly about "lessor evil" (can't even spell it right in the side bar)
Lessor is a participant of the lease who takes possession of the property and provides it as a leasing subject to the lessee for temporary possession
Mods, restore my comment, or remove the whole post or admit this is a joke sub that is about idealistic anarchist masturbatory fantasies and just ban my ass so I don't have to keep reading the smooth-brained drivel that got the orange fascist elected in the first place, whilst being unable to interject with basic logic and facts.
OP must be Maga to think that Trump was a lesser evil than Kamala.
Someone doesn't understand that the Democrats have been running that platform for a while now and been using it as a whipping rallying call to kowtow the actual left into compliance with them without any real consideration given to their ideology. The Democrats are not actually left, they're at best middle of the road conservatism and people need to realize that.
they're at best middle of the road conservatism and people need to realize that.
"The lesser of 2 evils."
America voted for the greater evil and is now experiencing face eating leopard.
Hillary Clinton was the lesser evil against Barack in 2008. Her whole campaign platform was that she was more electable and that voting for Obama was throwing your vote away.
The lesser evil thing doesn't apply to primaries, you always vote as progressive as possible in the primaries. And anyway, Clinton and Obama were both establishment candidates, they were the same level of evil.
Not really, because if people consistently choose the lesser evil. Like if 90% voted for lesser evils, then the other party would have to change things up, or there could be a new party that would have a chance of winning because they're competing for that 90% of people and no way would the evil party win.
But no, problems isn't choosing lesser evil, it's that significant people still choose evil
The problem is that, despite people swearing they never had any other choice, there has always been many instances of good options that go unchosen while the population fights over voting for turbo-evil vs naturally-aspirated-evil.
Here in Canada we have three main parties and people will do ANYTHING to justify why they cannot vote progressive and must vote for the centrist/conservative party because otherwise the conservative-conservatives might get power. Now we have a banker steam-rolling our people and our environment for free.
Then a new party will form. Again, if the votes are not split 50:50 and it's pretty much only on the lesser evil, then a good alternative party can easily grab the votes of the frustrated citizens without risking "splitting the vote and letting greater evil win"
What are you talking about? This is not a hypothetical. That's what already happened. And a new party didn't form. Because we were kept being told to vote for the lesser of two evils.
Tell me one single election where the lesser evil part got more than 60% of votes? Let alone 90%
The other party has had to change things up. The republicans decided to become more evil in response to Obama. The democrats have also decided to change things up by becoming more evil every election
Yes im sure if we keep doing the thing that we've been doing for decades as everything has been getting worse, then things will change. I would vote third party, but nobody has done all the work of making me feel like there's a good one for me so I guess I'll keep voting for genocide. Im sure this will help change things.
even more genocide
The majority of palestinians died under Biden
bombing Iran kids too
October 2024:
In an interview with the CBS television network aired on Monday night, the Democratic presidential candidate said Iran is the “obvious” answer when asked about the country she considers to be the US’s “greatest adversary”.
“Iran has American blood on their hands – this attack on Israel, 200 ballistic missiles,” she said. “What we need to do [is] to ensure that Iran never achieves the ability to be a nuclear power. That is one of my highest priorities.”
Meanwhile, the Biden administration continued to enforce Trump-era sanctions against Iran and added dozens of its own against Iranian companies and officials.
Harris “unequivocally” denounced the Iranian missile launches. “I am clear-eyed: Iran is a destabilising, dangerous force in the Middle East, and today’s attack on Israel only further demonstrates that fact,” she said on October 1.
The vice president has repeatedly pledged to continue to arm Israel, citing in part what she calls the threat of Iran, despite growing anger over well-documented Israeli abuses in Gaza and Lebanon.
Groceries keep getting more expensive though
Seeing as how that has never been the plan of the majority, its a plan that has never been tried. As opposed to the plan of voting for democrats even though they're (at best) republicans with a 2 year delay. We've tried that plan a bunch and all it has gotten us is genocide, mass deportations, a police state and an ever-worsening climate.
Voter participation has not been below 50% for any presidential election in modern history - Las time was in the 1920's and before that it was in the 1880's.
I was, however, thinking of registered Democrats and organised movements like the Uncommitted movement.
Yeah, just as blue-MAGA won't. Good thing there's a large group of non-voters and a large group of people who vote against the incumbent because they can tell things are shit, they just dont know why.
Can't be any worse than what voting alone has gotten for us
That's just stupid... First of all, what are we supposed to do? Vote for the greater of two evils? Second, we DO vote for the greater of two evils!
Pretty sure the greater of two evils won a whole bunch of times.
BlueMaga liberals have memory holed the entire Biden administration
Nice to start off with an insane ad hominem.
Sister, the democrats are fascists too.
"Everyone who disagrees with me is either a foreigner or an unthinking machine" And Other Insane Conspiracies For The Right Wing Mind.
Anyway, why do I never see you accuse people agreeing with you of being bots? The US also has massive bot farms, as does the individual parties. The most active city on Reddit was an air force base, yet I dont see you be cautious about people reinforcing your narrative? Why?
That BlueMaga is once again pulling out the same McCarthyism that has failed them for the past decade is also not surprising. Screeching that everyone who disagrees with you is a subhuman foreigner isn't exactly winning elections for you.
Should we have chosen the greater evil?
I think we did a few times.
You should do the only thing that has historically made conditions better for the average person.
Violent revolution.
Correct
Not to mention the 3rd parties just steal votes from the 2 party system we have
Actually they don't. The democrats arent owed your vote, a third party isn't stealing votes.
and don’t have a chance at winning.
And they never will because of short-sighted people like you.
The idea that third parties steal votes is also a liberal myth. Your party members do nothing to earn our votes. If there were no third-party candidates on the ballot, we would still not vote for your neoliberal, right-wing, fascist candidates.
Right, because your strategy has been really successful. Just look at all the genocide we're doing!
Revolution isn't a thing you do, it's something you organize for and prepare for when crisis turns to revolution. That's the primary focus of leftist action, not voting. Voting vs. organizing for revolution is kinda like building a sand castle vs. testing and studying rocketry if your goal is to get to the moon. Sand castles aren't really hurting anything, but they aren't helping either, so it's more important to actually work on what matters.
250 years. We've had a form of First Past the Post for as long as we've has government, and mathematically that always results in two parties, aka lesser of two evils. Without changing that, we can point fingers of blame wherever, but the people don't get a real choice.
I wonder if this sticker is on the car of someone who always voted third party or abstained? Clearly, since it's "you" and not "us", so not taking responsibility for generations of voting. Do they realize that their choice might have caused this outcome too? Probably not, since they're using a bumper sticker to blame everyone else.
It's not even a real bumper sticker, this image isn't a real photo
Which third party? There's always more than one, so now the vote is even weaker. And realize that you just also blamed the non-voters. Pointing fingers is very much a keyboard warrior, and it's what's always done after a loss caused by third party spoiling. Go ahead, say you didn't, but the numbers historically show in close races where a third party vote would have settled had they not thought "this time, it's different".
To think that a third party could ever win a national election in a Republican/Democrat owned system is fantasy land. At best you do exactly what resulted in MAGA, you splinter the group from within and force the moderate part to follow the radical. That means not playing by rules though, so Democrats have division within but no clear radical that is forcing changes.
As for causes of "this", meaning the current administration, there's so much more long term decline damage and not just votes that caused this. Things were not fine before. More fantasy.
You're ignorant of history. Yes, we'll have two parties due to our electoral system, but precisely which two parties can easily change. It's happened before. In fact, that's how the Republican party came to be. The Abolitionists spent nearly a century doing exactly what you advocate - voting for the lesser evil. Slavery only became more entrenched. It was only when they were willing to abandon the existing parties entirely and support a new third party - the Republicans, that Abolition actually happened.
We would have never had a President Lincoln if our ancestors had followed your advice.
I didn't realize I was advocating for voting for one of two parties. It almost seemed I was pointing out that we're stuck in that trap without a change of voting system. Let me reread my post... yeah, that was the point.
As for the rest, you're sort of right but very, very simplified what was going on. And of course with a different system from the start history would be different... maybe even avoided a Civil War and/or repairing its causes and damage. Oh well...
well i mean were we supposed to choose the greater of two evils?
You could also choose anyone else or make any sort of demand of your party
I dont have a party
I don't understand. We're bush, Nixon, Reagan and trump the lesser of 2 evils? I'm pretty sure they're the cause of the current MAGAstan government.
I think committing genocide is bad, even if someone else is also doing it, and I think its bad to reward someone for committing a genocide.
It didn't matter what Trump did or did not do. The fact is that you allowed the Democrats to keep doing it, and then to reward them for their bad behavior, you decided to try to elect them again. That's how US politics has become so fucking dysfunctional. You reward bad behavior.
What is your source for the Clintons "convincing" Trump to run? According to Politico "What the sources from both camps agreed upon, however, was that Clinton did not urge Trump to run. " https://www.politico.com/...
From that article: "an aide to Clinton said the 2016 race was never specifically discussed and that it was only a casual chat." The closest thing in the article to Clinton encouraging Trump to run is that they say the conversation was "upbeat."
I feel like you are reading too much into that.
Maybe OP is just starting highschool?
If OP is more than 2 years old, should be able to remember that the current government was not the lesser of 2 evils when it was elected. Don't need to look farther into history.
Seem to be missing a few administrations there. Though I notice BlueMaga liberals are basically having to memory hole every democratic president for the last forty years because "if you just vote us in we'll stop the Republicans!" Doesn't convince anyone when they look at what democrats actually did in office
Actually we've chosen the worse of two evils about half the time.
As opposed to choosing the greater evil for a change?
The actual issue is money in politics. It's the reason no politician wants voter reform. It's why Bernie never had a chance, not just as a presidential candidate. You need preferential voting, no more electoral college and no more Senate - pro rata representation only.
Slavery only ended after abolitionists stopped voting for the lesser evil. 50 years of voting for the lesser evil got them nowhere.
I don't know USA history very well at all, but was there really an election with a dramatically low voter turn out, which eventually triggered the civil war?
I just don't understand why the sentiment seems to be that if you advocate/participate in more change than just voting, then you should not vote, and if you vote, then you cannot participate in change more than that. Like surely these things can happen in parallel? Try to enact real change, but also vote for the lesser evil until those changes actually take hold?
The US has more than two parties, you dont have to vote for genociders
Ahh, I think I've been misunderstanding this side then. I thought it was along the lines of "don't vote since both sides are bad, instead protest and riot, etc", but it's rather "vote for someone else"
You can do a revolution and still vote for the lesser evil in the meantime. Not voting supports the others.
If the message is "revolutionize!" say that, don't imply to stop participating in democracy.
No, the message is "don't expect things to get better when you vote for genociders" you imbecile.
The collapse of a party and/via creation of a new one happened like 3 times in American history. How is banking on that more likely to help in the next 40 years than voting for the lesser of two evils?
How has the last forty years of voting for the lesser evil worked out for you?
How has changing parties 3 times in a quarter millennia stopped them from getting where they are now?
Blaming voters when the primary cause for all of that is corporate interference in every aspect from candidate selection to gerrymandering districts to lobbying to the ads seen online and on television to the misinformation/disinformation sewed into widely accepted corporate media.
The people with money are the ones to blame. Not the pool of potential voters beaten into submission at work and propagandized into thinking a far right party and center right party are our only options.
Oh ok, throw that on the big list. Whatcha all gonna do about it?
I participate politically in my city but it isn't about me, this isn't about atomization of each individual's participation level. The problem is systematic and framing it as such is important, not blaming individual nameless voters.
Well first of all, ditch the fucking pretense that the Democrats collectively are actually leftists. They're not, never were, never will be while you continue voting for them. Gavin Newsom is looking like the potential Democrat front runner for 2028, and he has a lot of negative things to say about LGBTQ+ people. That human rights are negotiable is an abhorrent political view.
So far, after watching pedophiles coup the government and strip it for parts while conducting treasonous acts, the Democrats have:
-secrety had meetings between dem leadership and Jared Kushner
-funded AIPAC Republicans campaigns over non AIPAC DEMS
-said that if they win the midterms that they shouldn't impeach anybody, and we should work with the Nazi pedophile traitors.
-NOT provide funding to left candidates in FL (chuck Schumer).
-will NOT commit to abolishing the secret police stablished by pedophilic traitors to terrorize us.
-will NOT speak out against CONCENTRATION CAMPS AND BAN THEM.
-Jeffries, who takes Peter Thiel money, setup an AI regulatory committee with some other Dems that TAKE PETER THIEL MONEY
IDK, beyond words, can anyone show me actions that show that Democrats are actually an opposition party?
Again the liberals think their lesser evil will result in change. It's all the difference of how much breaking the party is pushing out.
funded AIPAC Republicans campaigns over non AIPAC DEMS
Do you have a source for this one?
Sure.
-Pay attention to the verbiage below. They funded MAGA to boost the Standard Dems' likability. Schiff did this to Katie Porter in CA as well. They specifically do this so progressives can't win
-And this one https://www.ms.now/...
“AIPAC donors are single-issue donors,” said Doug Forand, a strategist working with the campaign of George Latimer, a Democrat whose challenge of progressive New York Rep. Jamaal Bowman has drawn more support from AIPAC than any other campaign this cycle.
Thanks!
And here come the blueanon McCarthyists to screech about how all their problems are the fault of evil foreigners
"Everyone who disagrees with me is either a foreigner or an unthinking machine" And Other Insane Conspiracies For The Right Wing Mind
It's just a way to simplify a complex situation.
Americans aren't particularly politically savvy and have been taught their entire lives that the only acceptable way to enact change is through voting. Pointing out that Democrats at the national level often function as controlled opposition raises an extremely frightening possibility: that voting only creates a small amount of change on a handful of token issues and otherwise their government is largely is out of their control.
So they spin up the false dichotomy that pointing out how the tacit cooperation of both parties in undermining the rights of US citizens is somehow not suggesting that the population must take action in addition to the government-sanctioned method of civic engagement, i.e., voting, but is instead suggesting one not vote at all. It's frankly one of the most smooth-brained standpoints I regularly see on Lemmy, but American liberals seem to cling to it like a talisman against the discomfort that is the very real possibility that far more than voting will be required to enact the significant, lasting change that will stop their country from careening into fascism, and unlike voting, that type of action does not provide a clear path with simple instructions.
I think you responded to the wrong comment.
The weird need to other anyone who dares to critique the democratic party is not some simplification of a complex situation. Its an extension of russiagate and is now just some insane conspiracy where everyone who disagrees with bluemaga is subhuman (a bot) or a dastardly foreigner (subhuman), because no true person could ever dare point out Obama installed Tom Homan.
Called out? Im neither russian, nor a bot.
In reality I just dont like to see people who are ostensibly "liberal" espouse insane jingoistic racism in response to someone disagreeing with them.
What do you think .ml has to do with anything?
You're just doing the same thing again
The last few years are an example of what happens when you stop choosing the lesser evil.
Of course, what we should be doing is working on getting a non-evil to a position of being selectable. But who's got time or energy for that?
The last few years are a result of choosing the lesser evil. Trump only ran because the clintons convinced him to do so. He very probably only got the nomination due to the media attention, which was only there due to the "pied piper" strategy of the democrats. And then he only won because any alternative to Hillary got ratfucked out of a nomination and every critique of her was shouted down.
Trump only ran because the clintons convinced him to do so.
Got any proof of that?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/...
who said anything about that?
Good thing there's other choices, then.
Pretty sure donald was the eviler of two evils. The evilist of many evils.
We as a society need to make posting AI slop as much of a taboo as, like, pissing on the side of a building. It should be something that you just don't do as a matter of decorum.
Except that choosing the greater evil is what's gotten us exactly where we are. Nixon, Reagan, W, Trump = greater evil every time.
Clinton, Obama, Biden. So not every time. And every time the republicans won were also times where we ran with "vote for the lesser evil" which you have to count too - Your strategy of "voting for the lesser evil" doesn't even win you elections.
Huh?? I wasn't old enough to remember Clinton but even during Obama's first election I clearly remember people calling him the lesser evil.
Already answered.
I'm genuinely unsure where else you responded to that point. I'm not trying to be obtuse, so if you wouldn't mind clarifying I'd really appreciate it. Thanks.
So you think Clinton, Obama, and Biden were the greater evil? I could maybe see that argument with Clinton, but Obama and Biden? I'd love to hear your explanation.
You wrote voting for the "greater" evil got us here. I pointed out that those three are just as responsible and, in your eyes, they are "lesser" evil.
Thus the line of reasoning that the "greater" evil got us here does not stand. I then add to this line that even if the blame were to solely lie at the feet of the "greater" evil, then that argument rests on absolving the democrats of blame for losing to the "greater" evil, which I find to be completely nonsensical. Running someone so evil they are barely distinguishable from a republican is part of why republicans win.
I think those three men are evil, too. Just like I think the republicans are evil.
The people who say no thanks to both do not consider those two options as unique in any way. Trump and Biden are inevitable and next election will have an even worse choice. The bourgeois state is declining and in its decline it turns towards fascism. Both parties are extensions of the bourgeois state.
By voting all one doesfurther entrench the system. For a long time the arguments for voting for democrats were:
As time has passed these arguments have shown themselves to be based on some faulty assumptions. Or conditions have changed to such an extent that the argument no longer stands.
This argument functions in the short term. However every election there's less and less "lesser" evil. Wether they win or lose democrats make the same conclusion: They must go further to the right. The democrats are also just throwing marginalised groups under the bus (This is ignoring that democrats have been doing all the "evil" stuff on a state-level for much longer than their presidential platform reflects). Every administration since, at least, Clinton has deported more immigrants than the previous administration. Biden surpassed Trump 1 ^[Some will protest that Biden did not "deport" more immigrants, he technically "removed" them instead. Technicalities like these are moot in my eyes, they function only to illustrate how democrats run the same child-crusher, they're just more "polite" about it. The child is crushed wether it is crushed or "pulverized".] They both suck on climate^[Some will protest that Biden passed the Green New Deal or that he signed the Paris Agreement. The Paris Agreement is a pointless treaty and he did nothing to approach its' goals. The "Green New Deal", while allocating some resources to renewable energy, was in practicality nothing. The actual development of the US under Biden was one where greenhouse gas emissions increased and one where he gave out so many fracking contracts that the emissions from the oil in those alone will be enough to push us up to 3.5C warming. It does not matter that you are kissing my booboo, if you're still stabbing me. The climate is not something that can be half-measured, it is an apocalypse and it is either-or. It needs IMMEDIATE and DRASTIC action, something neither party is willing to take. Therefore the faster neither party is in power, the better.], they both commit genocide, they are both expanding a police state, they're both imperialists, they're both giving more money to the military.
So while one side might give slightly less, the long term result of this "lesser evil" is one where more harm is produced, than the long term result of one where the system is replaced^[Here is an admitted assumption. I assume the system is easier to replace if it is less entrenched. This seems obvious to me, but others have wanted to discuss this a bunch. It's a discussion in itself.].
What do you think will happen when not even genocide is too far?
I don't know if conditions are "better" for organising. That's hard to say in my eyes. We have seen far more popular unrest under Trump. People are far more displeased with the regular actions of the US empire under Trump. People have become far more radicalised under Trump. The popular movements are not funnelled into or through the DNC, but instead develop organically. There are other challenges under Trump than under democrats, but "better" or "worse"? Hard to say. Internationally I would consider Trump better, because he is more incompetent.
The same commentators who through introspection can say that socialist movements across the world need to work with the USA isnt a betrayal of the revolution seemingly cannot apply the same caveated analysis to the shinier of two turds in a two party system sounds like more American exceptionalism.
This feels like a bit of a different discussion. The actions, motivations and needs of revolutionary movements engaged in military struggle around the world are different from that of the average US voter (as well as the average US leftist).
You are also conflating "voting for a democrat or a republican" with "agreeing to receive support from the US." It's kind of vague, so I don't really know what you're talking about here and tbh it is not my area of expertise. I'm going to send a link to this comment to someone else, who might be better at answering, but I'd really appreciate more specificity. Can you say what socialists movement across the world are you thinking of and what socialist commentators are you talking about?
From what I can think of: I know many people have critiqued the various Kurdish militias for cooperating with the US, the PRCs cooperation with the US during the sino-soviet split is seen by most as a massive black mark on that countrys history.
In general though I'd say that people are more forgiving of foreign movements accepting US aid because the aid helps them further towards their goals, whereas someone voting for the democrats would, at best, do nothing. The way I view it, it would make things worse for the domestic leftist to vote democrat. I can't speak on local politics.
If you're not voting for your “communist party of”, is this just virtue signalling?
I am voting third party. Here is a comment I wrote about leftist not voting or voting third party that whole thread has many illustrativt responses.
Here is another comment from the post, detailing my position
Here is my comment from another post
I would also recommend reading cowbees response in that comment thread.
Ok then, so what's your solution? I'm still gonna vote for the lesser evil, while still organizing and doing direct action, to reduce harm unless presented with an alternative.
Maybe a candidate that's good? You could run for an office.
Edit: essentially I mean for the situation at hand, especially with this upcoming election, what else can we do?
The solution is Ranked Choice Voting. Anyone can run and voters rank all the candidates. So if you put Stein (for example) first and she doesn't get enough votes, your vote then goes to your second choice, and so on. It lets you vote the way you really want it to go, not just strategically.
Ranked choice/instant runoff voting is not doing a lot for Australia. The "left" major party is centrist at best, the "right" major party is drifting further right and the only minor party of note is basically Nazis.
You seem angry and not great at comprehending the topic at hand. Maybe step away from the internet for a bit.
Ok, maybe I wasn't clear, so I apologize, I'm talking about the situation as it is, like with this election.
Edit: I think maybe getting people to run who will change things for racked choice voting is a good strategy long term, and we could and should work for that
Ranked choice voting as a topic comes up every 2-4 years. Then no one does anything about it after the election is over.
If you want it so bad, do whatever you can to keep the conversation going between elections.
A handful of jurisdictions have tried just that, it's absolutely wild.
You just keep doing what the bumper sticker says, obviously. You vote for the red and they hit you and rob you, vote for the blue and they rob you nicely.
How is this hard for people?
Republicans do what they want and the Democrats ask us to vote for them a little harder and, eventually, they will be able to do something, as long as precedent isn't broken, as long as it's the "high road", as long as it's not something the parliamentarian can override, etc...
currently,
-hakeem is secretly meeting with kushner. He is also taking Thiel money and setup and AI "regulations committee" with other Dems who take Thiel money.
-AIPAC Dems are funding AIPAC Republicans over actual left candidates
-tammy duckworth says that we shouldnt impeach and should work WITH the traitornazirapistpedophilicwarcriminals.
Can you please explain to me how voting for the "lesser" evil is helpful?
Ah so you think the third of the country that didn't vote was based and revolutionary, not just passively endorsing Trump.
No. I'm saying we need something new.
Whatever side you are on, unless it is the billionaires, the USA dies when Elon was allowed to take every bit of our most sensitive data and secrets. We are talking about the Pentagon, OPM, and Social Security. Unknown foreign agents with ILLEGAL access, downloaded it all to external servers and I stalled AI and code.
On top of this, our government has been revealed to be a majority of foreign paid agents from Israel that have blackmailed the worst of our politicians into doing their bidding.
These tech Nazis have been given actual military units and ranks, and now Palmer Lucky and Elon Musk will be overseeing killing, autonomous drones that may or may not have nukes.
We lost, we aren't voting our way out of this
Ok
I get that.
I really for sure get that.
But there's an election happening I'm not not going to let Republicans take office while I still can vote.
So while we're all gearing up for the downfall of the American government, I'm going to vote for anyone who's got a chance of winning against Republicans.
It's not going to magically fix the system. I'm not under any pretense it'll fix this mess.
But I'm going to do everything I can, and that includes voting.
So people who don't vote actually dont endorse a candidate. This is a bit of an advanced piece of politics, but the way voting in the US works is you vote for a candidate and if you dont vote for someone, then they dont get your vote.
Your logic rests on an assumption that the democrats are owed your vote, which they aren't. Had Harris won, then you wouldnt be saying the people who didnt vote passively endorsed her, but they would have done that just as much.
Those who don't vote are in fact doing the opposite of endorsing anyone, they are signalling apathy with the system.
This isn't profound. It's actually just a dumb "both sides bad" take said by people who would snub a candidate they agree with on 70% of issues with a 50% chance of winning for a person they agree with on 90% of issues with a 5% chance of winning.
The 70% candidate losing isn't a win for your cause because now a person you agree with on 5% of issues just won.
I dont agree with Democrats on 70% of issues. You people keep making these disingenuous framings where the issue people have with democrats is just some teeny tiny thing and not their policies. The democrats committed a genocide, that was the straw that broke the camels back - It is not the one thing we disagree on. I dont like them deporting more people than Trump, I dont like their fanatic militarism, their police state, the way they fuck the climate, healthcare, their kowtowing to corporate interests, their constant sabotaging of left-wing movements, their starvation of people through sanctions, their repressive violence against democratic protesters, their interventionism, their brinksmanship, etc.
And even if it was, GENOCIDE is pretty fucking massive. Voting for a genocide will only end up with you getting sent to the camps as well.
I - and seemingly many others - have been willing to accept voting for democrats despite their many many many dogshit policies, as long as they: Protected Roe v. Wade and didnt gleefully directly commit a genocide.
And they fucked it up. So now people won't vote for them, because there is no reason to.
Genocide apologia
And you not being able to see where two controlled parties got you shows you can't think beyond an election.
It's not hard, MAJORITY of Democrats are neoliberal, that is conservative. They felt they had to go more conservative after Reagan and have ever since. Which means that we have DROFTED AWAY FROM LEFT LEANING VALUES.
we drifted away from they by voting for the candidates that were MORE ALIGNED with our values and yet here we are.
Now, intelligent people can also look at what the "blue good guys" are doing right now to prep for "winning" the midterms in my post above.
*Hint - it's ACTIVELY helping the GOP
The people who like voting for evil won't vote for the lesser evil because it's lesser. The people who don't like voting for evil won't vote for the lesser evil because it's evil.
I have a feeling without that, the evil would have reached a lot sooner.
Every time someone says something for sure never happened like this? They're wrong.
Cope
No, it's not. Bush v. Gore decided this trajectory for us, by some Supreme Court justices.
Anybody who was around for that and doesn't oppose FPTP knows what they're doing.
The real issue is everyone forgets to actually grow support for actual good candidates between elections. Everyone just waits to see who is on the ballot and gets disappointed it's only self serving assholes who did the work themselves.
Because good people aren't wealthy enough or have the right connections outside of local elections MAYBE
Problem is you need money to remain active cause it's a constant thing. It's not something you can just do on weekends and afternoons. You're basically doing volunteer work for months with the small possibility of people donating to your cause, but that can't be a guarantee.
Because that's one of the evils tolerated by lesser evils.
"Someone disagrees with me? Clearly an evil foreigner"
Elaborate on how abstaining or voting for the more evil version would yield a better outcome
Elaborate on how decades of lesser evilism and foreigner blaming has helped
Elaborate on how decades of lesser evilism has helped
Can't elaborate on the value of something we've never tried
Definitely true with Biden. Did anyone WANT to vote for him?
What so many miss is that EVERYONE votes for the lesser of two evils. When Trump won, the lesser of two evils won, in the minds of those who voted for him.
So, yes, we HAVE ALL been choosing the lesser of two evils for generations, the fake bumper sticker is right.
MAGA could have this exact same thread with the evils reversed.
And, no it's not a two party system. We've been manipulated into accepting that there are only two viable parties.
We could have had Bernie, who ran as a DINO but we all know is socialist, (we've been manipulated into believing socialism is bad for generations) but someone with a voice said "Bernie is unelectable" and that was all it took, his numbers dropped overnight.
What people don't understand is that the DNC was NEVER going to give Bernie the nomination, no matter how many votes he got in the primary. He's an Independent who has never respected the Democratic party. He doesn't support them, he doesn't raise money for them, and he has criticized them often over the years. They hate him, he's not a Democrat, and they are not going to reward him with the biggest award a party can offer a member - their candidacy for President. Bernie's not a Democrat, and the Dems aren't going to make him their leader.
but someone with a voice said "Bernie is unelectable" and that was all it took, his numbers dropped overnight
That is not at all what happened. I remember. I was there. The DNC cheated over and over to sabotage him and eventually just had to nominate someone who didn't win their primaries (Clinton). There was even a court case where they admitted as much. Because their base was so pissed.
Wilding v. DNC
They have memory holed the hell out of this case. Last time I looked you could only find the transcript on the Internet archive
You can always trust Westerners to blame all their problems on evil foreigners.
And you can always trust BlueMaga liberals to write like the most cringy losers imaginable
It's almost like people talk more about politics during the political season!
It's the result of rich people only making shitty choices available. So sick of the victim blaming gaslighting shit.
It's not better to refrain from voting.
It's the result of incredibly stupid people believing the rich people who tell them that only their chosen puppets have any chance of winning the election, so you'd better vote for the puppet you hate the least, voting for someone you actually support is just a waste!
Someone has to have the resources to platform at such a broad level. We're not voting for the mayor of a tiny village.
You're right, we're not.
Which is one of many reasons the genocide supporters in both major parties are completely unqualified, and anyone voting for them is a self destructive class traitor.
The resources and platform come with the office, so why would you think Kamala Harris would be a better person to have those than Gloria La Riva?
Shhh. They're about to do it again
Indeed, and I don't know when things will get bad enough that people stop voting D and R.
Maybe we'll get a dozen DSA's elected this time. I dunno.
remove all epstein classes from affecting any elections and they are banned from office forever after you get to 0.01% of population you are barred from any political influence and cannot buy any influence illegal and if found the penalty is all assets seized. next also almost all laws are made to restrict the epstein class first then everything else.
the goal is to minimize the uncontrollably large evils that is the epstein class.
That's how democracy works everywhere. Do you think that in countries with more than two parties, somehow there's a party for everyone where you agree with everything that party stands for?
The united snakes very deliberately picked the biggest evil and as it turns out that things have been a bit shit since then for everyone who isn't a billionaire nazi or has a very specific bootlicking fetish.
Mmm, I sure do love a false dichotomy.
I'll vote in the primaries if there is a candidate I like. Otherwise I won't. And I wont vote for democrats if I dont like their candidate either. Doing so is a fools' game and exactly what got you trump.
Of course this is just a false dilemma, you can always vote third party.
Yes because the only thing to do is vote and the only parties are dem and republican, your hands are tied! You have to vote for genocide! Why won't people just let you have your treats?
Putting in overtime this close to the election, I see. I'm sure tRump will thank you for your services.
What would the french do?
But actually it's the result of young people thinking it's cool not to vote, elder stole the future of youths with debt.
You were offered 2 bowls of shit, and instead of refusing shit you chose the one that you thought was the better choice. Either way you chose shit
Your daily reminder that BlueMaga shitlibs don't consider Palestinians human
Afghanistan and Iraq happened with the support of democrats and was worsened under democratic leadership. The current genocide in Gaza started under Biden. Roe v Wade was overturned under Biden. By domestic terror do you mean ICE? Tom Homan was appointed by Obama and Obama was the one to massively expand ICE.
Iran has been the target of the US empire for decades, Kamala Harris called it the biggest enemy of the US. She was just as fervent a supporter of Israel as Biden and Trump, and Israel pushing for the war is why its happening. There is no way of knowing what would have happened under a dem president, but we have all reason to assume she would have gone along with the war against Iran, just like Trump did.
Afghanistan would probably have happened under a Democrat. Iraq almost certainly not. Clinton got shit for holding off on intervention in Rewanda Because he was gun-shy after Somalias black hawk down incident.
I don't think Gore would have ordered a ground invasion of Iraq. Bush ordered the Surge. Obama listed to Patreus and ordered the mini surge and then mostly pulled out when thr Iraqies asserted their independence and refused to allow the US military continued immunity from all crimes.
Yes I mean ICE. Democrats have refused to do the right things, yes, but they have been consistently less cruel and escalatory than Republicans, maybe you forgot Obama created Daca when congress killed the dream act? Who supported that law? Democrats or Republicans?
Netanyahu has pitched the idea of decapitation strikes against Iran to every president since Bush and they all told him that's a stupid idea and we won't go along with it, including Trump first term, when he still had advisors like Mark Milley who understood up from down.
We have every reason to think Harris would have told Netanyahu to shove it just like Biden did.
What fantasy world do you live in? It's certainly lot this reality. The war plans Trump used the first time he bombed Iran were from war games drawn up by the Biden administration. Biden 100% backed netanyahu.
I am so happy this thread is so old now that it no longer matters whether or not I engage with your fantastical imaginings. This whole alternate world you're making up where democrat-
We have every reason to think Harris would have told Netanyahu to shove it just like Biden did.
??? You're straight up deranged. What world are you living in? Biden bypassed congress to give Netanyahu more bombs.
No offense, but for the population at large, was there a meaningful choice?
The side that really wanted this might have been a smaller minority than the ones that did not, but ultimately they were not only far for violent (in every meaning of the word and method) but also had control of the police and the courts, meaning murderers routinely got away with it while the opposing leadership and even rank and file got murdered, received very long prison sentences that removed them from society entirely, or even got framed for murders and executed or lynched for it.
The average person does not now, or have they ever, dictated anything. Also as it stands there is no such thing as an 'average' person by any metric.
Yeppppp
So pick the greater evil next! Problem solved
You know the only US election where voters outnumbered nonvoters was 2020, right?
And what did that get us? Genocide, more deportations than Trump 1, massive fracking bills, more money to cops, violent crackdowns on peaceful protesters. The only good thing biden did was pull out of Afghanistan and he was hated for it and followed it up with immediate sanctions to stave the people already suffering under a taliban government.
Edit: Its also just not true. The last time a US presidential election had a turnout below 50% was in the 1920s
That "lesser evil" works well, you must admit.
So it's all functioning as designed. BoTh PaRtIeS blame the other for their failures and lack of progress, neither could exist without their evil twin.
They have no actual platform other than wealth acquisition, those issues that they deem important for an election cycle are "bait".
For example, Biden's bait was "15 an hour". The American voters took the bait and elected him; no minimum wage increase.
Trump's bait was "no war". The American voters took the bait and elected him, so... war.
Biden and Ds could have passed minimum wage bill easily. The "super majority requirement" is a parliamentary rule that can be changed whenever they would like with majority vote (they circumvent super majority all the time, see "exceptions to nuclear option", like budgets)
Most American voters have no idea that this is so, and it works very well to deceive the majority of them right out in the open. Blatantly and repeatedly.
I vote every election, and you should too! It's funny
For example, Biden's bait was "15 an hour". The American voters took the bait and elected him; no minimum wage increase.
??? The fuck are you talking about? He did raise the minimum wage of federal employees. Or is that not good enough and you want to move the fucking goalposts?
This one was like one of his sigbature EOs, it's such a fucking stupid thing to lie about.
Only my old college roommate got their forgiven. Not sure what the specific were. My wife and brother had their payments and interest paused for almost 2 years which helped a lot.
of federal employees
Lmao fell for it again
So, you admit that there was a minimum wage increase.
Like, if you wanna blame Biden for Congressional Democrats sucking, just admit that. Call him on his shit. But comparing Trump declaring war, an action he took on his own without anyone else, to Biden not raising the minimum wage, an action he did in part without the help of his party, is just... It's stupid baby shit.
There's legit reasons to hate Biden and if that is your best fucking one, then you did literally no research.
Oh no! The evil parlamentarian! Oh no! Egads! Whatever shall we do! Ah! Ah! The light!
All democrats will give you are some absolutely meaningless symbolic crumbs for pell grant recipients operating a business in low-income neighbourhoods for 2 years or more and that symbolic act is enough to appease clowns like you. A 15 dollar minimum wage for federal employess is the same as nothing, but it makes you feel like it matters. It solves nothing, it adresses no issues and it comes entirely too late for it to matter in any way. And every time anything like that happens you people fall for the same routine of [villain of the week] democrat being the reason why we can't have something nice. Somehow we can twist arms and break legs when it comes time to push through anything that will help Israel commit a genocide though.
But comparing Trump declaring war, an action he took on his own without anyone else,
I don't think the war is bad because it happens outside of the minutiae of the state, I think it's bad because it's bad. I would also think it is bad under Harris - who we have every reason to assume would also start a war with Iran.
Minimum wage is for everyone you fucking moron
love it
If you are advocating for proportional representation and ranked choice voting, perhaps you should say that, OP.
It's not like theres much of a choice.
There's actually more than two parties and more to do than vote
Lmao, this is the correct take. If you blame the current system on people who voted for the lesser of two evils then you can also clearly blame the system on those who didn't vote. In fact, most of the voting population choose not to vote. So if anything they are the most to blame. The implication is that instead of voting you should do something more radical or -insert some butt-ass thing- but clearly that worked the same amount or less than voting by this very logic.
With one turn elections, you have to vote for the lesser evil. If one of the candidate seems really good, you were probably brainwashed by some propaganda (or very lucky this time).
Yet no election is going to bring a leader who would take good decisions, if you allow that leader to peacefully manage own interests. I can't remember any election anywhere having such results. Good results seem always pushed by a strong people strugle. Is there a better way I am missing?
@lemmy.world
A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.
A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.
RULES:
1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.
2 No Trolling
3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, anti-communism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.
4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.
5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.
6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.
Introduction to Socialism (external links)
Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Basic Course
go to feed...
@lemmy.world
A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.
A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.
RULES:
1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.
2 No Trolling
3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, anti-communism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.
4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.
5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.
6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.
Introduction to Socialism (external links)
Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Basic Course
go to feed...
So instead of blaming the system that gave us two parties, you blame the voters who had no choice but to vote for two parties?
Sounds solid. 👍
save