It's just bad prop decisions. There are guns that better fit. In a cheap movie, I can forgive it. A budget over 200k? I'm upset
Do any modern movies use revolvers? The only reason i can see for using a revolver is if the movie is set in the past or if there's a plot reason to be using an old gun like e.g. it was his grandfather's
What? Revolvers are really common. They're incredibly reliable, in a way that a semi auto mag fed pistol isn't.
A revolver rotates the cylinder and the hammer falls on each individual round. If the ammo is bad (incredibly rare but it happens) then nothing happens, but just pull the trigger again and you're not jammed or anything.
A mag-fed semi auto, while higher capacity, has WAY more complicated moving parts. There's tons of ways it can jam up or malfunction, and since all the ammo is stacked in the same spring-tensioned magazine, if there's a problem you have to clear the jam in order to fire anything else.
If you're in a position where you are actually pulling the trigger your fine motor skills are gone because of adrenaline. Clearing a jam like that isn't something you'll be able to do effectively without a ton of training, and most people don't have that kind of training.
So a lot of people prefer a revolver. It's only 6 shots instead of 11, 17, whatever, but you KNOW you'll get six shots, and the thinking is if that's not enough then 17 probably isn't either. It's personal preference.
But yeah, they're not just "grandfather" guns.
I hate when an actor clearly doesn't even understand how to hold and aim a gun and their character is supposed to be competent at it.
Cate Blanchet's character in Borderlands is a recent and particularly obvious example. In the movie's trailer she is shown holding and aiming a rifle like someone who clearly never held a gun before and my understanding is that her character was supposed to be a highly competent gunslinger.
Someone coach those actors for crying out loud.
Or when people in a gunfight clearly aren't hearing the apocalyptically loud sound gunshots would make in their situation - like in a small room or in a car.
I think the problem is that Cate Blanchett has too big an ego to be taught/learn anything, including how to act. But that's just my humble opinion.
I don't know enough to notice bad gunplay but anachronistic makeup/hair styling can bother me. Costumes I give some slack because it could be a budget issue.
When it's supposed to be a post-apocalyptic/survival genre but everyone looks clean-cut, shaven, and recently showered with a day-old haircut ๐
Oh God yes and women with no body hair in times when only sex workers would shave pits&crotch
anachronistic makeup/hair styling
I don't know if this is exactly "anachronistic" since the movie is set 20,000 years in the future and who knows, but there's a scene in the second installment of the new Dune where the emperor is surrounded by his Sardaukar soldiers and they all have LA hipster haircuts.
Yes I think anything that is specifically recognizable like that counts. 80s permed hair is especially noticeable.
I also sometimes notice "old lady hairstyles" in the old movies that those old ladies watched in their teens, copied their style, and kept doing it for several decades, but that's different.
You learn a great deal about certain people by working high-end retail.....
The butt of the stock goes against your shoulder, not in your armpit!
That's a subtle one. If a revolver fires 7 or 9, unforgivable. If it fires 20, they knew damn well what they were doing and it's a Machete Kills style comedy, we're back to acceptable.
What if there's a cut where they could have conceivably reloaded?
Underworld was always the one that annoyed me with their guns. Main character fires this automatic handgun for minutes and doesn't reload.
Guns are absurd in almost all movies anyway. Zero reaction to firing in enclosed spaces, powering through a gunshot wound by using muscles that basically no longer exist because a bullet ripped through them, etc. And it's not even just action movies, it happens all the time.
My pet peeve is the reactionless guns with unlimited kinetic energy bullets. The shooter's hand barely twitches but the target flies as if they were hit by a cannonball. Newton would be spinning in his grave.

That's a bad script supervisor. A script supervisor is responsible for scene continuity between takes. Guaranteed the shooting schedule had a dozen days of frequent high intensity filming and the script supervisor was tired from making sure really busy scenes lined up within the time allowed.
Was watching the latest season of slow horses. Great show, I fully recommend. However... a couple of assassins that kept firing their pistols while chasing someone annoyed me. Sure, there was time to reload and it's plausible that they simply didn't show that. But what are the odds that they were carrying 3-4 spare clips with them? Especially since they weren't wearing tactical gear anything of the sort.
I'll accept whatever the premise of the thing asks of me to enjoy the story; that dragons exist, the main character finds a real spellbook, there's a secret community of shapeshifters, or that there's a long-lost secret artifact with magical properties. It's not a documentary.
But breaking internal logic is different. Unless someone's mentioned time travel, it's still a huge issue that it was Sunday in one scene and Friday in another on the same day.
Some people hate 'The Hulk' because they can buy genetic mutation that turns him giant and green, sure... But where the fuck is the extra body mass coming from? You can't just gain weight from nothing. Yes, magic does exist in the MCU, but he didn't get his powers from magic, did he?!
I mean... Marvel has clearly shown that in their world mutations just unlock some sort of magic. None of the X-Men powers make any sense in a world where conservation of mass / energy is a thing, the only possible explanation is that those genes unlock magic potential, so it's not breaking internal logic, that a specific mutation unlocked some kind of anger-magic in Dr. Banner.
True, though I didnโt mean I had a problem with it.
Just that a supposed scientist finding thereโs a gene that just lets you break physics and nobody of authority in-universe really commenting on entire branches of modern science being scrapped is too much of a stretch in logic for some.
Marvel has clearly shown that in their world mutations just unlock some sort of magic.
This never gets mentioned, but I wonder what responsibility Marvel bears for the generally low level of comprehension in our society of how evolution by natural selection actually works.
Some people hate 'The Hulk' because they can buy genetic mutation that turns him giant and green, sure... But where the fuck is the extra body mass coming from? You can't just gain weight from nothing. Yes, magic does exist in the MCU, but he didn't get his powers from magic, did he?!
My understanding is that hulk gets his strength (and size/mass) from his anger. So in the universe, anger must have energy that hulk converts to mass
Rightโฆ but then anger itself would require huge amounts of calories. You canโt just create energy.
The gamma does turn him green. Maybe that's not just stylistic, maybe he's photosynthesizing.
Sunlight only contains so much energy. Even if he's managing to metabolise every bit with no loss, there's not nearly enough light hitting him at any one moment for that to really make sense. If he's always photosynthesising and his body storing it for later somehow... he'd put on a huge amount of weight in his non-Hulk form.
Perhaps its pulled from another dimension, like Cyclop's laser from the DCU, or maybe it's another force of the universe, like the speed force also from the DCU. There's endless ways to explain it.
Someone explained to me that apparently in later comics it has been revealed that the gamma radiation that his anger resonates with is drawn from something called the green door which is created by a character known as the one below it all who is more or less Satan (gods nasty alter ego).
And apparently this is limitless so if he gets pissed enough he could destroy the universe as we know it.
I think this is covered by the Pym particles explained in Ant-Man.
Ant-Man makes lots of things, and himself, turn giant, so by Occam's razor, why not say Hulk's mutations allow his cells to access the same mechanism.
The one that gets me. In all the crazy wild stuff in The Fast and the Furious franchise.
I can't handle the safe drag scene in the 5th movie. There is no way those Chargers could drag a safe full of money with any sort of speed, if at all. I don't care how reinforced the frame is, or how much NOS they throw at it. Even if the thing happened to have wheels on it.
I can accept shit like, cars parachuting from a plane, and cars on ice battling a giant submarine, but not that stupid safe drag chase.
Yeah, that scene soured me on the franchise too. The first few were kinda stupid, but you could make an argument that the things they were doing was just regular car shit, albeit pushed the very, very extreme.
Then they yoinked a safe out a reinforced concrete wall with a car, and didn't just tear the fucking towing hitch off? Nah mate.
The cars fine even weigh enough to do that. Theyโd just break traction and spin the wheels lol.
What gets me, is they had The Rock with his little tank truck that would ALMOST believable be able to drag it around maybe, but still probably not very fast. Hell at one point they || Swap the real safe to a garbage truck || and I would find it more plausible that they put some huge engine in the back of that and sped it around more easily.
had to look it up, this is indeed ridiculous ๐ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vCvnOv3-Og
This is called verisimilitude. Self consistency. If you present the setting as Our World + Premise, then we are forgiving of the premise part but not so much of the unrelated things that don't match what we were told to expect.
Was gonna say this, fucking, yep.
Its this apparently baffling concept that even a fictional world has to be coherent and consistent within or as itself, otherwise, it seems cheesy or schlocky, obviously fake and contrived.
Iโm like this if a movieโs plot can only happen because of bad communication.
I was able to tolerate more of this in movies than I used to after acknowledging that tons of people in real life suck at communication.
Yeah, I'm watching the show Below right now, and they're faking into the "we can't advance the plot without a failure to properly communicate" rhythm, as expected with Netflix, and so much modern TV in general.
Not exactly the same, but the only time I've seen Cloverfield, my dad was watching it. He fast-forwarded through everything that wasn't giant monsters. The movie was about 40 minutes long, and I think it's my preferred cut.
I absolutely love the Sherlock & Co. podcast, the conceit of which is that Watson is a podcaster who records the adventures of Sherlock and releases them as a podcast. He's apparently always recording everything, at every moment, on a little portable recorder that's small enough to pass essentially unnoticed in almost any situation--and yet there's been only one time that I can remember in which this recorder has failed, and it has never run out of battery power, including when the investigation unexpectedly took them to rural southeast India for several days in The Sign of Four.
southeast India
Southeast India? There kind of isn't a southeast India.
I'd be down to try this, but I'm not skipping any scenes with my beloved Lizzy Caplan either. Been had a crush since Mean Girls came out.
The spinoff with John Goodman was good though.
My wife loves hocus pocus.
Every year I'm like... That zippo wouldn't light. The fluid would have evaporated ages ago. Look at the cobwebs, it's obviously been there for years.
She just reaches over, softly touches my and says 7u5k3n, it's a movie.
Lol
So yeah there's nothing wrong here.
Edit: softly touches my arm. Haha apparently I I accidentally'd a word
Yep. Could have But the virgin makes a show of lighting it.
It's just one of those things in movies where it's product placement and it needs to light. But it just bothers me. Lol
Inconsistencies in movies or shows do that to me. Happens.
I just want a movie where somebody "says turn on the TV", and the main character does, and it's just halfway through an episode of The Big Bang Theory or something because who's tuned to the news channel.
There's a scene in Community about this, where Abed is narrating a story, and when a story character turns on the radio, and its just playing conventional chill music instead of anything notable. Abed then points out that it's unlikely the radio would have anything notable right as they turned it on.
They are not only on the news channel, but they always switch on the TV just in time to get the exact information they needed to hear at that specific moment. All while not tuning in in the middle of a sentence, just perfect timing from start to finish.
I mean, it's a movie. They have license to cut out the boring parts seamlessly.
To be fair, if it was a zombie apocalypse scenario in the states, the national network news would have cut in on the local broadcast and the talking heads would be yapping 24/7 for the ratings. Every channel. There's be a good chance that you'd turn on your TV right to a newscast about the zombies.
Now something like an insane killer escaped from a mental institution would be at most a ticker across the bottom of the local broadcast after a brief local cut in when the story broke.
Not just that, but always the anchor says "For those of you just joining us..." Then does a exposition dump
Who uses a TV anymore?
If they want to make it realistic, they're texting a link.
whoโs tuned to the news channel
I agree this is rare, but my TV happened to be tuned to CNN on 9/11 when I turned it on around 10:30. I was playing hooky from work and getting high while playing bridge on my computer and nobody had called me. The screen showed a pillar of smoke and the caption said "second World Trade Center tower collapses" and I was like "what fucking movie is this?" Took a while for me to process what was happening.
I'm like this when something gets very basic technology wrong.
โIโll create a GUI interface using Visual Basic. See if I can track down the IP Addressโ
I'd like to see a cop show that applies that level of writing to guns.
A: What can you tell me about the bullet you recovered from the victim?
B: It's a handgun round, caliber 9x19 inch, solid steel frangible hollow-point. Fired with a muzzle velocity of 100 joules, one of these can punch through an inch of hardened RHA like wet toilet paper.
A: 100 joules?! Jesus Christ, that's enough to kill someone!
B: Exactly. This is the kind of bullet only a professional would use. Thankfully the firing pin left an imprint on the bullet; if we can find the shop that sold the gun they can tell us who fired it.
A: Only one shop in LA carries weapons that powerful. Let's go.
With scenes like that and the 'two characters typing on the same keyboard to hack faster' one, I'm 90% sure it's just the writers having fun and seeing what they can get away with. Long-running formulaic shows must be boring as hell to write for, so I can understand the impulse.
sudo apt install hollywood
I walked out of Total Recall(the original) in the final minutes when people got thrown out into the Martian landscape unprotected and their faces blew up like those little stress heads that you squeeze and the eyeballs pop out.
Once you kill my suspension of disbelief, that's it, I'm done.
This is also why I never liked Blade Runner. There were too many violations of known science for me to enjoy the movie.
I will say that scene in Blade Runner where Tyrell is trying to explain why they canโt extend a lifespan and basically just says โall these things create deadly virusesโ instead of literally anything more accurate like disrupting the immune system or causing cancer etc. that scene really does piss me off.
Why the hell would repressing a human gene create a virus in the first place?
Also checking โpupillary dilationโ and โblush responseโ but no โit wonโt affect the testโ if youโre smoking despite the fact nicotine would probably mess with those metrics as well as basically any other biometric like heart-rate or blood pressure.
That being said, I do actually kinda like watching it (or just having it play in the background while Iโm doing something else) just for the vibe of the environment. Cyberpunk megastructures? Cassette futurism? Dense but partly abandoned urban infrastructure? Synth jazz playing over shots of a rainy city night? Hell yeah.
(Tbf Iโve only watched the directorโs cut so I dont know if the version with Harrison Fordโs voice over makes any glaring mistakes; it definitely ruins the vibe of the movie imo)
There is nothing wrong with this.
Nazis dragging looted treasures all over the world but nobody could import a bunch of snakes for their snake pit?
It's more that if the story is about human drama and adventure, and then suddenly you go from desert to tropical island, or if everyone changes clothes to Victorian era, not all people will pick up on it. But some will, and it's enough to go from an adventure story where the actions are the fiction, to "woah.... Hey, now it looks like you just don't care to tell the story right."
It's that. Attention to detail.
Rather, the care imparted into a work of art.
If they don't care, neither do I.
I think there are probably about three people who use the expression "begs the question" as it's defined in books. Through misuse it has evolved to mean, "brings up the question," just as "based off" has come to mean the same as "based on".
How do you feel about other words or phrases with multiple definitions, like "theory"?
Dude I'm all for suspending disbelief but I feel this so hard. Like, sure, there's werewolves and you have silver bullets which in this universe don't melt and tumble, but that's a Beretta 92FS, you have 15+1 silver shots before a reload, not infinite, and you can't use your infinite Berettas to cut a hole in the floor.
They bought their guns from the same dealer who gave Lara Croft her handguns in the original games.
Yeah give me his number lol
That's Batman Begins
I rarely do that, but i did once with 28 Weeks Later where the army when they found out someone is infected inside the colony, just made everyone come out of their own room that is safe and isolated, and wait inside a huge room, which inevitably caused everyone to just get nibbled and infected. They also ordered personel to station at the place where they're unprotected from sprinter, and inevitably got nibbled and turned. I just give up. The series never recovered after that from what i've heard.
28 Days Later was fantastic. 28 Weeks Later was shit sandwich. I've not yet seen 28 Years Later.
I saw 28 Years Later on a plane. I could have just slept instead. It wasn't terrible, but it was certainly more artistic than I expected. Soooooo close to morbidly charming, but ended up just short of the line.
That's a better review than I would have given 28 weeks later.
28 Years Later isnโt nearly as good as 28 Days Later, but itโs way better than 28 Weeks Later. IMO
Honestly 28 Years a very different movie than the others, but itโs good.
28 Years Later felt like it was mostly a setup for The Bone Temple, which was a trip.
Glad to hear it was better than 28 Weeks Later, but honestly it wouldn't take that much.
Keep in mind that I saw it when it came out and it was my introduction to fast zombies. They were not popular before that movie, although DDG says a movie in 1980 had fast undead. Also it was artistic in a time when all movies were leaning toward "independent film" asthetics, despite being big budget films. And the opening with the Godspeed You Black Emperor song playing was freaking great.
I don't know how the movie will come across having decades of films in between. Will it still seem fantastic to an early 20s kid? No clue. But I thought it was fantastic back then.
It's honestly still pretty good, they were the first fast zombies I remember as well. Good tone throughout, good pacing, good sound I don't know much more you could ask for in a zombie movie.
It was shot on an old Motorola phone, but there are some shots that are really awesome and it works well. It's been pretty emulated, so it may not have that novelty anymore. It's still one of my favorites.
That's not "stupidly unrealistic though". Because the unrealistic part (everybody waiting together in the waiting room) actually plays a huge part in the plot moving forward. That's just bad writing.
Going the the post office on a sunday is something that can be easily tweaked without changing the rest of the plot.
In every scene in The North in Game of Thrones I was yelling at the characters to PUT ON A HAT! Also bacteria don't seem to exist in that universe. No wound ever gets infected despite medieval levels of health care.
I guess you could say
they didn't make the cut.
YEEEEEAAAAH
My wife can't help pointing out when travel isn't realistic enough, like when a series of city landmarks show up in the wrong order.
The snakes were not even dangerous in any way, they were mostly ball pythons if I remember correctly, those are neither venomous, nor eager to bite, their usual reaction is to curl into a ball. Oooh so dangerous! The common theme is to use non-venomous species (for obvious reasons) and people do not notice, since they usually know jackshit about reptiles, and ooh aaah snakes! Scary!
I also laugh, when there is some "super dangerous spider" or something, and then it is always of one of the slowest moving, least venomous, most docile tarantula species. The worst thing with those species is, they might kick itchy hairs on you, and the fangs make a small wound, if you manage to somehow make them bite. But aaah! Spiders! Scary!
Also hilarious when they use goddamn show bred huskies for wolves. Oh come on.
I stopped watching Stranger Things because in a show about demons from a parallel universe invading a small town, I couldn't get over a soccer mom breaking her friend out of a Russian prison camp.
That broke the realism for me.
I stopped before that, I think around the time the guy in the cool car banged some soccer mom. It was just a sign that we weren't exploring the human condition wither otherworldly tropes, but just throwing shit at the plot wall.
I'm very forgiving in this regard, as long as the movie is entertaining, I'll go along for the ride.
I did have a related weird thing happen once, though. I don't remember what movie I was watching, but about halfway through I suddenly realized everyone in the movie was acting and I couldn't watch anymore. It was a weird feeling, like they were all just lying to me, which of course they always are, but I was suddenly offended--"WTF? This is all bullshit!"
Maybe it was terrible chemistry. Maybe I subconsciously noticed all the subtle clues that the actors hated each other, but were pretending to be friends.
I suppose the one thing I can't forgive is a complete lack of chemistry between the actors, and that killing their performances.
I think Parks and Recreation had the absolute most unrealistic time-scales. The things they could get done in an afternoon or evening was absurd.
Also Pawnee is supposed to be a kinda folksy midwest town with like 30,000 population but the city hall is seemingly a modern $15mil building with floors and departments.
The actual Parks and Rec "department" of a town like that would be one haggard "Selma from the Simpsons" type character chainsmoking and sitting at a folding card table in some shitty repurposed storefront in a building from the 1950s across the square from the old courthouse.
We still laugh at the scale of their city council election. Our town is larger than Pawnee, and you're lucky if the people running spend money to make lawn signs.
Let alone run commercials and have a huge debate ๐
Bet he loved how Dexter had 40 hours in a day
Or how Doakes stalked Dexter through a shipping yard completely unseen, no footsteps no arrousing suspicion from employees, nuthin just "Surprise Muthafucka!"
I lost it during Raiders of the Lost Ark when Indy stowed away on the outside of a U-boat and then rode it like a thousand miles across the Mediterranean or wherever they were. I guess they thought submarines just buttoned up when they left port and nobody ever went outside on the conning tower. And they never dove or anything.
Please expand on "this"
They went to the space post office on a space Sunday.
What were they thinking.
The thing about Andor is they always try and walk it in
Like people would actually rise up and fight against a totalitarian government run by the biggest assholes.
Totally unbelievable.
Not like the Prequels before it where everyone eagerly clapped along to installing said Assholes as leaders. That is way more realistic.
Funny what can pull you back into reality and out of the temporary relief we get to enjoy when watching a movie. Some people are better at ignoring the absurd and out of place.
Perhaps they had better things to do than watch paint dry.
Am I their dad? Do I have kids now?
That's how you lucid dream. You realize the absurd, then wake up in the dream. Then, it goes where you want it.
Not always for me. If it's too ridiculous, I may wake up. Like "alright, I'm out"
The moment anyone creates a Gui using Visual Basic, we're done.
Isn't that the same steps as making a GUI using C#.NET?
It's a quiote from a crimgy tv show.
Ironically, that is exactly what Visual Basic was good at.
It didn't stop me from finishing Prometheus, but what grinds my gears is when the supposedly biologist was trying to pet the alien and it attacked him. Any trained biologist would know not to try to pet animals which you don't know if it's timid or not.
I'mma about to ruin medical shows/scenes for y'all. And once you see this, you cannot unsee it. the source for all this is the 15 years I spent riding in the back of the bus as a medic.
When you see a scene in the ER and a critical patient arrives, all the doctors go rushing into the exam room and start doing things and arguing about what to do. If we put this stupidity aside for a moment and roll back the scene to the beginning we will see the mistakes the show makes every time.
First, doctors don't rush into the exam room the moment the patient arrives. The doctor, just one and not a whole squad of them, will wait for a moment or two to let the medics and nurses get the patient on to a bed and the triage nurse gets the medic's report.
When the Medics and the cot leaves the room, the doctor will walk to the doorway and stop. Most of them will actually lean against the door jam and just look for a minute or so. They are making their first assessment of the patient from that distance and begin to formulate a treatment plan. Doctors are ACTUALLY TAUGHT to do this medical school. And they practice it because it's hard to remember in an oh shit moment and hard to do. Even us medics are taught the same thing. If the TV doctor does NOT do this, this is your first warning that this a bullshit medical show no matter what the producers and actors claim about realism. This is basic and fundamental to ER medicine and would be soooo easy to do. This is the point where I'm out and ne'er to be seen again.
The second mistake that gets made is that the doctors themselves do very little of the actual treatment of the patient. They stand off to the side and tell the nurses what they want them to do. The nurses do most of the work. The doctor observes and directs. Only if a procedure that requires a doctors skill and knowledge to do, do they get hands on. So that's the second bullshit thing in these shows.
And finally, doctors do not consult in the patient's room unless it absolutely can't be avoided. Which is very rare. They have a room, generally behind the nurses station where they go for that. I have been in there with doctors on occasions when I asked for a teaching moment to further my skills as a medic from one of them. And no matter what hospital, that's where we would go.
I love that level of detail in books! Reportedly in the first 6 books of the Wheel of Time every time they mention the moon, it's in the correct phase. Iirc it's never relevant to the plot.
Am I...
Am I a dad...?
I don't agree movie need to be as realistic as possible or insist on enforcing fact to audience face ,especially when the movie theme based or source is fiction itself , but i do agree realism and fact matter in movies that sell themselves as inspired, based on true event or a documentary and such.
I had this with Interstellar. The story is that most plants died and they can't grow food but corn. So they're at a baseball game and this older character says "Popcorn?! I'm sick of corn, I want a hotdog". He knows there aren't hotdogs anymore, he's just frustrated at the situation. Nobody responds.
That's the moment everyone should have jumped up to shut up grandpa. You can't say that! Billions died, you insensitive asshat. Be glad you have food. Eating meat would be socially unacceptable because you can't feed society that way anymore. It would be on the level of grandpa saying old-timey racist shit out loud in public
No thatโs realistic lol. Nobody would have said shit other than to agree, because after all of that everyone would want a hot dog.
Humans in general donโt deal with mass change that well. Look at Covid.
Theyโd bitch at the government, bitch at their neighbors, and find a nationalized group to blame for why the way of life changed.
It wasnโt that long of a time period in interstellar. The whole collapse happened over about 30 years. So anyone over around 40 would have remembered a normal time and would agree with grandpa. Theyโd have seen their lives get worse and worse and desperately want to go back to the old life.
I get what you're saying but I think society would change much more in 30 years with billions of deaths compared to covid which effectively lasted for like 2-3 years. A generation would grow up that doesn't know any better. Society would change. Covid was peanuts compared to the crisis in the movie. There is no going back in the movie.
All of humanity is doomed but the movie doesn't really show what that would do to society generally. A movie like Children of Men does show that. They also still have blaming immigrants and shit, but at least that movie doesn't pretend life would carry on as normal when faced with "no more food, we're all going to die"
@lemmy.world
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, Twitter X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
go to feed...
@lemmy.world
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, Twitter X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
go to feed...
I count bullets. If someone with a revolver fires off 20 rounds in a row without a pause, the show/movie lost credibility and I'm taken out of it. Extra bad if they later try to use ammo as a plot device to raise drama, ugh.
save